Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer With Distant Metastases to Other than Liver or Lung

ATSUSHI NAITO, YOSHINORI KAGAWA, KENJI KAWAI, ATSUSHI TAKENO, YUTAKA TAKEDA, MASAHISA OHTSUKA, YOZO SUZUKI, MITSUNOBU IMASATO, YUJIRO FUJIE, HIROYUKI NAKABA, HIROKI AKAMATSU and KOHEI MURATA
In Vivo September 2019, 33 (5) 1605-1608; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11643
ATSUSHI NAITO
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: naito.atsu{at}gmail.com
YOSHINORI KAGAWA
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENJI KAWAI
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ATSUSHI TAKENO
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUTAKA TAKEDA
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAHISA OHTSUKA
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOZO SUZUKI
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MITSUNOBU IMASATO
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUJIRO FUJIE
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROYUKI NAKABA
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROKI AKAMATSU
2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOHEI MURATA
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: If both distant metastases and the primary tumour of colorectal cancer (CRC) are resectable, resection of the distant metastases is considered. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the efficacy of curative resection of both primary and metastatic lesions in organs other than liver or lung in CRC patients. Patients and Methods: The medical records of 23 CRC patients who received R0 resection for primary and metastatic regions between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The 3-year overall survival (OS) in all 23 cases was 80.0%. There was no clinicopathological factor associated with OS on univariate analysis. Conclusion: Curative surgical resection appears to be useful for distant CRC metastases to organs other than liver or lung.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • metastases
  • R0 resection

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Japan. Of the patients who undergo curative resection of the primary tumour, nearly one third will develop recurrent disease. In addition, patients with stage IV CRC have a very poor prognosis, with the 5-year survival approaching 20% (1). However, if both the distant metastases and the primary tumour of CRC are resectable, curative resection of the primary tumour is performed, and resection of the distant metastases is considered to improve the prognosis (1). In particular, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after curative resection of hepatic or pulmonary metastases are well known to be 35-68% (2). Regarding other than hepatic or pulmonary metastases, there are only a few reports of resection of peritoneal metastases, and almost no reports of other organs. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the efficacy of curative resection of both primary and metastatic lesions in tissues other than liver or lung in CRC patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 23 patients with CRC with distant metastases in organs other than liver and lung underwent R0 resection of the primary and metastatic tumours at the Kansai Rosai Hospital from 2009 to 2018. The patients were Stage IV or had distant metastatic recurrence after curative surgery for Stage I-III.

Information on various clinicopathological factors of patients, including age, sex, tumour location, histological type, tumour markers, and status of distant metastatic organs was obtained from medical records and retrospectively analysed. Histological type was categorized as either differentiated (dif, well or moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma) or undifferentiated (undif, mucinous or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma). Regarding tumour location, those arising from the cecum and the ascending and transverse colon were defined as right-sided tumours, whereas those arising from the descending colon to the rectum were defined as left-sided tumours.

This study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards of the participating institutions (Approval number; 20160425).

Statistical analysis. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to generate actuarial survival estimates; these were compared using the log-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP version 14.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The clinicopathological characteristics of all patients (n=23) are presented in Table I. Their median age was 66 years (range=34-87 years). Synchronous resection for Stage IV was performed in 11 cases, and resection of metastatic recurrence after curative surgery was performed in 12 cases. All patients underwent R0 resection. The regimens of chemotherapy before resection of metastases were: CAPOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) + B-mab (bevacizumab), 2 cases; FOLFOXILI (5-FU + oxaliplatin + irinotecan) + B-mab; mFOLFOX6 (5-FU + oxaliplatin) + Bmab; capecitabine + Bmab; CAPOX; and capecitabine.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients.

Table II shows the details of the metastatic sites in all 23 patients. The most common metastatic site was the ovary (7 cases, 30.4%), followed by the peritoneum (6 cases, 26.1%).

The median length of follow-up for all patients was 32 months (range=10-73 months). The 3-year OS in all 23 cases was 80.0% (Figure 1). There was no clinicopathological factor associated with OS on univariate analysis (Table III).

Discussion

In this study, the prognosis of R0-resected CRC patients with distant metastases in organs other than liver or lung was evaluated. The 3-year OS in all 23 cases was 80.0%. In a multi-institutional study in Japan, it was reported that the 3-year OS after hepatectomy for liver metastases of CRC in 763 cases was 52.8% (3). The present results compare favourably with this report, suggesting that surgical resection is useful for distant metastases of CRC in tissues other than liver or lung. Another study has reported that patients with R0 resection (n=26) had significantly better survival than those with palliative resection (n=100) (5-year OS: R0 resection vs. palliative resection=55.6% vs. 9.2%, p<0.001) (4). However, in that study, the number of patients with metastases in organs other than liver or lung was 50, and the number of R0 resections was not mentioned.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Metastatic sites.

The most common metastatic site in the present study was ovary. It has been reported that isolated ovarian metastases from CRC are rare, representing only 3-8% of metastases (5). Metastasectomy of the ovary is reported to confer a good survival rate (6, 7). However, since the 5-year OS rate after metastasectomy of the ovary in those reports was only 15-25%, metastasectomy of the ovary has not been established.

The second most common metastatic site in this study was peritoneum. One report has shown that the 3-year OS rate (n=78) was 45%, and the 5-year OS rate was 28.7% after R0 resection of peritoneal metastasis (8). The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guideline describes complete resection as desirable for P1 (metastases only to adjacent peritoneum), complete resection is considered for P2 (a few metastases to distant peritoneum) when easily resectable, and the efficacy of resection of P3 (numerous metastases to distant peritoneum) has not been demonstrated (1). Excision for resectable P seems to be recommended.

Finally, clinicopathological factors relating to a poor prognosis were unclear in the present study. Other groups have analysed prognostic factors in patients with stage IV CRC, and they demonstrated that high pT stage and presence of positive node(s) were significant negative prognostic factors (9, 10). A prognostic factor in R0 resection for metastatic CRC patients has not been reported, and no clinicopathological factor associated with OS was identified in the present study.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Three-year overall survival of the 23 patients.

The main therapy of metastatic CRC at the present time is chemotherapy, but even triplet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab has a 3-year OS of about 40% (11). The present data showed better OS with resection than with chemotherapy alone; thus, R0 resection may extend overall OS, even if recurrence occurs later. We believe that R0 resection also improves the prognosis for metastatic CRC to organs other than liver or lung.

Although advances in chemotherapy have prolonged survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, the combination of R0 metastasectomy and chemotherapy may lead to better outcomes.

This study has certain limitations, such as low patient number, short observation period, and the fact that it was a retrospective, single-institute study. Thus, further large and multi-institutional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate analysis for prognostic variables correlated with 3-year overall survival.

Acknowledgements

The Authors gratefully acknowledge the work of past and present members of our hospital.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Study concepts: Atsushi Naito; Study design: Atsushi Naito; Data acquisition: Atsushi Naito; Quality control of data and algorithms: Yoshinori Kagawa; Data analysis and interpretation: Atsushi Naito; Data analysis and interpretation: Atsushi Naito; Statistical analysis: Atsushi Natio; Manuscript preparation: Atsushi Ntito; Manuscript editing: Kohei Murata; Manuscript review: K. Kawai, A. Takeno, Y. Takeda, M. Otsuka, Y.Suzuki, M. Imasato, Y.FUjie, H. Nakaba, H. Akamatsu.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this study.

  • Funding

    No funding was received for the drafting of the manuscript, nor did any author receive any form of compensation from any public institution or private company for participating in this project.

  • Received June 28, 2019.
  • Revision received July 2, 2019.
  • Accepted July 3, 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Watanabe T,
    2. Muro K,
    3. Ajioka Y,
    4. Hashiguchi Y,
    5. Ito Y,
    6. Saito Y,
    7. Hamaguchi T,
    8. Ishida H,
    9. Ishiguro M,
    10. Ishihara S,
    11. Kanemitsu Y,
    12. Kawano H,
    13. Kinugasa Y,
    14. Kokudo N,
    15. Murofushi K,
    16. Nakajima T,
    17. Oka S,
    18. Sakai Y,
    19. Tsuji A,
    20. Uehara K,
    21. Ueno H,
    22. Yamazaki K,
    23. Yoshida M,
    24. Yoshino T,
    25. Boku N,
    26. Fujimori T,
    27. Itabashi M,
    28. Koinuma N,
    29. Morita T,
    30. Nishimura G,
    31. Sakata Y,
    32. Shimada Y,
    33. Takahashi K,
    34. Tanaka S,
    35. Tsuruta O,
    36. Yamaguchi T,
    37. Yamaguchi N,
    38. Tanaka T,
    39. Kotake K,
    40. Sugihara K
    : Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 23: 1-34, 2018. PMID: 28349281. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1101-6
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Martin LW,
    2. Warren RS
    : Current management of colorectal liver metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 9: 853-876; discussion 877-8, 2000. PMID: 11008255.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kato T,
    2. Yasui K,
    3. Hirai T,
    4. Kanemitsu Y,
    5. Mori T,
    6. Sugihara K,
    7. Mochizuki H,
    8. Yamamoto J
    : Therapeutic results for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer with special reference to effectiveness of hepatectomy: analysis of prognostic factors for 763 cases recorded at 18 institutions. Dis Colon Rectum 46: S22-31, 2003. PMID: 14530655. DOI: 10.1097/01.DCR.000008 9106.71914.00
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sudo M,
    2. Furuya S,
    3. Shimizu H,
    4. Nakata Y,
    5. Iino H,
    6. Shiraishi K,
    7. Akaike H,
    8. Hosomura N,
    9. Kawaguchi Y,
    10. Amemiya H,
    11. Kawaida H,
    12. Inoue S,
    13. Kono H,
    14. Ichikawa D
    : Long-term outcomes after surgical resection in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of 129 patients at a single institution. World J Surg Oncol 17: 56, 2019. PMID: 30904026. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1599-3
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Erroi F,
    2. Scarpa M,
    3. Angriman I,
    4. Cecchetto A,
    5. Pasetto L,
    6. Mollica E,
    7. Bettiol M,
    8. Ruffolo C,
    9. Polese L,
    10. Cillo U,
    11. D'Amico DF
    : Ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer: prognostic value of radical oophorectomy. J Surg Oncol 96: 113-117, 2007. PMID: 17443728. DOI: 10.1002/jso.20803
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Huang PP,
    2. Weber TK,
    3. Mendoza C,
    4. Rodriguez-Bigas MA,
    5. Petrelli NJ
    : Long-term survival in patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 5: 695-698, 1998. PMID: 9869515. DOI: 10.1007/BF02303479
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Rayson D,
    2. Bouttell E,
    3. Whiston F,
    4. Stitt L
    : Outcome after ovarian/adnexal metastectomy in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 75: 186-192, 2000. PMID: 11088050.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Shida D,
    2. Tsukamoto S,
    3. Ochiai H,
    4. Kanemitsu Y
    : Long-term outcomes after R0 resection of synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer without cytoreductive surgery or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 25: 173-178, 2018. PMID: 29063295. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6133-7
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Ahmed S,
    2. Leis A,
    3. Chandra-Kanthan S,
    4. Fields A,
    5. Zaidi A,
    6. Abbas T,
    7. Le D,
    8. Reeder B,
    9. Pahwa P
    : Regional lymph nodes status and ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes correlate with survival in stage IV colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23: 2287-2294, 2016. PMID: 27016291. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5200-9
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Stillwell AP,
    2. Ho YH,
    3. Veitch C
    : Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors Related to Overall Survival in Patients with Stage IV Colorectal Cancer and Unresectable Metastases. World J Surg 35: 684-692, 2011. PMID: 21181473. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0891-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Cremolini C,
    2. Loupakis F,
    3. Antoniotti C,
    4. Lupi C,
    5. Sensi E,
    6. Lonardi S,
    7. Mezi S,
    8. Tomasello G,
    9. Ronzoni M,
    10. Zaniboni A,
    11. Tonini G,
    12. Carlomagno C,
    13. Allegrini G,
    14. Chiara S,
    15. D'Amico M,
    16. Granetto C,
    17. Cazzaniga M,
    18. Boni L,
    19. Fontanini G,
    20. Falcone A
    : FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol 16: 1306-1315, 2015. PMID: 26338525. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00122-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 33, Issue 5
September-October 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer With Distant Metastases to Other than Liver or Lung
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer With Distant Metastases to Other than Liver or Lung
ATSUSHI NAITO, YOSHINORI KAGAWA, KENJI KAWAI, ATSUSHI TAKENO, YUTAKA TAKEDA, MASAHISA OHTSUKA, YOZO SUZUKI, MITSUNOBU IMASATO, YUJIRO FUJIE, HIROYUKI NAKABA, HIROKI AKAMATSU, KOHEI MURATA
In Vivo Sep 2019, 33 (5) 1605-1608; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11643

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer With Distant Metastases to Other than Liver or Lung
ATSUSHI NAITO, YOSHINORI KAGAWA, KENJI KAWAI, ATSUSHI TAKENO, YUTAKA TAKEDA, MASAHISA OHTSUKA, YOZO SUZUKI, MITSUNOBU IMASATO, YUJIRO FUJIE, HIROYUKI NAKABA, HIROKI AKAMATSU, KOHEI MURATA
In Vivo Sep 2019, 33 (5) 1605-1608; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11643
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
  • Expression Patterns of T-cell immunoreceptor With Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study
  • Older Age and Outcomes of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • colorectal cancer
  • metastases
  • R0 resection
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire