Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Melanoma: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Classification

MARCO RASTRELLI, SAVERIA TROPEA, CARLO RICCARDO ROSSI and MAURO ALAIBAC
In Vivo November 2014, 28 (6) 1005-1011;
MARCO RASTRELLI
1Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: marco.rastrelli@ioveneto.it
SAVERIA TROPEA
1Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CARLO RICCARDO ROSSI
2Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS and Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAURO ALAIBAC
3Dermatology Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This article reviews epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis and diagnosis of melanoma. Data on melanoma from the majority of countries show a rapid increase of the incidence of this cancer, with a slowing of the rate of incidence in the period 1990-2000. Males are approximately 1.5-times more likely to develop melanoma than females, while according to other studies, the different prevalence in both sexes must be analyzed in relation with age: the incidence rate of melanoma is grater in women than men until they reach the age of 40 years, however, by 75 years of age, the incidence is almost 3-times as high in men versus women. The most important and potentially modifiable environmental risk factor for developing malignant melanoma is the exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays because of their genotoxic effect. Artificial UV exposure may play a role in the development of melanoma. The most important host risk factors are the number of melanocytic nevi, familiar hystory and genetic susceptibility. A patient with a personal history of melanoma must be considered at greater risk for subsequent melanoma. Indeed approximately 1-8% of patients with prior history of melanoma will develop multiple primary melanomas. We herein review the dermatological diagnosis and classification of melanoma.

  • Melanoma
  • epidemiology
  • risk factors
  • pathogenesis
  • diagnosis
  • classification
  • dermoscopy
  • reflect confocal microscopy
  • review

Epidemiology

At the start of 21st century, melanoma remains a potentially fatal malignancy. At a time when the incidence of many tumor types is decreasing, melanoma incidence continues to increase (1). Although most patients have localized disease at the time of the diagnosis and are treated by surgical excision of the primary tumor, many patients develop metastases (2).

The incidence of malignant melanoma has been increasing worldwide, resulting in an important socio-economic problem. From being a rare cancer one century ago, the average lifetime risk for melanoma has now reached 1 in 50 in many Western populations (3). Starting from 1960s, the incidence of this cancer has increased in Caucasian populations and, thus, melanoma has become one of the most frequent cancers in fair-skinned populations (4). Melanoma is now regarded as the fifth most common cancer in men and the sixth most common cancer in women in the United States, where the incidence of malignant melanoma from 1973 to 2002 increased by 270%. Currently, 1 in 63 Americans will develop melanoma during their lifetime (5). It has been estimated by the U.S. Surveillance, epidemiology and End Result Program (SEER) that there are approximately 793,283 men and women alive in the United States who had a history of invasive melanoma (385,054 men and 408,229 women) (6). In 1973, the U.S. melanoma incidence rate was 6.8 per 100,000 and by 2003 to 2007, this rate has grown to 20.1 per 100,000.

According to data collected during the period 1998-2002, Mackie and colleagues showed that the highest recorded incidence of melanoma worldwide is in Queensland (Australia), where there is an incidence equal to 55.8/105/annum for males and 41.1/105/annum for females. The incidence of this cancer is also elevated in New Zealand (34.8/105/annum and 31.4/105/annum for males and females, respectively). Reported incidence rates vary for Europe and are highest in Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries of Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Incidence rates in Europe are higher in the more affluent countries, compared to data from the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Belarus and Serbia, although recent data show a rise in incidence in many East European countries (1)

The incidence of melanoma in Italy is equal to 5-7 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year even though Mediterranean populations are considered to be at low risk for development of this tumor. Therefore, in Europe there is a gradient in incidence rates with the highest rates in Northern countries and the lowest ones in the Southern countries. This is probably due to increased protection against UV rays typical of highly pigmented skin (as the people who live in Southern European countries) but it is also due to the different pattern of sun (chronic rather than intermittent in Southern Europe) (7).

Summarizing, data on melanoma from the majority of countries show a rapid increase of the incidence of this cancer, with a slowing of the rate of incidence in the period 1990-2000 (1).

Parallel with this increase of the rate of incidence there is also an increase of melanoma related-mortality, albeit to a lower degree. In U.S. the mortality rate increased by 1.4% every year between 1977 and 1990. Since 1990, it has shown a small downward trend and decreased by 0,3% per year from 1990 to 2002 (5). According to Rigel et al., from 2003 to 2007 the median age of death for malignant melanoma was 68 years (6). There is a greater mortality rate in men (+2.3% from 1975 to 1989 and +0.2% from 1989 to 2007) compared to women of the same age in U.S. (+0.8% between 1975-1989 and during the period between 1989-2007 as it appears to be decreasing by −0.6%) (6).

Unlike other solid tumors, melanoma mostly affects young and middle-aged people. The median age at the time of diagnosis of melanoma is 57 years and it was observed that the incidence of this cancer increases linearly after the age of 25 years until the age of 50 years and then slows, especially in females.

Regarding the incidence of melanoma in relation to sex, different studies show results that are not always coincident. According to Markovic et al., males are approximately 1.5-times more likely to develop melanoma than females, while according to other studies, the different prevalence in both sexes must be analyzed in relation with age: the incidence rate of melanoma is grater in women than men until they reach the age of 40 years, however, by 75 years of age, the incidence is almost 3-times as high in men versus women (145.6 vs. 47.3 per 100,000) (6, 7).

The distribution of favoured sites of occurrence of the cancer is sex-dependent: the most common areas are the back for men and the arms and legs for women (5). The incidence rate of this disease varies widely also in relation to race. The white population has an approximately 10-fold greater risk of developing cutaneous melanoma than black, Asian or Hispanic populations. However, both white and African American populations have a similar risk of developing plantar melanoma, while non-cutaneous melanomas (e.g. mucosal) are more common in non-white populations (8). According to the dates collected during the year 2007 by SEER, the incidence rate of melanoma in the white population was 27.5 per 100,000, while in black people was 1.1 per 100,000 (in U.S) (6).

Risk Factors

Nowadays melanoma is considered as a multi-factorial disease arising from an interaction between genetic susceptibility and environmental exposure.

The most important and potentially modifiable environmental risk factor for developing malignant melanoma is the exposure to UV rays, because of their genotoxic effect. Elwood et al. studied the correlation between melanoma and sun exposure concluding that intermittent sun exposure appears to be a major determinant of risk for melanoma (9). Sunburn history may be a marker of intense intermittent sun exposure, moreover a history of sunburns in childhood are associated with the highest risk (10). By contrast, the chronic continuous pattern of exposure is associated more with actinic keratosis and non-melanomatous skin cancers (11). Artificial UV exposure may play a role in the development of melanoma; indeed the amount of UVA occurring in a typical tanning bed session is significantly higher in comparison to the exposure during ordinary outdoor activities or even during sunbathing (12). Also the psoralen–UV-A radiation photochemotherapy used for treating psoriasis has also been associated with an increased risk of melanoma (13).

The most important host risk factors are the number of melanocytic nevi, familiar hystory and genetic susceptibility. Melanocytic nevi are benign accumulations of melanocytes or nevus cells and may be congenital or acquired. Approximately 25% of melanoma cases occur in conjunction with a pre-existing nevus (14). Moreover, the total nevus count is positively correlated with melanoma risk and it varies on the basis of number, size and type of nevi (15-17). The outcome of a recent meta-analysis underlined that patients with more than 100 nevi have a 7-fold increased risk for melanoma (18). Regarding the size, larger (>5 mm) and giant (>20 cm) nevi are associated with a significantly higher risk of melanoma (19). An atypical nevus is usually large, at least 5 mm, with a flat component and has atypical features such as variable pigmentation, irregular asymmetric outline and indistinct borders. Twenty-nine to 49% of non-familial melanoma cases occur in the setting of a pre-existing dysplastic nevus (20). Not only atypical nevi are associated with an increased risk of melanoma; the presence of even a single nevus with atypical features enhances the risk. The presence of five atypical nevi give a six-fold increase for melanoma development (18, 21). Melanomas, which develop in the setting of previous nevi, are usually located on the trunk in younger patients and belong to the superficial spreading variety (22).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Dermoscopic criteria for diagnosis of melanoma (reference 41).

A family history of melanoma constitures a strong risk factor for the disease. Considering that familial clustering of a disease is an indicator of possible heritable causes, there has been an explosion in research directed at elucidating the genetic basis for melanoma in the past two decades.

Tsao et al. studied families with inherited melanoma demonstrating the presence of a clear pattern of autosomal-dominant inheritance with multiple family members affected in more than the first generation. Mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A or p16) were the most common genetic abnormalities found in these families, whereas mutation in cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), was a more rare event (23). Patients with an underlying genetic predisposition to develop melanoma usually show occurrence at a younger age (<40 years), multiple primary melanomas or a history of precursor lesions such as dysplastic nevi and are more likely to have tumors that are superficially invasive and have a better prognosis (24-25). Additionally, patients with family cancer syndromes, e.g. familial retinoblastoma, Li-Fraumeni cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome type II, show higher risk of developing melanoma (5).

Certain phenotypic characteristics such as red hair, fair skin, numerous freckles, light eyes, sun sensitivity and an inability to tan, raise the risk of developing melanoma by approximately 50% (26).

Patients belonging to the lower photo-types often develop featureless or amelanotic melanomas that are difficult to detect. For this reason its appears reasonable that they should be followed by a dermatologist independent of the presence of other risk factors (5).

Diagnosis

Early detection of malignant melanoma remains the key factor in lowering mortality. The prognosis in melanoma is directly proportionate to the depth of the neoplasm, which in turn increases with time. Indeed, in melanoma diagnosis, timely recognition, detection and rapid treatment of melanoma remain critical. Malignant melanoma, compared to other cancers, has the advantage of the cutaneous location, which permits its early detection through non-invasive approaches. Nevertheless, pathological examination remains the gold standard for diagnosis.

Skin self-examination. Skin self-examination has great potential as a simple, convenient method of screening for melanoma and precancerous lesions (27, 28). Before the 1980s, melanomas were often recognized by identifying clinically macroscopic features; they were often detected in an advanced stage when they appeared large, ulcerated and fungating (29).

The early recognition of melanoma is becoming an important public health priority (30). The challenge lies in identifying interventions to increase accuracy of skin self-examination for detecting lesions that have the highest probability for being melanoma.

Since there was a need to educate physicians and the public to recognize melanoma in its early clinical presentation, the “ABCD” criteria were developed in 1985. The ABCD acronym stands for Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Color variegation, Diameter >6 mm. Later the letter “E” was added for Evolving, which is especially important for the diagnosis of nodular melanomas (31, 32). This criteria were intended to be a simple tool to alert both public and non-dermatologists healthcare professionals in differentiating common moles from cutaneous lesions most suspicious for early melanoma. They were not meant to provide a comprehensive template for the recognition of all melanomas, as a “good clinical eye” is still fundamental in the evaluation of the lesion (?). Adopting the ABCD(E) criteria, the sensitivity of self skin examination ranges from 57% to 90% (33, 34, 35).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Melanoma clinical subtypes.

Other clinical approaches have been developed to enhance early diagnosis, such as the Glasgow 7-point checklist, which includes 3 major criteria (change in size, shape, color) and 4 minor criteria (sensory change, diameter of 7 mm or greater; and the presence of inflammation, crusting or bleeding) (36). This checklist, because of its sophistication, has been less widely adopted than the ABCD criteria. Another paradigm is the “ugly duckling” sign. It is based on the perception that a pigmented lesion “looks different from all of its neighbours”. This criteria for revealing suspected lesions has been shown to be sensitive for melanoma detection, even for non-dermatologists (37, 38).

Dermoscopy. In the diagnosis of melanoma various assistive optical devices are becoming essential. These devices include high-resolution optical handheld devices that have been designated as dermoscopes or dermatoscopes or epiluminescent microscopes (5).

Dermoscopy is a non-invasive diagnostic technique for in vivo observation of the skin; this device uses optic magnification to permit visualization of morphological structures that are not visible to the naked eye. Dermoscopy has increased the accuracy of melanoma detection since this approach renders early signs of the disease visible in the pigmented lesions much before clinical changes. There are, however, some dermoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of melanoma, the “melanoma-specific criteria” (39):

  1. Atypical pigment network. One of the characteristics of melanocytic lesions is the reticular pattern, which is characterized by a pigmented light-to-dark brown network with small symmetrical holes and thin network lines covering most part of the lesion. Little changes in this pigmented network can be appreciated in early melanomas and when the atypical network is present, then, the likelihood of melanoma is increased. These changes lead to an atypical pigmented reticular pattern characterized by a black, brown or gray network with irregular holes and thick lines irregularly distributed throughout the lesion, usually ending abruptly at the periphery. However this atypical reticular pattern may also be present in benign melanocytic naevi especially in atypical melanocytic lesions rendering, thus, the differential diagnosis is difficult (39).

  2. Irregular dots/globules. In pigmented lesions there is a possible presence of aggregated dots and globules. In benign melanocytic lesions dots and globules are regular in size and shape and are evenly distributed, while in malignant lesions irregular dots and globules (for the shape, size and the distribution within the lesion) are observed (39).

  3. Irregular streaks. Streaks, also called radial streaming, radial streaks or pseudopods, are linear structures that may be observed throughout a lesion but are more apparent in the periphery. The presence of irregular streaks is strongly associated with melanoma, particularly when they are unevenly distributed. However, regular and symmetrical streaks are typical of some benign lesions such as Spitz or Reed nevi (39).

  4. Irregular pigmentation. It is possible to observe black, brown and gray pigmented areas with irregular shape and/or distribution in melanoma cases (39).

  5. Regression structure. Regression structures are also a characteristic of malignant lesions. During the process of regression, fibrosis and melanosis are usually found together and, thus, the regression structures appear as white scare-like areas, blue areas or a combination of both (39).

  6. Blue-whitish veil. The blue-whitish veil is a confluent, irregular, structureless area of whitish-blue diffuse pigmentation associated with pigmented network, dots and globules, as well as streaks. It is relatively frequent in a malignant lesion and can be used for the diagnosis of melanoma (39).

  7. Vascular pattern. Melanoma can be associated with irregular hairpin vessels, dotted vessels, linear irregular vessels or vessels within regression structures (39).

Total-body photographic images and short-term surveillance. Some melanomas can be diagnosed neither with the naked eye nor dermoscopically. But it is possible to create images that can be electronically captured, archived, retrieved and analyzed. In this way it is possible to detect minimal changes in the first stages of melanoma development. With this approach it is possible to follow the dynamic evolution of the melanocytic naevi over time (5, 39).

Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM). Reflectance confocal microscopy has been shown to be a valuable imaging tool in the diagnosis of malignant melanocytic lesions. RCM allows non invasive examination of native skin in real-time at a nearly histologic resolution. The reflectance confocal microscope emits a near-infrared, coherent laser beam by which the human skin is illuminated. As the laser beam passes through the upper skin layers, it is partially backscattered due to the natural refractive index of microanatomical structures. This backscattered light has to pass through a narrow pinhole, which guarantees that only light reflected from structures “in focus” is detected; light from elsewhere is blocked. After passing the pinhole, the beam is diverted by a semi-reflective mirror system and, finally, directed to a detector. The obtained data are processed and visualized by special software on a computer screen. In contrast to histological slides, which show colored vertical sections, the black-and-white RCM images correspond to horizontal (enface) sections at a selected depth within the skin. RCM reveals skin changes at a cellular level (39). Some of the major advantages of this non invasive imaging tool are: improvement of diagnostic accuracy, improved assessment of dermoscopic-histologic correlation, in vivo biopsy side selection, surgical margin assessment and response control of conservative therapies in skin disease (40). RCM is a promising diagnostic technique for melanocytic lesions although currently it is not used routinely.

Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma

In relation to clinical and histological features, melanoma can be divided into 3 main subtypes: superficial spreading melanoma, nodular melanoma and lentigo maligna melanoma.

Superficial Spreading Melanoma (SSM). SSM is the most common type of melanoma accounting for approximately 70% of the cases. It is related to the intermittent exposure to the sun and it is localized most often on the back of the legs of women and on the backs of men. Superficial spreading melanomas may arise de novo or in association with a nevus (5). From the clinical point of view, this cancer shows a variety of colors including tan, brown, gray, black, violaceus, pink and rarely blue or white. The lesion outline is usually sharply marginated with one or more irregular peninsula-like protrusions. The surface may have a palpable papule or a nodule that extends several millimeters above the skin surface.

Nodular Melanoma (NMM). It accounts for 5% of melanomas and most often occurs on the trunk and limbs of patients in the fifth or sixth decade of life; it is more common in males than females. Nodular melanomas are often ulcerated. It does not have a radial growth phase but it has only a vertical growth phase correlated with more rapid growth and higher rate of metastasis (5). Clinically, NMM has a relative uniform brown, black, or blue-black color; it can present as a smoothly-surfaced nodule, as an ulcerated polyp or as an elevated plaque with irregular outlines. In almost 50% of cases, NMM can be achromic. It is related with the intermittent exposure to the sun. Histologically, NMM is characterized by a predominance of dermal invasive tumor. An intradermal component may be present but directly overlies the invasive melanoma. The tumor is composed of small nests and aggregates of cancer cells that together form the overall tumor nodule (2).

Lentigo Maligna Melanoma (LMM). LMM accounts for 4% to 15% of cutaneous melanomas and, unlike NMM and SSM, correlates with long-term sun exposure and increasing age. This cancer may evolve for decades before invading into the papillary dermis (5). Clinically, it shows a variety of colors black, brown or brown on a tan background. It has irregular outlines and although the tumor is often relatively large and flat, a focus of invasion may be detected as a papule. It is located mainly at the neck and head (2). Histologically, it is characterized by a proliferation of cells that are localized to the basal layers of the epidermis.

Acral Lentiginous Melanoma (ALM). This skin cancer is uncommon, accounting for 5% of melanomas in white people but it is the most common type of melanoma among Asian, Hispanic and African patients. Typically, it affects elderly patients, with a female predominance. ALM is mainly localized on glabrous skin and adjacent skin of digits, palms and soles; it usually involves the nail bed of the great toe or thumb (5).

Desmoplastic Melanoma (DM). Desmoplastic melanoma often occurs in individuals between the age of 60 and 70 years, it rises on the head and neck but it can occur on a variety of cutaneous and mucosal areas. It is slightly more common in men. Clinically, desmoplastic melanoma may be amelanotic and it can present as an erythematous or pale or flash-colored nodule or plaque arising in sun-damaged skin. This cancer is positive for S100 and it may be difficult to differentiate desmoplastic melanoma from scars tissue because S100-positive cells can also be seen in dermal scars. This cancer often shows nerve infiltration and it is characterized by high recurrence rates due to their highly infiltrative growth and frequent perineural invasion. It has a high incidence of local recurrence but it rarely metastasizes to the lymph nodes; however, it has a propensity to metastasize to the lungs (5).

Other Rare Forms of melanoma have been also described, notably balloon cell melanoma, myxoid melanoma, osteogenic melanoma, rhabdoid melanoma, that will be discussed in another review.

  • Received June 24, 2014.
  • Revision received August 4, 2014.
  • Accepted August 7, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. MacKie RM,
    2. Hauschild A,
    3. Eggermont AM
    : Epidemiology of invasive cutaneous melanoma. Ann Oncol 20: 1-7, 2009.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Duncan LM
    : The classification of cutaneous melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 23: 501-513, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Meyle KD,
    2. Guldberg P
    : Genetic risk factors for melanoma. Hum Genet 4: 499-510, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Caini S,
    2. Gandini S,
    3. Sera F,
    4. Raimondi S,
    5. Fargnoli MC,
    6. Boniol M,
    7. Armstrong BK
    : Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma according to anatomical site and clinicopathological variant. Eur J Cancer 17: 3054-3063, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Markovic SN,
    2. Erickson LA,
    3. Rao RD,
    4. Weenig RH,
    5. Pockaj BA,
    6. Bardia A,
    7. Vachon CM,
    8. Schild SE,
    9. McWilliams RR,
    10. Hand JL,
    11. Laman SD,
    12. Kottschade LA,
    13. Maples WJ,
    14. Pittelkow MR,
    15. Pulido JS,
    16. Cameron JD,
    17. Creagan ET,
    18. Melanoma Study Group of the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
    : Malignant melanoma in the 21st century, part 1: epidemiology, risk factors, screening, prevention, and diagnosis. Mayo Clin Proc 3: 364-380, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Rigel DS
    : Epidemiology of melanoma. Semin Cutan Med Surg 4: 204-209, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Lasithiotakis K,
    2. Leiter U,
    3. KrügerMacKie RM,
    4. Hauschild A,
    5. Eggermont AM
    : Epidemiology of invasive cutaneous melanoma. Ann Oncol 20(Suppl 6): vi1-7, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Krasagakis S,
    2. Tosca A,
    3. Garbe C
    : Comparative analysis of incidence and clinical features of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Crete (Greece) and southern Germany (central Baden-Württemberg). Br J Dermatol 6: 1123-1127, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Sera F,
    2. Gandini S,
    3. Cattaruzza MS,
    4. Pasquini P,
    5. Picconi O,
    6. Boyle P,
    7. Melchi CF
    : Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. Eur J Cancer 41: 45-60, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Elwood JM,
    2. Jopson J
    : Melanoma and sun exposure: an overview of published studies. Int J Cancer 73: 198-203, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Elwood JM,
    2. Gallagher RP,
    3. Worth AJ,
    4. Wood WS,
    5. Pearson JC
    : Etiological differences between subtypes of cutaneous malignant melanoma: Western Canada Melanoma Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 78: 37-44, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group on artificial ultraviolet (UV) light and skin cancer
    : The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: a systematic review. Int J Cancer 120: 1116-1122, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Stern RS
    : The risk of melanoma in association with long-term exposure to PUVA. J Am Acad Dermatol 44: 755-761, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Bevona C,
    2. Goggins W,
    3. Quinn T,
    4. Fullerton J,
    5. Tsao
    : Cutaneous melanomas associated with nevi. Arch Dermatol 139: 1620-1624, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Holly EA,
    2. Kelly JW,
    3. Shpall SN,
    4. Chiu SH
    : Number of melanocytic nevi as a major risk factor for malignant melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 17: 459-468, 1987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Grob JJ,
    2. Gouvernet J,
    3. Aymar D,
    4. Mostaque A,
    5. Romano MH,
    6. Collet AM,
    7. Noe MC,
    8. Diconstanzo MP,
    9. Bonerandi JJ
    : Count of benign melanocytic nevi as a major indicator of risk for nonfamilial nodular and superficial spreading melanoma. Cancer 66: 387-395, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Halpern AC,
    2. Guerry D 4th.,
    3. Elder DE,
    4. Clark WH Jr.,
    5. Synnestvedt M,
    6. Norman S,
    7. Ayerle R
    : Dysplastic nevi as risk markers of sporadic (nonfamilial) melanoma. A case–control study. Arch Dermatol 127: 995-999, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Gandini S,
    2. Sera F,
    3. Cattaruzza MS,
    4. Pasquini P,
    5. Abeni D,
    6. Boyle P,
    7. Melchi CF
    : Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. Eur J Cancer 41: 28-44, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Watt AJ,
    2. Kotsis SV,
    3. Chung KC
    : Risk of melanoma arising in large congenital melanocytic nevi: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 113: 1968-1974, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Tannous ZS,
    2. Mihm MC Jr..,
    3. Sober AJ,
    4. Duncan LM
    : Congenital melanocytic nevi: clinical and histopathologic features, risk of melanoma, and clinical management. J Am Acad Dermatol 52: 197-203, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Tucker MA,
    2. Halpern A,
    3. Holly EA,
    4. Hartge P,
    5. Elder DE,
    6. Sagebiel RW,
    7. Guerry D 4th.,
    8. Clark WH Jr.
    : Clinically recognized dysplastic nevi: a central risk factor for cutaneous melanoma. JAMA 277: 1439-1444, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Purdue MP,
    2. From L,
    3. Armstrong BK
    : Genes, Environment, and Melanoma Study Group. Etiologic and other factors predicting nevus associated cutaneous malignant melanoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 2015-2022, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Tsao H,
    2. Niendorf K
    : Genetic testing in hereditary melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 51: 803-808, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Stam-Posthuma JJ,
    2. van Duinen C,
    3. Scheffer E,
    4. Vink J,
    5. Bergman W
    : Multiple primary melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 44: 22-27, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Veierød MB,
    2. Weiderpass E,
    3. Thörn M,
    4. Hansson J,
    5. Lund E,
    6. Armstrong B,
    7. Adami HO
    : A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 1530-1538, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Titus-Ernstoff L,
    2. Perry AE,
    3. Spencer SK,
    4. Gibson JJ,
    5. Cole BF,
    6. Ernstoff MS
    : Pigmentary characteristics and moles in relation to melanoma risk. Int J Cancer 116: 144-149, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Gandini S,
    2. Sera F,
    3. Cattaruzza MS,
    4. Pasquini P,
    5. Zanetti R,
    6. Masini C,
    7. Boyle P,
    8. Melchi CF
    : Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors. Eur J Cancer 41: 204-2059, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Rigel DS,
    2. Russak J,
    3. Friedman R
    : The evolution of melanoma diagnosis: 25 years beyond the ABCDs. CA Cancer J Clin 5: 301-316, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Montella A,
    2. Gavin A,
    3. Middleton R,
    4. Autier P,
    5. Boniol M
    : Cutaneous melanoma mortality starting to change: a study of trends in Northern Ireland. Eur J Cancer 45: 2360-2366, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Bevona C,
    2. Sober AJ
    : Melanoma incidence trends. Dermatol Clin 20: 589-595, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Robinson JK,
    2. Turrisi R
    : Skills training to learn discrimination of ABCDE criteria by those at risk of developing melanoma. Arch Dermatol 142: 447-452, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Friedman RJ,
    2. Rigel DS,
    3. Kopf AW
    : Early detection of malignant melanoma: the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin. CA Cancer J Clin 35: 130-151, 1985.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Branstrom R,
    2. Hedblad MA,
    3. Krakau I,
    4. Ullen H
    : Laypersons' perceptual discrimination of pigmented skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 46: 667-673, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Rigel DS,
    2. Friedman RJ
    : The rationale of the ABCDs of early melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 29: 1060-1061, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Thomas L,
    2. Tranchand P,
    3. Berard F,
    4. Secchi T,
    5. Colin C,
    6. Moulin G
    : Semiological value of ABCDE criteria in the diagnosis is of cutaneous pigmented tumors. Dermatology 197: 11-17, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. MacKie RM
    : Clinical recognition of early invasive malignant melanoma. BMJ 301: 1005-1006, 1990.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Grob JJ,
    2. Bonerandi JJ
    : The “ugly duckling” sign: identification of the common characteristics of nevi in an individual as a basis for melanoma screening. Arch Dermatol 134: 103-104, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Scope A,
    2. Dusza SW,
    3. Halpern AC,
    4. Rabinovitz H,
    5. Braun RP,
    6. Zalaudek I,
    7. Argenziano G,
    8. Marghoob AA
    : The “ugly duckling” sign: agreement between observers. Arch Dermatol 144: 58-64, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Neila J,
    2. Soyer HP
    : Key points in dermoscopy for diagnosis of melanomas, including difficult to diagnose melanomas, on the trunk and extremities. J Dermatol 38: 3-9, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Hofmann-Wellenhof R,
    2. Wurm EM,
    3. Ahlgrimm-Siess V,
    4. Richtig E,
    5. Koller S,
    6. Smolle J,
    7. Gerger A
    : Reflectance confocal microscopy – state-of-art and research overview. Semin Cutan Med Surg 28: 172-179, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Argenziano G,
    2. Soyer HP,
    3. Chimenti S,
    4. Talamini R,
    5. Corona R,
    6. Sera F,
    7. Binder M,
    8. Cerroni L,
    9. De Rosa G,
    10. Ferrara G,
    11. Hofmann-Wellenhof R,
    12. Landthaler M,
    13. Menzies SW,
    14. Pehamberger H,
    15. Piccolo D,
    16. Rabinovitz HS,
    17. Schiffner R,
    18. Staibano S,
    19. Stolz W,
    20. Bartenjev I,
    21. Blum A,
    22. Braun R,
    23. Cabo H,
    24. Carli P,
    25. De Giorgi V,
    26. Fleming MG,
    27. Grichnik JM,
    28. Grin CM,
    29. Halpern AC,
    30. Johr R,
    31. Katz B,
    32. Kenet RO,
    33. Kittler H,
    34. Kreusch J,
    35. Malvehy J,
    36. Mazzocchetti G,
    37. Oliviero M,
    38. Ozdemir F,
    39. Peris K,
    40. Perotti R,
    41. Perusquia A,
    42. Pizzichetta MA,
    43. Puig S,
    44. Rao B,
    45. Rubegni P,
    46. Saida T,
    47. Scalvenzi M,
    48. Seidenari S,
    49. Stanganelli I,
    50. Tanaka M,
    51. Westerhoff K,
    52. Wolf IH,
    53. Braun-Falco O,
    54. Kerl H,
    55. Nishikawa T,
    56. Wolff K,
    57. Kopf AW
    : Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 5: 679-693, 2003.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 28 (6)
In Vivo
Vol. 28, Issue 6
November-December 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Melanoma: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Classification
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Melanoma: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Classification
MARCO RASTRELLI, SAVERIA TROPEA, CARLO RICCARDO ROSSI, MAURO ALAIBAC
In Vivo Nov 2014, 28 (6) 1005-1011;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Melanoma: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Classification
MARCO RASTRELLI, SAVERIA TROPEA, CARLO RICCARDO ROSSI, MAURO ALAIBAC
In Vivo Nov 2014, 28 (6) 1005-1011;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Epidemiology
    • Risk Factors
    • Diagnosis
    • Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Melanoma Risk Estimation Based on Objective Measures as a Complement to Self-Assessment
  • Residual Tumor on Wide Excisional Margins After Treatment of Invasive Melanoma
  • Eruptive Melanocytic Nevi Secondary to Encorafenib for BRAF Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
  • All-trans Retinoic Acid Overcomes Acquired Resistance to PLX4032 via Inhibition of PIN1 in Melanoma Cells
  • Endocrine toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world study leveraging US Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system
  • MiRNAs as Potential Prognostic Biomarkers for Metastasis in Thin and Thick Primary Cutaneous Melanomas
  • Analysis of Malignant Melanoma Cell Lines Exposed to Hypoxia Reveals the Importance of PFKFB4 Overexpression for Disease Progression
  • Karnofsky Performance Score, Radiation Dose and Nodal Status Predict Survival of Elderly Patients Irradiated for Limited-disease Small-cell Lung Cancer
  • Defining the Optimal Dose of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Treating Cerebral Metastases in Elderly Patients
  • Analysis of the Antitumor Activity of Clotrimazole on A375 Human Melanoma Cells
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Research Progress on the Microregulatory Mechanisms of Fertilization: A Review
  • Gastric Cancer Invading the Pancreas: A Review of the Role of Pancreatectomy
  • Circulating microRNAs and Clinicopathological Findings of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • melanoma
  • epidemiology
  • risk factors
  • pathogenesis
  • diagnosis
  • classification
  • dermoscopy
  • reflect confocal microscopy
  • review
In Vivo

© 2023 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire