Abstract
Background/Aim: From the standpoint of cancer therapy, it is valuable to enhance the anticancer effects of chemotherapy. Our previous reports revealed that up-regulation of heat-shock protein 27 (HSP27) has been linked to gemcitabine resistance of pancreatic cancer cells. Enzyme-treated asparagus extract (ETAS) is an extract that is produced from asparagus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of ETAS on the expression of HSP27 and other HSPs in the gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cell line KLM1-R. Materials and Methods: KLM1-R cells were treated with ETAS, and expression levels of HSPs, including HSP27, were investigated by western blotting. Results: ETAS down-regulated HSP27 and pHSP27 (serine 78) in KLM1-R cells, but, HSP70 and GRP78 levels were not altered. Conclusion: This study suggests the potential therapeutic benefit of ETAS in enhancing anticancer effects by its combination with gemcitabine for patients with pancreatic cancer.
Pancreatic cancer is one of the cancers with the poorest prognosis. For patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine (2’-deoxy-2’,2’-difluorocytidine monohydrochloride) is the most used chemotherapeutic agent, but intrinsic or acquired resistance disrupts the effects. Our previous study reported that up-regulation of heat-shock protein 27 (HSP27) was linked to gemcitabine-resistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Conversely, if the expression level of HSP27 can be decreased, the anticancer effect of gemcitabine against gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells can be re-achieved. In this manuscript the effect of the enzyme treated asparagus extract (ETAS) is reported, which can decrease the expression level of HSP27 in KLM1-R cells in vitro.
ETAS is an extract from asparagus known to induce HSP70 (1). HSP70 is one of the most well-known HSPs. It is a 70-kDa protein expressed in almost all organs (2) such as the gastrointestinal tract (3) and the nervous system (4), and is also known to be involved in tumors (5, 6), and neurological diseases (7). From the aspects of these reports, it was obvious that ETAS controls HSP, so this study was carried out to clarify the effect of ETAS on the expression of HSP27 involved in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer.
Materials and Methods
Cancer cell line and culture conditions. KLM1-R, a gemcitabine-resistant human pancreatic cancer cell line, was kindly provided by the Department of Surgery and Science, Kyushu University Graduate school of Medical Science. KLM1-R was established by exposing gemcitabine to gemcitabine-sensitive KLM1 cells (8). KLM1-R cells were incubated in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (inactivated at 56°C for 30 min), and maintained in a humidified 5% carbon dioxide-95% air mixture at 37°C.
Agents. ETAS and cyclodextrin were kindly provided by the Amino Up Chemical Co., Ltd. (Sapporo, Japan). Cyclodextrin is the excipient for ETAS, and it was used as a control against ETAS. ETAS and cyclodextrin were dissolved in RPMI, diluted, and subjected to filter sterilization treatment.
Sample preparation. ETAS (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/ml) or cyclodextrin (2.0 mg/ml) was administered to KLM1-R cells for 120 h. After that, cells were collected and homogenized in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.5, 165 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium vandate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 10 mM ethylendiaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA), 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin and 1% nonylphenoxypolyethoxylethnol-40 (NP-40)]. The suspension was further incubated at 4°C for 1 h on a vibrating shaker and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatants were collected and used for western blotting. Protein concentrations were measured by the Lowry method. Ten samples from KLM1-R were analyzed separately.
Western blot analysis. In order to analyze the expression levels of each protein in KLM1-R cells, 15 μg of protein from each sample was analyzed by western blotting. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was carried out in precast gels (4-20% gradient acrylamide; Mini-PROTEAN TGX Gels, Bio-Rad. Hercules, CA, USA). After electrophoresis, gels were transferred electrophoretically onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% skimmed milk dissolved in Tris-buffered saline (TBS). After then, membranes were washed twice with TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 and once with TBS.
The primary antibodies used were: mouse monoclonal antibody against HSP27 (dilution 1:200, #sc-13132 (F-4); Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit polyclonal antibody against pHSP27 (serine phosphorylation 78) (dilution 1:200, #2405; Cell Signaling Technology (CST), Beverly, MA, USA), goat polyclonal antibody against HSP70 (dilution 1:200, #sc-1060 (K-20); Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) (dilution 1:200, #sc-1050 (N-20); Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and actin (dilution 1:200, #sc-1616 (I-19); Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Membranes were incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C. They were washed three times with TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 and then incubated with one of the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-mouse for HSP27, anti-rabbit for pHSP27 (serine 78), anti-goat for HSP70, GRP78 and actin, dilution 1:10,000; Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Bands of HSP27, pHSP27 (serine 78), HSP70, GRP78 and actin were visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ImmunoStar Long Dectection; Wako, Osaka, Japan) and recorded by Image Reader Las-1000 Pro (Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Expression levels of HSP27, pHSP27 (serine 78), HSP70, GRP78 and actin in the group treated with ETAS (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/ml) or in the control group (2.0 mg/ml of cyclodextrin) in KLM1-R cells and the expression levels of actin in both groups were quantified by analyzing the intensity of each band with Multi Gauge ver 3.0 software (Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
The statistical significance of differences in HSP27, pHSP27 (serine 78), HSP70, GRP78 and actin expression levels with or without ETAS-treatment in KLM1-R cells were calculated by Student's t-test. A p-value<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
To investigate the effect of ETAS on HSP27, pHSP27 (serine 78), HSP70 and GRP78 expression levels in KLM1-R cells, western blotting with primary antibodies against HSP27, pHSP27 (serine 78), HSP70, GRP78 and actin was performed. The protein expression levels of HSP27 (Figure 1) and pHSP27 (serine 78) (Figure 2) in ETAS-treated KLM 1-R cells were decreased, whereas in the control group, no decrease was observed. However, HSP70 family proteins HSP70 and GRP78 showed the same levels of expression in both groups (Figures 3 and 4).
The ratio of intensities of HSP27/actin and pHSP27/actin in KLM1-R cells were measured. The ratio of the band intensities in the control were considered to be 100%. The ratio of intensities of HSP27/actin, pHSP27 (serine 78)/actin in ETAS-treated or control KLM1-R cells were 55.60%±24.30 (Figure 5) and 75.53%±34.89 (Figure 6), respectively. The ratio of intensity of HSP27/actin, pHSP27 (serine 78)/actin was significantly different (p<0.05) (Figures 5 and 6), but that of HSP70/actin and GRP78/actin did not show any difference (Figures 7 and 8).
These results show that the expression levels of HSP27 and pHSP27 (serine 78) were decreased in KLM1-R cells treated with ETAS.
Discussion
Heat shock proteins (HSPs), also called stress proteins, are expressed in the cytosol, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and nucleus and respond to various stresses (physical, chemical, environmental stress) (9). It is known that HSPs function widely in various organisms ranging from humans to bacteria (10). Their main function is to protect the cells and allow cells to survive when exposed to various stresses. This function is an essential function for the survival of living organisms. On the other hand, since they are also expressed in cancer cells, they also bring about resistance to anticancer drugs. Many groups have reported that overexpression of HSP27 in many types of cancer is related to anti-cancer drug resistance and poor prognosis (11-13). In pancreatic cancer cells, our previous study reported that the expression level of HSP27 was elevated in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells compared to gemcitabine-sensitive pancreatic cancer cells (14, 15). Therefore, it is thought that HSPs can be targets for anticancer drug treatment (16-19). So far we have reported the trial experiments to down-regulate HSP27 by IFN-γ, KNK437 or AHCC (20-24). These three materials showed significant synergistic cytotoxic effect on gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells by combinatorial treatment with gemcitabine. Since ETAS is an extract from asparagus known to up-regulate HSPs (1), this study was performed to clarify the dynamics of ETAS on HSP27. The results of this study, showed that ETAS suppressed HSP27 expression in vitro. There is a report that ETAS up-regulated HSP 70 (1), and thus the possibility arose that HSP 27 would rise in conjunction with it. However, in this study, the results showed only a decrease in HSP 27 levels, and from the viewpoint of HSP 27, there is a possibility for ETAS to be used in cancer treatment as an auxiliary substance. It may be used especially in the case of pancreatic cancer, where the 5-year survival rate is extremely low as 6.9%, and is one of the cancers (25) with poor prognosis, which usually presents at anwith advanced stage at the time of diagnosis.
Many pancreatic cancer patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents show resistance to gemcitabine, the first-choice chemotherapy drug, and they are, thus, difficult to treat. Response efficiency with gemcitabine alone was 13.3% (26), response rate with gemcitabine and S-1 concomitant administration was 29.3% (26), and response rate with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel concomitant administration was 58.8% which is not a good result at all (27).
In the future, it is necessary to compare the antitumor effect of the gemcitabine-alone group and ETAS/gemcitabine-combination group against KLM1-R in vitro and in vivo. This study suggested that a synergistic action of ETAS combined with gemcitabine would be expected.
Acknowledgements
The Authors thank Dr. Shin-ichiro Maehara and Prof. Yoshihiro Maehara at Kyushu University for providing KLM1-R cells. Immunoblot detection by LAS-1000 was conducted at Yamaguchi University Gene Research Center. Regarding this article, there are no conflicts of interest to be disclosed.
Footnotes
This article is freely accessible online.
- Received April 3, 2018.
- Revision received April 23, 2018.
- Accepted April 24, 2018.
- Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved