Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Case ReportClinical Studies

Salvage Re-irradiation Options in Adult Medulloblastoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

FRANCESCO CUCCIA, GIANLUCA MORTELLARO, LUCIA OGNIBENE, GIUSEPPE CRAPARO, ANTONIO LO CASTO and GIUSEPPE FERRERA
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 1283-1288; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11903
FRANCESCO CUCCIA
1Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
2Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: f.cuccia1{at}virgilio.it
GIANLUCA MORTELLARO
3Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUCIA OGNIBENE
4Radiotherapy Unit, San Gaetano Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Center, Palermo, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIUSEPPE CRAPARO
5Neuroradiology Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIO LO CASTO
6Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo - Section of Radiology - Di.Bi.Med., Palermo, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIUSEPPE FERRERA
3Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Medulloblastoma is a rare tumor of adult age, while it occurs more frequently in children. Given the rarity, there is a lack of evidence for the treatment of recurrent disease. Few data are available about salvage re-irradiation collecting very heterogeneous series. Case Report: A 51-year-old male presented with headache, nausea, double vision, and gait disorders. A contrast-enhanced brain-MRI showed the presence of multifocal medulloblastoma. After surgery, adjuvant craniospinal radiotherapy was performed, chemotherapy was stopped due to toxicity. After 27 months, a new MRI and a Methionine-PET revealed a late pontocerebellar relapse; multidisciplinary board decided for a SBRT treatment. The second course of RT was well tolerated and 14 months later, the patient is alive in good general conditions, with no evidence of disease. Conclusion: Our experience supports the use of salvage stereotactic radiotherapy as a safe and effective treatment option.

  • Medulloblastoma
  • re-irradiation
  • adult patients

Medulloblastoma is one of the most common central nervous system tumors of childhood (1), while it has an extremely lower incidence in the adult age, particularly in >40 years patients (2). Furthermore, in older patients it may occur with unusual presentations, like multifocal disease, of which only six cases are described in the literature (3-8). Due to its rarity in the older population, pre-operative diagnosis may be challenging since radiological features may differ from pediatric cases, for example in terms of lower contrast enhancement (9). Standard treatments for children are usually based on the multimodal combination of surgery plus adjuvant craniospinal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (10, 11).

The extremely rare incidence of medulloblastoma in adult patients renders the therapeutic management of this subset of individuals difficult, with most evidence coming from the adoption of pediatric guidelines that support the role of post-operative chemo-radiation to improve overall survival (12). Actually, for adult patients, the upfront use of chemotherapy is controversial, with many reports suggesting a higher incidence of toxicity in older subjects compared to children (13). Recent molecular analyses provided new data to stratify all medulloblastoma patients in four different subgroups (WNT, SH, group 3 and 4) with different prognosis, although the impact on therapeutic strategy is still limited (14). Moreover, unlike younger patients, adult medulloblastomas have a higher incidence of late relapses, that are usually associated with a poorer prognosis, since there are not enough evidence to recommend a standardized therapeutic approach, that currently may include as alternatives re-resection or re-irradiation or high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation (15, 16).

Case Report

In 2016, a 51-year-old male presented at our Center after the recent onset of headache, nausea, double vision, slurred speech, and gait disorders. A contrast-enhanced brain-MRI showed the presence of two cerebellar lesions close to the cerebellar tonsils and vermis (Figure 1).

Subsequently, a right tonsillectomy with a sub-occipital median approach in neuronavigation was performed. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology examination was negative, and a spine-MRI with contrast reported several hyperintense areas in the T2-weighted sequence with radiological features suspected for multifocal neoplastic disease. Histology examination was positive for classic-type medulloblastoma MIB1=20%. No molecular profiling was performed. A multidisciplinary board decided for adjuvant chemo-radiation and the patient underwent craniospinal RT for a total dose of 36 Gy in conventional fractionation plus a sequential boost to posterior fossa for a total dose of 54 Gy. Radiotherapy treatment was performed using Helical Tomotherapy using a thermoplastic mask for immobilization and daily megavoltage CT scan imaging before each fraction. Then, the patient interrupted the planned chemotherapy regimen (CDDP+CCNU+vincristine) after one cycle due to renal toxicity. Follow-up was negative until November 2018, when a brain-MRI reported the presence of a contrast enhanced area in the left cerebello-pontine angle suspected for relapsed disease (Figure 2). This finding was also reported by a Methionine-PET scan that confirmed the presence of an area of pathological uptake. Subsequently, after 27 months from the first treatment, the patient underwent stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy to the site of relapse for a total dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions by means of Helical Tomotherapy. Target volume delineation was performed through MRI-Methionine PET-image fusion, applying to the gross tumor volume (GTV) a 3-mm margin overlapping the brainstem, which was given a higher priority during the planning phase. Treatment was well tolerated, with no observed acute or late toxicity. No other therapies were administered. After 14 months a contrast-enhanced brain-MRI reported no evidence of disease, the patient is alive and in good general conditions. Informed consent was obtained before the start of all the treatment.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Preoperative brain MRI in T1-weighted contrast enhanced (right) and T2-weighted (left) sequence.

Discussion

Currently, a standard treatment strategy for recurrent medulloblastoma is not yet defined and different options may be considered: maximal safe resection where suitable, or radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, or high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation.

External-beam radiotherapy can be offered either in a definitive setting or after maximal safe resection, despite most of the literature reports data concerning exclusive intent. To date, almost 300 cases of re-irradiation after craniospinal radiotherapy are reported in the literature (Table I), but it is hard to compare these data due to the heterogeneity of the cohorts; furthermore, different RT schedules are used with or without chemotherapy, and only a few reports are available on the use of stereotactic radiotherapy (17-32).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Brain MRI in T1-weighted contrast enhanced before stereotactic radiotherapy (left) and after 14 months (right).

The main concern of re-treatment is the higher risk of toxicity, in particular for brain radionecrosis (33, 34). Radiobiological studies have described a reduced risk of normal brain radionecrosis when the normalized total dose is lower than 100 Gy, suggesting that tumor diameter, performance status, concurrent chemotherapy and time between the two courses of radiotherapy may be associated to an increased risk of neurotoxicity (35).

Similarly to the spinal cord, animal model studies revealed that the normal brain may recover up to 50% within the first 2 years from initial treatment if doses below tolerance have been delivered (36). In this scenario, when proposing a re-irradiation, the choice of the fractionation regimen is often driven by the presentation of the recurrent disease: while local small relapses may benefit from a focal treatment, like stereotactic radiotherapy, that combines higher therapeutic doses with a lower normal brain exposure, a recurrent larger or disseminated tumor may benefit from less aggressive RT schedules, like conventional or hyperfractionated regimens, that still allow safe delivery of a tumoricidal dose with an acceptable risk of late neurotoxicity.

The evaluation of all these factors focus the need for a careful patient selection process; this is also confirmed by a recent series published by Gupta et al. concerning 28 patients with relapsed medulloblastoma who underwent salvage re-irradiation, performed either with re-craniospinal RT or with focal treatments both in conventional or hyperfractionated regimens (32). The authors reported an acceptable profile of toxicity, describing only one case of symptomatic late radionecrosis after re-craniospinal irradiation.

Bakst et al. also adopted conventional schedules for the re-treatment of 13 patients with relapsed medulloblastoma, collecting 5-years progression-free survival and overall survival of 48% and 65%, respectively, with only one case of radiological in-field brain radionecrosis. The authors also observed better outcomes in patients with no evidence of disease after re-surgical excision, compared to non-surgical cases (29).

The potential advantage of hypofractionation or radiosurgery lies in the possibility to improve local control rates in patients with macroscopic disease, providing more precise irradiation of a small area, with steep dose gradients that may lead to a lower exposure of nearby healthy structures. The use of stereotactic radiosurgery is favorably reported by Napieralska et al. in a series of 14 patients treated with a median dose of 15 Gy in single or in three fractions, with no evidence of brain necrosis and promising results in terms of clinical outcomes (31).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Literature studies of salvage RT after craniospinal irradiation.

Similar data are reported by Abe et al., in a series of 12 adult and pediatric patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. The authors observed one case of brainstem edema and the patient died after 14 months for tumor dissemination; moreover, two patients developed respectively multiple organ failure and bulbar palsy due to chemotherapy (26). Despite the potential higher risk of metastatic spread, the combination of radio- and chemotherapy must be carefully evaluated in the recurrent setting, especially for adult patients who are more likely to have relevant toxicity given by systemic treatment (13).

Given the excellent performance status of our patient and the long interval of 27 months from the previous craniospinal RT, in our experience we decided to propose stereotactic radiotherapy to the cerebello-pontine angle relapse with the aim to provide a radical treatment to a smaller volume, in order to minimize the risk of toxicity, as also reported by other authors (37).

Concerning chemotherapy, the multidisciplinary board decided not to perform a systemic therapy, due to the high toxicity experienced during the first cycle and the patient was managed solely with stereotactic radiotherapy. The second course of RT was well tolerated, with no relevant side-effects, and after 14 months he is alive and in good general conditions, with no evidence of disease.

Re-irradiation of central nervous system tumors has become of increasing interest since the constant progress of both imaging and radiation technology is leading to a highly accurate targeting of tumor volumes, improving the possibility of a better organ-at-risk sparing. Given the rarity of the disease, especially in adult patients, when proposing re-irradiation, the concern for brain toxicity must be carefully assessed to provide a maximum tailored approach.

To date, literature evidence concerning salvage radiotherapy for relapsed medulloblastoma is scarce and based on heterogeneous series that include both pediatric and adult patients, applying wide different treatment regimens. Our experience reports an unusual presentation of adult medulloblastoma and supports the use of salvage stereotactic radiotherapy for a locally relapsed disease showing excellent results both in terms of safety and clinical outcomes, despite a longer follow up is needed.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Manuscript drafting: Francesco Cuccia, Gianluca Mortellaro, Giuseppe Craparo; Literature research: Francesco Cuccia, Lucia Ognibene; Conception and final revision: Giuseppe Ferrera, Antonio Lo Casto.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Received January 2, 2020.
  • Revision received January 25, 2020.
  • Accepted January 29, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Farwell JR,
    2. Dohrmann GJ,
    3. Flannery JT
    : Medulloblastoma in childhood: an epidemiological study. J Neurosurg 61(4): 657-664, 1984. PMID: 6470775. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Balducci M,
    2. Chiesa S,
    3. Chieffo D,
    4. Manfrida S,
    5. Dinapoli N,
    6. Fiorentino A,
    7. Miccichè F,
    8. Frascino V,
    9. Anile C,
    10. Valentini V,
    11. De Bari B
    : The role of radiotherapy in adult medulloblastoma: long-term single-institution experience and a review of the literature. J Neurooncol 106(2): 315-323, 2012. PMID: 21805324. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0665-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Gliemroth J,
    2. Kehler U,
    3. Knopp U,
    4. Reusche E,
    5. Nowak G
    : A multifocal cerebellar and supratentorial medulloblastoma in an adult. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140(7): 723-724, 1998. PMID: 9781288. DOI: 10.1007/s007010050169
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Spagnoli D,
    2. Tomei G,
    3. Masini B,
    4. De Santis A,
    5. Grimoldi N,
    6. Lucarini C,
    7. Gaini SM
    : A case of multifocal cerebellar medulloblastoma in an adult patient. J Neurosurg Sci 34(3-4): 323-325, 1990. PMID: 2098514.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Shen WC,
    2. Yang CF
    : Multifocal cerebellar medulloblastoma: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12(5): 894, 1988. PMID: 3170856. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198809010-00037
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Balik V,
    2. Trojanec R,
    3. Holzerova M,
    4. Tuckova L,
    5. Sulla I,
    6. Megova M,
    7. Vaverka M,
    8. Hrabalek L,
    9. Ehrmann J
    : An adult multifocal medulloblastoma with diffuse acute postoperative cerebellar swelling: immunohistochemical and molecular genetics analysis. Neurosurg Rev 38(1): 1-10; discussion 10, 2015. PMID: 24913771. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-014-0556-4
    OpenUrl
    1. Saad AG,
    2. Balik V,
    3. Parvez A,
    4. El Jamal SM
    : Multifocal supra and infratentorial medulloblastoma in an adult: Histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular evaluation of a rare case and review of the literature. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 25(10): e89-e94, 2017. PMID: 27801730. DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000447
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Hernández Cancela RM,
    2. Pombo Otero J,
    3. Concha-Lopez A
    : A case of multifocal medulloblastoma in an adult patient. Rev Esp Patol 50(1): 45-48, 2017. PMID: 29179964. DOI: 10.1016/j.patol.2015.12.005
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Ciccarino P,
    2. Rotilio A,
    3. Rossetto M,
    4. Manara R,
    5. Orvieto E,
    6. Berti F,
    7. Lombardi G,
    8. d'Avella D,
    9. Scienza R,
    10. Della Puppa A
    : Multifocal presentation of medulloblastoma in adulthood. J Neurooncol 107(2): 233-237, 2012. PMID: 22071791. DOI:10.1007/s11060-011-0746-7
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Anagnostopoulos AK,
    2. Papathanassiou C,
    3. Karamolegou K,
    4. Anastasiadou E,
    5. Dimas KS,
    6. Kontos H,
    7. Koutsopoulos A,
    8. Prodromou N,
    9. Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou F,
    10. Tsangaris GT
    : Proteomic studies of pediatric medulloblastoma tumors with 17p deletion. J Proteome Res 14(2): 1076-1088, 2015. PMID: 25543836. DOI: 10.1021/pr501219f
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Tsangaris GT,
    2. Dimas K,
    3. Malamou A,
    4. Katsafadou A,
    5. Papathanasiou C,
    6. Stravopodis DJ,
    7. Vorgias CE,
    8. Gazouli M,
    9. Anagnostopoulos AK
    : Molecular proteomic characterization of a pediatric medulloblastoma xenograft. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 14(4): 267-275, 2017. PMID: 28647700. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20037
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Majd N,
    2. Penas-Prado M
    : Updates on management of adult medulloblastoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 20(8): 64, 2019. PMID: 31236711. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0663-0
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Beier D,
    2. Proescholdt M,
    3. Reinert C,
    4. Pietsch T,
    5. Jones DTW,
    6. Pfister SM,
    7. Hattingen E,
    8. Seidel C,
    9. Dirven L,
    10. Luerding R,
    11. Reijneveld J,
    12. Warmuth-Metz M,
    13. Bonsanto M,
    14. Bremer M,
    15. Combs SE,
    16. Rieken S,
    17. Herrlinger U,
    18. Kuntze H,
    19. Mayer-Steinacker R,
    20. Moskopp D,
    21. Schneider T,
    22. Beringer A,
    23. Schlegel U,
    24. Stummer W,
    25. Welker H,
    26. Weyerbrock A,
    27. Paulsen F,
    28. Rutkowski S,
    29. Weller M,
    30. Wick W,
    31. Kortmann RD,
    32. Bogdahn U,
    33. Hau P
    : Multicenter pilot study of radiochemotherapy as first-line treatment for adults with medulloblastoma (NOA-07). Neuro Oncol 20(3): 400-410, 2018. PMID: 29016837. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox155
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Buglione M,
    2. Ghirardelli P,
    3. Triggiani L,
    4. Pedretti S,
    5. Pasinetti N,
    6. De Bari B,
    7. Tonoli S,
    8. Borghetti P,
    9. Spiazzi L,
    10. Magrini SM
    : Radiotherapy for adult medulloblastoma: Long term result from a single institution. A review of prognostic factors and why we do need a multi-institutional cooperative program. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 20(4): 284-291, 2015. PMID: 26109916. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Brandes AA,
    2. Franceschi E,
    3. Tosoni A,
    4. Blatt V,
    5. Ermani M
    : Long-term results of a prospective study on the treatment of medulloblastoma in adults. Cancer 110(9): 2035-2041, 2007. PMID: 17823910. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Herrlinger U,
    2. Steinbrecher A,
    3. Rieger J,
    4. Hau P,
    5. Kortmann RD,
    6. Meyermann R,
    7. Schabet M,
    8. Bamberg M,
    9. Dichgans J,
    10. Bogdahn U,
    11. Weller M
    : Adult medulloblastoma: prognostic factors and response to therapy at diagnosis and at relapse. J Neurol 252(3): 291-299, 2005. PMID: 16189725. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-005-0560-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Privitera G,
    2. Acquaviva G,
    3. Ettorre GC,
    4. Spatola C
    : Antiangiogenic therapy in the treatment of recurrent medulloblastoma in the adult: case report and review of the literature. J Oncol 2009: 247873, 2009. PMID: 20111585. DOI: 10.1155/2009/247873
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rao AD,
    2. Rashid AS,
    3. Chen Q,
    4. Villar RC,
    5. Kobyzeva D,
    6. Nilsson K,
    7. Dieckmann K,
    8. Nechesnyuk A,
    9. Ermoian R,
    10. Alcorn S,
    11. MacDonald SM,
    12. Ladra MM,
    13. Ford EC,
    14. Winey BA,
    15. Figueiredo MLS,
    16. Chen MJ,
    17. Terezakis SA
    : Reirradiation for recurrent pediatric central nervous system malignancies: A multi-institutional review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99(3): 634-641, 2017. PMID: 29280457. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.026
    OpenUrl
    1. Wetmore C,
    2. Herington D,
    3. Lin T,
    4. Onar-Thomas A,
    5. Gajjar A,
    6. Merchant TE
    : Reirradiation of recurrent medulloblastoma: does clinical benefit outweigh risk for toxicity? Cancer 120(23): 3731-3737, 2014. PMID: 25080363. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28907
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Buglione M,
    2. Triggiani L,
    3. Grisanti S,
    4. Liserre R,
    5. Buttolo L,
    6. Gipponi S,
    7. Bonetti F,
    8. Todeschini A,
    9. Spiazzi L,
    10. Magrini SM
    : Retreatment of recurrent adult medulloblastoma with radiotherapy: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 7: 64, 2013. PMID: 23497715. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-64
    OpenUrl
    1. Keshavarzi S,
    2. Meltzer H,
    3. Ben-Haim S,
    4. Newman CB,
    5. Lawson JD,
    6. Levy ML,
    7. Murphy K
    : Initial clinical experience with frameless optically guided stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy in pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst 25(7): 837-844, 2009. PMID: 19326128. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-009-0840-8
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Cieślak E,
    2. Kepka L,
    3. Fijuth J,
    4. Marchel A,
    5. Kroh H
    : Very late relapse of medulloblastoma. Folia Neuropathol 42(1): 49-53, 2004. PMID: 15119746.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Padovani L,
    2. Andre N,
    3. Gentet JC,
    4. Figarella Branger D,
    5. Scavarda D,
    6. Verschuur A,
    7. Chinot O,
    8. Cowen D,
    9. Muracciole X
    : Reirradiation and concomitant metronomic temozolomide: an efficient combination for local control in medulloblastoma disease? J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 33(8): 600-604, 2011. PMID: 22042276. DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182331eaf
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Saran F,
    2. Baumert BG,
    3. Creak AL,
    4. Warrington AP,
    5. Ashley S,
    6. Traish D,
    7. Brada M
    : Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of recurrent or residual medulloblastoma/PNET. Pediatr Blood Cancer 50(3): 554-560, 2008. PMID: 17941071. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21382
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Patrice SJ,
    2. Tarbell NJ,
    3. Goumnerova LC,
    4. Shrieve DC,
    5. Black PM,
    6. Loeffler JS
    : Results of radiosurgery in the management of recurrent and residual medulloblastoma. Pediatr Neurosurg 22(4): 197-203, 1995. PMID: 7619720. DOI: 10.1159/000120901
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Abe M,
    2. Tokumaru S,
    3. Tabuchi K,
    4. Kida Y,
    5. Takagi M,
    6. Imamura J
    : Stereotactic radiation therapy with chemotherapy in the management of recurrent medulloblastomas. Pediatr Neurosurg 42(2): 81-88, 2006. PMID: 16465076. DOI: 10.1159/000090460
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Milker-Zabel S,
    2. Zabel A,
    3. Thilmann C,
    4. Zuna I,
    5. Hoess A,
    6. Wannenmacher M,
    7. Debus J
    : Results of three-dimensional stereotactically-guided radiotherapy in recurrent medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol 60(3): 227-233, 2002. PMID: 12510774. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021184400053
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chojnacka M,
    2. Skowrońska-Gardas A,
    3. Pędziwiatr K,
    4. Morawska-Kaczyńska M,
    5. Perek M,
    6. Perek D
    : Reirradiation of relapsed brain tumors in children. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 17(1): 32-37, 2011. PMID: 24376994. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2011.10.004
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bakst RL,
    2. Dunkel IJ,
    3. Gilheeney S,
    4. Khakoo Y,
    5. Becher O,
    6. Souweidane MM,
    7. Wolden SL
    : Reirradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma. Cancer 117(21): 4977-4982, 2011. PMID: 21495027. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Massimino M,
    2. Gandola L,
    3. Spreafico F,
    4. Biassoni V,
    5. Luksch R,
    6. Collini P,
    7. Solero CN,
    8. Simonetti F,
    9. Pignoli E,
    10. Cefalo G,
    11. Poggi G,
    12. Modena P,
    13. Mariani L,
    14. Potepan P,
    15. Podda M,
    16. Casanova M,
    17. Pecori E,
    18. Acerno S,
    19. Ferrari A,
    20. Terenziani M,
    21. Meazza C,
    22. Polastri D,
    23. Ravagnani F,
    24. Fossati-Bellani F
    : No salvage using high-dose chemotherapy plus/minus reirradiation for relapsing previously irradiated medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(5): 1358-1363, 2009. PMID: 19019566. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp. 2008.06.1930
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Napieralska A,
    2. Brąclik I,
    3. Radwan M,
    4. Mandera M,
    5. Blamek S
    : Radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after craniospinal irradiation in children and adults with medulloblastoma and ependymoma. Childs Nerv Syst 35(2): 267-275, 2019. PMID: 30515559. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-4010-8
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Gupta T,
    2. Maitre M,
    3. Sastri GJ,
    4. Krishnatry R,
    5. Shirsat N,
    6. Epari S,
    7. Sahay A,
    8. Chinnaswamy G,
    9. Patil V,
    10. Shetty P,
    11. Moiyadi A
    : Outcomes of salvage re-irradiation in recurrent medulloblastoma correlate with age at initial diagnosis, primary risk-stratification, and molecular subgrouping. J Neurooncol 144(2): 283-291, 2019. PMID: 31236820. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03225-9
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Bauman GS,
    2. Sneed PK,
    3. Wara WM,
    4. Stalpers LJ,
    5. Chang SM,
    6. McDermott MW,
    7. Gutin PH,
    8. Larson DA
    : Reirradiation of primary CNS tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36(2): 433-441, 1996. PMID: 8892469. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00315-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Marks JE,
    2. Baglan RJ,
    3. Prassad SC,
    4. Blank WF
    : Cerebral radionecrosis: incidence and risk in relation to dose, time, fractionation and volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 7(2): 243-252, 1981. PMID: 6260715. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(81) 90443-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Mayer R,
    2. Sminia P
    : Reirradiation tolerance of the human brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(5): 1350-1360, 2008. PMID: 18037587. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Withers HR
    : Biologic basis for altered fractionation schemes. Cancer 55(9 Suppl): 2086-2095, 1985. PMID: 3919923. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850501)55:9+<2086::aid-cncr2820551409>3.0.co;2-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Nieder C,
    2. Andratschke NH,
    3. Grosu AL
    : Re-irradiation for recurrent primary brain tumors. Anticancer Res 36(10): 4985-4995, 2016. PMID: 27798857. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11067
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 34, Issue 3
May-June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Salvage Re-irradiation Options in Adult Medulloblastoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Salvage Re-irradiation Options in Adult Medulloblastoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
FRANCESCO CUCCIA, GIANLUCA MORTELLARO, LUCIA OGNIBENE, GIUSEPPE CRAPARO, ANTONIO LO CASTO, GIUSEPPE FERRERA
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 1283-1288; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11903

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Salvage Re-irradiation Options in Adult Medulloblastoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
FRANCESCO CUCCIA, GIANLUCA MORTELLARO, LUCIA OGNIBENE, GIUSEPPE CRAPARO, ANTONIO LO CASTO, GIUSEPPE FERRERA
In Vivo May 2020, 34 (3) 1283-1288; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11903
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
  • Expression Patterns of T-cell immunoreceptor With Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study
  • Older Age and Outcomes of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Medulloblastoma
  • re-irradiation
  • adult patients
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire