Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Prognostic Significance of Neoadjuvant Rectal Score and Indication for Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

KIYOSHI MAEDA, MASATSUNE SHIBUTANI, AKIKO TACHIMORI, TAKAFUMI NISHII, NAOKI AOMATSU, TATSUNARI FUKUOKA, HISASHI NAGAHARA, HIROSHI OTANI, TORU INOUE and MASAICHI OHIRA
In Vivo January 2020, 34 (1) 283-289; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11772
KIYOSHI MAEDA
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m1378386{at}med.osaka-cu.ac.jp
MASATSUNE SHIBUTANI
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIKO TACHIMORI
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAFUMI NISHII
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAOKI AOMATSU
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TATSUNARI FUKUOKA
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HISASHI NAGAHARA
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI OTANI
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORU INOUE
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAICHI OHIRA
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The relapse-free survival subdivided by a combination of NAR score and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The prognosis was significantly (p=0.038) better in the patients who received postoperative adjuvant therapy in the low NAR group (Figure 1A). Whereas, no difference existed between postoperative adjuvant therapy and survival in the high NAR group (Figure 1B). No correlation was observed between regimen and survival, based on the types of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (Figure 1C, D).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table I.
  • Table II.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 34, Issue 1
January-February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Significance of Neoadjuvant Rectal Score and Indication for Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Significance of Neoadjuvant Rectal Score and Indication for Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
KIYOSHI MAEDA, MASATSUNE SHIBUTANI, AKIKO TACHIMORI, TAKAFUMI NISHII, NAOKI AOMATSU, TATSUNARI FUKUOKA, HISASHI NAGAHARA, HIROSHI OTANI, TORU INOUE, MASAICHI OHIRA
In Vivo Jan 2020, 34 (1) 283-289; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11772

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prognostic Significance of Neoadjuvant Rectal Score and Indication for Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
KIYOSHI MAEDA, MASATSUNE SHIBUTANI, AKIKO TACHIMORI, TAKAFUMI NISHII, NAOKI AOMATSU, TATSUNARI FUKUOKA, HISASHI NAGAHARA, HIROSHI OTANI, TORU INOUE, MASAICHI OHIRA
In Vivo Jan 2020, 34 (1) 283-289; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11772
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Casein Kinase 2{alpha} Enhances 5-Fluorouracil Resistance in Colorectal Cancer Cells by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Evaluation Versus Clinical Evaluation With Dermoscopy in Malignant Skin Neoplasms Diagnosis
  • Clinical Utility of Body Weight Monitoring During Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy
  • NLRP3 and RANK-RANKL-OPG Pathway-related Gene Expression Levels in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Rectal cancer
  • chemoradiotherapy
  • neoadjuvant rectal score
  • adjuvant therapy
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire