Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Korea With MET Exon 14 Skipping

JOON YOUNG HUR, BO MI KU, JOON HO SHIM, HYUN AE JUNG, JONG-MU SUN, SE-HOON LEE, JIN SEOK AHN, KEUNCHIL PARK and MYUNG-JU AHN
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 1399-1406; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11920
JOON YOUNG HUR
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BO MI KU
2Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOON HO SHIM
3Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HYUN AE JUNG
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JONG-MU SUN
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SE-HOON LEE
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JIN SEOK AHN
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEUNCHIL PARK
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MYUNG-JU AHN
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: silkahn@skku.edu silk.ahn@samsung.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: MET exon 14 skipping occurs in 3-4% of patients with lung adenocarcinomas. In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of clinical data from Korean non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with MET exon 14 skipping. Patients and Methods: Overall, 1,020 patients diagnosed with NSCLC between January 2015 and July 2017 were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. Results: MET exon 14 skipping was identified in 20 NSCLC patients (1.9%). The median age was 69 years (range=39-86 years), 60.0% were male, and most (55.0%) were ever-smokers. For first-line chemotherapy, the median overall survival was 9.5 months and progression-free survival was 4.0 months, respectively. Twelve patients received pemetrexed-based chemotherapy and the overall response rate was 33.3% (4/12). Among four crizotinib-treated patients, one continued therapy for 8 months with the best response being disease stability. Conclusion: Given the poor clinical outcome and response to therapy for NSCLC, and the availability of promising anti-tumor MET inhibitors, screening for the MET exon 14 skip mutation should be incorporated into clinical practice.

  • MET Exon 14 Skipping
  • NSCLC
  • crizotinib

Lung cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is reported to be the leading cause of death from cancer in Korea (1). NSCLC accounts for approximately 85% of all cases of lung cancer (2). The identification of genetic abnormalities has dramatically changed the treatment landscape of NSCLC. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are the most clinically relevant targets. EGFR tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors have been shown to be effective in patients with specific tumor cell mutations in the EGFR TK domain (3). In addition, the newly developed ALK inhibitors –ceritinib, alectinib, and brigatinib– have been approved for ALK-positive NSCLC (4). With advances in technology, more oncogenic drivers, such as ROS1, RET, BRAF, NTRK, MET, NRG1, and others, can be identified using next generation sequencing (NGS) (5).

The MET proto-oncogene, located on chromosome 7q21-q31, encodes the tyrosine kinase receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (6). MET is activated when the HGF ligand binds to the MET receptor leading to homodimerization and phosphorylation of intracellular tyrosine residues (7). Dysregulation of the MET pathway in lung cancer arises due to gene mutation, amplification, and rearrangement, and protein overexpression (5, 8). Among them, MET exon 14 skipping gives rise to one of the most important oncogenic drivers. MET exon 14 encodes part of the juxtamembrane domain, containing the c-Cbl E3 ubiquitin ligase binding site, Y1003 (9). Because ubiquitination tags MET receptor for degradation, MET exon 14 skipping, which produces a truncated MET receptor lacking the ubiquitin binding site, results in decreased ubiquitination and sustained MET activation (10). MET exon 14 skipping occurs in 3-4% (11) of patients with lung adenocarcinomas and is recognized as a poor prognostic factor in patients with NSCLC; it has also been associated with a poor response to standard therapies (12). In this paper, we report a comprehensive analysis of clinical data from NSCLC patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation in Korea.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flow-chart of patient selection. Samples were analyzed using Oncomine™ Focus Assay (n=441) or CancerSCAN™ (n=579).

Patients and Methods

Ethical statement. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Samsung Medical Center (2019-07-194-002) and informed consent was waived.

Patients. A total of 1,020 patients who had been diagnosed with NSCLC were reviewed between January 2015 and July 2017 at the Samsung Medical Center. Clinical data, including patient characteristics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, surgery type, EGFR or ALK mutation, PDL1 expression and sites of metastasis, and response to chemotherapy or MET inhibitor, were retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic assessment of the response to chemotherapy or treatment with MET inhibitors was performed by a single physician (J.Y.H.) using RECIST 1.1 criteria (13).

Identification of MET exon 14 skipping. MET Exon 14 skipping was identified by NGS. Briefly, DNA and RNA were extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded or fresh biopsy tissue samples. Specimens with tumor tissues (>10% tumor content) were included in the study. In Figure 1, samples were analyzed using Oncomine™ Focus Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Francisco, CA, USA) (n=441) (14) or CancerSCAN™, a targeted sequencing platform established at the Samsung Medical Center Genomic Institute (n=579) (15). MET amplification was defined as a copy number greater than two.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Baseline characteristics of patients with NSCLC.

MET immunohistochemistry (IHC). The BenchMark XT automated slide processing system (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) was employed. The anti-MET (SP44) (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) antibody was used for MET IHC staining. IHC data were categorized according to the following staining scores: 0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong (16).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Genomic landscape of all patients with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC. Concurring alterations, including PIK3CA mutation (4 patients), TP53 mutation (2 patients), KRAS amplification (2 patients), PTEN mutation (1 patient), and KRAS mutation (1 patient) were infrequently observed with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC. Notably, patients with MET exon 14 skipping did not harbor concurrent EGFR, BRAF, ALK, ROS1 mutations, or RET translocations, suggesting that they are mutually exclusive.

Statistical analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of first-line chemotherapy to the progression of cancer or death from any cause. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period between the date of first-line chemotherapy and death from any cause. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier plot. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 3.2.3, R for Statistics Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

MET exon 14 skipping was identified in 20 NSCLC patients (1.9%). The median age was 69 years (range=39-86 years), and 60.0% of the patients were male. Most patients (55.0%) were ever-smokers. Adenocarcinoma was predominant (85.0%), and we identified two cases (10.0%) with squamous cell carcinoma and one case with pleomorphic carcinoma. Among 20 patients, 15 (75.0%) had stage IV NSCLC at initial work-up. The most common metastatic site was bone (40%), followed by the pleura (35%) and brain (15%). One of the five pleomorphic carcinoma (20%) cases harbored MET exon 14 skipping. Four patients underwent lobectomy and one patient pneumonectomy. Most patients (95.0%) had ECOG performance status (PS) 0 to 2. Four of the patients tested for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression were positive. All patients were negative for EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangements as assayed by IHC (Table I).

The genomic landscape of the patients with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC is shown in Figure 2. Notably, patients with MET exon 14 skipping did not harbor concurrent EGFR, BRAF, ALK, ROS1 mutations, or RET translocations, suggesting that they are mutually exclusive. In contrast, concurring alterations, including PIK3CA mutation (4 patients), TP53 mutation (2 patients), SMAD4 mutation (2 patients), KRAS amplification (2 patients), PTEN mutation (1 patient), and KRAS mutation (1 patient) were infrequently observed with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC. The MET IHC test was conducted in two patients. Of the two patients, one patient was positive (membranous, 2+), and the other negative. No patient was tested using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect the MET amplification.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier plots of progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients. For first line chemotherapy, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=2.8-14.1] (A) and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 months (95%CI=6.5-23.1) (B).

For first line chemotherapy, the median PFS was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=2.8-14.1] (Figure 3A) and the median OS was 9.5 months (95%CI=6.5-23.1) (Figure 3B). In 12 patients treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, the overall response rate was 33.3% (4/12). No patient had previous exposure to MET therapy as first-line chemotherapy.

Of the 20 patients with identified MET exon 14 alterations, four patients received orally crizotinib at a starting dose of 250 mg, twice daily. Clinical and pathologic characteristics are summarized in Table II. A 69-year-old woman, never smoker who had been diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis, showed progression despite crizotinib as third-line chemotherapy (PFS, 9 days). A 62-year-old man with lung squamous cell carcinoma died 8 days after crizotinib was prescribed as fourth-line chemotherapy. A 39-year-old man with pleomorphic carcinoma died 4 days after crizotinib treatment as second-line chemotherapy. A 61-year-old man presented with a thoracic spine compression fracture along with adenocarcinoma in the right upper lung; NGS revealed the MET exon 14 skipping mutation without other genomic alterations. The patient was treated with pemetrexed and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy. After 14 months of first-line chemotherapy, 250 mg crizotinib twice daily was initiated because of cancer progression. CT scans obtained after 8 weeks of crizotinib treatment revealed a decreased subpleural metastatic lesion in the left lower lobe and unchanged NSCLC in the right upper lobe (Figure 4). The patient continued therapy for 8 months with stable disease as the best response.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Computed tomography (CT) scans of a patient with MET exon 14 skipping showing the response while the patient was receiving crizotinib. CT scans obtained after 8 weeks of crizotinib treatment revealed a decreased subpleural metastatic lesion in the left lower lobe and unchanged tumor in the right upper lobe.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Clinical information and treatment outcomes of four patients who received crizotinib.

Discussion

In this study, we found that the incidence of MET exon 14 skipping in NSCLC was 1.9%, which is lower than that (3%) in previous studies (17). The overall incidence of MET mutations varies, occurring in 3% of squamous cell lung cancer and 3-8% of lung adenocarcinoma cases (18, 19). One study identified MET exon 14 mutations in 28 of 933 nonsquamous NSCLCs (3.0%) (20). In another study of Korean patients, MET exon 14 skipping was detected in adenocarcinoma (4.8%; 11/230) and sarcomatoid carcinoma (9.5%; 2/21) cases by histology only (21). Liu et al. have reported that pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma is associated with a high incidence (approximately 22%) of MET exon 14 skipping (22). The lower incidence of MET exon 14 skipping in our study might be partly attributed to the small number of patients with pleomorphic carcinoma (5/1,020) enrolled.

MET exon 14 skipping occurred more frequently in older patients and ever-smokers. These findings are consistent with those of previous studies (16). Moreover, these are quite distinct clinical features compared to that of other patients with oncogenic drivers. Regarding the initial treatment, patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy had short PFS (median PFS=4 months) and poor outcome (median OS=9.5 months). In a previous study, an 85-year-old man received four cycles of pemetrexed and carboplatin as the first-line chemotherapy for MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC, followed by one cycle of pemetrexed with maintenance chemotherapy, but the number of lung nodules were found to have increased (23).

Currently, a variety of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors are being assessed in clinical trials. Crizotinib has been investigated in patients with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC and showed a 32% response rate (8/18) and a 9.1 month response duration, leading to its designation as breakthrough therapy by the Food and Drug Administration, USA (24). In our study, three of the four patients who were treated with crizotinib showed progression, and only one patient showed a durable response for more than 8 months. The lower response may be due to the enrollment of heavily pre-treated patients.

Capmatinib, an oral ATP-competitive, reversible, highly selective inhibitor of MET receptor tyrosine kinase, showed a 39.1% response rate among pretreated and 72% among treatment naive patients. Of note, a patient with brain metastasis experienced brain tumor shrinkage, suggesting that the drug penetrated in the CNS (25). Tepotinib, another highly selective MET inhibitor, demonstrated a 59.1% response rate with a 14.3-month response duration, and this drug has also been shown to have anti-brain tumor activity (26). Given their high selectivity, in contrast to previous drugs, most of these agents are quite effective.

Similar to other targeted agents, the development of acquired resistance is inevitable, and the exact mechanisms underlying this resistance have not yet been fully established. Resistance mechanisms include a secondary mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain, such as D1228N (27) or Y1230C (28), or activation of a bypass pathway, e.g., K-ras or EGFR amplification (29, 30). Further studies to determine the resistance to MET inhibitors are required.

There are several limitations to this study; it is a single cancer center study and involved a small sample size and retrospective data collection, which may have led to selection bias. Finally, most of the patients were not treated with other MET inhibitors, such as capmatinib, merestinib, or tepotinib.

In conclusion, MET exon 14 skipping was detected in 1.9% of Korean patients with NSCLC by NGS. MET exon 14 skipping occurred more frequently in older patients and ever-smokers. The median overall survival was limited to within 12 months. Given the poor clinical outcome and response to standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, and the availability of MET inhibitors with promising anti-tumor activities, screening for the MET exon 14 skipping mutation should be incorporated into clinical practice.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Collaborative Genome Program for Fostering New Post-Genome Industry of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (No. NRF-2017M3C9A6044633).

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Study design: HAJ, JMS, SHL, JSA; Study supervision: KP, MJA;Data collection: JYH, BMK; Data analysis: BMK, JHS; Statistical analysis: JYH; Manuscript preparation: JYH, MJA; Manuscript approval: all Authors.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this study.

  • Received January 22, 2020.
  • Revision received February 4, 2020.
  • Accepted February 7, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jung KW,
    2. Won YJ,
    3. Kong HJ,
    4. Lee ES
    : Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in korea, 2019. Cancer Res Treat 51(2): 431-437, 2019. PMID: 30913864. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2019.139
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Molina JR,
    2. Yang P,
    3. Cassivi SD,
    4. Schild SE,
    5. Adjei AA
    : Non-small cell lung cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc 83(5): 584-594, 2008. PMID: 18452692. DOI: 10.4065/83.5.584
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lynch TJ,
    2. Bell DW,
    3. Sordella R,
    4. Gurubhagavatula S,
    5. Okimoto RA,
    6. Brannigan BW,
    7. Harris PL,
    8. Haserlat SM,
    9. Supko JG,
    10. Haluska FG,
    11. Louis DN,
    12. Christiani DC,
    13. Settleman J,
    14. Haber DA
    : Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 350(21): 2129-2139, 2004. PMID: 15118073. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040938
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Spagnuolo A,
    2. Maione P,
    3. Gridelli C
    : Evolution in the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer with alk gene alterations: From the first- to third-generation of alk inhibitors. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 23(3): 231-241, 2018. PMID: 30251885. DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2018.1527902
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network
    : Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 511: 543-550, 2014. PMID: 25079552. DOI: 10.1038/nature13385
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Drilon A,
    2. Cappuzzo F,
    3. Ou SI,
    4. Camidge DR
    : Targeting met in lung cancer: Will expectations finally be met? J Thorac Oncol 12(1): 15-26, 2017. PMID: 27794501. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Skead G,
    2. Govender D
    : Gene of the month: Met. J Clin Pathol 68(6): 405-409, 2015. PMID: 25987653. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203050
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Ou SH,
    2. Kwak EL,
    3. Siwak-Tapp C,
    4. Dy J,
    5. Bergethon K,
    6. Clark JW,
    7. Camidge DR,
    8. Solomon BJ,
    9. Maki RG,
    10. Bang YJ,
    11. Kim DW,
    12. Christensen J,
    13. Tan W,
    14. Wilner KD,
    15. Salgia R,
    16. Iafrate AJ
    : Activity of crizotinib (pf02341066), a dual mesenchymal-epithelial transition (met) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (alk) inhibitor, in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with de novo met amplification. J Thorac Oncol 6(5): 942-946, 2011. PMID: 21623265. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31821528d3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Onozato R,
    2. Kosaka T,
    3. Kuwano H,
    4. Sekido Y,
    5. Yatabe Y,
    6. Mitsudomi T
    : Activation of met by gene amplification or by splice mutations deleting the juxtamembrane domain in primary resected lung cancers. J Thorac Oncol 4(1): 5-11, 2009. PMID: 19096300. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181913e0e
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kong-Beltran M,
    2. Seshagiri S,
    3. Zha J,
    4. Zhu W,
    5. Bhawe K,
    6. Mendoza N,
    7. Holcomb T,
    8. Pujara K,
    9. Stinson J,
    10. Fu L,
    11. Severin C,
    12. Rangell L,
    13. Schwall R,
    14. Amler L,
    15. Wickramasinghe D,
    16. Yauch R
    : Somatic mutations lead to an oncogenic deletion of met in lung cancer. Cancer Res 66(1): 283-289, 2006. PMID: 16397241. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-05-2749
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Drilon A
    : Met exon 14 alterations in lung cancer: Exon skipping extends half-life. Clin Cancer Res 22(12): 2832-2834, 2016. PMID: 27009743. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-16-0229
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Tong JH,
    2. Yeung SF,
    3. Chan AW,
    4. Chung LY,
    5. Chau SL,
    6. Lung RW,
    7. Tong CY,
    8. Chow C,
    9. Tin EK,
    10. Yu YH,
    11. Li H,
    12. Pan Y,
    13. Chak WP,
    14. Ng CS,
    15. Mok TS,
    16. To KF
    : Met amplification and exon 14 splice site mutation define unique molecular subgroups of non-small cell lung carcinoma with poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 22(12): 3048-3056, 2016. PMID: 26847053. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-15-2061
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Eisenhauer EA,
    2. Therasse P,
    3. Bogaerts J,
    4. Schwartz LH,
    5. Sargent D,
    6. Ford R,
    7. Dancey J,
    8. Arbuck S,
    9. Gwyther S,
    10. Mooney M,
    11. Rubinstein L,
    12. Shankar L,
    13. Dodd L,
    14. Kaplan R,
    15. Lacombe D,
    16. Verweij J
    : New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised recist guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2): 228-247, 2009. PMID: 19097774. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Williams HL,
    2. Walsh K,
    3. Diamond A,
    4. Oniscu A,
    5. Deans ZC
    : Validation of the oncomine™ focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples. Virchows Arch 473(4): 489-503, 2018. PMID: 30105577. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2411-4
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Shin HT,
    2. Choi YL,
    3. Yun JW,
    4. Kim NKD,
    5. Kim SY,
    6. Jeon HJ,
    7. Nam JY,
    8. Lee C,
    9. Ryu D,
    10. Kim SC,
    11. Park K,
    12. Lee E,
    13. Bae JS,
    14. Son DS,
    15. Joung JG,
    16. Lee J,
    17. Kim ST,
    18. Ahn MJ,
    19. Lee SH,
    20. Ahn JS,
    21. Lee WY,
    22. Oh BY,
    23. Park YH,
    24. Lee JE,
    25. Lee KH,
    26. Kim HC,
    27. Kim KM,
    28. Im YH,
    29. Park K,
    30. Park PJ,
    31. Park WY
    : Prevalence and detection of low-allele-fraction variants in clinical cancer samples. Nat Commun 8(1): 1377, 2017. PMID: 29123093. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01470-y
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Lee GD,
    2. Lee SE,
    3. Oh DY,
    4. Yu Db,
    5. Jeong HM,
    6. Kim J,
    7. Hong S,
    8. Jung HS,
    9. Oh E,
    10. Song JY,
    11. Lee MS,
    12. Kim M,
    13. Jung K,
    14. Kim J,
    15. Shin YK,
    16. Choi YL,
    17. Kim HR
    : Met exon 14 skipping mutations in lung adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathologic implications and prognostic values. J Thorac Oncol 12(8): 1233-1246, 2017. PMID: 28502721. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.031
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Reungwetwattana T,
    2. Liang Y,
    3. Zhu V,
    4. Ou SI
    : The race to target met exon 14 skipping alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: The why, the how, the who, the unknown, and the inevitable. Lung Cancer 103: 27-37, 2017. PMID: 28024693. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.11.011
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Paik PK,
    2. Drilon A,
    3. Fan PD,
    4. Yu H,
    5. Rekhtman N,
    6. Ginsberg MS,
    7. Borsu L,
    8. Schultz N,
    9. Berger MF,
    10. Rudin CM,
    11. Ladanyi M
    : Response to met inhibitors in patients with stage iv lung adenocarcinomas harboring met mutations causing exon 14 skipping. Cancer Discov 5(8): 842-849, 2015. PMID: 25971939. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-1467
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Lee C,
    2. Usenko D,
    3. Frampton GM,
    4. McMahon C,
    5. Ali SM,
    6. Weiss J
    : Met 14 deletion in sarcomatoid non-small-cell lung cancer detected by next-generation sequencing and successfully treated with a met inhibitor. J Thorac Oncol 10(12): e113-114, 2015. PMID: 26709483. DOI: 10.1097/jto.0000000000000645
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Awad MM,
    2. Oxnard GR,
    3. Jackman DM,
    4. Savukoski DO,
    5. Hall D,
    6. Shivdasani P,
    7. Heng JC,
    8. Dahlberg SE,
    9. Janne PA,
    10. Verma S,
    11. Christensen J,
    12. Hammerman PS,
    13. Sholl LM
    : Met exon 14 mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer are associated with advanced age and stage-dependent met genomic amplification and c-met overexpression. J Clin Oncol 34(7): 721-730, 2016. PMID: 26729443. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.63.4600
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kim EK,
    2. Kim KA,
    3. Lee CY,
    4. Kim S,
    5. Chang S,
    6. Cho BC,
    7. Shim HS
    : Molecular diagnostic assays and clinicopathologic implications of met exon 14 skipping mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 20(1): e123-e132, 2019. PMID: 30391211. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.10.004
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Jia Y,
    3. Stoopler MB,
    4. Shen Y,
    5. Cheng H,
    6. Chen J,
    7. Mansukhani M,
    8. Koul S,
    9. Halmos B,
    10. Borczuk AC
    : Next-generation sequencing of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma reveals high frequency of actionable met gene mutations. J Clin Oncol 34(8): 794-802, 2016. PMID: 26215952. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.0674
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Katakura S,
    2. Kobayashi N,
    3. Somekawa K,
    4. Masumoto N,
    5. Kudo M,
    6. Kaneko T
    : Non-small cell lung cancer with mesenchymal-epithelial transition gene exon 14 skipping mutation treated with crizotinib. Respirol Case Rep 7(7): e00453, 2019. PMID: 31312453. DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.453
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Drilon A,
    2. Clark J,
    3. Weiss J,
    4. Ou S,
    5. Camidge DR,
    6. Solomon B,
    7. Otterson G,
    8. Villaruz L,
    9. Riely G,
    10. Heist R,
    11. Shapiro G,
    12. Murphy D,
    13. Wang S,
    14. Usari T,
    15. Li S,
    16. Wilner K,
    17. Paik P
    : Updated antitumor activity of crizotinib in patients with met exon 14-altered advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 13 (Suppl_10): S348, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.300
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Wolf J,
    2. Seto T,
    3. Han JY,
    4. Reguart N,
    5. Garon EB,
    6. Groen HJM,
    7. Tan DS,
    8. Hida T,
    9. de Jonge MJA,
    10. Orlov SV,
    11. Smit EF,
    12. Souquet PJ,
    13. Vansteenkiste JF,
    14. Giovannini M,
    15. Le Mouhaer S,
    16. Robeva A,
    17. Waldron-Lynch M,
    18. Heist RS
    : Results of the geometry mono-1 phase II study for evaluation of the met inhibitor capmatinib (inc280) in patients (pts) with met delta ex14 mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol 29(suppl_8), 2018. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy424.090
  26. ↵
    1. Felip E,
    2. Sakai H,
    3. Patel J,
    4. Horn L,
    5. Veillon R,
    6. Griesinger F,
    7. Bruns R,
    8. Scheele J,
    9. Paik P
    : Phase ii data for the met inhibitor tepotinib in patients with advanced nsclc and met exon 14-skipping mutations. J Thorac Oncol 13 (Suppl_10): S347, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.299
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Heist RS,
    2. Sequist LV,
    3. Borger D,
    4. Gainor JF,
    5. Arellano RS,
    6. Le LP,
    7. Dias-Santagata D,
    8. Clark JW,
    9. Engelman JA,
    10. Shaw AT,
    11. Iafrate AJ
    : Acquired resistance to crizotinib in nsclc with met exon 14 skipping. J Thorac Oncol 11(8): 1242-1245, 2016. PMID: 27343442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.06.013
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Awad MM,
    2. Leonardi GC,
    3. Kravets S,
    4. Dahlberg SE,
    5. Drilon AE,
    6. Noonan S,
    7. Camidge DR,
    8. Ou S-HI,
    9. Costa DB,
    10. Gadgeel SM,
    11. Steuer CE,
    12. Forde PM,
    13. Zhu VW,
    14. Fukuda YK,
    15. Clark JW,
    16. Janne PA,
    17. Mok T,
    18. Sholl LM,
    19. Heist RS
    : Impact of met inhibitors on survival among patients (pts) with met exon 14 mutant (metdel14) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 35: 8511-8511, 2017. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.8511
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Bahcall M,
    2. Awad MM,
    3. Sholl LM,
    4. Wilson FH,
    5. Xu M,
    6. Wang S,
    7. Palakurthi S,
    8. Choi J,
    9. Ivanova EV,
    10. Leonardi GC,
    11. Ulrich BC,
    12. Paweletz CP,
    13. Kirschmeier PT,
    14. Watanabe M,
    15. Baba H,
    16. Nishino M,
    17. Nagy RJ,
    18. Lanman RB,
    19. Capelletti M,
    20. Chambers ES,
    21. Redig AJ,
    22. VanderLaan PA,
    23. Costa DB,
    24. Imamura Y,
    25. Janne PA
    : Amplification of wild-type kras imparts resistance to crizotinib in met exon 14 mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 24(23): 5963-5976, 2018. PMID: 30072474. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-18-0876
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Qi J,
    2. McTigue MA,
    3. Rogers A,
    4. Lifshits E,
    5. Christensen JG,
    6. Janne PA,
    7. Engelman JA
    : Multiple mutations and bypass mechanisms can contribute to development of acquired resistance to met inhibitors. Cancer Res 71(3): 1081-1091, 2011. PMID: 21266357. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-10-1623
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 34 (3)
In Vivo
Vol. 34, Issue 3
May-June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Korea With MET Exon 14 Skipping
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Korea With MET Exon 14 Skipping
JOON YOUNG HUR, BO MI KU, JOON HO SHIM, HYUN AE JUNG, JONG-MU SUN, SE-HOON LEE, JIN SEOK AHN, KEUNCHIL PARK, MYUNG-JU AHN
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 1399-1406; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11920

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Korea With MET Exon 14 Skipping
JOON YOUNG HUR, BO MI KU, JOON HO SHIM, HYUN AE JUNG, JONG-MU SUN, SE-HOON LEE, JIN SEOK AHN, KEUNCHIL PARK, MYUNG-JU AHN
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 1399-1406; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11920
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Surgical Techniques of Y-Sleeve Lobectomy in Patients With Primary Lung Cancer
  • Vesico-uterine Fistula Following C-section – A Case Report and Literature Review
  • VsN, a Reliability-index of Shear-wave Measurement in Sonoelastography, Is Useful for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Tumor Malignancy
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • MET Exon 14 Skipping
  • NSCLC
  • crizotinib
In Vivo

© 2022 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire