Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Pathophysiological Changes During Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Rodent Hepatic Steatosis

ANNA-AIKATERINI NERI, ISMENE A. DONTAS, DIMITRIOS C. ILIOPOULOS and THEODORE KARATZAS
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 953-964; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11863
ANNA-AIKATERINI NERI
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System “Th. Garofalidis”, KAT Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Kifissia, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anaikneri{at}gmail.com
ISMENE A. DONTAS
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System “Th. Garofalidis”, KAT Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Kifissia, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DIMITRIOS C. ILIOPOULOS
2Laboratory of Experimental Surgery & Surgical Research “N.S. Christeas”, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
THEODORE KARATZAS
2Laboratory of Experimental Surgery & Surgical Research “N.S. Christeas”, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
32nd Department of Propedeutic Surgery, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Ischemia and reperfusion injuries may produce deleterious effects on hepatic tissue after liver surgery and transplantation. The impact of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) on the liver depends on its substrate, the percentage of liver ischemic tissue subjected to IRI and the ischemia time. The consequences of IRI are more evident in pathologic liver substrates, such as steatotic livers. This review is the result of an extended bibliographic PubMed search focused on the last 20 years. It highlights basic differences encountered during IRI in lean and steatotic livers based on studies using rodent experimental models. Conclusion: The main difference in cell death between lean and steatotic livers is the prevalence of apoptosis in the former and necrosis in the latter. There are also major changes in the effect of intracellular mediators, such as TNFα and IL-1β. Further experimental studies are needed in order to increase current knowledge of IRI effects and relevant mechanisms in both lean and steatotic livers, so that new preventive and therapeutic strategies maybe developed.

  • Liver injury
  • ischemia-reperfusion injury
  • hepatic steatosis
  • pathophysiological changes
  • oxidative stress
  • cytokines
  • review

Fatty liver disease represents a very common disorder with a global prevalence of 25%, and a rate of 20-30% in developed countries and up to 95% among the obese population. The existence of hepatic steatosis is a critical factor for liver surgery and transplantation and has aggravating effects when associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) (1-7). Hepatic steatosis is associated with an operative mortality higher than 14% after extended liver resection, in contrast to 2% in patients with lean livers (8-11).

IRI refers to the enhanced cellular damage inflicted on a hypoxic liver following blood flow restoration observed in major liver resections and transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) maneuver, which is applied to minimize blood loss during surgery, has detrimental effects on the liver due to ischemia (12-15). IR phenomena are present after restoration of reduced blood flow as a result of shock, hypotension, hypoxemia and secondary low blood flow due, for instance, to congestive heart failure (16-18). The liver substrate, the percentage of liver tissue undergoing ischemia and the duration of ischemia are critical for the viability of the hepatic tissue.

Pathophysiological Changes

The different reaction of the fatty liver to IRI is linked to its decreased ability to restore adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels after IR stress, and its increased sensitivity to proinflammatory factors (19). Liver becomes steatotic via chronic overfeeding, triglycerides' excess, gradual increase in the deposition of adipose tissue and adipocyte hypertrophy, as well as endoplasmic reticulum stress. The activation of apoptotic and inflammatory pathways results in increased concentration of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and Kupffer cells (KCs), which differentiate to myofibroblasts and lead to fibrosis (20). Selzner et al. have claimed that the augmented sensitivity of fatty liver is due to changes in the onset of apoptotic cell death and the types of cell death. Specifically, the main type of cell death in lean ischemic liver is rapid apoptosis, while its onset is delayed in fatty ischemic liver (10). Apoptosis requires adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and when ATP is depleted, apoptosis switches to necrosis (21). Apoptosis remains the main type of cell death in lean liver where necrosis is minimal (18%). On the other hand, fatty liver is characterized by moderate apoptosis and massive necrosis (73%). The difference between these livers has also been confirmed in experimental rat studies by evaluation of intracellular mediators of apoptosis; when the livers were subjected to 60 minutes of total hepatic ischemia, the rats with fatty livers died within 3 days, whereas those with normal livers survived 30 days (8, 10, 22).

Tiriveedhi et al. have demonstrated that even the proteome profiles of livers with steatosis subjected to IRI, are significantly different compared to lean livers (23).

During the ischemia phase, oxygen, glycogen and ATP are depleted, resulting in intracellular metabolic changes and the so-called “pH paradox”. In the early phase, due to the initiation of necrosis, intracellular pH drops so that hepatocytes are protected. Normalization of intracellular pH upon reperfusion, however, accelerates hepatocytes' death. The supremacy of pro-oxidants characterizes the intermediate phase, while inflammatory and adhesion molecules the late phase (24, 25).

In the first two hours of reperfusion, oxidative stress is dominant. Activated endothelial cells of microvessels generate additional reactive oxygen species (ROS) and less nitric oxide (NO), causing immediate cellular injury (24-26). The subsequent imbalance between superoxide and NO in endothelial cells leads to an increase in pro-inflammatory factors (25). During the following 6-48 hours of reperfusion, activated neutrophils injure hepatocytes via inflammatory mechanisms mediating the release of ROS, elastase, cathepsin G, heparinase, collagenase and hydrolytic enzymes (24, 26).

Frequently encountered pathophysiological changes and differences between lean and steatotic livers regarding mainly IRI, are described below. The main parameters that increase are listed in Table I.

Mitochondrial injury generally leads to cell necrosis and apoptosis in IRI. i. Mitochondria uncoupling protein-2 (UCP2) expression is normally cytoprotective when augmented by mitochondrial superoxide production. Nevertheless, during IR, UCP2 expression promotes hepatocyte injury. This is more evident in steatotic hepatocytes that contain higher levels of superoxide and H2O2. UCP2 higher levels in steatotic hepatocytes are also related to ATP depletion and to IRI (26-31). Evans ZP and his coworkers have concluded that UCP2 renders steatotic livers more sensitive to IRI through the regulation of hepatic ATP levels (31-36). ii. Mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) is promoted by IR's oxidative stress, increased mitochondrial calcium and inorganic phosphate in lean livers. When a certain amount of calcium accumulates, mitochondria start to swell (36). The permeability of the inner mitochondrial membrane increases, the mitochondrial membrane potential collapses, oxidative phosphorylation is inhibited, ATP is depleted, and apoptosis-induced factors are released. In fatty livers, MPT induction is increased due to the decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (38, 39).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Parameters considerably increased in rodent models of steatotic liver after IRI.

ROS. ROS are of great importance both in hepatoprotective mechanisms and during IRI. Recently, endoplasmic reticulum stress has been associated with the production and accumulation of intracellular ROS, which are important mediators of inflammation (40). In the liver, the production of ROS is greater when excessive fat is present, as hepatocytes seem more susceptible to lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial function is disrupted (22, 41-44). According to Prieto I. and Monsalve M., the inability of the steatotic liver to react to ROS is linked to decreased levels of antioxidants, mitochondrial injury, hepatocyte cell death, and the stimulation of mediators of the immune system and pro-fibrosis (45).

Nitric oxide (NO). NO is a diffusible mediator that originates from oxygen and L-arginine through the activity of NO synthase (NOS); it has vasodilating properties that prevent microcirculatory changes imposed by reperfusion, which are more profound in a steatotic liver (46-48). Generally, NO's impact on IRI depends on its concentration, duration and site of production/isoform of NOS that generates it (46, 49, 50). A small quantity of NO is considered to decrease tumor cell growth and prostaglandin E2 and F2 alpha (proinflammatory products) levels, while it increases protein synthesis and DNA-repair enzymes (51). Specifically, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), which functions in the control of vascular tone, increases blood perfusion and therefore protects hepatocytes from IRI (46, 52). In contrast, limited quantities of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) may increase ROS thereby injuring hepatocytes (46, 53-56). Koeppel et al. have shown increased iNOS gene expression after IRI in steatotic liver which was more evident in hepatocytes with fatty degeneration (57). Due to the different actions of iNOS, its expression is regulated by the cooperation of cytokine-inducible transcription factors. Taylor et al. have shown that three cytokines, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), and interferon-gamma (INFγ), are needed to attain a significant augmentation of iNOS in human hepatocytes (58). Transcription nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) also relates to iNOS production, in both rodent macrophages and human liver, along with signal transducer and activator of transcription factor 1α (STAT1) (41, 59-62). Interestingly, Koeppel et al. have noted that CCl4-mediated liver injury led to the activation of transcription factors (NF-kB, STAT1), resulting in further aggravation upon reperfusion (57).

Glutathione (GSH). Endogenous GSH concentrates intracellularly and is oxidized during reperfusion, forming glutathione disulfide (GSSG) (63, 64). In lean organs, GSH administration following 60, 90, or 120 minutes of ischemia or liver transplantation, attenuates rodent IRI (65, 66). Pratchke et al. have shown that intravenous administration of GSH, in order to achieve supraphysiological levels in hepatocytes, ameliorated IRI in both lean and steatotic livers. They postulated that most of the GSH reacted with ROS, therefore, GSSG was also found to be increased after GSH administration (44, 67). This is related to improved sinusoidal perfusion, decreased leukocyte adhesion and reduction of sinus endothelial cell injury in lean organs (66, 68, 69). Glycine, a product of GSH metabolism, has also hepatoprotective properties (70).

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER). ER function consists mainly in protein synthesis, oxidative folding and transportation, calcium storage and cellular stress detection. The accurate folding of proteins requires energy. The use of molecular oxygen produces ROS and oxidized glutathione, resulting in oxidative stress. In general, a disturbance in the redox homeostasis of the ER produces ER stress and ROS (70, 71). ROS are also increased through ER-released calcium which concentrates in the matrix of the mitochondria, depolarizes the inner mitochondrial membrane and disrupts electron transport (73). Mitochondrial ROS may further sensitize ER calcium-releasing channels. Aside from ROS and the release of calcium, the ER relates to inflammation through the unfolded-protein response (UPR) and other signaling pathways, involving the activation of NF-κB, JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK) and the initiation of an acute-phase response to inflammation. Conditions such as obesity, contribute to alterations in liver architecture, increased protein synthesis and different cellular energy pathways, which increase the demands on the ER (74, 75). Therefore, ER stress is related to the emergence of hepatic steatosis, hepatocellular injury and fibrosis. Nonetheless, when Henkel et al. used chemical chaperons to reduce ER stress in methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet, they found that ER stress does not have a primary role in the pathogenesis of steatohepatitis (76).

Chaperonins. They are small molecules, belonging to the large class of chaperones, which contribute to protein folding and structure and therefore stabilize the unfolded proteins (75, 77). IRI disrupts cellular homeostasis and, as a result, unfolded proteins accumulate. A proteomic study performed by Tiriveedhi et al. has shown significant down-regulation of multiple chaperones upon IRI in steatotic liver, which may contribute to the augmented levels of ER stress and, subsequently, in apoptosis and necrosis observed in livers with steatosis, in contrast to lean ones (78). However, Henkel et al., have shown that chemical chaperones inhibit the ER stress response without reducing hepatic steatosis in MCD diet-fed mice (76).

Selectins. They are a family of lectin-like glycoproteins and adhesion molecules that initiate the rolling and attachment of leukocytes to the vascular intima. During early IRI, P- and E-selectins are produced by activated endothelial cells, while L-selectin is expressed by all classes of leukocytes. On this basis, Amersi et al. introduced the application of soluble recombinant selectin glycoprotein ligands to fatty livers as a new method against IRI (79, 79). In lean livers, application of a soluble recombinant form of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) impedes the interaction of P-selectin with membrane-associated PSGL-1, leading to reduced polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) penetration, improved liver survival and hepatocyte injury.

Interleukins. i. IL-1 promotes the inflammatory processes by up-regulating ROS production (22, 81, 82). Impediment of IL-1 has been found to reduce IRI in non-steatotic livers (22, 81, 83-85). Specifically, Serafin et al. have found that IL-1α probably does not contribute to hepatic IRI, because IL-1α levels were similar in lean and steatotic livers, at 6 hours of reperfusion when 70% of the liver had subjected to 60 min of ischemia. Conversely, IL-1β's values were two-fold higher in the fatty livers compared to lean livers. ii. IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine which is increased in the plasma and peripheral blood monocytes in cases of obesity. It is correlated both with the development and the severity of hepatic diseases, as increasing evidence indicates IL-6's importance in promoting liver regeneration and therefore protecting against injury in lean liver (86-101). Liver regeneration depends upon IL-6 activity; reduction of this cytokine may result in graft failure, in both lean and steatotic livers (79, 102). Hong et al. have found that long term treatment with IL-6 alleviates steatosis, and IRI and normalizes serum aminotransferase activity. They concluded that the in vivo effect of IL-6 on hepatic triglycerides is mediated by indirect mechanisms, such as down-regulation of hepatic TNFa expression, reduction in serum TNFa levels or upregulation of hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. Tacchine et al. have suggested that the study of transcription factors that trigger the production of IL-6, could lead to the identification of possible molecular events that may impair its protective effect on IRI in fatty livers (102). Similarly, Jimenez-Castro et al. have considered the use of adipocytokines (IL-6, leptin etc.) as indicators of steatosis' grading and liver injury; they proposed i.e. that adipocytokines could help recognize marginal steatotic livers and assess postoperative liver injury (104). iii. IL-10 is hepatoprotective and augments allograft survival following liver transplantation (22, 105-107). This quality has been confirmed for endogenous IL-10 in lean livers, but the effects of exogenous IL-10 depend on its dosage. Serafin et al. have related hepatoprotection seen by high doses of exogenous IL-10 to the decreased release of IL-1β (22). Also, they have found that exogenous IL-10 was not accumulated in fatty livers, concluding that the observed imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory ILs in IRI of steatotic livers could be involved in their decreased tolerance. The above IL changes are listed in Table II.

Kupffer cells (KCs). KCs are activated liver macrophages found in liver's sinusoids, and the major source of ROS and pro-inflammatory mediators (109, 110). To better understand their function, Mustafa SB and Olson MS treated rat KCs with lipopolysaccharide. They showed that rat KCs produced great quantities of nitrite and nitrate, synthesized and released several cytokines, which stimulated neighboring hepatocytes to produce NO resulting in degenerative changes (111-112). In total IR, KCs reduced hepatic IRI and inflammation. In lean livers, KCs may maintain a homeostatic level of inflammation through the production of IL-10 (114). Dysregulated inflammatory responses are even more important for IRI in steatotic livers. Phagocytically active KCs seem to be hepatoprotective in livers with steatosis. Sutter et al. pretreated lean and genetically obese mice with IL-10 or the liposomally-encapsulated bisphosphonate clodronate, which depletes KCs, before total IR. They found that KCs' depletion sensitizes steatotic livers to IRI through non-IL-10-dependent mechanisms.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Interleukin changes in rodent models of lean and steatotic liver after IRI.

Caspases. They are a family of proteases essential for inflammation and programmed cell death. In the extrinsic signaling pathway of apoptosis, TNFa and Fas ligand promote the binding of procaspase 8, and activate caspase 8 and procaspase 3 leading to apoptosis (115, 116). In the intrinsic pathway, MPT causes cytochrome c release, activation of caspase 9 and subsequently of caspase 3 (116-118). Suzuki et al. have found that caspase 8 did not differ between lean and fatty livers. On the contrary, caspases 9 and 3 were further increased in fatty livers after IRI, indicating the importance of MPT. Furthermore, it is known that the intrinsic pathway occurs in hepatocytes and induces apoptosis faster than the extrinsic pathway. When the caspase cascade is inhibited, lean liver is significantly protected and IRI is reduced, while apoptosis in fatty liver is also reduced, with no change in the degree of necrosis (10). In a study by Jiang et al., significant differences were observed in malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentrations between lean and fatty rat liver groups (119). MDA is known to result from free radical lipid peroxidation and thus is a marker of ROS (120). SOD participates in the balance between oxidants and antioxidants, so it represents tissues' ability to discharge free radicals (121). Instead, MPO is mainly expressed in neutrophil granulocytes, so its activity indicates the quantity of neutrophils (122). The increase of MDA and MPO levels and the decrease in SOD in the fatty liver group, concur with a more severe IRI in the steatotic liver, and its hepatocytes are more sensitive to lipid peroxidation and ROS (119).

Following IRI in lean and fatty livers, higher serum alanine transaminase (ALT) levels are observed in fatty livers, representing more severe liver IRI, even when different methods of implementing fatty livers are chosen (39, 86, 123). According to Kostakis et al. there is a steady augmentation of ALT and aspartate transaminase (AST) serum levels after hepatic ischemia in both lean and steatotic livers during the first 24 postoperative hours. Transaminases' levels remain significantly higher at 24 hours in steatotic livers (124).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Main histopathological changes in lean and steatotic liver regarding IRI.

Microcirculatory Disorders

Microcirculatory blood flow disorders after IR significantly affect the extent of liver injury and the prognosis of its function (57, 125). In normal livers, control of local sinusoidal blood flow is moderated by sinusoidal constriction in reply to inflammatory mediators, e.g. endothelin (ET-1), NO and carbon monoxide, which are generated within the sinusoids (126, 127). Alterations in the regulation and synthesis of these vasoactive mediators may result in intracellular deposits of fatty droplets in pericentral hepatocytes, which contribute to significant iNOS protein expression. The swollen hepatocytes in steatotic livers can induce chronic hypoxia, ATP depletion and increased leukocyte adhesion, resulting in decreased sinusoidal blood flow (43, 44, 128-132).

During reperfusion, regional L-arginine depletion causes reduced local NO synthesis which counteracts the effect of endothelins on liver microcirculation, resulting in hepatic sinusoidal reperfusion failure (133, 134). ET-1 is a peptide whose levels increase in both sinusoidal endothelial and hepatic stellate cells upon reperfusion, when TNF-α and other inflammatory cytokines are released by KCs and attach to hepatic endothelial cells (57, 135). The resulting extreme sinusoidal vasoconstriction may cause microcirculatory damage to the hepatic parenchyma, heterogeneous perfusion and local hypoxia that results in hepatic failure (136-140). In a study by Koeppel et al., IR induced an additional augmentation in ET-1 gene expression in most reperfused steatotic livers. As a result, it was considered that the disturbance in the sinusoidal perfusion caused by ET-1 is likely to contribute to steatotic liver IRI (57). Additionally, injection of an anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 monoclonal antibody, to prevent sinusoidal congestion, ameliorated only the survival rates of rodents with fatty livers (122, 141).

Histopathological Findings

The liver is considered fatty when its cells are steatotic in a low magnification view (119, 142). Specifically, hepatic steatosis of less than 30% is considered mild, 30%- 60% moderate, and more than 60% severe (119, 143, 144). Hepatic inflammation and fibrosis differentiate steatohepatitis from plain steatosis. Following MCD, rats' livers exhibit massive fatty infiltration, which is mainly macrovescicular. Fat accumulation in the cytoplasm of the hepatocytes increases cell volume, leading to various degrees of obstruction of liver sinusoids (4, 134, 145). Therefore, sinusoids appear narrow and irregularly shaped due to compression by the fat-loaded hepatocytes. Single-cell necrosis is not often, whereas there is no inflammation and/or fibrosis.

In normal livers, IRI presents moderate early hepatocyte necrosis, minor coagulative necrosis with neutrophil infiltration, haphazardly spread throughout the liver parenchyma (22). At the end of the ischemic period, some hepatocytes are spotted with vacuolization or ballooning, while at the same time in fatty livers there are small foci of hepatocyte necrosis. In a higher magnification view, normal livers after IRI exhibit modest inflammatory infiltration in the hepatic lobule and the portal area in comparison to fatty livers. Furthermore, fatty livers present increased infiltration of neutrophils and lymphocytes. Soon after reperfusion in normal livers, focal points of necrosis, regions of vacuolar abnormalities, separation of the endothelial lining, moderate sinusoidal congestion and maintenance of the lobular architecture are observed. At this moment, the degree of sinusoidal congestion is the main histopathological difference between lean and fatty livers.

Later in reperfusion, most normal livers resolve the sinusoidal congestion, maintain their sinusoidal lining and present tiny regions of necrosis. In contrast, hepatocytes with pyknotic or karyorrhectic nuclei are dispersed all over the lobule in fatty livers, and the sinusoids dilate significantly without preserving their lining. Red blood cells are located in fat globules and diffuse hemorrhagic necrosis is present. Subsequent to sinusoidal architecture failure, red cells extravasate within large areas of the parenchyma. The alterations noted are spotty hemorrhage, hepatocyte necrosis, decreased sinusoidal density and blood flow, which lead to decreased oxygen delivery and energy metabolism (57, 131, 146). After IRI, all livers show predominantly single cell necrosis/apoptosis, with numerous great, acute necrotic regions, mainly around the central veins, which are significantly increased in fatty livers.

Table III summarizes the main histopathological differences between lean and fatty livers before ischemia and during IRI.

Fasting Effect

Pre-ischemic fasting does not seem to have any significant effect on animal survival when the liver is normal. Even though the degree of the hepatic damage is more severe in lean livers of fasted animals, the histological findings are similar to the non-fasted ones (145).

On the contrary, pre-ischemic fasting reduces survival of rats with fatty liver tremendously. Fasting and fatty degeneration act synergistically to exacerbate hepatic IRI. Mitochondrial injury is the main characteristic of ultrastructural hepatocyte damage in fasted rodents with fatty livers. Clinically, rats with fatty liver that were fasted, took longer to recover from anesthesia, and their majority developed labored respiration and finally succumbed the following hours after reperfusion (123).

Conclusion

Ischemia-reperfusion injury consists a significant problem in liver surgery and transplantation which is aggravated by the increased prevalence of hepatic steatosis. Steatotic livers are more sensitive to IRI compared to lean livers, leading to increased postoperative graft failure, morbidity, and mortality. Moreover, the constant growth in the demand for liver donors has already led to accepting livers with moderate steatosis for transplantation, introducing potentially more postoperative complications. Therefore, additional research on IRI underlying mechanisms is needed, so that new preventive and therapeutic strategies will emerge through pharmaceutical agents, surgical interventions or gene therapy.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    AAN: Conception of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of references, critical revision; IAD: conception of the study, supervision, critical revision and final approval of the article; DCI: critical revision, final approval of the article; TK: conception of the study, supervision, critical revision and final approval of the article.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors report no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

  • Received January 22, 2020.
  • Revision received February 3, 2020.
  • Accepted February 7, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Younossi ZM,
    2. Koenig AB,
    3. Abdelatif D,
    4. Fazel Y,
    5. Henry L,
    6. Wymer M
    : Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 64(1): 73-84, 2016. PMID: 26707365. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28431
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kucera O,
    2. Cervinkova Z
    : Experimental models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats. World J Gastroenterol 20(26): 8364-8376, 2014. PMID: 25024595. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8364
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Vernon G,
    2. Baranova A,
    3. Younossi ZM
    : Systematic Review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34: 274-285, 2011. PMID: 21623852. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04724.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Selzner M,
    2. Clavien PA
    : Fatty Liver in liver transplantation and surgery. Semin Liver Dis 21: 105-113, 2001. PMID: 11296690. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12933
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mokuno Y,
    2. Berthiaume F,
    3. Tompkins RG,
    4. Balis UJ,
    5. Yarmush ML
    : Technique for expanding the donor liver pool: heat shock preconditioning in a rat fatty liver model. Liver Transpl 10: 264-272, 2004. PMID: 14762865. DOI: 10.1002/lt.20014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Koneru B,
    2. Reddy MC,
    3. de la Torre AN,
    4. Patel D,
    5. Ippolito T,
    6. Ferrante RJ
    : Studies of hepatic warm ischemia in the obese Zucker rat. Transplantation 59: 942-946, 1995. PMID: 7709452. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199504150-00003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Veteläinen R,
    2. van Vliet AK,
    3. van Gulik TM
    : Severe steatosis increases hepatocellular injury and impairs liver regeneration in a rat model of partial hepatectomy. Ann Surg 245: 44-50, 2007. PMID: 17197964. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225253.84501.0e
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Selzner N,
    2. Selzner M,
    3. Jochum W,
    4. Clavien PA
    : Ischemic preconditioning protects the steatotic mouse liver against reperfusion injury: an ATP dependent mechanism. J Hepatol 39: 55-61, 2003. PMID: 12821044. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(03)00147-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Clavien PA
    1. Selzner M,
    2. Clavien PA
    : Resection of liver tumors: special emphasis on neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. In: Malignant liver tumors-current and emerging therapies. Clavien PA (ed.). Malden, MA, Blackwell Science, pp. 137-149, 1999.
  5. ↵
    1. Selzner M,
    2. Rüdiger HA,
    3. Sindram D,
    4. Madden J,
    5. Clavien PA
    : Mechanisms of ischemic injury are different in the steatotic and normal rat liver. Hepatology 32: 1280-1288, 2000. PMID: 11093735. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2000.20528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Scheele J,
    2. Stangl R,
    3. Altendorf-Hofmann A
    : Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma: impact of surgical resection on the natural history. Br J Surg 77: 1241-1246, 1990. PMID: 2253003. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800771115
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ploeg RJ,
    2. D'Alessandro AM,
    3. Knechtle SJ
    : Risk factors for primary dysfunction after liver transplantation- a multivariate analysis. Transplantation 55: 807, 1993. PMID: 8475556. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199304000-00024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Saidi RF,
    2. Chang J,
    3. Brooks S,
    4. Nalbantoglu I,
    5. Adsay V,
    6. Jacobs MJ
    : Ischemic preconditioning and intermittent clamping increase the tolerance of fatty liver to hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat. Transplant Proc 39: 3010-3014, 2007. PMID: 18089311. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.09.044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lee CT,
    2. Dunn RL,
    3. Chen BT,
    4. Joshi DP,
    5. Sheffield J,
    6. Montie JE
    : Impact of body mass index on radical Cystectomy. J Urol 172: 1281, 2004. PMID: 15371824. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000138785.48347.aa
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tsukada K,
    2. Miyazaki T,
    3. Kato H,
    4. Masuda N,
    5. Fukuchi M,
    6. Fukai Y,
    7. Nakajima M,
    8. Ishizaki M,
    9. Motegi M,
    10. Mogi A,
    11. Sohda M,
    12. Moteki T,
    13. Sekine T,
    14. Kuwano H
    : Body fat accumulation and postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. Am Surg 70: 347, 2004. PMID: 15098790.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Rushing GD,
    2. Britt LD
    : Reperfusion injury after hemorrhage: a collective review. Ann Surg 247(6): 929-937, 2008. PMID: 18520219. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816757f7
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Birrer R,
    2. Takuda Y,
    3. Takara T
    : Hypoxic hepatopathy: pathophysiology and prognosis. Intern Med 46(14): 1063-1070, 2007. PMID: 17634701. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0059
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Soleimanpour H,
    2. Safari S,
    3. Rahmani F,
    4. Nejabatian A,
    5. Alavian SM
    : Hepatic shock differential diagnosis and risk factors: a review article. Hepat Mon 15(10): e27063, 2015. PMID: 26587034. DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.27063
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Sutter AG,
    2. Palanisamy PA,
    3. Ellet JD,
    4. Schmidt MG,
    5. Schnellmann RG,
    6. Chavin KD
    : Intereukin-10 and Kupffer cells protect steatotic mice livers from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Eur Cytokine Netw 25(4): 69-76, 2014. PMID: 25679269. DOI: 10.1684/ecn.2015.0359
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Mollica MP,
    2. Lionetti L,
    3. Putti R,
    4. Cavaliere G,
    5. Gaita M,
    6. Barletta A
    : From chronic overfeeding to hepatic injury: role of endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 21(3): 222-230, 2011. PMID: 21277757. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.10.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Jaeschke H,
    2. Lemasters JJ
    : Apoptosis versus oncotic necrosis in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Gastroenterology 125: 1246-1257, 2003. PMID: 21277757. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.10.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Serafın A,
    2. Rosello-Catafau J,
    3. Prats N,
    4. Gelpí E,
    5. Rodés J,
    6. Peralta C
    : Ischemic preconditioning affects interleukin release in fatty livers of rats undergoing ischemia/reperfusion. Hepatology 39: 688-698, 2004. PMID: 14999687. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20089
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Tiriveedhi V,
    2. Conzen DK,
    3. Liaw-Conlin J,
    4. Upadhya G,
    5. Malone J,
    6. Townsend RR,
    7. Kerns R,
    8. Jia1 J,
    9. Csontos K,
    10. Ramachandran S,
    11. Mohanakumar T,
    12. Anderson DC,
    13. Chapman CW
    : The role of molecular chaperonins in warm ischemia and reperfusion injury in the steatotic liver: a proteomic study. BMC Biochem 13: 17, 2012. PMID: 22962947. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2091-13-17
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Karatzas T,
    2. Neri AA,
    3. Baibaki ME,
    4. Dontas IA
    : Rodent models of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury: time and percentage-related pathophysiological mechanisms. J Surg Res 191(2): 399-412, 2014. PMID: 25033703. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.024
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Eltzschig HK,
    2. Collard CD
    : Vascular ischemia and reperfusion injury. Br Med Bull 70: 71, 2004. PMID: 15494470. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldh025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Teoh NC,
    2. Farrell GC
    : Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury: pathogenic mechanisms and basis for hepatoprotection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18: 891, 2003. PMID: 12859717. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.03056.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zaouali AM,
    2. Ben Mosbah I,
    3. Boncompagni E,
    4. Ben Abdennebi H,
    5. Mitjavila MT,
    6. Bartrons R,
    7. Freitas I,
    8. Rimola A,
    9. Roselló-Catafau J
    : Hypoxia inducible factor-1α accumulation in steatotic liver preservation: role of nitric oxide. World J Gastroenterol 16(28): 3499-3509, 2010. PMID: 20653058. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3499
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chavin KD,
    2. Yang S,
    3. Lin HZ,
    4. Chatham J,
    5. Chacko VP,
    6. Hoek JB,
    7. Walajtys-Rode E,
    8. Rashid A,
    9. Chen CH,
    10. Huang CC,
    11. Wu TC,
    12. Lane MD,
    13. Diehl AM
    : Obesity induces expression of uncoupling protein-2 in hepatocytes and promotes liver ATP depletion. J Biol Chem 274: 5692, 1999. PMID: 10026188. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5692
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kimura K,
    2. Jung BD,
    3. Kanehira K,
    4. Irie Y,
    5. Cañas X,
    6. Saito M
    : Induction of uncoupling protein (UCP) 2 in primary cultured hepatocytes. FEBS Lett 457: 75, 1999. PMID: 10486567. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00987-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Larrouy D,
    2. Laharrague P,
    3. Carrera G,
    4. Viguerie-Bascands N,
    5. Levi-Meyrueis C,
    6. Fleury C,
    7. Pecqueur C,
    8. Nibbelink M,
    9. André M,
    10. Casteilla L,
    11. Ricquier D
    : Kupffer cells are a dominant site of uncoupling protein 2 expression in rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 235: 760, 1997. PMID: 9207235. DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6852
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Evans ZP,
    2. Ellett JD,
    3. Schmidt MG,
    4. Schnellmann RG,
    5. Chavin KD
    : Mitochondrial uncoupling protein-2 mediates steatotic liver injury following ischemia/reperfusion. J BiolChem 283: 8573, 2008. PMID: 18086675. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M706784200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Evans ZP,
    2. Mandavilli BS,
    3. Ellett JD,
    4. Rodwell D,
    5. Fariss MW,
    6. Fiorini RN,
    7. Schnellmann RG,
    8. Schmidt MG,
    9. Chavin K
    : Vitamin E succinate enhances steatotic liver energy status and prevents oxidative damage following ischemia/reperfusion. Transplant Proc 41(10): 4094-4098, 2009. PMID: 20005347. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.09.055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Yang S,
    2. Zhu H,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Lin H,
    5. Gabrielson K,
    6. Trush MA,
    7. Diehl AM
    : Mitochondrial adaptations to obesity-related oxidant stress. Arch Biochem Biophys 378: 259, 2000. PMID: 10860543. DOI: 10.1006/abbi.2000.1829
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Echtay KS,
    2. Murphy MP,
    3. Smith RA,
    4. Talbot DA,
    5. Brand MD
    : Superoxide activates mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 from the matrix side. Studies using targeted antioxidants. J Biol Chem 277: 47129, 2002. PMID: 12372827. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M208262200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Echtay KS,
    2. Roussel D,
    3. St-Pierre J,
    4. Jekabsons MB,
    5. Cadenas S,
    6. Stuart JA,
    7. Harper JA,
    8. Roebuck SJ,
    9. Morrison A,
    10. Pickering S,
    11. Clapham JC,
    12. Brand MD
    : Superoxide activates mitochondrial uncoupling proteins. Nature 415: 96, 2002. PMID: 11780125. DOI: 10.1038/415096a
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Evans ZP,
    2. Ellett JD,
    3. Fariss MW,
    4. Schnellmann RG,
    5. Schmidt MG,
    6. Chavin K
    : Vitamin E succinate reduces ischemia/reperfusion injury in steatotic livers. Transplant Proc 40: 3327, 2008. PMID: 19100382. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.06.076
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hausenloy DJ,
    2. Yellon DM,
    3. Mani-Babu S,
    4. Duchen MR
    : Preconditioning protects by inhibiting the mitochondrial permeability transition. Am J Physiol 287: H841, 2004. PMID: 15072953. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00678.2003
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Teodoro JS,
    2. Rolo AP,
    3. Duarte FV,
    4. Simoes AM,
    5. Palmeira CM
    : Differential alterations in mitochondrial function induced by a choline-deficient diet: understanding fatty liver disease progression. Mitochondrion 8: 367, 2008. PMID: 18765303. DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2008.07.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Rolo PA,
    2. Teodoro SJ,
    3. Peralta C,
    4. Rosello-Catafau J,
    5. Palmeira MC
    : Prevention of I/R Injury in fatty livers by ischemic preconditioning is associated with increased mitochondrial tolerance: the key role of ATPsynthase and mitochondrial permeability transition. Transpl Int 22: 1081-1090, 2009. PMID: 19619169. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.00916.x
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Morris MW Jr.,
    3. Dorsett-Martin WA,
    4. Drake LC,
    5. Anderson CD
    : Autophagy is involved in endoplasmic reticulum stress induced cell death of rat hepatocytes. Surg Res 183(2): 929-935, 2013. PMID: 23548375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.043
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Koeppel TA,
    2. Trauner M,
    3. Mennone A,
    4. Arrese M,
    5. Rios-Velez L,
    6. Boyer JL
    : Role of glutathione in hepatic bile formation during reperfusion after cold ischemia of the rat liver. J Hepatol 28(5): 812-819, 1998. PMID: 9625316. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(98)80231-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Soltys K,
    2. Dikdan G,
    3. Koneru B
    : Oxidative stress in fatty livers of obese Zucker rats: rapid amelioration and improved tolerance to warm ischemia with tocopherol. Hepatology 34: 13-18, 2001. PMID: 11431728. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.25452
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Nardo B,
    2. Caraceni P,
    3. Pasini P,
    4. Domenicali M,
    5. Catena F,
    6. Cavallari G,
    7. Santoni B,
    8. Maiolini E,
    9. Grattagliano I,
    10. Vendemiale G,
    11. Trevisani F,
    12. Roda A,
    13. Bernardi M,
    14. Cavallari A
    : Increased generation of reactive oxygen species in isolated rat fatty liver during postischemic reoxygenation. Transplantation 71: 1816-1820, 2001. PMID: 11455263. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200106270-00018
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Pratschke S,
    2. Angele MK,
    3. Grützner U,
    4. Tufman A,
    5. Bilzer M,
    6. Loehe F,
    7. Jauch KW,
    8. Schauer RJ
    : GSH attenuates organ injury and improves function after transplantation of fatty livers. Eur Surg Res 45: 13-19, 2010. PMID: 20689302. DOI: 10.1159/000316643
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Prieto I,
    2. Monsalve M
    : ROS homeostasis, a key determinant in liver ischemic-preconditioning. Redox Biol 12: 1020-1025, 2017. PMID: 28511345. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.036
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Zaouali AM,
    2. Ben Mosbah I,
    3. Boncompagni E,
    4. Ben Abdennebi H,
    5. Mitjavila MT,
    6. Bartrons R,
    7. Freitas I,
    8. Rimola A,
    9. Roselló-Catafau J
    : Hypoxia inducible factor-1α accumulation in steatotic liver preservation: role of nitric oxide. World J Gastroenterol 16(28): 3499-3509, 2010. PMID: 20653058. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3499
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ben MI,
    2. Roselló-Catafau J,
    3. Franco-Gou R,
    4. Abdennebi HB,
    5. Saidane D,
    6. Ramella-Virieux S,
    7. Boillot O,
    8. Peralta C
    : Preservation of steatotic livers in IGL-1 solution. Liver Transpl 12: 1215-1223, 2006. PMID: 16724331. DOI: 10.1002/lt.20788
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ben MI,
    2. Massip-Salcedo M,
    3. Fernández-Monteiro I,
    4. Xaus C,
    5. Bartrons R,
    6. Boillot O,
    7. Roselló-Catafau J,
    8. Peralta C
    : Addition of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activators to university of wisconsin solution: a way of protecting rat steatotic livers. Liver Transpl 13: 410-425, 2007. PMID: 17326058. DOI: 10.1002/lt.21059
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Hon WM,
    2. Lee KH,
    3. Khoo HE
    : Nitric oxide in liver diseases: friend, foe, or just passerby? Ann N Y Acad Sci 962: 275-295, 2002. PMID: 12076981. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04074.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Thomas DD,
    2. Ridnour LA,
    3. Isenberg JS,
    4. Flores-Santana W,
    5. Switzer CH,
    6. Donzelli S,
    7. Hussain P,
    8. Vecoli C,
    9. Paolocci N,
    10. Ambs S,
    11. Colton CA,
    12. Harris CC,
    13. Roberts DD,
    14. Wink DA
    : The chemical biology of nitric oxide: implications in cellular signaling. Free Radic Biol Med 45(1): 18-31, 2008. PMID: 18439435. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.03.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Alexander B
    : The role of nitric oxide in hepatic metabolism. Nutrition. 14(4): 376-90, 1998. PMID: 9591311. DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(97)00492-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Duranski MR,
    2. Elrod JW,
    3. Calvert JW,
    4. Bryan NS,
    5. Feelisch M,
    6. Lefer DJ
    : Genetic overexpression of eNOS attenuates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H2980-H2986, 2006. PMID: 16877550. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01173.2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Vardanian AJ,
    2. Busuttil RW,
    3. Kupiec-Weglinski JW
    : Molecular mediators of liver ischemia and reperfusion injury: a brief review. Mol Med 14: 337-345, 2008. PMID: 18292799. DOI: 10.2119/2007-00134.Vardanian
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Thomas DD,
    2. Ridnour LA,
    3. Isenberg JS,
    4. Flores-Santana W,
    5. Switzer CH,
    6. Donzelli S,
    7. Hussain P,
    8. Vecoli C,
    9. Paolocci N,
    10. Ambs S,
    11. Colton CA,
    12. Harris CC,
    13. Roberts DD,
    14. Wink DA
    : The chemical biology of nitric oxide: Implications in cellular signaling. Free Radic Biol Med 45: 18-31, 2008. PMID: 18439435. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.03.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Duranski MR,
    2. Elrod JW,
    3. Calvert JW,
    4. Bryan NS,
    5. Feelisch M,
    6. Lefer DJ
    : Genetic overexpression of eNOS attenuates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H2980-H2986, 2006. PMID: 16877550. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01173.2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Abe Y,
    2. Hines I,
    3. Zibari G,
    4. Grisham MB
    : Hepatocellular protection by nitric oxide or nitrite in ischemia and reperfusion injury. Arch Biochem Biophys 484: 232-237, 2009. PMID: 18940177. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.10.006
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Koeppel TA,
    2. Mihaljevic N,
    3. Kraenzlin B,
    4. Loehr M,
    5. Jesenofsky R,
    6. Post S,
    7. Palma P
    : Enhanced iNOS gene expression in the steatotic rat liver after normothermic ischemia. Eur Surg Res 39(5): 303-311, 2007. PMID: 17595544. DOI: 10.1159/000104401
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Taylor SB,
    2. de Vera ME,
    3. Ganster RW,
    4. Wang Q,
    5. Shapiro RA,
    6. Morris SM Jr.,
    7. Billiar TR,
    8. Geller DA
    : Multiple NF-kB enhancer elements regulate cytokine induction of the human inducible nitric oxide synthase gene. J Biol Chem 273(24): 15148-15156, 1998. PMID: 9614127. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.24.15148
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Xie QW,
    2. Kashiwabara Y,
    3. Nathan C
    : Role of transcription factor NF-Kappa B/Rel in induction of nitric oxide synthase. J Biol Chem 269: 4705-4708, 1994. PMID: 7508926.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Martin E,
    2. Nathan C,
    3. Xie Q
    : Role of interferon regulatory factor 1 in induction of nitric oxide synthase. J Exp Med. 180: 977-984, 1994. PMID: 7520478. DOI: 10.1084/jem.180.3.977
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kamijo R,
    2. Harada H,
    3. Matsuyama T,
    4. Bosland M,
    5. Gerecitano J,
    6. Shapiro D,
    7. Le J,
    8. Koh SI,
    9. Kimura T,
    10. Green SJ,
    11. Mak WT,
    12. Taniguchi T,
    13. Vilček J
    : Requirement for transcription factor IRF-1 in NO synthase induction in macrophages. Science 263: 1612-1615, 1994. PMID: 7510419. DOI: 10.1126/science.7510419
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Griscavage JM,
    2. Wilk S,
    3. Ignarro L
    : Inhibitors of proteasome pathway interfere with induction of nitric oxide synthase in macrophages by blocking activation of transcription factor NF-kappa B. J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 3308-3312, 1995. PMID: 8622934. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3308
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Lauterburg BH,
    2. Adams JD,
    3. Mitchell JR
    : Hepatic GSH homeostasis in the rat: efflux accounts for GSH turnover. Hepatology 4: 586-590, 1984. PMID: 6745847. DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840040402
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Bilzer M,
    2. Lauterburg BH
    : GSH metabolism in activated human neutrophils: stimulation of GSH synthesis and consumption of GSH by reactive oxygen species. Eur J Clin Invest 21: 316-322, 1991. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1991.tb01376.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Bilzer M,
    2. Baron A,
    3. Schauer R,
    4. Steib C,
    5. Ebensberger S,
    6. Gerbes AL
    : GSH treatment protects the rat liver against injury after warm ischemia and Kupffer cell activation. Digestion 66: 49-57, 2002. PMID: 12379815. DOI: 10.1159/000064415
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Schauer RJ,
    2. Kalmuk S,
    3. Gerbes AL,
    4. Leiderer R,
    5. Meissner H,
    6. Schildberg FW,
    7. Messmer K,
    8. Bilzer M
    : Intravenous administration of GSH protects parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells against reperfusion injury following rat liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 10: 864-870, 2004. PMID: 15040034. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i6.864
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Aebi S,
    2. Assereto R,
    3. Lauterburg BH
    : Highdose intravenous GSH in man: pharmacokinetics and effects on cyst(e)ine in plasma and urine. Eur J Clin Invest 21: 103-110, 1991. PMID: 1907548. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1991.tb01366.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Dickinson DA,
    2. Forman HJ
    : GSH in defense and signaling: lessons from a small thiol. Ann NY Acad Sci 973: 488-504, 2002. PMID: 12485918. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04690.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Schauer RJ,
    2. Gerbes AL,
    3. Vonier D,
    4. Meissner H,
    5. Michl P,
    6. Leiderer R,
    7. Schildberg FW,
    8. Messmer K,
    9. Bilzer M
    : GSH protects the rat liver against reperfusion injury after prolonged warm ischemia. Ann Surg 239: 220-231, 2004. PMID: 14745330. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000110321.64275.95
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Schemmer P,
    2. Bradford BU,
    3. Rose ML,
    4. Bunzendahl H,
    5. Raleigh JA,
    6. Lemasters JJ,
    7. Thurman RG
    : Intravenous glycine improves survival in rat liver transplantation. Am J Physiol 276: G924-G932, 1999. PMID: 10198336. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1999.276.4.G924
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Tu BP,
    2. Weissman JS
    : Oxidative protein folding in eukaryotes: mechanisms and consequences. J Cell Biol 164: 341-346, 2004. PMID: 14757749. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200311055
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tu BP,
    2. Weissman JS
    : The FAD- and O2-dependent reaction cycle of Ero1-mediated oxidative protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell 10: 983-994, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00696-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Gorlach A,
    2. Klappa P,
    3. Kietzmann T
    : The endoplasmic reticulum: folding, calcium homeostasis, signaling, and redox control. Antioxid Redox Signal 8: 1391-1418, 2006. PMID: 16986999. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.1391
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Hotamisligil GS
    : Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature 444: 860-867, 2006. PMID: 17167474. DOI: 10.1038/nature05485
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Zhang K,
    2. Kaufman JR
    : From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response. Nature 454(7203): 455-462, 2008. PMID: 18650916. DOI: 10.1038/nature07203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Henkel SA,
    2. Dewey AM,
    3. Anderson KA,
    4. Olivares S,
    5. Green RM
    : Reducing endoplasmic reticulum stress does not improve steatohepatitis in mice fed a methionine- and choline-deficient diet. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303(1): G54-G59, 2012. PMID: 22556147. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00052.2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Fink AL
    : Chaperone-mediated protein folding. Physiol Rev 79(2): 425-449, 1999. PMID: 10221986. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.2.425
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Tiriveedhi V,
    2. Conzen DK,
    3. Liaw-Conlin J,
    4. Upadhya G,
    5. Malone J,
    6. Townsend RR
    : The role of molecular chaperonins in warm ischemia and reperfusion injury in the steatotic liver: a proteomic study. BMC Biochem 13: 17, 2012. PMID: 22962947. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2091-13-17
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Amersi F,
    2. Farmer GD,
    3. Shaw GD,
    4. Kato H,
    5. Coito AJ,
    6. Kaldas F,
    7. Zhao D,
    8. Lassman CR,
    9. Melinek J,
    10. Ma J,
    11. Volk HD,
    12. Kupiec-Weglinski JW,
    13. Busuttil RW
    : P-Selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (rPSGL-Ig) - mediated blockade of CD62 selectin molecules protects rat steatotic liver grafts from ischemia/reperfusion injury. Am J Transpl 2: 600-608, 2002. PMID: 12201360. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20704.x
    OpenUrl
    1. Dulkanchainun T,
    2. Goss JA,
    3. Imagawa DK,
    4. Shaw GD,
    5. Anselmo DM,
    6. Kaldas F,
    7. Wang T,
    8. Zhao D,
    9. Busuttil AA,
    10. Kato H,
    11. Murray NG,
    12. Kupiec-Weglinski JW,
    13. Busuttil RW
    : Reduction of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury by a soluble P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1. Ann Surg 227: 832-840, 1998. PMID: 9637546. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199806000-00006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Shirasugi N,
    2. Wakabayashi G,
    3. Shimazu M,
    4. Oshima A,
    5. Shito M,
    6. Kawachi S,
    7. Karahashi T,
    8. Kumamoto Y,
    9. Yoshida M,
    10. Kitajima M
    : Up-regulation of oxygen-derived free radicals by interleukin-1 in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Transplantation 64: 1398-403, 1997. PMID: 9392301. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199711270-00004
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Shirasugi N,
    2. Wakabayashi G,
    3. Shimazu M,
    4. Shito M,
    5. Kawachi S,
    6. Kitajima M
    : Interleukin-1 receptor blockade attenuates oxygen-derived free radical production and microcirculatory disturbances in ischemia/reperfusion injury in the liver. Transplant Proc 29: 371-373, 1997. PMID: 9123042. DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(96)00124-8
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Shito M,
    2. Wakabayashi G,
    3. Ueda M,
    4. Shimazu M,
    5. Shirasugi N,
    6. Endo M,
    7. Mukai M,
    8. Kitajima M
    : Interleukin-1 receptor blockade reduces tumor necrosis factor production, tissue injury, and mortality after hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in the rat. Transplantation 63: 143-148, 1997. PMID: 9000676. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199701150-00026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hashimoto K,
    2. Nishizaki T,
    3. Yoshizumi T,
    4. Uchiyama H,
    5. Okano S,
    6. Ikegami T,
    7. Yanaga K,
    8. Sugimachi K
    : Beneficial effect of FR167653 on cold ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat liver transplantation. Transplantation 70: 1318-1322, 2000. PMID: 11087146. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200011150-00009
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Kobayashi J,
    2. Takeyoshi I,
    3. Ohwada S,
    4. Iwanami K,
    5. Matsumoto K,
    6. Muramoto M,
    7. Morishita Y
    : The effects of FR167653 in extended liver resection with ischemia in dogs. Hepatology 28: 459-465, 1998. PMID: 9696012. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510280225
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Hong F,
    2. Radaeva S,
    3. Pan HN,
    4. Tian Z,
    5. Veech R,
    6. Gao B
    : Interleukin-6 alleviates hepatic steatosis and ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice with fatty liver disease. Hepatology 40: 933-941, 2004. PMID: 15382116. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20400
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hill DB,
    2. Marsano L,
    3. Cohen D,
    4. Allen J,
    5. Shedlofsky S,
    6. McClain CJ
    : Increased plasma Interleukin-6 concentrations in alcoholic hepatitis. J Lab Clin Med 119: 547-552, 1992. PMID: 1583411.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. McClain CJ,
    2. Barve S,
    3. Deaciuc I,
    4. Kugelmas M,
    5. Hill D
    : Cytokines in alcoholic liver disease. Semin Liver Dis 19: 205-219, 1999. PMID: 22367091. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-012-0814-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hill DB,
    2. Barve S,
    3. Joshi-Barve S,
    4. McClain C
    : Increased monocyte nuclear factor kappa B activation and tumor necrosis factor production in alcoholic hepatitis. J Lab Clin Med 135: 387-395, 2000. PMID: 10811053. DOI: 10.1067/mlc.2000.106451
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kugelmas M,
    2. Hill DB,
    3. Vivian B,
    4. Marsano L,
    5. McClain CJ
    : Cytokines and NASH: a pilot study of the effects of lifestyle modification and vitamin E. Hepatology 38: 413-419, 2003. PMID: 12883485. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50316
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Cressman DE,
    2. Greenbaum LE,
    3. DeAngelis RA,
    4. Ciliberto G,
    5. Furth EE,
    6. Poli V,
    7. Taub R
    : Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in Interleukin-6 -deficient mice. Science 274: 1379-1383, 1996. DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5291.1379
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Zimmers TA,
    2. McKillop IH,
    3. Pierce RH,
    4. Yoo JY,
    5. Koniaris LG
    : Massive liver growth in mice induced by systemic Interleukin-6 administration. Hepatology 38: 326-334, 2003. PMID: 12883476. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50318
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Peters M,
    2. Blinn G,
    3. Jostock T,
    4. Schirmacher P,
    5. Meyer zumBüschenfelde KH,
    6. Galle PR,
    7. Rose-John S
    : Combined Interleukin-6 and soluble Interleukin-6 receptor accelerates murine liver regeneration. Gastroenterology 119: 1663-1671, 2000. PMID: 11113088. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2000.20236
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Selzner M,
    2. Camargo CA,
    3. Clavien PA
    : Ischemia impairs liver regeneration after major tissue loss in rodents: protective effects of interleukin-6. Hepatology 30: 469-475, 1999. PMID: 10421656. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510300215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Camargo CA Jr.,
    2. Madden JF,
    3. Gao W,
    4. Selvan RS,
    5. Clavien PA
    : Interleukin-6 protects liver against warm ischemia/reperfusion injury and promotes hepatocyte proliferation in the rodent. Hepatology 26: 1513-1520, 1997. PMID: 9397992. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510260619
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kovalovich K,
    2. Li W,
    3. DeAngelis R,
    4. Greenbaum LE,
    5. Ciliberto G,
    6. Taub R
    : Interleukin-6 protects against Fas-mediated death by establishing a critical level of anti-apoptotic hepatic proteins FLIP, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL. J BiolChem 276: 26605-26613, 2001. PMID: 11349125. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M100740200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Streetz KL,
    2. Tacke F,
    3. Leifeld L,
    4. Wüstefeld T,
    5. Graw A,
    6. Klein C,
    7. Kamino K,
    8. Spengler U,
    9. Kreipe H,
    10. Kubicka S,
    11. Müller W,
    12. Manns MP,
    13. Trautwein C
    : Interleukin-6/gp130-dependent pathways are protective during chronic liver diseases. Hepatology 38: 218-229, 2003. PMID: 12830005. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50268
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Blindenbacher A,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Langer I,
    4. Savino R,
    5. Terracciano L,
    6. Heim MH
    : Interleukin-6 is important for survival after partial hepatectomy in mice. Hepatology 38: 674-682, 2003. PMID: 12939594. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50378
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hong F,
    2. Kim WH,
    3. Tian Z,
    4. Jaruga B,
    5. Ishac E,
    6. Shen X,
    7. Gao B
    : Elevated Interleukin-6 during ethanol consumption acts as a potential endogenous protective cytokine against ethanol-induced apoptosis in the liver: involvement of induction of Bcl-2 and Bcl-x (L) proteins. Oncogene 21: 32-43, 2002. PMID: 11791174. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hong F,
    2. Jaruga B,
    3. Kim WH,
    4. Radaeva S,
    5. El-Assal ON,
    6. Tian Z,
    7. Nguyen VA,
    8. Gao B
    : Opposing roles of STAT1 and STAT3 in T cell-mediated hepatitis: regulation by SOCS. J Clin Invest 110: 1503-1513, 2002. PMID: 12438448. DOI: 10.1172/JCI15841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Streetz KL,
    2. Wustefeld T,
    3. Klein C,
    4. Kallen KJ,
    5. Tronche F,
    6. Betz UA,
    7. Schütz G,
    8. Manns MP,
    9. Müller W,
    10. Trautwein C
    : Lack of gp130 expression in hepatocytes promotes liver injury. Gastroenterology 125: 532-543, 2003. PMID: 12891556. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00901-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Selzner M,
    2. Clavien PA
    : Failure of regeneration of the steatotic rat liver: disruption at two different levels in the regeneration pathway. Hepatology 31: 35-42, 2000. PMID: 10613725. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510310108
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tacchine l,
    2. Cairo G,
    3. De Ponti C,
    4. Massip M,
    5. Rosellò-Catafau J,
    6. Peralta C
    : Up-regulation of IL-6 by ischemic preconditioning in normal and fatty rat livers: association with reduction of oxidative stress. Free Rad Res 40(11): 1206-1217, 2006. PMID: 17050174. DOI: 10.1080/10715760600885432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Jiménez-Castro M,
    2. Casillas-Ramírez A,
    3. Negrete-Sánchez E,
    4. Avalos-de León CG,
    5. Gracia-Sancho J,
    6. Peralta C
    : Adipocytokines in steatotic liver surgery/transplantation. Transplantation 103(1): 71-77, 2019. PMID: 30586349. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002098
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Yoshidome H,
    2. Kato A,
    3. Edwards MJ,
    4. Lentsch AB
    : Interleukin-10 suppresses hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice: implications of a central role for nuclear factor kappa B. Hepatology 30: 203-208, 1999. PMID: 10385657. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510300120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Yagihashi A,
    2. Hirata K,
    3. Zou XM,
    4. Tsuruma T,
    5. Araya J,
    6. Yajima T,
    7. Kameshima H,
    8. Yanai Y,
    9. Nakamura M,
    10. Wada Y,
    11. Asanuma K,
    12. Watanabe N
    : Down-regulation of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractants and reduction of reperfusion injury in liver allograft by Interleukin-10. Transplant Proc 32: 2302, 2000. PMID: 11120174. DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)01673-0
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Zou XM,
    2. Hirata K,
    3. Nie G,
    4. Liang YW,
    5. Zhang JG,
    6. Qin HD,
    7. Zhang B
    : Investigation of rhIL-10 inhibition of acute rejection after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 32: 2123-2124, 2000. PMID: 11120097. DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)01598-0
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Le Moine O,
    2. Louis H,
    3. Demols A,
    4. Desalle F,
    5. Demoor F,
    6. Quertinmont E,
    7. Goldman M,
    8. Devière J
    : Cold liver ischemia-reperfusion injury critically depends on liver T cells and is improved by donor pretreatment with interleukin-10 in mice. Hepatology 31: 1266-1274, 2000. PMID: 10827152. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2000.7881
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Wang M,
    3. Xie HY,
    4. Zhou L,
    5. Meng XQ,
    6. Shi J,
    7. Zheng S
    : Role of reactive oxygen species in mediating hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and its therapeutic applications in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 39: 1332-1337, 2007. PMID: 17580134. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.11.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Ogiku M,
    2. Kono H,
    3. Hara M,
    4. Tsuchiya M,
    5. Fujii H
    : Glycyrrhizin prevents liver injury by inhibition of high-mobility group box 1 production by Kupffer cells after ischemia-reperfusion in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 339: 93-98, 2011. PMID: 21737537. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.111.182592
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Mustafa SB,
    2. Olson MS
    : cAMP. J Biol Chem 273(9): 5073-5080, 1998. PMID: 9478958. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.9.5073
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Laskin DL,
    2. Rodriguez del Valle M,
    3. Heck DE,
    4. Hwang SM,
    5. Ohnishi ST,
    6. Durham SK,
    7. Goller NL,
    8. Laskin JD
    : Hepatic nitric oxide production following acute endotoxemia in rats is mediated by increased inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression. Hepatology 22: 223-234, 1995. PMID: 7541386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nussler AK,
    2. Di Silvio M,
    3. Liu ZZ,
    4. Geller DA,
    5. Freeswick P,
    6. Dorko K,
    7. Bartoli F,
    8. Billiar RT
    : Further characterization and comparison of inducible nitric oxide synthase in mouse, rat, and human hepatocytes. Hepatology 21: 1552-1560, 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0270-9139(95)90459-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Movita D,
    2. Kreefft K,
    3. Biesta P,
    4. van Oudenaren A,
    5. Leenen PJ,
    6. Janssen HL,
    7. Boonstra A
    : Kupffer cells express a unique combination of phenotypic and functional characteristics compared with splenic and peritoneal macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 92: 723-733, 2012. PMID: 22685319. DOI: 10.1189/jlb.1111566
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Suzuki T,
    2. Yoshidome H,
    3. Kimura F,
    4. Shimizu H,
    5. Ohtsuka M,
    6. Takeuchi D,
    7. Kato A,
    8. Furukawa K,
    9. Yoshitomi H,
    10. Iida A,
    11. Dochi T,
    12. Miyazaki M
    : Hepatocyte apoptosis is enhanced after ischemia/reperfusion in the steatotic liver. J Clin Biochem Nutr 48(2): 142-148, 2011. PMID: 21373267. DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.10-74
    OpenUrlPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Soeda J,
    2. Miyagawa S,
    3. Sano K,
    4. Masumoto J,
    5. Taniguchi S,
    6. Kawasaki S
    : Cytochrome C release into cytosol with subsequent caspase activation during warm ischemia in rat liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 281: G1115-G1123, 2001. PMID: 11557532. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.4.G1115
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Morin D,
    2. Pires F,
    3. Plin C,
    4. Tillement JP
    : Role of the permeability transition pore in cytochrome C release from mitochondria during ischemia-reperfusion in rat liver. Biochem Pharmacol 68: 2065-2073, 2004. PMID: 15476677. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.07.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Wang X
    : The expanding role of mitochondria in apoptosis. Genes Dev 15: 2922-2933, 2001. PMID: 11711427. DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.1074
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Jiang Y,
    2. Tang JJ,
    3. Wu BQ,
    4. Yuan B,
    5. Qu Z
    : The protective effects of different-time-ischemic preconditioning on the reperfusion injury in fatty livers in rats. PLoS One 8(3): e58086, 2013. PMID: 23483973. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058086
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Camara-Lemarroy CR,
    2. Guzman-de la Garza FJ,
    3. Alarcon-Galvan G
    : The effects of NMDA receptor antagonists over intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 621: 78-85, 2009. PMID: 19751722. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.08.038
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Lehmann TG,
    2. Wheeler MD,
    3. Froh M
    : Effects of three superoxide dismutase genes delivered with an adenovirus on graft function after transplantation of fatty livers in the rat. Transplantation 76: 28-37, 2003. PMID: 12865782. DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000065299.29900.17
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Rensen SS,
    2. Slaats Y,
    3. Nijhuis J
    : Increased hepatic myeloperoxidase activity in obese subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Pathol 175: 1473-1482, 2009. PMID: 19729473. DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Caraceni P,
    2. Domenicali M,
    3. Vendemiale G,
    4. Grattagliano I,
    5. Pertosa A,
    6. Nardo B,
    7. Morselli-Labate AM,
    8. Trevisani F,
    9. Palasciano G,
    10. Altomare E,
    11. Bernardi M
    : The reduced tolerance of rat fatty liver to ischemia reperfusion is associated with mitochondrial oxidative injury. J Surg Res 124(2): 160-168, 2005. PMID: 15820243. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.10.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Kostakis ID,
    2. Sikalias N,
    3. Alexiou K,
    4. Mountzalia L,
    5. Papalois A,
    6. Karatzas T
    : How much ischemia can the severely steatotic rat liver tolerate? In Vivo 32(6): 1381-1386, 2018. PMID: 30348692. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11390
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Chun K,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Biewer J,
    4. Ferguson D,
    5. Clemens MG
    : Microcirculatory failure determines lethal hepatocyte injury in ischemic/reperfused rat livers. Shock 1: 3-9, 1994. PMID: 7743324. DOI: 10.1097/00024382-199401000-00002
    OpenUrlPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Bauer M,
    2. Zhang JX,
    3. Bauer I,
    4. Clemens MG
    : Endothelin-1 as a regulator of hepatic microcirculation: sublobular distribution of effects and impact on hepatocellular secretory function. Shock 1: 457-465, 1994. PMID: 7735976.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Rensing H,
    2. Bauer I,
    3. Zhang WJ,
    4. Paxian M,
    5. Pannen HJB,
    6. Yokoyama Y,
    7. Clemens MG,
    8. Bauer M
    : Endothelin-1 and heme oxygenase-1 as modulators of sinusoidal tone in the stress-exposed rat liver. Hepatology 36: 1453-1465, 2002. PMID: 12447872. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36934
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Seifalian AM,
    2. Piasecki C,
    3. Agarwal A,
    4. Davidson BR
    : The effect of graded steatosis on flow in the hepatic parenchymal microcirculation. Transplantation 68: 780-784, 1999. PMID: 10515377. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199909270-00009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Serkova NJ,
    2. Jackman M,
    3. Brown JL,
    4. Liu T,
    5. Hirose R,
    6. Roberts JP,
    7. Maher JJ,
    8. Niemann CU
    : Metabolic profiling of livers and blood from obese Zucker rats. J Hepatol 44: 956-962, 2006. PMID: 16223541. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Teramoto K,
    2. Bowers JL,
    3. Kruskal JB,
    4. Clouse ME
    : Hepatic microcirculatory changes after reperfusion in fatty and normal liver transplantation in the rat. Transplantation 56: 1076-1082, 1993. PMID: 8249103. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199311000-00005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Sun CK,
    2. Zhang XY,
    3. Zimmermann A,
    4. Davis G,
    5. Wheatley AM
    : Effect of ischemia-reperfusion injury on the microcirculation of the steatotic liver of the Zucker rat. Transplantation 72: 1625-1631, 2001. PMID: 11726821. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200111270-00008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Yamagami K,
    2. Hutter J,
    3. Yamamoto Y,
    4. Schauer RJ,
    5. Enders G,
    6. Leiderer R,
    7. Ozen O,
    8. Hammer C,
    9. Yamaoka Y,
    10. Messmer K
    : Synergistic effects of brain death and liver steatosis on the hepatic microcirculation. Transplantation 80: 500-505, 2005. PMID: 16123725. DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000167723.46580.78
    OpenUrlPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Peralta C,
    2. Rull R,
    3. Rimola A,
    4. Deulofeu R,
    5. Roselló-Catafau J,
    6. Gelpí E,
    7. Rodés J
    : Endogenous nitric oxide and exogenous nitric oxide supplementation in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat. Transplantation 71: 529-536, 2001. PMID: 11258432. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200102270-00008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Rockey DC
    : Hepatic blood flow regulation by stellate cells in normal and injured liver. Semin Liver Dis 21: 337-349, 2001. PMID: 11586464. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17551
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Rockey DC,
    2. Fouassier L,
    3. Chung JJ,
    4. Carayon A,
    5. Vallee P,
    6. Rey C,
    7. Housset C
    : Cellular localization of Endothelin-1 and increased production in liver injury in the rat: potential for autocrine and paracrine effects on stellate cells. Hepatology 27: 472-480, 1998. PMID: 9462646. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510270222
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Kaffarnik MF,
    2. Ahmadi N,
    3. Lock JF,
    4. Wuensch T,
    5. Pratschke J,
    6. Stockmann M,
    7. Malinowski M
    : Correlation between plasma Endothelin-1 levels and severity of septic liver failure quantified by maximal liver function capacity (LiMAx test). A prospective study. PLoS One 12(5): e0178237, 2017. PMID: 28542386. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178237
    OpenUrl
    1. Chan CC,
    2. Wang SS,
    3. Lee FY,
    4. Chang FY,
    5. Lin HC,
    6. Chu CJ,
    7. Chen CT,
    8. Huang HC,
    9. Lee SD
    : Endothelin-1 induces vasoconstriction on portal-systemic collaterals of portal hypertensive rats. Hepatology 33: 816-820, 2001. PMID: 11283844. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.23079
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Eakes AT,
    2. Olson MS
    : Regulation of Endothelin synthesis in hepatic endothelial cells. Am J Physiol 274: G1068-1076, 1998. PMID: 9696707. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1998.274.6.G1068
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. McKenna S,
    2. Gossling M,
    3. Bugarini A,
    4. Hill E,
    5. Anderson AL,
    6. Rancourt RC,
    7. Balasubramaniyan N,
    8. El Kasmi KC,
    9. Wright CJ
    : Endotoxemia induces I kappa B beta/NF-kappa B-dependent endothelin-1 expression in hepatic macrophages. J Immunol 195: 3866-3879, 2015. PMID: 26342031. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    1. Zhao RZ,
    2. Chen X,
    3. Yao Q,
    4. Chen C
    : TNF-alpha induces Interleukin-8 and Endothelin-1 expression in human endothelial cells with different redox pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 327: 985-992, 2005. PMID: 15652492. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.109
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Hakamada K,
    2. Sasaki M,
    3. Takahashi K,
    4. Umehara Y,
    5. Konn M
    : Sinusoidal flow block after warm ischemia in rats with diet-induced fatty liver. J Surg Res 70: 12-20, 1997. PMID: 9228921. DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1997.5077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Federico A,
    2. Trappoliere M,
    3. Loguercio C
    : Treatment of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: current views and perspectives. Dig Liver Dis 38: 789-801, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.04.009
    OpenUrlPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. McCormack L,
    2. Dutkowski P,
    3. El-Badry AM,
    4. Clavien PA
    : Liver transplantation using fatty livers: always feasible? J Hepatol 54(5): 1055-1062, 2011. PMID: 21145846. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Chu MJJ,
    2. Vather R,
    3. Hickey AJR,
    4. Phillips RJA,
    5. Bartlett ASJR
    : Impact of ischaemic preconditioning on experimental steatotic livers following hepatic ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 17(1): 1-10, 2015. PMID: 24712641. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12258
    OpenUrl
  95. ↵
    1. Zaouali AM,
    2. Ben Mosbah I,
    3. Boncompagni E,
    4. Ben Abdennebi H,
    5. Mitjavila MT,
    6. Bartrons R,
    7. Freitas I,
    8. Rimola A,
    9. Roselló-Catafau J
    : Hypoxia inducible factor-1α accumulation in steatotic liver preservation: role of nitric oxide. World J Gastroenterol 16(28): 3499-3509, 2010. PMID: 20653058. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3499
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Hui AM,
    2. Kawasaki S,
    3. Makuuchi M,
    4. Nakayama J,
    5. Ikegami T,
    6. Miyagawa S
    : Liver injury following normothermic ischemia in steatotic rat liver. Hepatology 20: 1287-1293, 1994. PMID: 7927264. DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840200528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 34, Issue 3
May-June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pathophysiological Changes During Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Rodent Hepatic Steatosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pathophysiological Changes During Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Rodent Hepatic Steatosis
ANNA-AIKATERINI NERI, ISMENE A. DONTAS, DIMITRIOS C. ILIOPOULOS, THEODORE KARATZAS
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 953-964; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11863

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Pathophysiological Changes During Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Rodent Hepatic Steatosis
ANNA-AIKATERINI NERI, ISMENE A. DONTAS, DIMITRIOS C. ILIOPOULOS, THEODORE KARATZAS
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 953-964; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11863
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Pathophysiological Changes
    • Microcirculatory Disorders
    • Histopathological Findings
    • Fasting Effect
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Liraglutide With Metformin Therapy Ameliorates Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Injury in a Mouse Model of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Research Progress on the Microregulatory Mechanisms of Fertilization: A Review
  • Gastric Cancer Invading the Pancreas: A Review of the Role of Pancreatectomy
  • Circulating microRNAs and Clinicopathological Findings of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review
Show more Reviews

Keywords

  • liver injury
  • ischemia-reperfusion injury
  • hepatic steatosis
  • pathophysiological changes
  • oxidative stress
  • cytokines
  • review
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire