Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Effect of Androgen-deprivation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Patients with Prostate Cancer

YOSHIYUKI MIYAZAWA, YOSHITAKA SEKINE, TAKAHIRO SYUTO, MASASHI NOMURA, HIDEKAZU KOIKE, HIROSHI MATSUI, YASUHIRO SHIBATA, KAZUTO ITO and KAZUHIRO SUZUKI
In Vivo March 2018, 32 (2) 409-412;
YOSHIYUKI MIYAZAWA
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: miya.yoshi@hotmail.co.jp
YOSHITAKA SEKINE
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAHIRO SYUTO
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASASHI NOMURA
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEKAZU KOIKE
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI MATSUI
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUHIRO SHIBATA
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUTO ITO
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUHIRO SUZUKI
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: To evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) in Japanese patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after administering androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 2 years. Patients and Methods: A total of 84 Japanese patients with PCa were enrolled in this study during the period 2008-2011. BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, every 6 months. The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score was calculated before starting ADT. We evaluated the change in BMD over a 2-year period and the relationship between this change, the FRAX score, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results: Compared to baseline, BMD decreased by 2.50% at 6 months after ADT, by 4.28% after 12 months, by 5.34% after 18 months, and by 6.16% after 2 years (all p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the eGFR, according to a threshold rate of 73.5 ml/min, was a significant factor in BMD. Conclusion: Lumbar BMD in Japanese patients with PCa decreased by 4.28% at 1 year after ADT and by 6.16% after 2 years. We found a correlation between the decrease in BMD and the eGFR before initiating ADT, suggesting a small BMD reduction in patients with PCa who have good renal function.

  • Prostate cancer
  • androgen-deprivation therapy
  • bone mineral density
  • chronic kidney disease

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common carcinomas in developed countries, including Japan (1). PCa is known to be an androgen-dependent cancer and controlling androgen levels is thus effective for its suppression. Surgery and radiation therapy are often applied for curative treatment of topical PCa, but androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is usually used in Japan as the initial therapy in combination with radiation, and in cases that are refractory to surgery. While ADT is highly effective, various complications associated with its long-term use may be problematic, including osteoporosis accompanying a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) (2-4). A decrease in BMD is associated with an increased incidence of bone fracture, and various complications are believed to increase the mortality rate. A reduction in muscle mass due to ADT may also contribute to an increased risk of falls (5-6). Previous studies done in the United States showed that BMD decreased by 2-8% in the first year after ADT initiation (3, 7, 8). The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score has been used to predict the incidence of bone-related events. The FRAX score was developed by the World Health Organization to predict fracture risk in patients according to the presence of clinical risk factors, alone or in combination with femoral neck BMD (9). It is a computer-based algorithm that calculates the 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fractures (e.g., clinical spine, forearm, hip, or shoulder fracture) according to age, sex, body mass index, and clinical risk factors (10, 11). No study has reported on the relationship between the FRAX score before ADT and the change in BMD after initiating ADT treatment in Japanese patients with PCa. In this study, we measured the effect of administering a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist on BMD in patients with PCa over 2 years and examined the relationship between the change in BMD and FRAX score before treatment. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) can lead to disturbed mineral homeostasis, increasing or decreasing the circulating levels of calcium, phosphorus, fibroblast growth factor 23, vitamin D, and parathyroid hormone. This effect on mineral homeostasis may be associated with increased bone fragility (12, 13). Therefore, we examined renal function before the start of ADT and examined the degree of change in BMD after administration of ADT.

Patients and Methods

We conducted an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-arm, open-label trial. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the change in lumbar spine BMD after administration of ADT for 2 years in Japanese patients. A total of 103 Japanese patients with PCa were enrolled in this study during the period 2008-2011. All patients were pathologically diagnosed with PCa and followed-up at Gunma University Hospital (Gunma, Japan). A retrospective study was conducted on 84 of the patients, who were followed for 2 years. Of the 19 patients who were lost to follow up, 1 died of rectal cancer and the other 18 were transferred to another institution. The characteristics of the 84 patients are shown in Table I. The mean age of the 84 patients was 70.3 years; the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before administration of ADT was 10.1 ng/ml. The clinical stages of the patients were T1cN0M0 (n=30), T2N0M0 (n=23), T3N0M0 (n=29), and T4N1M1 (n=2). Two patients had bone metastases and lymph node metastasis. Eighteen patients underwent combined-androgen blockade (CAB) with bicalutamide. Among the 84 cases studied, no patient was administered medications for osteoporosis (bisphosphonates, vitamin D, calcium preparations, etc.) during the 2-year study period. All patients were administered leuprolide as ADT. A dose of 3.75 mg was administered only at the start of treatment, with 11.25 mg being administered every 3 months thereafter. Seventy patients (83.3%) underwent radiation treatment (external beam radiation therapy) for curative purposes; the other fourteen patients received ADT only. No events, such as fractures, occurred in any case during the observation period. In total, 5 patients (6.0%) had diabetes, 13 (15.5%) had heart disease, 17 (20.2%) had hypertension, and 4 (4.8%) had a history of other carcinoma treatments. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), used as an indicator of kidney function, was calculated by substituting sex, age, weight, and serum creatinine level (mg/ml) data into the Cockcroft–Gault formula. The Ethics Committee for Clinical Studies of Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine approved this study, and written consent was obtained from all enrolled patients.

BMD measurements. BMD was measured in our hospital during the period 2008-2011 by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a Hologic DXA scanner (Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA). The BMD, in grams per square centimeter, was measured in the lumbar spine. We measured BMD by DXA at pre-treatment and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after starting ADT treatment. The BMD after initiating treatment was compared with the pre-treatment BMD.

FRAX scoring. The FRAX score was calculated before starting ADT. The FRAX tool (https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX/tool.jsp?lang=jp) was used to compute the probability of a major osteoporotic event or a hip fracture: in this study, we used the Japanese version of the instrument. Date of birth, weight (kg), height (cm), and various clinical risk factors (history of fracture, history of hip fracture in a parent, tobacco smoker, current use of glucocorticoids, rheumatoid arthritis, secondary osteoporosis, and daily consumption of ≥3 units of alcohol; all yes/no responses) were entered into the FRAX tool, and the fracture probability was calculated for each subject. Because we could not obtain the femoral neck BMD data, we did not enter this variable into FRAX. ADT was performed, and the questionnaire items pertaining to the presence or absence of secondary osteoporosis examined, in all cases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinical characteristics of the patients.

Statistical analysis. Numerical data were compared using Student's t-test. Correlations among variables were determined using binomial logistic regression analysis. In all analyses, p-values <0.05 were considered significant. We conducted the statistical analysis using SPSS software (ver. 24.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Ethics approval and consent to participate. The Ethics Committee for Clinical Studies of the Gunma University Hospital approved this study, and written consent was obtained from all of the enrolled patients. It was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent.

Results

The pre-treatment parameters of the 84 cases are summarized in Table II. Mean lumbar spine BMD was 1.025±0.200 mg/cm2. Mean serum creatinine was 0.80±0.18 mg/ml, and the mean eGFR calculated based on serum creatinine was 73.5±5.40 ml/min. Among all patients, the median 10-year probability of fracture according to the risk factors entered into FRAX was 23.0±2.8%. The median 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture was 9.6±3.4%. The median 10-year probability of a hip fracture was 3.6±2.6%. BMD tended to decrease with time, but the decline at 1 year after treatment tended to be proportionally larger than that between 1 and 2 years after treatment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Baseline characteristics of the patients.

Table III shows changes in BMD during the 2-year period after starting ADT. Relative to baseline, BMD decreased by 2.50% at 6 months after ADT, by 4.28% at 12 months, by 5.34% at 18 months, and by 6.16% at 2 years (all p<0.05).

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether or not the decrease in BMD at 2 years after ADT was less than 6.16%: the results are shown in Table IV. The only factor that remained significant in the multivariate analysis was the eGFR (≥73.5 vs. <73.5 ml/min). No significant correlation was detected between the rate of bone-related events (calculated by reference to the FRAX score) and the rate of change in BMD.

Discussion

ADT causes a reduction in BMD, thus resulting in an increased frequency of osteoporosis and fractures. Previous reports showed that BMD decreases by 2-8% in the first year after ADT initiation (3, 4, 7). The BMD decline in men treated with ADT may be greater compared with the 2.5% decrease per year reported for post-menopausal women (14). Maillefert et al. showed that lumbar spine BMD decreased by 7.1% after ADT treatment combined with 18 months of LHRH agonist administration in 12 patients with PCa (7). Miyaji et al. showed that, in 27 Japanese patients without bone metastasis in 2004, the median lumbar spine BMD decreased significantly, from 0.966 to 0.937 g/cm3 (p=0.047), after 2 years of ADT (15). Based on these data, ADT for 2 years resulted in an approximately 3% reduction in BMD. Thus, there was an almost two-fold difference in the rate of reduction in BMD after ADT initiation between Miyaji et al. and the present study. Differences in sample size (84 cases in the present study, 27 cases in Miyaji et al.) and patient characteristics may have had an effect, and our results were similar to those of western studies (2-8).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Absolute change (mg/cm2) and percent change in bone mineral density from baseline.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Factors predicting a decrease in BMD, at 2 years after initiation of ADT, of less than 6.16%: results of univariate and multivariate analyses.

With reference to the likelihood of fractures (as determined by FRAX), it may be useful to consider osteoporosis treatment in patients undergoing ADT treatment (9, 10). Prior to our analysis, we predicted that patients with high fracture risk, as calculated by FRAX, would show a greater decline in BMD, but the results did not support this. A logistic binomial analysis was conducted to examine whether there was a correlation between FRAX fracture risk and BMD; however, no significant correlation was found, suggesting that the risk of fracture calculated by FRAX is to calculate the possibility of the last fracture, indicating that it does not correlate with the decrease in BMD. As there were no bone-related events among our study population during the observation period, such as fractures, it was not possible to examine the correlations among fracture risk on FRAX, BMD, and bone-related events. We aim to extend the observation period in future studies. Multivariate analysis revealed that the eGFR (median=73.5 ml/min) at ADT initiation was related to the degree of decrease in BMD. Regardless of whether or not ADT is administered, bone management of patients with CKD is important because kidney function is related to bone mineral content (12, 13). However, the optimal eGFR cutoff value for predicting reduced BMD is unknown. Therefore, a future study is necessary to ascertain this.

This study had certain limitations. For example, it is necessary to measure femoral neck BMD when calculating the FRAX score. However, our unique results regarding changes in BMD over 2 years following ADT initiation, in a comparatively large sample of Japanese patients with PCa, are important for informing future bone management of such patients.

Conclusion

We found that the lumbar BMD of Japanese patients with PCa who underwent ADT decreased by 4.28% at 1 year and by 6.16% at 2 years. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that the decrease in BMD was correlated with the eGFR before initiating ADT, suggesting a small BMD reduction in patients with PCa and good renal function.

Acknowledgements

None.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    Yoshiyuki Miyazawa, Takahiro Syuto, Yoshitaka Sekine, Masashi Nomura, Hidekazu Koike, Hiroshi Matsui, Yasuhiro Shibata and Kazuto Ito declare that there are no conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported. Kazuhiro Suzuki is a recipient of research grants and honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Astellas Pharma Inc.

  • Received December 24, 2017.
  • Revision received January 22, 2018.
  • Accepted January 23, 2018.
  • Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ito K
    : Prostate cancer in Asian man. Nat Rev Urol 11: 197-212, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bergström I,
    2. Gustafsson H,
    3. Sjöberg K,
    4. Arver S
    : Changes in bone mineral density differ between gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue- and surgically castrated men with prostate cancer: a prospective, controlled, parallel-group study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38: 148-152, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Berruti A,
    2. Dogliotti L,
    3. Terrone C,
    4. Cerutti S,
    5. Isaia G,
    6. Tarabuzzi R,
    7. Reimond G,
    8. Mari M,
    9. Ardissone P,
    10. De Luca S,
    11. Fasolis G,
    12. Fontana D,
    13. Rossetti SR,
    14. Angell A
    : Changes in bone mineral density, lean body mass and fat content as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with prostate cancer without apparent bone metastases given androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol 167: 2361-2367, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Daniell HW,
    2. Dunn SR,
    3. Ferguson DW,
    4. Lomas G,
    5. Niazi Z,
    6. Stratte PT
    : Progressive osteoporosis during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 163: 181-186, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Smith MR
    : Changes in fat and lean body mass during androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Urology 63: 742-745, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Smith MR,
    2. Finkelstein JS,
    3. McGovern FJ,
    4. Zietman AL,
    5. Fallon MA,
    6. Schoenfeld DA,
    7. Kantoff PW
    : Changes in body composition during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 599-603, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Maillefert JF,
    2. Sibilia J,
    3. Michel F,
    4. Saussine C,
    5. Javier RM,
    6. Tavemier C
    : Bone mineral density in men treated with synthetic gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prostatic carcinoma. J. Urol 161: 1219-1222, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Daniell HW,
    2. Dunn SR,
    3. Ferguson DW,
    4. Lomas G,
    5. Niazi Z,
    6. Stratte PT
    : Progressive osteoporosis during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 163: 181-186, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kanis JA,
    2. Oden A,
    3. Johansson H,
    4. Borgstrom F,
    5. Strom O,
    6. McCloskey E
    : FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44(5): 734-743, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Johansson H,
    2. Kanis JA,
    3. Oden A,
    4. Johnell O,
    5. McCloskey E
    : BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 20(10): 1675-1682, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Kuruvilla K,
    2. Kenny AM,
    3. Raisz LG,
    4. Kerstetter JE,
    5. Feinn RS,
    6. Rajan TV
    : Importance of bone mineral density measurements in evaluating fragility bone fracture risk in Asian Indian men. Osteoporosis Int J 22(1): 217-221, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. KDIGO
    : Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 3: 19-62, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. KDIGO
    : Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl 113(3): 19-62, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Seifert-Klauss V,
    2. Fillenberg S,
    3. Schneider H,
    4. Luppa P,
    5. Mueller D,
    6. Kiechle M
    : Bone loss in premenopausal, perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: results of a prospective observational study over 9 years. Climacteric 15: 433-440, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Miyaji Y,
    2. Saika T,
    3. Yamamoto Y,
    4. Kusaka N,
    5. Arata R,
    6. Ebara S,
    7. Nasu Y,
    8. Tsushima T,
    9. Kumon H
    : Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists on bone metabolism markers and bone mineral density in patients with prostate cancer. Urology 64: 128-131, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 32, Issue 2
March-April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of Androgen-deprivation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Patients with Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effect of Androgen-deprivation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Patients with Prostate Cancer
YOSHIYUKI MIYAZAWA, YOSHITAKA SEKINE, TAKAHIRO SYUTO, MASASHI NOMURA, HIDEKAZU KOIKE, HIROSHI MATSUI, YASUHIRO SHIBATA, KAZUTO ITO, KAZUHIRO SUZUKI
In Vivo Mar 2018, 32 (2) 409-412;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Effect of Androgen-deprivation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Patients with Prostate Cancer
YOSHIYUKI MIYAZAWA, YOSHITAKA SEKINE, TAKAHIRO SYUTO, MASASHI NOMURA, HIDEKAZU KOIKE, HIROSHI MATSUI, YASUHIRO SHIBATA, KAZUTO ITO, KAZUHIRO SUZUKI
In Vivo Mar 2018, 32 (2) 409-412;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Sclerotherapy With Polidocanol Is Highly Effective for Treating Oral Cavernous Hemangiomas in Children
  • Survival Predictors in Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: A Combined Clinical, Inflammatory, and Histopathological Approach
  • Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type I-related Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • androgen-deprivation therapy
  • bone mineral density
  • Chronic kidney disease
In Vivo

© 2025 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire