Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Ischemic Damage Represents the Main Risk Factor for Biliary Stricture After Liver Transplantation: A Follow-Up Study in a Danish Population

BARBARA LATTANZI, PETER OTT, ALLAN RASMUSSEN, KAREN RABEN KUDSK, MANUELA MERLI and GERDA ELISABETH VILLADSEN
In Vivo November 2018, 32 (6) 1623-1628; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11423
BARBARA LATTANZI
1Department of Clinical Medicine, Umberto 1 Hospital, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PETER OTT
2Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALLAN RASMUSSEN
3Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAREN RABEN KUDSK
2Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MANUELA MERLI
1Department of Clinical Medicine, Umberto 1 Hospital, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GERDA ELISABETH VILLADSEN
2Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gerdvill@rm.dk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Biliary complications (BC) are frequently observed following liver transplantation. The aim of the present retrospective study, conducted at an outpatients' tertiary care hospital, was to determine the incidence of biliary complications and risk factors associated with their development in liver transplantation (lT) patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records were reviewed for all patients who underwent liver transplantation at the Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, from 2000 to 2011 and were referred to the Aarhus University Hospital for follow-up. Patients who died within 3 months of surgery or had incomplete clinical information were excluded. All data for demographic characteristics and possible risk factors for development of biliary stricture were collected. Fifty-one patients were included. Results: The median age at transplantation was 40 (range=7-64) years, and 53% of patients were males. Biliary complications occurred in 18 patients (35%), the majority of whom developed strictures (12 patients, 24%). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that cytomegalovirus infection (p=0.008), hepatic artery obstruction (p=0.03) and hepatic artery graft abnormalities (p=0.03) were independent risk factors for the development of biliary strictures. Conclusion: One-third of patients presented biliary complications after liver transplantation, among which biliary strictures were the most common. Cytomegalovirus infection, hepatic artery stenosis and anatomical abnormality of the graft's hepatic artery are independent risk factors for the development of biliary stricture.

  • Liver transplantation
  • biliary complication
  • strictures
  • cytomegalovirus
  • hepatic artery stenosis

Biliary complications (BCs) remain a major problem after liver transplantation (1, 2) and are associated with a significant burden of disease. An incidence of BC of 10-25% has been reported following liver transplantation (LT) from beating-heart donors, and even higher rates in transplantation from non-beating heart donors (3-5). Biliary stricture (BS) represents the most frequently observed post-LT biliary complication. Typically, BSs occur within the first year of LT (5-7), and the reported incidence of this type of complication reportedly ranges from 10-25% following deceased donor LT to 28-32% following living donor LT (4, 6-12). BSs are conventionally classified as anastomotic (AS) and non-anastomotic (NAS). While the development of AS is generally related to the surgical technique employed (13), the etiology of NAS is less clear. Ischemic damage is often regarded as the main cause of BS (6, 14-17). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has also been reported to be associated with BS development, possibly mediated by the immunological activation induced by this infection (18).

The incidence of BCs after LT in Denmark is unknown. No previous study has identified the risk factors associated with the development of BCs in a Scandinavian population. Therefore, a study was performed on a group of patients who underwent LT in Denmark to identify incidence of BCs, risk factors associated with BS development and the impact of BCs and BS on patient survival.

Materials and Methods

The medical records were reviewed of all patients that underwent LT at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen and were referred to Aarhus University Hospital for follow-up from 2000 to 2011. This cohort of patients was followed from the date of transplantation until biliary complication diagnosis, death, or study end (August 15, 2012). Patients who died within 3 months of LT or had incomplete clinical information were excluded. Fifty-one patients were included in this study. For transplant recipients, age, gender, body mass index, liver disease etiology, hepatitis virus B and C infection, and presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension before and after LT were analyzed; for transplant donors, age, gender and mortality due to cerebrovascular accidents were considered. Duration of operation, duration of cold and warm ischemia, type of biliary anastomosis (duct-to-duct anastomosis or hepaticojejunostomy) and presence of anatomical abnormalities of the grafted hepatic artery (HA) were also recorded. Episodes of acute rejection, CMV infection and evidence of HA obstruction (stenosis or thrombosis) were also recorded. After discharge from Rigshospitalet, all patients were followed-up at the outpatient clinic of Aarhus University Hospital.

For patients in whom cholestasis was suspected, the diagnostic approach included an abdominal ultrasound to evaluate the biliary tree and hepatic vasculature followed by a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and angio-computed tomographic scan when required. In the presence of distal BS, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed with sphincterotomy and stent placement when indicated. In cases with proximal BS or endoscopic treatment failure, a percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and stent placement was considered. Stents were changed every 3 months and permanently removed after 1 year. Treatment was defined as successful when cholangiography indicated BS resolution, cholestasis was ameliorated, and symptoms were resolved. BS was diagnosed when stenosis of the bile duct was observed on imaging in the presence of biochemical cholestasis with or without clinical symptoms. AS was diagnosed in the presence of a stenosis at the anastomotic level. Strictures, dilatations or irregularities of the intra-and extra-hepatic bile ducts, excluding the site of anastomosis, were classified as NAS.

Statistical analysis. Categorical variables are reported as the number and percentage of cases, and Pearson Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for their comparisons. Continuous variables are reported as medians. Student t-test was used for comparing continuous variables with Gaussian distributions, while Mann–Whitney U-tests were adopted for variables with skewed distributions. Differences with p-values of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Initially, univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for the development of BS. Subsequent multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed including only variables with values of p<0.1 in the univariate analyses. Risk prediction estimates are reported as p-values, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Patient and graft survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Statistical analyses were performed and plots were generated using NCSS 2007 (NCSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study population (n=51).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Types and presentations of biliary complication in study patients (n=51).

Results

The medical records were reviewed of 51 liver recipients with a median follow-up of 53 months. The clinical and demographic characteristics of patients are reported in Table I. For surgical team policy, none of the patients had a T-tube placed after transplantation. Biliary complications occurred in 18 patients (35.3%). The most common complications were strictures (15 patients, 29%). Of the patients with BS, six (40%) developed AS, five (33%) NAS and four (27%) both stricture types. The median time from LT to BS diagnosis was 7.8 months (range=0.1-84.2 months). In seven cases (47%), BS diagnosis was made within 6 months of LT, and in eight cases (53%) within 1 year. The types and presentations of biliary complications are reported in Table II. The Kaplan–Meier plot (log-rank test) showed no difference in patient or graft survival between patients with and without BSs (p-values of 0.9 and 0.9, respectively).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate analysis of risk factors for the development of biliary stricture (BS).

Risk factors for the development of BS. In the univariate analyses, CMV infection, HA obstruction (stenosis or thrombosis) and anatomical abnormalities of the grafted HA were associated with the development of BS. Duration of cold and warm ischemia, duration of operation, episodes of rejection and donor age were not significantly associated with the development of BS (Table III). In the multivariate analysis, CMV infection (OR=6.5; p=0.028), anatomical abnormalities of the grafted HA (OR=8.4; p=0.042) and HA obstruction (OR=7.4; p=0.048) appeared to be independent risk factors for the development of BS (Table IV).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) of significant risk factors for biliary stricture.

Discussion

Despite continuous progress in the field of LT (19), biliary complications still affect a considerable number of LT patients (3, 4, 20). In our study, we confirmed the presence of a high BC incidence in a Danish population. Overall, 35% of LT patients developed BCs, among which BSs were the most common, developing in 29.4% of patients. These rates were comparable with those reported in other studies conducted in similar populations (6, 7, 21, 22). However, lower rates have also been reported in some series (2, 23). These discrepancies may be explained by differences in the definitions of BCs, imaging techniques utilized for surveillance of BS and duration of follow-up (24). As also reported previously, in our series, BCs most often developed within 1 year of LT (6, 7). The development of BSs after LT has previously been reported to be associated with risk factors closely linked to ischemia, such as long ischemia time, reperfusion injury and HA thrombosis and stenosis (25-27). CMV infection and surgical technique have also previously been correlated with BS development (14, 28). In addition, recent studies have suggested that ‘marginal donor characteristics’ such as donor age and macrovesicular steatosis of the graft may also be important in this context (21, 29, 30).

In our study, we confirmed previous findings suggesting that HA stenosis and thrombosis were risk factors for the development of biliary strictures (31-34). Moreover, we observed a correlation between anatomical abnormalities of the grafted HA and BS development, which may also be related to ischemic damage to the biliary tree. The biliary tree may be especially vulnerable to a reduction in arterial blood flow from the HA; in fact, vascular supply to the allograft biliary system is maintained by a unique HA terminating in the peribiliary vascular plexus (16, 35, 36). The low number of included patients did not allow a separate analysis of risk factors associated with AS and NAS to be performed.

We confirmed the previously suggested association between CMV infection and BS development (14). The mechanism due to this association is likely immunological. CMV is known to be a potent up-regulator of alloantigens, thereby increasing the risk of acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction; these mechanisms may be linked to the development of vanishing bile duct syndrome and ductopenic rejection, leading to chronic cholestasis and, eventually, allograft failure (17, 37-40).

In contrast to the results of previous studies, we did not identify any association between the duration of warm or cold ischemia and the development of BS; neither did we observe associations between either recipient gender or age and the onset of this type of complication. However, it should be noted that the mean recipient age in our study population did not exceed 48 years. It has been suggested that the peribiliary vascular plexus is better flushed out and better preserved when low-viscosity rather than high-viscosity fluids are used (41, 42). However, to our knowledge, these observations have not yet been confirmed in randomized control trials, and in our series, no association was observed between the incidence of BS and the type of preservation fluid utilized. Moreover, the biliary anastomosis technique employed did not seem to play a role in the onset of BS; in fact, no difference was observed between patients who underwent duct-to-duct anastomosis and those who underwent a hepaticojejunostomy. Although previous studies have shown a shorter survival time in patients with BC (43), we observed no differences in patient or graft survival, which is in accordance with the findings of recent reports (21, 44, 45). Early detection of BSs and therapeutic intervention improvement in radiology or endoscopy may easily explain these results (46).

The present study has certain limitations. Firstly, it was a retrospective study, and the use of this methodology limited our ability to comprehensively collect data for all variables potentially influencing BS development, such as median blood loss and graft steatosis frequency, as these data were not available. Secondly, the small number of patients with AS and NAS prevented us from performing separate analyses focusing on these patient subgroups.

In conclusion, based on the results of our study, BSs still represent an important complication in LT patients, and the main mechanism involved in their development appears to be ischemic damage. Immunological damage mediated by CMV infection may also be involved in the onset of this complication.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received July 7, 2018.
  • Revision received August 3, 2018.
  • Accepted August 6, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Calne RY
    : A new technique for biliary drainage in orthotopic liver transplantation utilizing the gall bladder as a pedicle graft conduit between the donor and recipient common bile ducts. Ann Surg 184: 605-609, 1976.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Nemes B,
    2. Gámán G,
    3. Doros A
    : Biliary complications after liver transplantation. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9: 447-466, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Wojcicki M,
    2. Milkiewicz P,
    3. Silva M
    : Biliary tract complications after liver transplantation: a review. Dig Surg 25: 245-257, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Kobayashi N,
    2. Kubota K,
    3. Shimamura T,
    4. Watanabe S,
    5. Kato S,
    6. Suzuki K,
    7. Uchiyama T,
    8. Maeda S,
    9. Takeda K,
    10. Nakajima A,
    11. Endo I
    : Complications of the treatment of endoscopic biliary strictures developing after liver transplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18: 202-210, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ayoub WS,
    2. Esquivel CO,
    3. Martin P
    : Biliary complications following liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 55: 1540-1546, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Pirenne J,
    2. Monbaliu D,
    3. Aerts R,
    4. Desschans B,
    5. Liu Q,
    6. Cassiman D,
    7. Laleman W,
    8. Verslype C,
    9. Magdy M,
    10. Van Steenbergen W,
    11. Nevens F
    : Biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Risk factors and prevention by donor treatment with epoprostenol. Transplant Proc 41: 3399-3402, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Chang JH,
    2. Lee IS,
    3. Choi JY,
    4. Yoon SK,
    5. Kim DG,
    6. You YK,
    7. Chun HJ,
    8. Lee DK,
    9. Choi MG,
    10. Chung IS
    : Biliary stricture after adult right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation with duct-to-duct anastomosis: long-term outcome and its related factors after endoscopic treatment. Gut Liver 4: 226-233, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Sawyer RG,
    2. Punch JD
    : Incidence and management of biliary complications after 291 liver transplants following the introduction of transcystic stenting. Transplantation 66: 1201-1207, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Yersiz H,
    2. Renz JF,
    3. Farmer DG,
    4. Hisatake GM,
    5. McDiarmid SV,
    6. Busuttil RW
    : One hundred in situ split-liver transplantations: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 238: 496-505, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Gondolesi GE,
    2. Varotti G,
    3. Florman SS,
    4. Muñoz L,
    5. Fishbein TM,
    6. Emre SH,
    7. Schwartz ME,
    8. Miller C
    : Biliary complications in 96 consecutive right lobe living donor transplant recipients. Transplantation 77: 1842-1848, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Thethy S,
    2. Thomson BNj,
    3. Pleass H,
    4. Wigmore SJ,
    5. Madhavan K,
    6. Akyol M,
    7. Forsythe JL,
    8. James Garden O
    : Management of biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 18: 647-653, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Graziadei IW,
    2. Schwaighofer H,
    3. Koch R,
    4. Nachbaur K,
    5. Koenigsrainer A,
    6. Margreiter R,
    7. Vogel W
    : Long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment of biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 12: 718-725, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Verdonk RC,
    2. Buis CI,
    3. Porte RJ,
    4. van der Jagt EJ,
    5. Limburg AJ,
    6. van den Berg AP,
    7. Slooff MJ,
    8. Peeters PM,
    9. de Jong KP,
    10. Kleibeuker JH,
    11. Haagsma EB
    : Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: causes and consequences. Liver Transpl 12: 726-735, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Buis CI,
    2. Verdonk RC,
    3. Van der Jagt EJ,
    4. van der Hilst CS,
    5. Slooff MJ,
    6. Haagsma EB,
    7. Porte RJ
    : Nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation, part 1: Radiological features and risk factors for early vs. late presentation. Liver Transpl 13: 708-718, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Cho KJ,
    2. Lunderquist A
    : The peribiliary vascular plexus: the microvascular architecture of the bile duct in the rabbit and in clinical cases. Radiology 147: 357-364, 1983.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Sibulesky L,
    2. Nguyen JH
    : Update on biliary strictures in liver transplants. Transplant Proc 43: 1760-1764, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Jiang T,
    2. Li C,
    3. Duan B,
    4. Liu Y,
    5. Wang L,
    6. Lu S
    : Risk factors for and management of ischemic-type biliary lesions following orthotopic liver transplantation: A single-center experience. Ann Hepatol 15: 41-46, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Hsu HY,
    2. Chang MH,
    3. Ni YH,
    4. Huang SF
    : Cytomegalovirus infection and proinflammatory cytokine activation modulate the surface immune determinant expression and immunogenicity of cultured murine extrahepatic bile duct epithelial cells. Clin Exp Immunol 126: 84-91, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Shiffman ML,
    2. Saab S,
    3. Feng S,
    4. Abecassis MI,
    5. Tzakis AG,
    6. Goodrich NP,
    7. Schaubel DE
    : Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States 1995-2004. Am J Transplant 6: 1170-1187, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kienlein S,
    2. Schoening W,
    3. Andert A,
    4. Kroy D,
    5. Neumann UP,
    6. Schmeding M
    : Biliary complications in liver transplantation: Impact of anastomotic technique and ischemic time on short-and long-term outcome. World J Transplant 5: 300-309, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Lattanzi B,
    2. Lai Q,
    3. Guglielmo N,
    4. Giannelli V,
    5. Merli M,
    6. Giusto M,
    7. Melandro F,
    8. Ginanni Corradini S,
    9. Mennini G,
    10. Berloco PB,
    11. Rossi M
    : Graft macrosteatosis and time of T-tube removal as risk factors for biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 27: E332-338, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Senter-Zapata M,
    2. Khan AS,
    3. Subramanian T,
    4. Vachharajani N,
    5. Dageforde LA,
    6. Wellen JR,
    7. Shenoy S,
    8. Majella Doyle MB,
    9. Chapman WC
    : Patient and graft survival: biliary complications after liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 226: 484-494, 2018.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Zimmerman MA,
    2. Baker T,
    3. Goodrich NP,
    4. Freise C,
    5. Hong JC,
    6. Kumer S,
    7. Abt P,
    8. Cotterell AH,
    9. Samstein B,
    10. Everhart JE,
    11. Merion RM
    : Development, management, and resolution of biliary complications after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: a report from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study consortium. Liver Transpl 19: 259-2567, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Gastaca M,
    2. Matarranz A,
    3. Muñoz F,
    4. Valdivieso A,
    5. Aguinaga A,
    6. Testillano M,
    7. Bustamante J,
    8. Terreros I,
    9. Suarez MJ,
    10. Montejo M,
    11. Ortiz de Urbina J
    : Biliary complications in orthotopic liver transplantation using choledochocholedochostomy with a T-tube. Transplant Proc 44: 1554-1556, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Guichelaar MM,
    2. Benson JT,
    3. Malinchoc M,
    4. Krom RA,
    5. Wiesner RH,
    6. Charlton MR
    : Risk factors for and clinical course of non-anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 3: 885-890, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Park JB,
    2. Kwon CH,
    3. Choi GS,
    4. Chun JM,
    5. Jung GO,
    6. Kim SJ,
    7. Joh JW,
    8. Lee SK
    : Prolonged cold ischemic time is a risk factor for biliary strictures in duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 86: 1536-1542, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Welling TH,
    2. Heidt DG,
    3. Englesbe MJ,
    4. Magee JC,
    5. Sung RS,
    6. Campbell DA,
    7. Punch JD,
    8. Pelletier SJ
    : Biliary complications following liver transplantation in the model for end-stage liver disease era: effect of donor, recipient, and technical factors. Liver Transpl 14: 73-80, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Weiss S,
    2. Schmidt SC,
    3. Ulrich F,
    4. Pascher A,
    5. Schumacher G,
    6. Stockmann M,
    7. Puhl G,
    8. Guckelberger O,
    9. Neumann UP,
    10. Pratschke J,
    11. Neuhaus P
    : Biliary reconstruction using a side-to-side choledochocholedochostomy with or without T-tube in deceased donor liver transplantation: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 250: 766-771, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Shah SA,
    2. Levy GA,
    3. Greig PD,
    4. Smith R,
    5. McGilvray ID,
    6. Lilly LB,
    7. Girgrah N,
    8. Cattral MS,
    9. Grant DR
    : Reduced mortality with right-lobe living donor compared to deceased-donor liver transplantation when analyzed from the time of listing. Am J Transplant 7: 998-1002, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Baccarani U,
    2. Isola M,
    3. Adani GL,
    4. Avellini C,
    5. Lorenzin D,
    6. Rossetto A,
    7. Currò G,
    8. Comuzzi C,
    9. Toniutto P,
    10. Risaliti A,
    11. Soldano F,
    12. Bresadola V,
    13. De Anna D,
    14. Bresadola F
    : Steatosis of the hepatic graft as a risk factor for post-transplant biliary complications. Clin Transplant 24: 631-635, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Tzakis AG
    : The dearterialized liver graft. Semin Liver Dis 5: 375-376, 1985.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lerut JP,
    2. Gordon RD,
    3. Iwatsuki S,
    4. Starzl TE
    : Human orthotopic liver transplantation: surgical aspects in 393 consecutive grafts. Transplant Proc 20: 603-606, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Margarit C,
    2. Hidalgo E,
    3. Lázaro JL,
    4. Murio E,
    5. Charco R,
    6. Balsells J
    : Biliary complications secondary to late hepatic artery thrombosis in adult liver transplant patients. Transpl Int 11: S251-254, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Verdonk RC,
    2. Buis CI,
    3. Porte RJ,
    4. Haagsma EB
    : Biliary complications after liver transplantation: a review. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 243: 89-101, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Northover JM,
    2. Terblanche J
    : A new look at the arterial supply of the bile duct in man and its surgical implications. Br J Surg 66: 379-384, 1979.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Demetris AJ,
    2. Jaffe R,
    3. Tzakis A,
    4. Ramsey G,
    5. Todo S,
    6. Belle S,
    7. Esquivel C,
    8. Shapiro R,
    9. Markus B,
    10. Mroczek E
    : Antibody-mediated rejection of human orthotopic liver allografts. A study of liver transplantation across ABO blood group barriers. Am J Pathol 132: 489-502, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ludwig J,
    2. Wiesner RH,
    3. Batts KP,
    4. Perkins JD,
    5. Krom RA
    : The acute vanishing bile duct syndrome (acute irreversible rejection) after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology 7: 476-483, 1987.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. O'Grady JG,
    2. Alexander GJ,
    3. Sutherland S,
    4. Donaldson PT,
    5. Harvey F,
    6. Portmann B,
    7. Calne RY,
    8. Williams R
    : Cytomegalovirus infection and donor/recipient HLA antigens: Interdependent co-factors in pathogenesis of vanishing bile-duct syndrome after liver transplantation. Lancet 2: 302-5, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Noack KB,
    2. Wiesner RH,
    3. Batts K,
    4. van Hoek B,
    5. Ludwig J
    : Severe ductopenic rejection with features of vanishing bile duct syndrome: clinical, biochemical, and histologic evidence for spontaneous resolution. Transplant Proc 23: 1448-1451, 1991.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Razonable RR,
    2. Paya CV
    : Infections and allograft rejection-intertwined complications of organ transplantation. Swiss Med Wkly 135: 571-573, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Canelo R,
    2. Hakim NS,
    3. Ringe B
    : Experience with hystidine tryptophan ketoglutarate versus University Wisconsin preservation solutions in transplantation. Int Surg 88: 145-151, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Cavallari A,
    2. Cillo U,
    3. Nardo B,
    4. Filipponi F,
    5. Gringeri E,
    6. Montalti R,
    7. Vistoli F,
    8. D'amico F,
    9. Faenza A,
    10. Mosca F,
    11. Vitale A,
    12. D'Amico D
    : A multicenter pilot prospective study comparing Celsior and University of Wisconsin preserving solutions for use in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 9: 814-821, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Khuroo MS,
    2. Al Ashgar H,
    3. Khuroo NS,
    4. Khan MQ,
    5. Khalaf HA,
    6. Al-Sebayel M,
    7. El Din Hassan MG
    : Biliary disease after liver transplantation: the experience of the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20: 217-228, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Dorobantu B,
    2. Brasoveanu V,
    3. Matei E,
    4. Dima S,
    5. Giacomoni A,
    6. Slim A,
    7. Lauterio A,
    8. Forti D,
    9. Popescu I,
    10. De Carlis L
    : Biliary complications after liver transplantation–523 consecutive cases in two centers. Hepatogastroenterology 57: 932-938, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Sundaram V,
    2. Jones DT,
    3. Shah NH,
    4. de Vera ME,
    5. Fontes P,
    6. Marsh JW,
    7. Humar A,
    8. Ahmad J
    : Posttransplant biliary complications in the pre-and post-model for end-stage liver disease era. Liver Transpl 17: 428-435, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Shin M,
    2. Joh JW
    : Advances in endoscopic management of biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation: Comprehensive review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 22: 6173-6191, 2016.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 32 (6)
In Vivo
Vol. 32, Issue 6
November-December 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ischemic Damage Represents the Main Risk Factor for Biliary Stricture After Liver Transplantation: A Follow-Up Study in a Danish Population
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Ischemic Damage Represents the Main Risk Factor for Biliary Stricture After Liver Transplantation: A Follow-Up Study in a Danish Population
BARBARA LATTANZI, PETER OTT, ALLAN RASMUSSEN, KAREN RABEN KUDSK, MANUELA MERLI, GERDA ELISABETH VILLADSEN
In Vivo Nov 2018, 32 (6) 1623-1628; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11423

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Ischemic Damage Represents the Main Risk Factor for Biliary Stricture After Liver Transplantation: A Follow-Up Study in a Danish Population
BARBARA LATTANZI, PETER OTT, ALLAN RASMUSSEN, KAREN RABEN KUDSK, MANUELA MERLI, GERDA ELISABETH VILLADSEN
In Vivo Nov 2018, 32 (6) 1623-1628; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11423
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Treatment of Renal Anemia in Patients With Hemodialysis Using Hypoxia-inducible Factor (HIF) Stabilizer, Roxadustat: A Short-term Clinical Study
  • Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease at a Public Hospital: Nutrition, Compliance and Early Experience With L-Glutamine Therapy
  • Five-year Follow-up of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Nivolumab and Long-term Responders for Over Two Years
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • liver transplantation
  • biliary complication
  • strictures
  • cytomegalovirus
  • hepatic artery stenosis
In Vivo

© 2022 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire