Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Quantum Dots-Bevacizumab Complexes for In Vivo Imaging of Tumors

MARIA GAZOULI, PENELOPE BOUZIOTIS, ANNA LYBEROPOULOU, JOHN IKONOMOPOULOS, APOSTOLOS PAPALOIS, NICHOLAS P. ANAGNOU and EFSTATHIOS P. EFSTATHOPOULOS
In Vivo November 2014, 28 (6) 1091-1095;
MARIA GAZOULI
1Department of Basic Biological Science, Laboratory of Biology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
42nd Department of Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mgazouli{at}med.uoa.gr
PENELOPE BOUZIOTIS
2Radiochemical Studies Laboratory, Institute of Nuclear and Radiological Sciences, Technology, Energy and Safety (I.N.Ra.S.T.E.S.) N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNA LYBEROPOULOU
1Department of Basic Biological Science, Laboratory of Biology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOHN IKONOMOPOULOS
3Department of Anatomy and Physiology of Farm Animals, Faculty of Animal Science and Hydrobiology, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
APOSTOLOS PAPALOIS
5Experimental and Research Center, ELPEN Pharma, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NICHOLAS P. ANAGNOU
1Department of Basic Biological Science, Laboratory of Biology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EFSTATHIOS P. EFSTATHOPOULOS
42nd Department of Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The basic role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in cancer is underscored by the approval of bevacizumab for first-line treatment of cancer patients. Recent anticancer therapeutics based on active tumor targeting by conjugating tumor-specific antibodies has become of great interest in oncology. Current progress in nanomedicine has exploited the possibility of designing tumor-targeted nanocarriers able to deliver specific molecule payloads in a selective manner to improve the efficacy and safety of cancer imaging and therapy. We herein aimed to determine the targeting ability of bevacizumab-conjugated quantum dots (QDs) in vitro and in vivo. Materials and Methods: We used QDs labeled with bevacizumab, in various in vitro experiments using cell lines derived from colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BC). For a competition study of QD-bevacizumab complex and bevacizumab, the cells were pre-treated with bevacizumab (100 nmol/L) for 24 h before exposure to the QD-bevacizumab complex. The breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) were injected to 9 nude mice to make the xenograft tumor model. The QD-bevacizumab complex was injected into the tumor model and fluorescence measurements were performed at 1, 12, and 24 h post-injection. Results: Immunocytochemical data confirmed strong and specific binding of the QD-bevacizumab complex to the cell lines. The cells pre-treated with an excess of bevacizumab showed absence of QD binding. The in vivo fluorescence image disclosed that there was an increased signal of tumor after the injection of QDs. Ex vivo analysis showed 3.1±0.8%, 28.6±5.4% and 30.8±4.2% injected dose/g accumulated in the tumors at 1, 12 and 24 h respectively. Tumor uptake was significantly decreased in the animals pretreated with excess of bevacizumab (p=0.001). Conclusion: In conclusion, we could successfully detect the VEGF-expressing tumors using QDs-bevacizumab nanoprobes in vitro and in vivo, opening new perspectives for VEGF-targeted non-invasive imaging in clinical practice.

  • QDs
  • VEGF
  • cancer
  • bevacizumab
  • in vivo imaging

Cancer remains the leading cause of death worldwide (1). Despite intensive research in understanding cancer aetiopathogenesis, identification of cancer biomarkers, and improvements in surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients survival rate from cancer has not significantly improved (1). Thus novel tools or agents for early cancer detection and diagnosis are urgently required.

It is well-accepted that tumor growth and metastatic dissemination basically depend on new blood vessel formation (angiogenesis). The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) signaling pathway is a key regulator of this process (2). In situ hybridization studies have shown high VEGF expression levels in the majority of human tumors (3, 4). The pivotal role of VEGF/VEGFR signaling pathway in cancer is underscored by the approval of bevacizumab (a humanized anti-VEGF antibody), for first-line treatment of cancer patients (5). Apart from treatment, as VEGF expression is localized in the tumor and VEGF is expressed during cancer development, this provides the opportunity for designing VEGF-targeted approaches for early cancer detection (6). Nowadays, anticancer therapeutics based on active tumor targeting by conjugating tumor-specific antibodies has become of great interest in oncology and nanomedicine, since this approach will increase therapeutic efficacy and will decrease systemic toxicity (7). Additionally, molecular imaging has emerged as a crucial tool in the field of cancer for in vivo monitoring of specific molecules and cellular processes, as well as targeted drug delivery (8-10).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Immunocytochemical studies of QDs-bevacizumab activity in cultured cell lines. A. DLD-1 cells as revealed by the presence of the QDs-bevacizumab complexes. B, MDA-MB-231 cells revealed by the presence of the QDs-bevacizumab complexes. Competition study of QDs-bevacizumab complexes and bevacizumab. After the addition of 100 nmol/L bevacizumab to DLD-1 (D) and MDA-MB-231 (C) cells. QDs-bevacizumab complex specific fluorescence was significantly reduced or absent.

Quantum dots (QDs) are semi-conductor nanocrystals with a quantum confinement property, which enables them to emit fluorescence from visible to infrared wavelengths on excitation (11). Recently due to their bright fluorescence, great photostability and their narrow and tunable emission spectrum, QDs have gained much interest for in vivo imaging applications (12).

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the systemic delivery of bevacizumab conjugated to the surface of functionalized QDs led to target-specific ability in vitro, and accumulation in the tumor.

Materials and Methods

QDs-antibody conjugation. QDs which contain amine-derivatized, PEG-coated nanocrystals and the amine–thiol crosslinker (SMCC) was conjugated to bevacizumab with a Qdot605 Antibody Conjugation Kit (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The molar ratio of bevacizumab fragments to the QDs at mixing is approximately 3:1. The final concentration of QD-bevacizumab complexes was determined by measuring the conjugate absorbance at 600 nm and using an extinction coefficient of 650,000 M-1 cm−1 at 600 nm.

Cell lines. The MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and the DLD-1 colorectal cancer cell lines were used for the in vitro experiments. Both cell lines were cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum. Conventional immunohistochemical techniques were used to determine the binding of ODs-bevacizumab complex to cells, using unconjugated QDs as a negative control. In these experiments QDs and QDs-bevacizumab (100 nmol/L) were incubated with cells for 1h at 37°C, washed, and photographed. For competition studies cells were pretreated with bevacizumab (100 nmol/L) for 24 h before exposure to the QDs-complex conjugate.

Tumor xenografts. All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the European legislation for animal welfare. Animal protocols have been approved by the Greek Authorities. Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice (average weight of 20 g) were obtained from the breeding facilities of the Institute of Biology NCSR “Demokritos” and were used for imaging studies. SCID mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 100 μl of cell suspension (approximately 107 MDA-MB-231 cells/animal) just above the left anterior leg, under sterile conditions. Tumors were allowed to grow for 3-5 weeks, or until well-palpable tumors developed. The animals were kept under aseptic conditions and had free access to food and water until the day of experimentation. All experiments were carried out in compliance with the relevant national laws relating to the conduct of animal experimentation.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Representative image of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer-bearing mouse obtained at 12 h after intravenous injection of QDs-bevacizumab complexes. Arrows indicate the tumors.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Tumor non-pre-treated (A) and pre-treated (B) with excess fold of bevacizumab. Tumor fluorescence in the pretreated group of mice is significantly reduced (p=0.001) (B). Representative histological image of tumors in mice treated with QDs-bevacizumab complexes (C) and in mice treated with QDs-bevacizumab complexes after pretreatment with excess bevacizumab (D).

In vivo optical tumor imaging. QDs-bevacizumab complexes were injected into the tail vein of mice at a concentration of 2 μmol/L and a volume of 100 μL. The animals were anesthetized with an i.p. injection of a ketamine and xylazine mixture at a dosage of 95 and 5 mg/kg respectively before the acquisition was started. In vivo fluorescence imaging was performed with an IVIS 200 small animal imaging system (Xenogen, Alameda, CA, USA). A DsRed filter (excitation wavelength 500-550 nm and emission wavelength 575-650 nm) was used for acquiring fluorescence imaging in vivo. The biodistribution of fluorescence intensity was monitored at 1, 12 and 24 h post-injection. In order to quantitatively estimate accumulation of the probe in tumors, animals were killed by decapitation. Tumors were excised and weighed. The fluorescence intensity was measured and normalized to photons per second with an ROI covering the entire tumor. The total fluorescence flux of each tumor was divided by its weight. The results were calculated as % injected dose/gram (% ID/g). For immunohistologic examination, tumors were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and then transferred to ethanol before processing and paraffin embedding.

Statistical analysis. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Means were compared using unpaired student's t-test. p-Values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

In vitro study. QDs were conjugated to bevacizumab using the Qdot605 Antibody Conjugation Kit. Immunocytochemical data indicated strong and specific binding of the QDs-bavacizumab complex to both VEGF-expressing human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) and colorectal cancer (DLD-1) cell lines (Figure 1A). QDs without antibody showed almost no binding to cells (Figure 1B). MDA-MB-231and DLD-1 cells pre-treated by excess bevacizumab also showed the absence of QDs-bavacizumab complex binding (Figure 1C).

In vivo imaging study with QDs-bevacizumab complex. After verifying that QDs-bevacizumab complexes have sensitive and specific binding ability to VEGF using the cell-binding assay described above, we proceeded to test it in living organisms. Figure 2 shows fluorescence images of mice bearing VEGF-positive MDA-MB-231 tumors at 12 h. In vivo fluorescence detection revealed distinct uptake in the VEGF expressing MDA-MB-231 tumors at 12 h after IV injection of QDs-bevacizumab complexes. The specific fluorescence signal was clearly visualized in the tumors area as compared with normal regions. The MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing xenografts pre-treated with excess fold of bevacizumab showed a significant decrease in the accumulation of QDs-bevacizumab (p=0.001) (Figure 3). Quantitative analysis of the ex vivo tumor tissue fluorescence images post-injection with QDs-bevacizumab demonstrates the progressive accumulation of QDs-bevacizumab by the VEGF positive MDA-MB-231 tumors (Figure 4). Specifically, ex vivo analysis showed 3.1±0.8%, 28.6±5.4% and 30.8±4.2% injected dose/g accumulated in the tumors at 1, 12 and 24 h respectively. To further examine the specific binding of QDs-bevacizumab complexes in tumor tissues, tumors were harvested and paraffin-embedded. As shown in Figure 3C and D, sections from QDs-bevacizumab injected mice showed red fluorescence staining, whereas the tissues originating from animals pre-treated with bevacizumab before QDs-bevacizumab injections showed significantly reduced fluorescence signals.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Ex vivo study of QDs-bevacizumab in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer-bearing mice at 1, 12 and 24 h. Data compare the percent injected dose per gram in the tumor after injection with QDs-bevacizumab complexes. Tumor uptake reached the peak at 12 h.

Discussion

The present study reports the development of QDs-bevacizumab conjugates for non-invasive tumor targeting and imaging of VEGF expression in human breast cancer xenografts in mice. Bevacizumab was chosen since, as it is mentioned above, it is a first-line treatment for several cancers and VEGF is a key mediator in tumor angiogenesis and cancer pathogenesis. Recently, nanotechnology has provided new perceptions for the development of cancer diagnosis by molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery platforms. Even if a lot of progress has been done, the poor penetration of drugs across the vascular barrier and into the tumor parenchyma remains a major problem for cancer therapy (13). In vivo imaging of QDs has been applied to many cases such as lymph node mapping, prostate cancer imaging and receptor-based specific tumor targeting (7, 14, 15).

QDs due to their optical and electrical properties have been intensively studied as a new class of nanoprobe for in vivo molecular imaging (12). QDs also have a modified surface with reactive functional groups for efficient conjugation of tumor-targeting ligands, antibodies and theurapeutic targets allowing for efficient and specific bioimaging (16). In the present study we used QDs-bevacizumab complexes for in vivo imaging studies. The major advantage of QDs for imaging in living organisms is that are photostable fluorophores in biological fluids (17). Furthermore, the therapeutic antibody component attached to the QDs, allows for differentiation between specific binding to specific molecular targets and also allows monitoring in a 12–24 h window as the antibody might stay bound for long time period (18). So, the QDs-bevacizumab can efficiently be used for non-invasive assess tumor, tumor angiogenesis and targeted drug delivery in vivo allowing several studies to be performed in experimental animals and humans. VEGF is strongly expressed in most of cancers (6, 14, 19), thus the specific localization of anti-VEGF-QDs in tumor indicate that can be used for improvement of imaging diagnostic accuracy and simultaneous targeted therapy (20). Concerning the QDs their potential toxicity is a problem for clinical applications, thus further studies concerning the optimal dose, toxicity and biodistribution are needed.

We showed the potential of specific in vitro and in vivo targeted-imaging regarding QDs-bevacizumab, which is among the potential nanoparticles for molecular imaging. This approach suggests that QDs conjugated with antibodies or therapeutics can be promising for cancer detection and targeted therapy.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Scholarship – Grant by the Experimental Research Center ELPEN Pharmaceuticals (E.R.C.E), and the Hellenic Society for Gastrointestinal Oncology (H.S.G.O.)

  • Received August 5, 2014.
  • Revision received October 2, 2014.
  • Accepted October 9, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Center MM,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Ward E,
    6. Forman D
    : Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2): 69-90, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ferrara N
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev 25(4): 581-611, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Brown LF,
    2. Berse B,
    3. Jackman RW,
    4. Tognazzi K,
    5. Guidi AJ,
    6. Dvorak HF,
    7. Senger DR,
    8. Connolly JL,
    9. Schnitt SJ
    : Expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) and its receptors in breast cancer. Hum Pathol 26(1): 86-91, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Suzuki K,
    2. Hayashi N,
    3. Miyamoto Y,
    4. Yamamoto M,
    5. Ohkawa K,
    6. Ito Y,
    7. Sasaki Y,
    8. Yamaguchi Y,
    9. Nakase H,
    10. Noda K,
    11. Enomoto N,
    12. Arai K,
    13. Yamada Y,
    14. Yoshihara H,
    15. Tujimura T,
    16. Kawano K,
    17. Yoshikawa K,
    18. Kamada T
    : Expression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor in human hepatocellular carcinoma Cancer Res 56(13): 3004-3009, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Ferrara N,
    2. Hillan KJ,
    3. Gerber HP,
    4. Novotny W
    : Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer.Nat Rev Drug Discov 3(5): 391-400, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hsieh WJ,
    2. Liang CJ,
    3. Chieh JJ,
    4. Wang SH,
    5. Lai IR,
    6. Chen JH,
    7. Chang FH,
    8. Tseng WK,
    9. Yang SY,
    10. Wu CC,
    11. Chen YL
    : In vivo tumor targeting and imaging with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody-conjugated dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 7: 2833-2842, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Tada H,
    2. Higuchi H,
    3. Wanatabe TM,
    4. Ohuchi N
    : In vivo real-time tracking of single quantum dots conjugated with monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody in tumors of mice. Cancer Res 67(3): 1138-1144, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Paudyal B,
    2. Zhang K,
    3. Chen CP,
    4. Wampole ME,
    5. Mehta N,
    6. Mitchell EP,
    7. Gray BD,
    8. Mattis JA,
    9. Pak KY,
    10. Thakur ML,
    11. Wickstrom E
    : Determining efficacy of breast cancer therapy by PET imaging of HER2 mRNA. Nucl Med Biol 40(8): 994-999, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Ke S,
    2. Wen X,
    3. Gurfinkel M,
    4. Charnsangavej C,
    5. Wallace S,
    6. Sevick-Muraca EM,
    7. Li C
    : Near-infrared optical imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer xenografts. Cancer Res 63(22): 7870-7875, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Chang SK,
    2. Rizvi I,
    3. Solban N,
    4. Hasan T
    : In vivo optical molecular imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor for monitoring cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res 14(13): 4146-4153, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Yee D,
    3. Wang C
    : Quantum dots for cancer diagnosis and therapy: biological and clinical perspectives. Nanomedicine (Lond) 3(1): 83-91, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Pericleous P,
    2. Gazouli M,
    3. Lyberopoulou A,
    4. Rizos S,
    5. Nikiteas N,
    6. Efstathopoulos EP
    : Quantum dots hold promise for early cancer imaging and detection. Int J Cancer 31(3): 519-528, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Sugahara KN,
    2. Teesalu T,
    3. Karmali PP,
    4. Kotamraju VR,
    5. Agemy L,
    6. Girard OM,
    7. Hanahan D,
    8. Mattrey RF,
    9. Ruoslahti E
    : Tissue-penetrating delivery of compounds and nanoparticles into tumors. Cancer Cell 6(6): 510-520, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Kwon H,
    2. Lee J,
    3. Song R,
    4. Hwang SI,
    5. Lee J,
    6. Kim YH,
    7. Lee HJ
    : In vitro and in vivo imaging of prostate cancer angiogenesis using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody-conjugated quantum dot. Korean J Radiol 14(1): 30-37, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Chen K,
    2. Li ZB,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Cai W,
    5. Chen X
    : Dual-modality optical and positron emission tomography imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor on tumor vasculature using quantum dots. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(12): 2235-2244, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Chen LD,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Yu XF,
    4. He M,
    5. Pei XF,
    6. Tang ZY,
    7. Wang QQ,
    8. Pang DW,
    9. Li Y
    : The biocompatibility of quantum dot probes used for the targeted imaging of epatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Biomaterials 29(31): 4170-4176, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Kim S,
    2. Lim YT,
    3. Soltesz EG,
    4. De Grand AM,
    5. Lee J,
    6. Nakayama A,
    7. Parker JA,
    8. Mihaljevic T,
    9. Laurence RG,
    10. Dor DM,
    11. Cohn LH,
    12. Bawendi MG,
    13. Frangioni JV
    : Near-infrared fluorescent type II quantum dots for sentinel lymph node mapping. Nat Biotechnol 22(1): 93-97, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Towner RA,
    2. Smith N,
    3. Asano Y,
    4. He T,
    5. Doblas S,
    6. Saunders D,
    7. Silasi-Mansat R,
    8. Lupu F,
    9. Seeney CE
    : Molecular magnetic resonance imaging approaches used to aid in the understanding of angiogenesis in vivo: implications for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 16(2): 357-364, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Guba M,
    2. Seeliger H,
    3. Kleespies A,
    4. Jauch KW,
    5. Bruns C
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor in colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 19(6): 510-517, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Malvindi MA,
    2. Brunetti V,
    3. Vecchio G,
    4. Galeone A,
    5. Cingolani R,
    6. Pompa PP
    : SiO2 nanoparticles biocompatibility and their potential for gene delivery and silencing. Nanoscale 4(2): 486-495, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 28, Issue 6
November-December 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantum Dots-Bevacizumab Complexes for In Vivo Imaging of Tumors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Quantum Dots-Bevacizumab Complexes for In Vivo Imaging of Tumors
MARIA GAZOULI, PENELOPE BOUZIOTIS, ANNA LYBEROPOULOU, JOHN IKONOMOPOULOS, APOSTOLOS PAPALOIS, NICHOLAS P. ANAGNOU, EFSTATHIOS P. EFSTATHOPOULOS
In Vivo Nov 2014, 28 (6) 1091-1095;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Quantum Dots-Bevacizumab Complexes for In Vivo Imaging of Tumors
MARIA GAZOULI, PENELOPE BOUZIOTIS, ANNA LYBEROPOULOU, JOHN IKONOMOPOULOS, APOSTOLOS PAPALOIS, NICHOLAS P. ANAGNOU, EFSTATHIOS P. EFSTATHOPOULOS
In Vivo Nov 2014, 28 (6) 1091-1095;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • A New Predictive Tool for Optimization of the Treatment of Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer After Stereotactic Radiosurgery
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Geometric Transformation Algorithm for Acetabular Cup Orientation: Converting 2D Radiographic Projections to 3D Spatial Positioning
  • Association of Transforming Growth Factor-β1 and α-Smooth Muscle Actin in Experimental Selective Obstructive Cholestasis
  • Time-course Investigation of Bone and Disc Degeneration in a Rat Model of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • QDs
  • VEGF
  • cancer
  • Bevacizumab
  • in vivo imaging
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire