Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Complementary Medicine Down-regulates Side-effects of Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients

JOSEF BEUTH, RUDOLF VAN LEENDERT, KIRSTEN PEMPELFORT, BERTHOLD SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINA GRUND and UDO ENGELMANN
In Vivo September 2014, 28 (5) 979-982;
JOSEF BEUTH
1Institute for Naturopathy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hans.beuth{at}uk-koeln.de
RUDOLF VAN LEENDERT
2Medical Data Research (MDR)-CRO, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KIRSTEN PEMPELFORT
2Medical Data Research (MDR)-CRO, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BERTHOLD SCHNEIDER
3Institute of Biometrics, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTINA GRUND
4Urological Outdoor Practice, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
UDO ENGELMANN
5Clinic of Urology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: The present clinical investigation was performed to evaluate the benefits of complementary medicine in prostate cancer patients undergoing hormone therapy (HT). Patients and Methods: Patients (N=93) were treated according to international guidelines. All patients suffered from side-effects induced by the HT. To reduce the side-effects, the patients were complementarily treated with a combination of sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lens culinaris (Lc) lectin. On case report formulas (CRFs), self assessment of defined side-effects of HT (arthralgia, mucosal dryness, bone pain and hot flushes) were documented before (T-0) and on days 25 (T-1) and 50 (T-2) after complementary treatment. Validation was carried-out by scoring from 1 (no side-effects/optimal tolerability) to 6 (extreme side-effects/extremely bad tolerability), however, only patients suffering from severe side-effects (symptom scores >3) were enrolled in this investigation. Results: The severity of side-effects of HT was reduced by complementary treatment with sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin. The mean scores of side-effects declined for arthralgia from 4.72 (T-0) to 3.66 (T-1) to 2.76 (T-2), for mucosal dryness from 4.45 (T-0) to 3.65 (T-1) to 2.90 (T-2), for bone pain from 4.74 (T-0) to 3.44 (T-1) to 2.82 (T-2), for hot flushes from 4.97 (T-0) to 3.70 (T-1) to 3.15 (T-2). The reduced severity of the side-effects was statistically significant (p<0.001) for T-1 and T-2, compared to T-0. Conclusion: This investigation demonstrates benefits of indication-based complementary treatment with the combination of sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin in prostate cancer patients, e.g. reduction of side-effects of HT.

  • Prostate cancer
  • adjuvant hormone therapy
  • side-effects
  • complementary medicine
  • tolerability

Prostate cancer is amongst the most common cause of cancer death in men worldwide (1). Evidence-based treatment of prostate cancer follows recommendations of international expert panels (2, 3). They are regularly updated and comprise of indication-based surgery, radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) and HT (3-5). CT and RT are known to induce a broad range of side-effects, e.g. nausea, vomiting, arthralgia, mucosal dryness and inflammation (6, 7). The indication-based HT for prostate cancer patients with hormone receptor-positive cancer as well is often restricted by severe side-effects such as mucosal dryness, arthralgia and vascular events (3, 8, 9).

HT for prostate cancer results in a depletion of androgenic hormones which causes thinning of mucosal linings, mucosal dryness and inflammation (3). Recently a clinical investigation demonstrated enhanced tolerability of HT in breast cancer patients that were complementarily treated with a combination of sodium selenite, plant enzymes and Lc-lectin due to decreased side-effects such as mucosal dryness and arthralgia (9-11). Since reduced function of mucosal linings and correlating symptoms result from hormone depletion (8, 9), distinct side-effects were chosen as primary aims in this investigation.

Complementary medicine is popular all over the world. If these treatments are carefully chosen and managed, they may add to enhanced comfort and well-being (12, 13). Some complementary treatments have been tested, e.g. nutrition, sports, psycho-oncology (6-8). Certain complementary medications such as sodium selenite and proteolytic plant enzymes have shown clinical benefits in randomized controlled trials, e.g. reduced adverse reactions of CT and RT, enhanced quality of life (7, 13), while others, e.g. Lc-lectin are traditional naturopathic remedies to stabilize the mucosal surfaces (15).

The present clinical investigation was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of complementary sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin treatment to reduce defined side-effects (e.g. mucosal dryness, arthralgia, bone pain) of guideline-based HT in prostate cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

Patients. Men (N=93) with histologically-verified prostate cancer undergoing HT (according to actual guideline recommendations) were enrolled into this investigation. The patients investigated suffered from severe side-effects of HT, e.g. mucosal dryness, arthralgia, bone pain, hot flushes (symptom score >3), which were initially validated and documented.

Complementary treatment. The patients were complementarily treated with an oral medication (Equinovo; Kyberg Pharma GmbH, Oberhaching, Germany) containing sodium selenite (300 μg/day), proteolytic plant enzymes (800 mg/day) and Lc-lectin (20 mg/day), as described elsewhere (8, 9, 11). Complementary treatment to HT was continued for 50 days. Safety and efficacy of sodium selenite (17) and proteolytic plant enzymes were extensively investigated in randomized controlled trials (16-18). Their combination with Lc-lectin (15) was found to be an innovative and beneficial complementary approach to stabilize mucosal linings (8, 10, 11). Other complementary remedies, especially anti-oxidative vitamins and trace elements and immunoactivation, were not taken by the patients throughout this investigation.

Side-effects of HT. Case report formulas (CRFs) were used to document self assessed safety and efficacy of the complementary treatment. Patients were documented routinely before onset (T-0) and 25 (T-1) and 50 days (T-2) after terminating the complementary therapy. The efficacy of the complementary treatment was verified by questioning the severity of side-effects such as mucosal dryness, arthralgia, bone pain, hot flushes as primary aims of this investigation. Severity of symptoms was quantified by scoring from 1 (no side-effects) to 6 (extreme side-effects). An average score was calculated for symptoms of the adjuvant therapy to investigate the value of this complementary treatment.

Statistics. The student's t-test was performed to calculate statistical significance between mean values of scores for side-effects of HT after 25 and 50 days of complementary treatment.

Results

A total of 93 evaluable prostate cancer patients were enrolled in the present clinical investigation. All patients suffered from severe side-effects (symptom scores >3) induced by HT.

Tolerability of HT along with complementary administration of sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin was investigated by self assessment. As shown in Figure 1, patients suffering from arthralgia, mucosal dryness, hot flushes and bone pain benefited from complementary medicine. The severity of arthralgia, mucosal dryness, hot flushes and bone pain were significantly reduced (p<0.001) after 25 and 50 days of complementary treatment. These results demonstrate that an efficient management of adverse reactions of HT in prostate cancer patients is possible by well defined complementary medicine.

Adverse reactions of the complementary medication (sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin) were not found in this investigation, although a relevant panel of symptoms, e.g. nausea, emesis, bloating were routinely checked. These data confirm randomized controlled trials on the safety of sodium selenite and proteolytic plant enzymes (16-18).

Discussion

By definition, complementary medicine cannot replace the well-studied conventional cancer therapies, such as surgery, CT, RT or HT. Complementary approaches in oncology that are recommended as an addition to standard treatment claim to optimize these therapies. Data emerging from recent clinical trials show that defined complementary procedures may be beneficial for patients (6, 7, 9, 13).

Complementary medicine should primarily be regarded as an optimization of current standard treatment options in oncology. It is to be differentiated from alternative medicine, which postulates to provide replacements for conventional toxic approaches. Although complementary and alternative medicines are grouped together in the popular acronym CAM, they are in fact quite different in their aims. Since many alternative treatments are still poorly-documented (19), equating the two could lead to rejection of complementary medicine. That complementary recommendations concerning balanced nutrition, physical activity, psycho-oncologic support as well as defined medications, such as proteolytic plant enzymes, defined trace elements and vitamins can optimize standard treatment and have been shown in clinical studies (16-18).

This clinical investigation was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an innovative complementary medication composed of sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin. Whereas sodium selenite and proteolytic plant enzymes have proven their clinical safety and efficacy in controlled clinical trials (16-18), Lc-lectin was added to the medication because of its stabilizing effects on mucosal surfaces (15). The scientific rationale of this complementary treatment is: enhancement of the tolerability of HT by reduction of defined adverse reactions to optimize this guideline-based therapy. The present investigation shows that complementarily administered sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin significantly reduced defined side-effects of HT in prostate cancer patients. The reduced adverse reactions of HT, e.g. arthralgia, mucosal dryness, bone pain and hot flushes lead to enhanced tolerability and compliance.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Efficacy of a sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin combination on intensity of side-effects (mucosal dryness, arthralgia, hot flushes, bone pain) induced by HT in prostate cancer patients (N=93). Severity of symptoms was quantified by scoring from 1 (no side-effects) to 6 (extreme side-effects). Patients with severe side-effects (score>3) were investigated before (T-0) as well as 25 (T-1) and 50 days (T-2) after onset of complementary treatment. An average score was calculated for symptoms to investigate the value of this complementary treatment. The Student's t-test was performed to calculate statistical significance.

Since the tolerability of adjuvant HT determines its optimal administration, complementary treatment with sodium selenite, proteolytic plant enzymes and Lc-lectin may enhance the chance of curative treatment.

  • Received May 27, 2014.
  • Revision received July 9, 2014.
  • Accepted July 10, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Haas GP,
    2. Delongchamps N,
    3. Braweley OW,
    4. Wang CY,
    5. de la Roza G
    : The worldwide epidemiology of prostate cancer. Perspectives from autopsy studies. Can J Urol 15: 3866-3871, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Sackett DL,
    2. Rosenberg WM,
    3. Gray JA,
    4. Haynes RB,
    5. Richardson WS
    : Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. Br Med J 312: 71-72, 1996.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie
    : Interdisziplinäre Leitlinie der Qualität S3 zur Früherkennung, Diagnose und Therapie der verschiedenen Stadien des Prostatakarzinoms. Version 2.0, 2012.
    1. De Vita VT,
    2. Hellman S,
    3. Rosenberg SA
    : Cancer. Principles and Practices of Oncology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Ninth edition, 2011.
  4. ↵
    1. Boergermann C,
    2. Hess J,
    3. Otto T
    : Prostatakarzinom. Colloquium Urologie 61-111, 2013.
  5. ↵
    1. Unger C,
    2. Weis J
    : Unkonventionelle und supportive Therapiestrategien. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, 2006.
  6. ↵
    1. Beuth J,
    2. Moss RW
    : Complementary oncology. Adjunctive methods in treatment of cancer. Thieme NY, 2005.
  7. ↵
    1. Beuth J
    : Komplementärmedizinische Behandlung von Nebenwirkungen und Begleitbeschwerden der Krebs-Standardtherapien. Thieme Praxis Report, 2014.
  8. ↵
    1. Beuth J
    : Komplementäre Behandlungsmethoden bei Krebserkrankungen. Krebsgesellschaft NRW, 2011.
  9. ↵
    1. Uhlenbruck G,
    2. van Leendert R,
    3. Schneider B,
    4. Beuth J
    : Reduced side-effects of adjuvant hormone therapy in breast cancer patients by complementary medicine. In Vivo 24: 799-802, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Beuth J,
    2. van Leendert R,
    3. Schneider B,
    4. Uhlenbruck G
    : Complementary medicine on side-effects of adjuvant hormone therapy in patients with breast cancer. In Vivo 27: 869-871, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. American Cancer Society
    : Guidelines for using complementary and alternative medicine. www.cancer.org, 2008.
  12. ↵
    1. Beuth J
    : Evidence-based complementary oncology: Innovative approaches to optimize standard therapy strategies. Anticancer Res 5: 1767-1771, 2010.
    OpenUrl
    1. Beuth J
    : Krebsprävention durch Lebensführung – was ist gesichert? Best practice oncologie 5: 6-13, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Pusztai A,
    2. Bardocz S
    : Biological effects of plant lectins on the gastrointestinal tract. Trends Glycosci Glycotechnol 8: 149-165, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Gröber U,
    2. Mücke R,
    3. Adamietz IA,
    4. Holzhauer P,
    5. Kisters K,
    6. Buentzel J,
    7. Micke O
    : Komplementärer Einsatz von Antioxidanzien und Mikronährstoffen in der Onkologie. Der Onkologe 19: 136-143, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Muecke R,
    2. Schomburg L,
    3. Buentzel J,
    4. Groeber U,
    5. Holzhauer P,
    6. Micke O
    : Komplementärer Seleneinsatz in der Onkologie. Der Onkologe 16: 181-186, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Beuth J
    : Proteolytic enzyme therapy in evidence-based oncology. Fact or fiction? Integrative Cancer Therapies 7: 311-316, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Münstedt K
    : Ratgeber unkonventionelle Krebstherapien. Ecomed Verlag, Landsberg, 2005.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 28, Issue 5
September-October 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Complementary Medicine Down-regulates Side-effects of Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Complementary Medicine Down-regulates Side-effects of Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients
JOSEF BEUTH, RUDOLF VAN LEENDERT, KIRSTEN PEMPELFORT, BERTHOLD SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINA GRUND, UDO ENGELMANN
In Vivo Sep 2014, 28 (5) 979-982;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Complementary Medicine Down-regulates Side-effects of Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients
JOSEF BEUTH, RUDOLF VAN LEENDERT, KIRSTEN PEMPELFORT, BERTHOLD SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINA GRUND, UDO ENGELMANN
In Vivo Sep 2014, 28 (5) 979-982;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Large-scale Survey of the Impact of Complementary Medicine on Side-effects of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Patients with Breast Cancer
  • Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Survival Score Particularly Developed for Elderly Prostate Cancer Patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
  • Expression Patterns of T-cell immunoreceptor With Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study
  • Older Age and Outcomes of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • adjuvant hormone therapy
  • side-effects
  • Complementary medicine
  • tolerability
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire