Abstract
Background/Aim: Personalization of the treatment of brain metastases considering patient's overall survival (OS) prognosis is gaining importance. This study was conducted to develop an OS score particularly for patients receiving local therapies for single brain metastasis from gynecological malignancies. Patients and Methods: In 11 patients, the following factors were retrospectively analyzed for associations with OS: Age, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor type, extra-cranial metastatic sites, and time from diagnosis of gynecological malignancy to treatment of brain metastasis. Factors showing at least a strong trend were used for the score. Results: A KPS of 80-90% resulted in a significantly better OS than a KPS of 50-70% (p=0.008). Absence of extra-cranial metastases showed a strong trend (p=0.052). For the score, the following points were used: KPS 50-70%=0, KPS 80-90%=1, presence of extra-cranial metastatic sites=0, absence=1. Patients' scores were 0, 1 or 2 points. OS rates at both 6 and 12 months were 0%, 67% and 100%, respectively (p=0.020). Conclusion: This specific score can be used to estimate OS in patients receiving local therapies for single brain metastasis from gynecological malignancies and personalize their care.
Patients with a single brain metastasis from a gynecological malignancy are quite rare and account for less than 0.5% of adult patients with brain metastases from a solid tumor (1). The majority of patients with single brain metastasis receive a local therapy, either alone or in combination with whole-brain irradiation (WBI) plus/minus a radiation boost to the metastatic site (2). The overall survival (OS) prognoses of patients with a single brain metastasis can vary considerably between a very few months and much longer than one year. The OS prognosis should be considered when tailoring the treatment regimen to a patient. Patients with a poor expected OS time should preferably receive a short palliative regimen with consuming as little of the patients' remaining lifespan as possible. In patients with a longer expected OS time, the goals of treatment should be more on intracerebral control, prolonging of survival and avoidance of late treatment-related morbidities (2). Therefore, it would be very helpful if an OS score was available giving physicians a better idea of an individual patient's OS prognosis. Since solid tumors vary with respect to prognosis and biological behavior, specific OS scores for different tumor types associated with brain metastases would be ideal to choose the best personalized treatment for each patient (3-6). Furthermore, the prognoses and treatment of patients with a single brain metastasis differ from those patients with oligometastatic disease and multiple brain metastases (7-9). Therefore, specific scores for each of these three categories appear reasonable. In addition to a previous score developed in patients with brain metastases from a gynecological malignancy, of whom 80% received WBI alone and 70% had more than one lesion, this subgroup analysis was performed to create a specific OS score particularly for patients who received a local therapy for a single brain metastasis (10).
Patients and Methods
Eleven patients with a single brain metastasis from a gynecological malignancy who received a local therapy as part of their treatment between 2000 and 2016 were included in this retrospective study, which represents a subgroup analysis of a previous study (10). Local therapies included 15-25 Gy of stereotactic radiosurgery or 3×10 Gy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy alone (N=6) and neurosurgical resection followed by 10×3 Gy or 20x2 Gy of whole-brain irradiation plus/minus a sequential boost to the resection cave (N=5). Patients had either ovarian cancer (N=8), cervical cancer (N=1), uterine cancer (N=1) or vulvar cancer (N=1). In this cohort, the following factors were investigated for an association with OS: Age (≤65 vs. >65 years, median=65), Karnofsky performance score (KPS) (50-70% vs. 80-90%, median=70), primary tumor type (ovarian cancer vs. other malignancies), extra-cranial metastatic sites (no vs. yes) and time from diagnosis of the gynecological malignancy to treatment of the brain metastasis (<36 vs. ≥36 months, median=36). The distribution of these factors is shown in Table I.
For the statistical analyses of OS, the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test were applied (11). p-Values from the log-rank test of <0.05 were considered significant, and p-values of <0.06 nearly significant (=strong trend). Factors showing at least a strong trend were used for the creation of the survival score.
Results
A KPS of 80-90% resulted in significantly better OS than a KPS of 50-70% (p=0.008). In addition, absence of extra-cranial metastatic sites showed a strong trend (p=0.052). Therefore, these two factors were incorporated in the OS score. The OS rates at 6 and 12 months following treatment of the single brain metastasis of all investigated factors are summarized in Table II.
With respect to the OS score, the following scoring points were used: KPS of 50-70%=0 points, KPS of 80-90%=1 point, presence of extra-cranial metastatic sites=0 points, absence of extra-cranial metastatic sites=1 point. After adding these points, the score for a patient was either 0 (N=4), 1 (N=3) or 2 (N=4) points. For these scores, the OS rates at 6 months were 0%, 67% and 100%, respectively, and the OS rates at 12 months were also 0%, 67% and 100%, respectively (p=0.020, Figure 1).
Discussion
Since patients with brain metastases from a gynaecological malignancy are rare, there is a lack of data regarding this particular group. The majority of these patients present with multiple cerebral lesions and usually receive WBI alone (2). Patients with only a single lesion often have a considerably better OS prognosis than those patients with multiple lesions and could, therefore, benefit from employment of local therapies such as neurosurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (2, 7-9).
Efforts have been made to improve the results of the primary treatment of gynecological malignancies including novel surgical approaches and systemic drugs (12-18). An improvement of the primary treatment often results in a better prognosis and a prolonged lifetime. Since the risk of developing metastases increases with lifetime the number of patients with brain metastases from a gynaecological malignancy will likely increase, too. For these patients, personalized treatment regimens are required to achieve optimal results in terms of palliation, disease control and reduction of treatment-related side effects. Besides other factors, personalized treatment should also consider the patient's OS prognosis. Therefore, it would be of great value for the treating physicians to have a more precise idea of the patient's remaining lifespan. OS scores assist them with this matter (3-6). Taking into account that primary tumors are different in many aspects, specific scores should be available for different tumor types to allow best possible personalization of the treatment. Furthermore, since the treatment of brain metastases also depends on the number of lesions, i.e. one vs. limited number of vs. multiple lesions, separate OS scores for the different categories of the numbers of lesions would be desirable (2, 7-9). The present study aimed to create an OS score specifically for patients treated with local therapies for a single brain metastasis from a gynaecological malignancy. This study represents a subgroup analysis of a previous study that included patients with gynecological malignancies who belonged to all three categories regarding the number of brain metastases (one lesion, limited number of lesions, multiple lesions) (10). Moreover, 80% of the patients of the previous study received WBI alone and no local therapy. And 70% of the patients in the previous study had a very poor performance score (3-4 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, which is similar a KPS of 50% or less) (10). In the present study, only one patient had a KPS of 50% and no patient had a KPS of less than 50%. Therefore, the aim to create a specific OS score particularly for patients receiving local therapies for a single lesion is justified. In the present study, two factors were included in the OS score, KPS and extra-cranial metastatic sites. Three prognostic groups were identified with significantly different OS rates at both 6 and 12 months. Of the patients of the 0-point group, no patient survived 6 months or longer. Therefore, these patients should receive the least stressful treatment possible, e.g. lower-dose (to keep the time patients have to lie under the tight head mask short) single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (e.g. 12-15 Gy), or short-course local 3-D conformal radiotherapy (2). Neurosurgical resection should be avoided in this group. In the 1-point group and the 2-point group, 67% and 100% of the patients survived for 12 months or longer following treatment. Taking into account these favorable prognoses, improvement of intracerebral control and OS with acceptable late toxicity should be the goals of treatment. These patients appear suitable candidates for neurosurgical resection, higher-dose stereotactic radiosurgery (e.g. 20-25 Gy) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (e.g. 3×10-12 Gy in three days), either alone or supplemented by WBI (19-22). However, taking into account the retrospective design of this study and the small size of the patient cohort, these recommendations are preliminary and await validation in a larger population.
Kaplan-Meier curves of survival for 0, 1 and 2 scoring points. The p-value was obtained using the log-rank test.
Distribution of the factors potentially associated with survival.
Freedom from new cerebral metatsases (univariate analysis).
In conclusion, given the limitations of the study, this very specific score can support physicians when they attempt to estimate the OS of patients planned to receive a local therapy for a single brain metastasis from a gynecological malignancy and can enhance the personalization of treatment for this particular patient group.
Footnotes
This article is freely accessible online.
Conflicts of Interest
On behalf of all Authors, the corresponding Author states that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.
- Received March 19, 2018.
- Revision received March 30, 2018.
- Accepted April 2, 2018.
- Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved
References
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Radiotherapy of Grade III Gliomas: Identification of Clinical Prognostic Factors for Local Tumor Control and Survival
- Occurrence of Seizures Prior to Single-fraction Radiosurgery or Multi-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients With Very Few Brain Metastases
- The Results of Whole-brain Radiotherapy for Elderly Patients With Brain Metastases from Urinary Bladder Cancer
- A Simple Implement for Assessing the Survival of Elderly Patients With Melanoma Irradiated for Cerebral Metastases
- An Instrument to Guide Physicians when Estimating the Survival of Elderly Patients With Brain Metastasis from Gynecological Cancer
- Performance Status Is Associated With Survival in Elderly Patients Irradiated for Cerebral Metastases from Prostate Cancer
- A Scoring Tool to Estimate the Survival of Elderly Patients With Brain Metastases from Esophageal Cancer Receiving Whole-brain Irradiation
- Confirmatory Analysis of QUARTZ Study Results: Survival Prolongation After Whole-brain Radiotherapy
- Prognostic Role of Pre-Treatment Symptoms for Survival of Patients Irradiated for Brain Metastases
- Diagnosis-specific WBRT-30-CRC Score for Estimating Survival of Patients Irradiated for Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
- Comparison of Diagnosis-specific Survival Scores for Patients With Cerebral Metastases from Malignant Melanoma Including the New WBRT-30-MM
- Potential Impact of the Interval Between Imaging and Whole-brain Radiotherapy in Patients With Relatively Favorable Survival Prognoses
- Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Contributes to Prognostic Assessment in Patients With Oligometastatic Cancer and Brain Involvement
- Patterns of Treatment and Outcome in Patients With 20 or More Brain Metastases