Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Comparison of 20×2 Gy and 12×3 Gy for Whole-brain Irradiation of Multiple Brain Metastases from Malignant Melanoma

DIRK RADES, LENA SEHMISCH, AMIRA BAJROVIC, STEFAN JANSSEN and STEVEN E. SCHILD
In Vivo November 2016, 30 (6) 917-919;
DIRK RADES
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rades.dirk@gmx.net
LENA SEHMISCH
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AMIRA BAJROVIC
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Epppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEFAN JANSSEN
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
3Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEVEN E. SCHILD
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Most patients with multiple brain metastases from melanoma receive whole-brain irradiation. In a previous study, doses >30 Gy resulted in better outcomes than 10×3 Gy. However, the optimal dose-fractionation regimen has not yet been defined. This study compared 20×2 Gy over four weeks, which was used in the previous study, to 12×3 Gy over two-and-a-half weeks. Patients and Methods: Eleven patients treated with 20×2 Gy for multiple brain metastases were compared to 12 patients treated with 12×3 Gy. Results: Intracerebral control rates at 6 and 12 months were 17% and 0% after 20×2 Gy vs. 42% and 11% after 12×3 Gy (p=0.28). Survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 36% and 9% after 20×2 Gy vs. 50% and 25% after 12×3 Gy (p=0.75). Conclusion: The less time-consuming regimen 12x3 Gy appeared not inferior to 20×2 Gy and a reasonable treatment option, particularly for patients with a limited life expectancy.

  • Melanoma
  • multiple brain metastases
  • whole-brain irradiation
  • dose-fractionation regimens
  • intracerebral control
  • survival

The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma has been constantly increasing over years (1). More than 40% of the patients with a malignant melanoma develop brain metastases (2). Many patients with a single or very few brain metastases of less than 4 cm in size, controlled extracranial disease and a good performance status receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) (3, 4). However, many patients with brain metastases from melanoma do not fulfil these criteria and receive whole-brain irradiation (WBI) alone instead. When WBI is administered, the best suitable dose-fractionation regimen for patients with cerebral metastases from melanoma still needs to be defined.

According to a previous study, an escalation of the radiation dose beyond the most commonly used regimen 10×3 Gy resulted in improved intracreberal control and survival rates (5). However, in that study, 10×3 Gy was not compared to a specific higher dose regimen. The majority of patients in the higher dose group had received 20×2 Gy over four weeks.

An overall treatment time of four weeks appears relatively long for patients with a very limited remaining lifespan, which accounts for many patients with multiple brain metastases from malignant melanoma. Therefore, the present study compared 20×2 Gy over four weeks to a shorter regimen, namely 12×3 Gy over two-and-a-half weeks, with respect to intracerebral control and survival.

Patients and Methods

Eleven patients who received WBI alone with 20×2 Gy over four weeks for multiple brain metastases (defined as more than one metastatic cerebral lesion) were compared to 12 patients receiving WBI alone with 12×3 Gy over two-and-a-half weeks. Investigated endpoints included intracerebral control (freedom from progressive and/or new brain metastases) and survival, which were both referenced form the last day of WBI. Patients included in this study must have been evaluable for both end-points. The characteristics of both patient groups are shown in Table I. The comparison of both groups with respect to the distribution of the characteristics was performed with the Chi-square test. The fractionation regimen of WBI did mainly depend on the preferred regimen at the contributing centers at certain periods of time. Patients included in this study were treated between 2000 and 2015.

The comparison of both groups with respect to intracerebral control and survival was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the difference between the corresponding curves was calculated with the log-rank test (6). All p-values of <0.05 were defined as being significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Distribution of patients' characteristics in both treatment groups.

Results

Both treatment groups were well-balanced for most patients' characteristics (Table I). However, more patients in the 12×3 Gy group had extracranial non-cutaneous metastases than in the 20×2 Gy group (92% vs. 64%), although the difference was not significant (p=0.45).

The intracerebral control rates at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months were 56%, 17%, 0% and 0%, respectively, after 20×2 Gy vs. 74%, 42%, 11% and 11%, respectively, after 12×3 Gy (p=0.28, Figure 1). The survival rates at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months were 73%, 36%, 18% and 9%, respectively, after 20×2 Gy vs. 75%, 50% and 25%, respectively, after 12×3 Gy (p=0.75, Figure 2).

Discussion

Due to its increasing incidence, malignant melanoma has gained importance in the field of oncologic research (7-11). A considerable number of patients with melanoma develop metastasis to the brain during the course of their disease (1). Radiotherapy is the most frequently applied type of treatment for these patients. Most patients with multiple intracerebral lesions receive WBI alone. A previous retrospective study of 51 patients with brain metastases from melanoma suggested that the most common WBI regimen, 10×3 Gy, resulted in worse intracerebral control and survival when compared to higher doses (5). Six-month intracerebral control rates were 23% and 50%, respectively (p=0.021) and 6-month survival rates were 27% and 50%, respectively (p=0.009). In the higher dose group, different dose-fractionation regimens were combined. In that study, one of these regimens was 20×2 Gy given over four weeks. Taken into account the relatively poor survival prognosis of patients with multiple brain metastases from malignant melanoma, an overall treatment time of four weeks can be considered quite long. A shorter regimen would be preferable if it led to similar treatment outcomes as 20×2 Gy. The biological effective dose of a radiation regimen can be given as equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2), which considers both total dose and dose per fraction (12). The EQD2 for 20×2 Gy with respect to tumor cell kill is 40 Gy. When using a dose per fraction of 3 Gy, the most similar EQD2 is achieved with 12 fractions (12×3 Gy), which corresponds to an EQD2 of 39 Gy. Therefore, it may be assumed that 20×2 Gy and 12×3 Gy will result in similar treatment outcomes. However, this has not yet been demonstrated. Therefore, the present study compared 20×2 Gy and 12×3 Gy with respect to intracerebral control and survival. According to the results obtained, 12×3 Gy was not inferior to 20×2 Gy. Intracerebral control and survival were even better with 12×3 Gy, although the results were not significant. Since this was a retrospective study with relatively small numbers of patients on both treatment groups, the results should ideally be confirmed in a larger prospective trial.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier curves for intracerebral control.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves for survival.

In conclusion, 12×3 Gy appeared similarly effective as 20×2 Gy with respect to intracerebral control and survival and can, therefore, be considered a reasonable option for patients with multiple brain metastases from melanoma, in particular for those patients with a limited life expectancy.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    On behalf of all Authors, the corresponding Author states that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.

  • Received August 26, 2016.
  • Revision received September 13, 2016.
  • Accepted September 14, 2016.
  • Copyright © 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Miller KD,
    2. Siegel RL,
    3. Lin CC,
    4. Mariotto AB,
    5. Kramer JL,
    6. Rowland JH,
    7. Stein KD,
    8. Alteri R,
    9. Jemal A
    : Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66: 271-289, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Morris SL,
    2. Low SH,
    3. A'Hern RP,
    4. Eisen TG,
    5. Gore ME,
    6. Nutting CM,
    7. Harrington KJ
    : A prognostic index that predicts outcome following palliative whole brain radiotherapy for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 91: 829–833, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Huttenlocher S,
    2. Sehmisch L,
    3. Schild SE,
    4. Blank O,
    5. Hornung D,
    6. Rades D
    : Identifying melanoma patients with 1-3 brain metastases who may benefit from whole-brain irradiation in addition to radiosurgery. Anticancer Res 34: 5589-5592, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Sehmisch L,
    3. Huttenlocher S,
    4. Blank O,
    5. Hornung D,
    6. Terheyden P,
    7. Gliemroth J,
    8. Schild SE
    : Radiosurgery alone for 1-3 newly-diagnosed brain metastases from melanoma: Impact of dose on treatment outcomes. Anticancer Res 34: 5079-5082, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Heisterkamp C,
    3. Huttenlocher S,
    4. Bohlen G,
    5. Dunst J,
    6. Haatanen T,
    7. Schild SE
    : Dose escalation of whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases from melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77: 537-541, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kaplan EL,
    2. Meier P
    : Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457-481, 1958.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Barak V,
    2. Leibovici V,
    3. Peretz T,
    4. Kalichman I,
    5. Lotem M,
    6. Merims S
    : Assessing response to new treatments and prognosis in melanoma patients, by the biomarker S-100β. Anticancer Res 35: 6755-6760, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Krajsová I,
    2. Arenberger P,
    3. Lakomý R,
    4. Kubala E,
    5. Březinová I,
    6. Poprach A,
    7. Šťastný M,
    8. Mužík J,
    9. Melichar B
    : Long-term survival with ipilimumab: Experience from a national expanded access program for patients with melanoma. Anticancer Res 35: 6303-6310, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Donizy P,
    2. Kaczorowski M,
    3. Halon A,
    4. Leskiewicz M,
    5. Kozyra C,
    6. Matkowski R
    : Paucity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is an unfavorable prognosticator and predicts lymph node metastases in cutaneous melanoma patients. Anticancer Res 35: 351-358, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kim C,
    2. Economou S,
    3. Amatruda TT,
    4. Martin JC,
    5. Dudek AZ
    : Prognostic significance of microscopic tumor burden in sentinel lymph node in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Anticancer Res 35: 301-309, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Ramos D,
    2. Pellín-Carcelén A,
    3. Agustí J,
    4. Murgui A,
    5. Jordá E,
    6. Pellín A,
    7. Monteagudo C
    : Deregulation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression during tumor progression of human cutaneous melanoma. Anticancer Res 35: 439-444, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Steel GG
    1. Joiner MC,
    2. Van der Kogel AJ
    : The linear-quadratic approach to fractionation and calculation of isoeffect relationships, in Steel GG (ed): Basic clinical radiobiology. New York, Oxford University Press, 106-112, 1997.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 30 (6)
In Vivo
Vol. 30, Issue 6
November-December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of 20×2 Gy and 12×3 Gy for Whole-brain Irradiation of Multiple Brain Metastases from Malignant Melanoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparison of 20×2 Gy and 12×3 Gy for Whole-brain Irradiation of Multiple Brain Metastases from Malignant Melanoma
DIRK RADES, LENA SEHMISCH, AMIRA BAJROVIC, STEFAN JANSSEN, STEVEN E. SCHILD
In Vivo Nov 2016, 30 (6) 917-919;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Comparison of 20×2 Gy and 12×3 Gy for Whole-brain Irradiation of Multiple Brain Metastases from Malignant Melanoma
DIRK RADES, LENA SEHMISCH, AMIRA BAJROVIC, STEFAN JANSSEN, STEVEN E. SCHILD
In Vivo Nov 2016, 30 (6) 917-919;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Simple Implement for Assessing the Survival of Elderly Patients With Melanoma Irradiated for Cerebral Metastases
  • Validation of a Survival Score for Patients Receiving Radiosurgery or Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for 1 to 3 Brain Metastases
  • Does Marital Status Influence Levels of Anxiety and Depression Before Palliative Radiotherapy?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Preferences Regarding Breast Surgery Omission Among Patients With Breast Cancer Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
  • Forensic Medical Examination After Sexual Violence: Implications Based on Victims’ Perceptions
  • Albumin–derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Score as a Marker of Nivolumab Treatment Sensitivity in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • melanoma
  • multiple brain metastases
  • whole-brain irradiation
  • dose-fractionation regimens
  • intracerebral control
  • survival
In Vivo

© 2023 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire