Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Establishment of Peritoneal and Hepatic Metastasis Mouse Xenograft Models Using Gastric Cancer Cell Lines

TAKASHI MIWA, MITSURO KANDA, SHINICHI UMEDA, HARUYOSHI TANAKA, DAI SHIMIZU, CHIE TANAKA, DAISUKE KOBAYASHI, MASAMICHI HAYASHI, SUGURU YAMADA, GORO NAKAYAMA, MASAHIKO KOIKE and YASUHIRO KODERA
In Vivo November 2019, 33 (6) 1785-1792; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11669
TAKASHI MIWA
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MITSURO KANDA
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m-kanda{at}med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
SHINICHI UMEDA
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARUYOSHI TANAKA
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAI SHIMIZU
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIE TANAKA
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAISUKE KOBAYASHI
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAMICHI HAYASHI
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SUGURU YAMADA
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GORO NAKAYAMA
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAHIKO KOIKE
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUHIRO KODERA
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Establishment of mouse xenograft models is necessary for oncological research and depends on the characteristics of the cell lines and the immune system of the host. In this study, we describe the development of mouse xenograft models using human gastric cancer (GC) cell lines. Materials and Methods: MKN1 stably-expressing luciferase (MKN1-Luc), N87, KATO III, MKN45 stably-expressing luciferase (MKN45-Luc), NUGC4, and OCUM-1 human GC cell lines were injected intraperitoneally into mice to establish peritoneal metastasis models. MKN45-Luc were injected into subcutaneously implanted spleen, and MKN1-Luc and MKN45-Luc were injected directly into the portal veins of mice for the establishment of hepatic metastasis models. Results: Peritoneal metastasis was formed after implantation of MKN1-Luc, N87, KATO III, MKN45-Luc, and NUGC4 in nude mice, but not formed in OCUM-1 even in NOD/SCID mice. After intrasplenic injection of MKN45-Luc, we found no hepatic metastasis formation. We identified hepatic metastasis formation after direct injection of MKN45-Luc and MKN1-Luc into the portal veins of NOD/SCID mice. Conclusion: Peritoneal and hepatic metastasis mouse xenograft models were successfully established using several human GC cell lines.

  • Gastric cancer
  • peritoneal metastasis
  • hepatic metastasis
  • xenograft

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1). Perioperative adjuvant therapy has improved prognosis to a certain degree (2-4). However, it is still less than satisfactory in its therapeutic efficacy, because some patients with advanced GC often experience recurrence even after curative gastrectomy. To develop a therapeutic strategy, elucidation of the mechanisms of metastasis formation and identification of therapeutic targets are urgently required.

As previously reported, complex processes such as invasion into the circulation, survival in the circulation, adhesion, migration, invasion and proliferation in other organs are necessary for metastasis formation (5). Various molecules are involved in these processes (5-10). Analysis of certain molecules and development of therapeutic agents are undertaken using in vitro experiments. However, it is necessary to establish xenograft models for further molecular biological analysis and validation via in vivo experiments. Nonetheless, it is not always possible to develop xenograft models, because xenotransplantation results in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules of xenotransplanted cells and antigen-presenting cells phagocytosing the graft due to antigen presentation, thereby activating CD4-positive T cells. These activated CD4-positive cells also activate cell-mediated immunity and antibody-mediated immunity, which exclude implanted grafts (11, 12).

Herein we attempted to establish mouse xenograft models using several human GC cell lines. We hope that our experience will be useful for other researchers conducting in vivo studies.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and cell culture. MKN1 cells stably expressing luciferase (MKN1-Luc), MKN45 cells stably expressing luciferase (MKN45-Luc), NUGC4, and OCUM-1 were obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bio Resources Cell Bank (JCRB) (Osaka, Japan). N87 and KATO III cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 in the recommended medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. The characteristics of the gastric cancer cell lines are listed in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of gastric cancer cell lines.

Mice. All animal experiments conformed to ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guideline and were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Nagoya University (IRB No. 29329) (13). Four-week-old male nude mice (BULB/cSlc-nu/nu) were obtained from Chubu Kagaku Shizai (Nagoya, Japan). Four-week-old male NOD/SCID mice (nod/shi-SCID) were purchased from Japan SLC, Inc. (Hamamatsu, Japan). Mice were housed and adapted to the breeding environment for two weeks before the experiment.

Mouse subcutaneous xenograft model. A total of 1×106 of MKN1, KATO III, and MKN45 cells were suspended in 100 μl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and subcutaneously injected into the bilateral flanks of nude mice.

Mouse peritoneal metastasis models. MKN1-Luc, N87, KATO III, MKN45-Luc, NUGC4, and OCUM-1 cells were injected into nude mice intraperitoneally with 1 ml PBS. A total of 1.0×106 OCUM-1 cells were injected into NOD/SCID mice intraperitoneally with 1 ml PBS. After each observation period, these mice were sacrificed and peritoneal metastasis formation was observed under direct viewing.

Mouse hepatic metastasis models. Under general anesthesia, we mobilized and excised the spleens of nude mouse, which were then subcutaneously implanted. A total of 0.5×106 MKN45-Luc cells were suspended in 100 μl of PBS and injected into the subcutaneously implanted spleens. For direct injection into the portal vein, nude mice and NOD/SCID mice were placed under general anesthesia and laparotomized. Then, 1.0×106 MKN45-Luc and 0.5×106 MKN1-Luc cells were suspended in 100 μl of PBS and directly injected into the portal veins of mice using a 35-gauge NanoNeedle (NIPPON Genetics, Tokyo, Japan). After injection of the cell suspensions, we oppressed the puncture site of the portal vein using SURGICEL (Johnson & Johnson, NJ, USA) for a few minutes. Twelve weeks after injection, these mice were killed and hepatic metastasis formation was observed under direct viewing.

In vivo imaging. The In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) Lumina (Xenogen, Alameda, CA, USA) was employed every four weeks after injection to non-invasively measure the volumes of peritoneal and liver metastases. D-Luciferin (150 mg/kg) (Summit Pharmaceuticals International, Tokyo, Japan) was administered intraperitoneally and luciferase activity was measured using the IVIS at 15 min after injection of D-luciferin. We used Living Image Ver. 2.6 (Xenogen) software to acquire and analyze the data. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRS 3000, MR solutions, Guildford, UK) was employed twelve weeks after injection as an alternative approach to detecting the formation of hepatic metastasis.

Results

Subcutaneous tumor formation. Subcutaneous tumors were formed after subcutaneous injection of MKN1-Luc, KATO III, and MKN45-Luc cells. Previous reports have shown that N87, NUGC4 and OCUM-1 can form subcutaneous tumors in nude mice (14-18).

Peritoneal metastasis formation. Peritoneal metastasis formation was noted eight weeks after implantation of 0.5×106 and 1.0×106 MKN1-Luc cells in nude mice (Figure 1A and B). IVIS images of mice injected with 1.0×106 MKN1-Luc cells are shown in Figure 1B. Four weeks after implantation of 10×106 and 50×106 N87 cells, peritoneal metastasis was observed in nude mice (Figure 1C and D). Four weeks after implantation of 1.0×106 MKN45-Luc and 1.0×106 and 5.0×106 NUGC4 cells, hemorrhagic ascites and peritoneal metastasis was also evident in nude mice (Figure 1E, F, G). Peritoneal metastasis formation was not detected eight weeks after implantation of 1.0×106 and 5.0×106 KATO III cells and four weeks after implantation of 10×106, 50×106, and 100×106 KATO III cells in nude mice (Figure 2A-E). However, nine weeks after implantation of 100×106 KATO III cells in nude mice, peritoneal metastasis was detected (data not shown). We could not identify peritoneal metastasis at four weeks after intraperitoneal injection of 1.0×106 or 5.0×106 OCUM-1 cells in nude mice, or 1.0×106 OCUM-1 cells in NOD/SCID mice(Figure 3A-C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Peritoneal metastasis formation in nude mice. (A) Eight weeks after injection with 0.5×106 MKN1-Luc cells. (B) Eight weeks after injection with 1.0×106 MKN1-Luc cells. (C) Four weeks after injection with 10×106 N87 cells. (D) Four weeks after injection with 50×106 N87 cells. (E) Four weeks after injection with 1.0×106 MKN45-Luc cells. (F) Four weeks after injection with 1.0×106 NUGC4 cells. (G) Four weeks after injection with 5.0×106 NUGC4 cells.

Hepatic metastasis formation. Subcutaneously implanted spleen data are shown in Figure 4A. Hepatic metastasis was not identified in nude mice, but splenic tumors were found twelve weeks after injection of 0.5×106 MKN45-Luc cells into subcutaneously implanted spleen (Figure 4B). The procedure for direct injection into the portal veins of mice is shown in Figure 5A. In our early experiences, most of the mice died immediately after treatment if they underwent thoracotomy. Although another major cause of treatment-related death is hemorrhage from the portal vein after injection, it can be prevented by usage of a 35-gauge needle and astriction with an oxidized cellulose cotton. We did not find hepatic metastasis formation in nude mice at all. However, we identified hepatic metastasis formation twelve weeks after injection of 1.0×106 MKN45-Luc cells in the portal veins of NOD/SCID mice (Figure 5B). Hepatic metastasis was also detected twelve weeks after injection of 0.5×106 MKN1-Luc cells in the portal veins of NOD/SCID mice (Figure 5C). IVIS and MRI images of mice twelve weeks after injection are also shown in Figure 5C.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Peritoneal metastasis formation in nude mice after intraperitoneal injection of KATO III cells. No peritoneal metastasis was found (A) eight weeks after injection with 1.0×106 cells, (B) eight weeks after injection with 5.0×106 cells, (C) four weeks after injection with 10×106 cells, (D) four weeks after injection with 50×106 cells, or (E) four weeks after injection with 100×106 cells.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Peritoneal metastasis formation after intraperitoneal injection of OCUM-1 cells. No peritoneal metastasis was found four weeks after injection of (A) 1.0×106 and (B) 5.0×106 OCUM-1 cells in nude mice. No peritoneal metastasis was found (C) four weeks after injection of 1.0×106 OCUM-1 cells in NOD/SCID mice.

Discussion

Before conducting phase I studies, we need to validate the effects of novel pharmacological agents and treatment methods through the use of animal models (19). Experiments using mice are the first step in laboratory animal studies before the use of large-sized animals such as dogs and monkeys. Peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis are the main reasons for gastric cancer-related death (20). In this study, we attempted to establish peritoneal and hepatic metastasis mouse xenograft models using several gastric cancer cell lines that can form subcutaneous tumors in nude mouse to generate tools, for examining the mechanisms of metastasis formation and for developing novel therapeutic strategies. A summary of this study is shown in Table II.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Hepatic metastasis formation after intrasplenic injection in nude mice. (A) Subcutaneously implanted spleen. (B) Twelve weeks after injection with 0.5×106 MKN45-Luc cells.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Hepatic metastasis formation after direct injection of the portal vein in NOD/SCID mice. (A) Direct injection procedure into the portal veins of mice. (B) Twelve weeks after injection of 1.0×106 MKN45-Luc cells into the portal vein. (C) Twelve weeks after injection of 0.5×106 MKN1-Luc cells into portal vein.

Generally, the host immune system rejects transplanted grafts in xenotransplantation (11, 12). Thus, immunocompromised animals are needed to establish xenograft models. In 1962, the nude mouse was detected as the first immunocompromised mouse. The nude mouse has no mature T cells due to the lack of a thymus gland, resulting in poor immunity (21). A number of human cancer cell lines were engrafted successfully in nude mice (22-24). These mice have subsequently been used in cancer research and in the development of anticancer agents. However, the nude mouse has some immunocytes besides mature T cells, and many human cell lines cannot be engrafted successfully. Subsequently, the NOD/SCID mouse was developed as a immunocompromised mouse that lacks both T cells and B cells (25). The discovery of such mice has facilitated the establishment of xenograft models (26-28), although these animals do not absolutely lack immunity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Summary of mouse xenograft models.

We observed peritoneal metastasis formation after injection of MKN1-Luc, N87, KATO III, MKN45-Luc, and NUGC4 cells. These cell lines can be disseminated in manageable nude mice and may be suitable for peritoneal metastasis xenograft models. However, OCUM-1 failed to form peritoneal metastases, even in the NOD/SCID mouse. This cell line has not been reported previously in peritoneal metastasis xenografts and is unsuitable for this practice.

We can generate hepatic metastasis mouse xenograft models by injecting cell suspensions directly into the liver. However, this procedure can only assess the survival and proliferation of cancer cells in hepatic tissue. Implantation by injection into the spleen is reportedly one of the ways to establish hepatic metastasis xenograft models (29-31). There have been several reports of successful establishment of hepatic metastasis models by subcapsular injection of murine cancer cell lines to the spleen (32-34). The procedure of intrasplenic injection is simple and convenient. However, this procedure does not reliably establish hepatic metastasis because cancer cells must migrate and invade into the splenic vein to reach the portal vein system. In our experience using human gastric cancer cell lines, we could not establish hepatic metastasis by intrasplenic injection of MKN45-Luc cells in nude mice. We conducted the procedure by directly injecting into the portal vein to ensure the cell suspension reached the portal vein system. However, it took some time to establish this procedure because of the difficulty of direct injection into the thin mouse portal vein, as well as the hemostasis after injection. In the early days of this study, hemostasis was not obtained after injection of the cell suspension into the portal vein and mice frequently died of blood loss. Finally, we were able to establish hepatic metastasis for a brief time in NOD/SCID mice after injection with 0.5×106 of MKN1-Luc and 1.0×106 of MKN45-Luc cells using our procedure.

Using immunosuppressed mice, human GC cell lines were successfully engrafted at different organs from the original organs from which the cell lines were derived. This enables us to use these cell lines properly according to the purpose of the animal experiment by applying several characteristics, such as cell differentiation and molecular expression. These findings contributed to our previous studies of the identification of molecules related to the formation of peritoneal and hepatic metastasis (35, 36).

In conclusion, we developed a procedure to establish peritoneal and hepatic mouse xenograft models with several human GC cell lines. This information will be useful for the elucidation of the mechanism of metastasis formation and the development of novel treatment approaches for GC.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank H. Nikki March, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Mitsuro Kanda and Yasuhiro Kodera make substantial contributions to conception and design. Shinichi Umeda and Haruyoshi Tanaka and Dai Shimizu make substantial contributions to acquisition of data. Chie Tanaka and Daisuke Kobayashi and Masamichi Hayashi and Suguru Yamada and Goro Nakayama and Masahiko Koike make substantial contributions to interpretation of data.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this study.

  • Received July 12, 2019.
  • Revision received July 17, 2019.
  • Accepted July 18, 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Center MM,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Ward E,
    6. Forman D
    : Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2): 69-90, 2011. PMID: 21296855. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20107
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bang YJ,
    2. Kim YW,
    3. Yang HK,
    4. Chung HC,
    5. Park YK,
    6. Lee KH,
    7. Lee KW,
    8. Kim YH,
    9. Noh SI,
    10. Cho JY,
    11. Mok YJ,
    12. Kim YH,
    13. Ji J,
    14. Yeh TS,
    15. Button P,
    16. Sirzen F,
    17. Noh SH
    : Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after d2 gastrectomy (classic): A phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379(9813): 315-321, 2012. PMID: 22226517. DOI: 10.1016/s0 140-6736(11)61873-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kanaji S,
    2. Suzuki S,
    3. Matsuda Y,
    4. Hasegawa H,
    5. Yamamoto M,
    6. Yamashita K,
    7. Oshikiri T,
    8. Matsuda T,
    9. Nakamura T,
    10. Sumi Y,
    11. Kakeji Y
    : Recent updates in perioperative chemotherapy and recurrence pattern of gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2(6): 400-405, 2018. PMID: 30460342. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12199
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Sakuramoto S,
    2. Sasako M,
    3. Yamaguchi T,
    4. Kinoshita T,
    5. Fujii M,
    6. Nashimoto A,
    7. Furukawa H,
    8. Nakajima T,
    9. Ohashi Y,
    10. Imamura H,
    11. Higashino M,
    12. Yamamura Y,
    13. Kurita A,
    14. Arai K
    : Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with s-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357(18): 1810-1820, 2007. PMID: 17978289. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa072252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Shimizu D,
    2. Kanda M,
    3. Kodera Y
    : Emerging evidence of the molecular landscape specific for hematogenous metastasis from gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 10(6): 124-136, 2018. PMID: 29988904. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i6.124
    OpenUrl
    1. De Mattos-Arruda L,
    2. Bidard FC,
    3. Won HH,
    4. Cortes J,
    5. Ng CK,
    6. Peg V,
    7. Nuciforo P,
    8. Jungbluth AA,
    9. Weigelt B,
    10. Berger MF,
    11. Seoane J,
    12. Reis-Filho JS
    : Establishing the origin of metastatic deposits in the setting of multiple primary malignancies: The role of massively parallel sequencing. Mol Oncol 8(1): 150-158, 2014. PMID: 24220311. DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.10.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hudler P
    : Challenges of deciphering gastric cancer heterogeneity. World J Gastroenterol 21(37): 10510-10527, 2015. PMID: 26457012. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10510
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Makohon-Moore AP,
    2. Zhang M,
    3. Reiter JG,
    4. Bozic I,
    5. Allen B,
    6. Kundu D,
    7. Chatterjee K,
    8. Wong F,
    9. Jiao Y,
    10. Kohutek ZA,
    11. Hong J,
    12. Attiyeh M,
    13. Javier B,
    14. Wood LD,
    15. Hruban RH,
    16. Nowak MA,
    17. Papadopoulos N,
    18. Kinzler KW,
    19. Vogelstein B,
    20. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA
    : Limited heterogeneity of known driver gene mutations among the metastases of individual patients with pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet 49(3): 358-366, 2017. PMID: 28092682. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3764
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Naxerova K,
    2. Reiter JG,
    3. Brachtel E,
    4. Lennerz JK,
    5. van de Wetering M,
    6. Rowan A,
    7. Cai T,
    8. Clevers H,
    9. Swanton C,
    10. Nowak MA,
    11. Elledge SJ,
    12. Jain RK
    : Origins of lymphatic and distant metastases in human colorectal cancer. Science 357(6346): 55-60, 2017. PMID: 28684519. DOI: 10.1126/science.aai8515
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Shimizu D,
    2. Kanda M,
    3. Kodera Y
    : Review of recent molecular landscape knowledge of gastric cancer. Histol Histopathol 33(1): 11-26, 2018. PMID: 28447336. DOI: 10.14670/hh-11-898
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Chapman HA
    : Endosomal proteolysis and mhc class ii function. Curr Opin Immunol 10(1): 93-102, 1998. PMID: 9523118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Pamer E,
    2. Cresswell P
    : Mechanisms of mhc class i--restricted antigen processing. Annu Rev Immunol 16: 323-358, 1998. PMID: 9597133. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.323
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kilkenny C,
    2. Browne WJ,
    3. Cuthill IC,
    4. Emerson M,
    5. Altman DG
    : Improving bioscience research reporting: The arrive guidelines for reporting animal research. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20(4): 256-260, 2012. PMID: 22424462. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Hu N,
    2. Yin JF,
    3. Ji Z,
    4. Hong Y,
    5. Wu P,
    6. Bian B,
    7. Song Z,
    8. Li R,
    9. Liu Q,
    10. Wu F
    : Strengthening gastric cancer therapy by trastuzumab-conjugated nanoparticles with simultaneous encapsulation of anti-mir-21 and 5-fluorouridine. Cell Physiol Biochem 44(6): 2158-2173, 2017. PMID: 29241186. DOI: 10.1159/000485955
    OpenUrl
    1. Kubo T
    : Establishment and characterization of a new gastric cancer cell line (ocum-1), derived from borrmann type IV tumor. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 92(10): 1451-1460, 1991. PMID: 1961183.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kubota T,
    2. Kuroda S,
    3. Kanaya N,
    4. Morihiro T,
    5. Aoyama K,
    6. Kakiuchi Y,
    7. Kikuchi S,
    8. Nishizaki M,
    9. Kagawa S,
    10. Tazawa H,
    11. Fujiwara T
    : Her2-targeted gold nanoparticles potentially overcome resistance to trastuzumab in gastric cancer. Nanomedicine 14(6): 1919-1929, 2018. PMID: 29885899. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2018.05.019
    OpenUrl
    1. Lee S,
    2. Kim H,
    3. Kang YR,
    4. Kim H,
    5. Kim JY,
    6. Lee YJ,
    7. Kim JM,
    8. Kim JS
    : Selection criteria for determination of optimal reconstruction method for cu-64 trastuzumab dosimetry on siemens inveon pet scanner. J Clin Med 8(4), 2019. PMID: 31014003. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8040512
  10. ↵
    1. Takabayashi K,
    2. Kashiwagi K,
    3. Kawata T,
    4. Sato T,
    5. Matsuoka K,
    6. Hisamatsu T,
    7. Takaishi H,
    8. Hibi T,
    9. Ogata H,
    10. Yahagi N,
    11. Kitagawa Y,
    12. Shigematsu N,
    13. Kanai T
    : Continuous low-dose irradiation by i-125 seeds induces apoptosis of gastric cancer cells regardless of histological origin. Cancer Biol Ther 15(1): 81-88, 2014. PMID: 24149371. DOI: 10.4161/cbt.26610
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki
    : Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20): 2191-2194, 2013. PMID: 24141714. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Nashimoto A,
    2. Akazawa K,
    3. Isobe Y,
    4. Miyashiro I,
    5. Katai H,
    6. Kodera Y,
    7. Tsujitani S,
    8. Seto Y,
    9. Furukawa H,
    10. Oda I,
    11. Ono H,
    12. Tanabe S,
    13. Kaminishi M
    : Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in japan: 2009 annual report of the jgca nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer 16(1): 1-27, 2013. PMID: 22729699. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-012-0163-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Flanagan SP
    : ‘Nude’, a new hairless gene with pleiotropic effects in the mouse. Genet Res 8(3): 295-309, 1966. PMID: 5980117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Beattie GM,
    2. Knowles AF,
    3. Jensen FC,
    4. Baird SM,
    5. Kaplan NO
    : Induction of sarcomas in athymic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79(9): 3033-3036, 1982. PMID: 6283553. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.9.3033
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Faguet GB,
    2. Agee JF,
    3. DiPiro JT
    : Blood kinetics, tissue distribution, and radioimaging of anti-common chronic lymphatic leukemia antigen (CCLLA) monoclonal antibody cll2 in mice transplanted with cclla-bearing human leukemia cells. Blood 75(9): 1853-1861, 1990. PMID: 2331525.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Ovejera AA,
    2. Houchens DP,
    3. Catane R,
    4. Sheridan MA,
    5. Muggia FM
    : Efficacy of 6-diazo-5-oxo-l-norleucine and n-[n-gamma-glutamyl-6-diazo-5-oxo-norleucinyl]-6-diazo-5-oxo-norleucine against experimental tumors in conventional and nude mice. Cancer Res 39(8): 3220-3224, 1979. PMID: 572261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Gerling IC,
    2. Serreze DV,
    3. Christianson SW,
    4. Leiter EH
    : Intrathymic islet cell transplantation reduces beta-cell autoimmunity and prevents diabetes in nod/lt mice. Diabetes 41(12): 1672-1676, 1992. PMID: 1446808.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Korbelik M,
    2. Sun J
    : Cancer treatment by photodynamic therapy combined with adoptive immunotherapy using genetically altered natural killer cell line. Int J Cancer 93(2): 269-274, 2001. PMID: 11410876. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1326
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mancini R,
    2. Giarnieri E,
    3. De Vitis C,
    4. Malanga D,
    5. Roscilli G,
    6. Noto A,
    7. Marra E,
    8. Laudanna C,
    9. Zoppoli P,
    10. De Luca P,
    11. Affuso A,
    12. Ruco L,
    13. Di Napoli A,
    14. Mesiti G,
    15. Aurisicchio L,
    16. Ricci A,
    17. Mariotta S,
    18. Pisani L,
    19. Andreetti C,
    20. Viglietto G,
    21. Rendina EA,
    22. Giovagnoli MR,
    23. Ciliberto G
    : Spheres derived from lung adenocarcinoma pleural effusions: Molecular characterization and tumor engraftment. PLoS One 6(7): e21320, 2011. PMID: 21789168. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021320
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Stany MP,
    2. Vathipadiekal V,
    3. Ozbun L,
    4. Stone RL,
    5. Mok SC,
    6. Xue H,
    7. Kagami T,
    8. Wang Y,
    9. McAlpine JN,
    10. Bowtell D,
    11. Gout PW,
    12. Miller DM,
    13. Gilks CB,
    14. Huntsman DG,
    15. Ellard SL,
    16. Wang YZ,
    17. Vivas-Mejia P,
    18. Lopez-Berestein G,
    19. Sood AK,
    20. Birrer MJ
    : Identification of novel therapeutic targets in microdissected clear cell ovarian cancers. PLoS One 6(7): e21121, 2011. PMID: 21754983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kopper L,
    2. Van Hanh T,
    3. Lapis K
    : Experimental model for liver metastasis formation using lewis lung tumor. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 103(1): 31-38, 1982. PMID: 7076715.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Liang Y,
    3. Yang G,
    4. Lan Y,
    5. Han J,
    6. Wang J,
    7. Yin D,
    8. Song R,
    9. Zheng T,
    10. Zhang S,
    11. Pan S,
    12. Liu X,
    13. Zhu M,
    14. Liu Y,
    15. Cui Y,
    16. Meng F,
    17. Zhang B,
    18. Liang S,
    19. Guo H,
    20. Liu Y,
    21. Hassan MK,
    22. Liu L
    : Tetraspanin 1 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma via pi3k/akt signaling. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 37(1): 300, 2018. PMID: 30514341. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0969-y
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Zhang JW,
    2. Li LX,
    3. Wu WZ,
    4. Pan TJ,
    5. Yang ZS,
    6. Yang YK
    : Anti-tumor effects of paeoniflorin on epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human colorectal cancer cells. Med Sci Monit 24: 6405-6413, 2018. PMID: 30208371. DOI: 10.12659/msm.912227
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Hiraoka K,
    2. Kimura T,
    3. Logg CR,
    4. Kasahara N
    : Tumor-selective gene expression in a hepatic metastasis model after locoregional delivery of a replication-competent retrovirus vector. Clin Cancer Res 12(23): 7108-7116, 2006. PMID: 17145835. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1452
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hotta Y,
    2. Kasuya H,
    3. Bustos I,
    4. Naoe Y,
    5. Ichinose T,
    6. Tanaka M,
    7. Kodera Y
    : Curative effect of hf10 on liver and peritoneal metastasis mediated by host antitumor immunity. Oncolytic Virother 6: 31-38, 2017. PMID: 28331843. DOI: 10.2147/ov.s127179
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Pawlik TM,
    2. Nakamura H,
    3. Mullen JT,
    4. Kasuya H,
    5. Yoon SS,
    6. Chandrasekhar S,
    7. Chiocca EA,
    8. Tanabe KK
    : Prodrug bioactivation and oncolysis of diffuse liver metastases by a herpes simplex virus 1 mutant that expresses the cyp2b1 transgene. Cancer 95(5): 1171-1181, 2002. PMID: 12209705. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10776
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Kanda M,
    2. Shimizu D,
    3. Tanaka H,
    4. Tanaka C,
    5. Kobayashi D,
    6. Hayashi M,
    7. Takami H,
    8. Niwa Y,
    9. Yamada S,
    10. Fujii T,
    11. Sugimoto H,
    12. Kodera Y
    : Synaptotagmin xiii expression and peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Br J Surg 105(10): 1349-1358, 2018. PMID: 29741294. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10876
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Kanda M,
    2. Tanaka H,
    3. Shimizu D,
    4. Miwa T,
    5. Umeda S,
    6. Tanaka C,
    7. Kobayashi D,
    8. Hattori N,
    9. Suenaga M,
    10. Hayashi M,
    11. Iwata N,
    12. Yamada S,
    13. Fujiwara M,
    14. Kodera Y
    : Syt7 acts as a driver of hepatic metastasis formation of gastric cancer cells. Oncogene 37(39): 5355-5366, 2018. PMID: 29858600. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0335-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 33, Issue 6
November-December 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Establishment of Peritoneal and Hepatic Metastasis Mouse Xenograft Models Using Gastric Cancer Cell Lines
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Establishment of Peritoneal and Hepatic Metastasis Mouse Xenograft Models Using Gastric Cancer Cell Lines
TAKASHI MIWA, MITSURO KANDA, SHINICHI UMEDA, HARUYOSHI TANAKA, DAI SHIMIZU, CHIE TANAKA, DAISUKE KOBAYASHI, MASAMICHI HAYASHI, SUGURU YAMADA, GORO NAKAYAMA, MASAHIKO KOIKE, YASUHIRO KODERA
In Vivo Nov 2019, 33 (6) 1785-1792; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11669

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Establishment of Peritoneal and Hepatic Metastasis Mouse Xenograft Models Using Gastric Cancer Cell Lines
TAKASHI MIWA, MITSURO KANDA, SHINICHI UMEDA, HARUYOSHI TANAKA, DAI SHIMIZU, CHIE TANAKA, DAISUKE KOBAYASHI, MASAMICHI HAYASHI, SUGURU YAMADA, GORO NAKAYAMA, MASAHIKO KOIKE, YASUHIRO KODERA
In Vivo Nov 2019, 33 (6) 1785-1792; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11669
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • A Novel Ex Vivo Peritoneal Model to Investigate Mechanisms of Peritoneal Metastasis in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
  • G protein subunit gamma 4 expression has potential of detection, prediction, and therapeutic target for liver metastasis of gastric cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Time-course Investigation of Bone and Disc Degeneration in a Rat Model of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis
  • Plasma Exosomal miR-106b-5p Is Associated With Osteoporosis by Targeting SMAD5, BMP2, and MAPK1 Genes
  • Exercise Stimulates PINK-1, PARKIN, MFN-1, and ATG-3 Genes Expression Despite High-fat Diet: Tissue-specific Responses
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • Peritoneal metastasis
  • hepatic metastasis
  • xenograft
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire