Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Clinical Implication of Pre-operative C-reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Factor of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-institutional Retrospective Study

MASAAKI MURAKAWA, NAOTO YAMAMOTO, YUTO KAMIOKA, MARIKO KAMIYA, SATOSHI KOBAYASHI, MAKOTO UENO, MANABU MORIMOTO, YOSUKE ATSUMI, TORU AOYAMA, HIROSHI TAMAGAWA, NORIO YUKAWA, YASUSHI RINO, MUNETAKA MASUDA and SOICHIRO MORINAGA
In Vivo January 2020, 34 (1) 347-353; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11780
MASAAKI MURAKAWA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.murakawa{at}kcch.jp
NAOTO YAMAMOTO
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUTO KAMIOKA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIKO KAMIYA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SATOSHI KOBAYASHI
2Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAKOTO UENO
2Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MANABU MORIMOTO
2Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSUKE ATSUMI
3Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORU AOYAMA
3Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI TAMAGAWA
3Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NORIO YUKAWA
3Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUSHI RINO
3Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MUNETAKA MASUDA
3Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SOICHIRO MORINAGA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-serum albumin ratio is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with several cancers. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and overall survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in patients who received radical surgery and S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: We included 117 patients who underwent radical surgery with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. We constructed receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) of the CRP/Alb ratio to determine the cut-off value. We analyzed the relationship among the CRP/Alb ratio, clinicopathological status, and survival. Results: The optimal cut-off value of the CRP/Alb ratio was 0.036. All patients were divided into a high-ratio group (CRP/Alb ratio ≥0.036) and low-ratio group (CRP/Alb ratio <0.036). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the high- and low-ratio groups were 22.5% and 36.4%, respectively (p=0.0089). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates in the high- and low-ratio groups were 12.5% and 22.1%, respectively (p=0.0097). The univariate and multivariate analyses of the OS showed that the pathological N factor and CRP/Alb ratio were independent factors of the survival. The univariate and multivariate analyses of the RFS showed that the pathological N factor, resection margin, and CRP/Alb ratio were independent factors of the survival. Conclusion: The preoperative CRP/Alb ratio is a strong prognostic factor for PDAC patients with undergo curative resection with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

  • Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • CRP/Alb ratio
  • prognostic factor

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death with a 5-year relative survival of 8% (1, 2). It has been estimated that pancreatic cancer will become the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States by 2030 (3). Complete surgical resection and perioperative adjuvant treatment is the only chance for a cure. In Japan, the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer (JASPAC) showed that S-1 (oral fluorouracil) adjuvant chemotherapy improved the overall survival (OS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) for completely resected pancreatic cancer patients with a 5-year OS and 3-year DFS of 44.1% and 22.6%, respectively (4).

The relationship between systemic inflammation and tumor progression has been reported in several investigations, with the involvement of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) suggested (5-7). Recently, the CRP/Alb ratio has been associated with poor outcomes in patients in renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and systemic inflammation diseases (8-11). The C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-serum albumin ratio was first developed as a predictive system of critically ill patients (12). However, there are few reports that have investigated the prognostic and predictive value of the CRP/Alb ratio in PDAC patients preoperatively.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and the survival of PDAC patients who received radical surgery and S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

Patients. The consecutive 201 patients who received pancreatic surgery at Kanagawa Cancer Center from 2007 to 2016 were enrolled retrospectively. All patients were pathologically confirmed as PDAC and staged according to the UICC TNM 7th edition. The patients underwent macroscopically curative resection with pathological R0 or R1 resection. The patients who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible for this study. The patients who have pathologically proven of distant metastases, such as metastasis to para-aortic lymph nodes, and who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy or received adjuvant chemotherapy with other regimens were excluded from this study.

Surgical treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy. All surgeries were performed in accordance to standardized procedures that have been described (13). After surgery, all patients received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant treatment was started within 10 weeks after curative surgery and continued for 24 weeks. The patients received 80 mg/m2/day of S-1 for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest. If the adverse events appeared according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), the daily dose was reduced. Adjuvant chemotherapy was withdrawn when patients showed adverse events even after dose modification and recognized the recurrence by imaging.

Clinicopathological data. The following clinicopathological data were collected and evaluated in this study: gender, age, preoperative CA 19-9 value, complication after surgery, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, pathological stage according to TNM classification, residual tumor, and serum CRP and albumin levels. Blood samples were evaluated within 14 days before surgery and the start day of the adjuvant chemotherapy. The grade of postoperative complications was defined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification that occurred within 30 days after surgery (14).

Follow-up. All patients were followed-up at outpatient for five years after received surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients are regularly checked the serum CEA and CA19-9 levels with blood samples and radiological examination by computed tomography every three months until five years after surgery.

Evaluations and statistical analyses. We constructed receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) to determine the appropriate cut-off value of the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio. Comparisons between the high CRP/Alb ratio and the low CRP/Alb ratio groups were compared with using χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. The OS was defined as the period from surgery until death or the date of final observation. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create the OS curves and compared using the log-rank test. The univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Cox's proportional hazards model. The two-sided p-values of <0.05 were defined as statistically significant. All of the statistical analyses were calculated using EZR (15). This study was approved by the IRB Committee of the Kanagawa Cancer Center.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

A comparison of the patient background characteristics between the high-CRP/Alb ratio group and the low-CRP/Alb ratio group.

Results

Patients. A total of 306 patients underwent surgical resection between 2007 and 2016, and 117 patients were eligible for this study. The median age was 70 years (range=44-84 years). Sixty-three patients were males, and 54 were females. Seventy-eight patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 30 distal pancreatectomy, and 9 total pancreatectomy. All patients received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, with 62 completing the planned therapy. Patients with obstructive jaundice and acute cholangitis were already being treated by endoscopic or percutaneous drainage. There were no patients who underwent pancreatic surgery with cholangitis.

Determination of the cut-off value of the CRP/Alb ratio. We collected data on the preoperative values (within 14 days before surgery) of CRP (mg/dl) and Alb (g/dl) by sampling the peripheral blood. We constructed a ROC curve to determine the appropriate cut-off value of the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and determined the value as 0.036 preoperatively.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Comparison of overall survival between the high-CRP/Alb ratio group and the low-CRP/Alb ratio group.

DFS and OS analyses. All patients were divided into a high-ratio group (CRP/Alb ratio ≥0.036) and low-ratio group (CRP/Alb ratio <0.036). Preoperatively, 48 patients were included in the high-ratio group, and 69 were included in the low-ratio group. The background characteristics of these two groups are shown in Table I. Only the pathological N factor differed markedly between the two groups. The 5-year OS rates in the high- and low-ratio groups were 22.5% and 36.4%, respectively (p=0.0089) (Figure 1). The 5-year DFS rates in the high- and low-ratio groups were 12.5% and 22.1%, respectively (p=0.0097) (Figure 2).

A univariate analysis of the OS showed that the age, preoperative CA19-9 value, pathological N factor, tumor size, and CRP/Alb ratio were factors affecting the survival. A multivariate analysis showed that the pathological N factor [hazard ratio (HR)=1.931; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.038-3.592; p=0.038] and CRP/Alb ratio (HR=1.692; 95%CI=1.03-2.778; p=0.038) were independent factors affecting the survival (Table II).

A univariate analysis for the DFS showed that the age, preoperative CA19-9 value, pathological N factor, tumor size, residual tumor, and CRP/Alb ratio were independent factors affecting recurrence. A multivariate analysis showed that the age (HR=1.604; 95%CI=1.03-2.499; p=0.037), pathological N factor (HR=1.728; 95%CI=1.03-2.897; p=0.038), residual tumor (HR=1.747; 95%CI=1.069-2.857; p=0.026), and CRP/Alb ratio (HR=1.692; 95%CI=1.019-2.411; p=0.041) were independent factors affecting the recurrence (Table III).

Discussion

In the present study, we revealed the clinical significance of the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio as an independent prognostic factor for PDAC patients who received radical surgery and S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. We determined the appropriate cut-off value of the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio to be 0.036, and statistical analyses showed that the CRP/Alb ratio was strongly related to the survival as an independent prognostic factor. This result suggests that patients with a high preoperative CRP/Alb ratio have a poorer prognosis.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Comparison of disease-free survival between the high-CRP/Alb ratio group and the low-CRP/Alb ratio group.

The relationship between inflammation and cancer is well-documented (5, 6). Inflammation plays an important role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Many investigators have already reported that inflammation-based prognostic scores, including the NLR, PLR, the GPS, and modified GPS, are associated with the prognosis of several types of malignancies. Recently, the CRP/Alb ratio was reported to have prognostic value in pancreatic cancer patients. However, there have been few reports evaluating the significance of the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio as a prognostic factor in PDAC patients. In a previous report, Haruki et al. reported on the significance of the preoperative CRP/Alb ratio as an independent prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic cancer (16). They analyzed 113 patients who had undergone pancreatic resection and reported the optimal cut-off level of the CRP/Alb ratio to be 0.03, which is associated with a poor prognosis after pancreatic resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. In another report, Wu et al. reported that the cut-off value of the CRP/Alb ratio was 0.54 in 233 advanced pancreatic cancer patients (17). They found that the CRP/Alb ratio was an independent prognostic factor in advanced PDAC patients. They also reported that the CRP/Alb ratio was a more useful marker than other inflammation-based scores by comparing the AUC values. Given the above, the CRP/Alb ratio appears to be a useful marker for identifying patients with a poor prognosis.

Our data showed that the prognosis of PDAC patients could be predicted by evaluating a small blood sample obtained preoperatively. We focused on the preoperative values, because postoperative values reflect not only cancer progression but also surgical invasion. Pancreatectomy is one of the most invasive surgical procedures, and invasive surgery can cause systemic inflammation along with postoperative complications and a poor nutritional status. For example, Arima et al. reported that the CRP/Alb ratio at postoperative day 14 was significantly associated with a shorter OS and relapse-free survival (18). The cut-off value of the CRP/Alb ratio in their study was 0.34, which is higher than that obtained in the present study. In addition, we detected a relationship between survival and postoperative complications, especially infectious complications, such as intra-abdominal abscess (19). As we mentioned above, we need to be careful when evaluating the CRP/Alb ratio postoperatively.

Several limitations associated with the present study warrant mentioning. First, the rate of pathological lymph node metastasis differed significantly between the two groups. However, while we cannot deny its effect on the survival curves, the multivariate analysis showed that the CRP/Alb ratio was an independent prognostic factor. Second, the current study was a retrospective, single-center study with a small sample size. It is very important that these results be confirmed in another cohort or in a multi-center study. Finally, our data included only patients who received upfront surgery and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Whether or not the same results would have been obtained with PDAC patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for the overall survival.

Conclusion

The CRP/Alb ratio was found to be a useful prognostic marker in PDAC patients who underwent curative resection with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. The high CRP/Alb ratio is associated with poorer prognosis with the cut-off value of 0.036. This result should be confirmed by another cohort study or multi-center study.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for the disease-free survival.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Masaaki Murakawa: Conception of the work, collection of data, statistical analysis and writing manuscript; Yuto Kamioka, Mariko Kamiya, Yosuke Atsumi, Toru Aoyama: Contribution to collection of data; Naoto Yamamoto, Satoshi Kobayashi, Makoto Ueno, Manabu Morimoto: Contribution to advice regarding Tables, Figures and evaluation and interpretation of clinical data; Hiroshi Tamagawa, Norio Yukawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda and Soichiro Morinaga: Contribution to evaluation of clinical data and statistical analysis. Advice regarding Discussion.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

  • Received October 15, 2019.
  • Revision received October 30, 2019.
  • Accepted November 5, 2019.
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Soerjomataram I,
    3. Dikshit R,
    4. Eser S,
    5. Mathers C,
    6. Rebelo M,
    7. Parkin DM,
    8. Forman D,
    9. Bray F
    : Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5): E359-386, 2015. PMID: 25220842. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD,
    3. Jemal A
    : Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66(1): 7-30, 2016. PMID: 26742998. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21332
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Rahib L,
    2. Smith BD,
    3. Aizenberg R,
    4. Rosenzweig AB,
    5. Fleshman JM,
    6. Matrisian LM
    : Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the united states. Cancer Res 74(11): 2913-2921, 2014. PMID: 24840647. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Uesaka K,
    2. Boku N,
    3. Fukutomi A,
    4. Okamura Y,
    5. Konishi M,
    6. Matsumoto I,
    7. Kaneoka Y,
    8. Shimizu Y,
    9. Nakamori S,
    10. Sakamoto H,
    11. Morinaga S,
    12. Kainuma O,
    13. Imai K,
    14. Sata N,
    15. Hishinuma S,
    16. Ojima H,
    17. Yamaguchi R,
    18. Hirano S,
    19. Sudo T,
    20. Ohashi Y,
    21. Group JS
    : Adjuvant chemotherapy of s-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: A phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (jaspac 01). Lancet 388(10041): 248-257, 2016. PMID: 27265347. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30583-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Coussens LM,
    2. Werb Z
    : Inflammation and cancer. Nature 420(6917): 860-867, 2002. PMID: 12490959. DOI: 10.1038/nature01322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Mantovani A,
    2. Allavena P,
    3. Sica A,
    4. Balkwill F
    : Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 454(7203): 436-444, 2008. PMID: 18650914. DOI: 10.1038/nature07205
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. McMillan DC
    : The systemic inflammation-based glasgow prognostic score: A decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 39(5): 534-540, 2013. PMID: 22995477. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.08.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tsujino T,
    2. Komura K,
    3. Hashimoto T,
    4. Muraoka R,
    5. Satake N,
    6. Matsunaga T,
    7. Tsutsumi T,
    8. Yoshikawa Y,
    9. Takai T,
    10. Minami K,
    11. Uehara H,
    12. Hirano H,
    13. Nomi H,
    14. Ibuki N,
    15. Takahara K,
    16. Inamoto T,
    17. Ohno Y,
    18. Azuma H
    : C-reactive protein-albumin ratio as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma - a data from multi-institutional study in japan. Urol Oncol, 2019. PMID: 31053528. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.002
    1. Liu X,
    2. Sun X,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Kong P,
    5. Chen S,
    6. Zhan Y,
    7. Xu D
    : Preoperative c-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for gastric cancer. Transl Oncol 8(4): 339-345, 2015. PMID: 26310380. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.06.006
    OpenUrl
    1. Kinoshita A,
    2. Onoda H,
    3. Imai N,
    4. Iwaku A,
    5. Oishi M,
    6. Tanaka K,
    7. Fushiya N,
    8. Koike K,
    9. Nishino H,
    10. Matsushima M
    : The c-reactive protein/albumin ratio, a novel inflammation-based prognostic score, predicts outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22(3): 803-810, 2015. PMID: 25190127. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4048-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Qin G,
    2. Tu J,
    3. Liu L,
    4. Luo L,
    5. Wu J,
    6. Tao L,
    7. Zhang C,
    8. Geng X,
    9. Chen X,
    10. Ai X,
    11. Shen B,
    12. Pan W
    : Serum albumin and c-reactive protein/albumin ratio are useful biomarkers of crohn's disease activity. Med Sci Monit 22(4393-4400, 2016. PMID: 27848931. DOI: 10.12659/msm.897460
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Ranzani OT,
    2. Zampieri FG,
    3. Forte DN,
    4. Azevedo LC,
    5. Park M
    : C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts 90-day mortality of septic patients. PLoS One 8(3): e59321, 2013. PMID: 23555017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059321
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Murakawa M,
    2. Aoyama T,
    3. Miyagi Y,
    4. Kobayashi S,
    5. Ueno M,
    6. Morimoto M,
    7. Numata M,
    8. Yamamoto N,
    9. Tamagawa H,
    10. Yukawa N,
    11. Rino Y,
    12. Masuda M,
    13. Morinaga S
    : The impact of sparc expression on the survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients after curative resection. J Cancer 10(3): 627-633, 2019. PMID: 30719160. DOI: 10.7150/jca.28660
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Dindo D,
    2. Demartines N,
    3. Clavien PA
    : Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2): 205-213, 2004. PMID: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kanda Y
    : Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘ezr’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3): 452-458, 2013. PMID: 3590441. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Haruki K,
    2. Shiba H,
    3. Shirai Y,
    4. Horiuchi T,
    5. Iwase R,
    6. Fujiwara Y,
    7. Furukawa K,
    8. Misawa T,
    9. Yanaga K
    : The c-reactive protein to albumin ratio predicts long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer after pancreatic resection. World J Surg 40(9): 2254-2260, 2016. PMID: 26956901. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3491-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Wu M,
    2. Guo J,
    3. Guo L,
    4. Zuo Q
    : The c-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts overall survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Tumour Biol 37(9): 12525-12533, 2016. PMID: 27344157. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-5122-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Arima K,
    2. Yamashita YI,
    3. Hashimoto D,
    4. Nakagawa S,
    5. Umezaki N,
    6. Yamao T,
    7. Tsukamoto M,
    8. Kitano Y,
    9. Yamamura K,
    10. Miyata T,
    11. Okabe H,
    12. Ishimoto T,
    13. Imai K,
    14. Chikamoto A,
    15. Baba H
    : Clinical usefulness of postoperative c-reactive protein/albumin ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 216(1): 111-115, 2018. PMID: 28859917. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.016
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Aoyama T,
    2. Murakawa M,
    3. Katayama Y,
    4. Yamaoku K,
    5. Kanazawa A,
    6. Higuchi A,
    7. Shiozawa M,
    8. Morimoto M,
    9. Yoshikawa T,
    10. Yamamoto N,
    11. Rino Y,
    12. Masuda M,
    13. Morinaga S
    : Impact of postoperative complications on survival and recurrence in pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 35(4): 2401-2409, 2015. PMID: 25862906.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 34, Issue 1
January-February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Implication of Pre-operative C-reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Factor of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-institutional Retrospective Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinical Implication of Pre-operative C-reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Factor of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-institutional Retrospective Study
MASAAKI MURAKAWA, NAOTO YAMAMOTO, YUTO KAMIOKA, MARIKO KAMIYA, SATOSHI KOBAYASHI, MAKOTO UENO, MANABU MORIMOTO, YOSUKE ATSUMI, TORU AOYAMA, HIROSHI TAMAGAWA, NORIO YUKAWA, YASUSHI RINO, MUNETAKA MASUDA, SOICHIRO MORINAGA
In Vivo Jan 2020, 34 (1) 347-353; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11780

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Clinical Implication of Pre-operative C-reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Factor of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-institutional Retrospective Study
MASAAKI MURAKAWA, NAOTO YAMAMOTO, YUTO KAMIOKA, MARIKO KAMIYA, SATOSHI KOBAYASHI, MAKOTO UENO, MANABU MORIMOTO, YOSUKE ATSUMI, TORU AOYAMA, HIROSHI TAMAGAWA, NORIO YUKAWA, YASUSHI RINO, MUNETAKA MASUDA, SOICHIRO MORINAGA
In Vivo Jan 2020, 34 (1) 347-353; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11780
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Can D3 Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Colon Cancer With a Poor C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Improve Survival Outcomes?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
  • Older Age and Outcomes of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Expression Patterns of T-cell immunoreceptor With Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • CRP/Alb ratio
  • prognostic factor
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire