Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Structural Chromatin Alterations in Peripheral Blood Leukocytes of Alcohol-dependent Individuals During Detoxification Therapy

MARGARITA CHRYSANTHOU PITEROU, ISMINI KLOUKINA PANTAZIDOU, SOPHIA HAVAKI, JOHN LIAPPAS and MARIETTA ISSIDORIDES RADOVITCH
In Vivo July 2014, 28 (4) 529-539;
MARGARITA CHRYSANTHOU PITEROU
1Research Unit of Histochemistry and Electron Microscopy, First Department of Psychiatry, University of Athens, Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mchrysa{at}eginitio.uoa.gr
ISMINI KLOUKINA PANTAZIDOU
2Neurobiology Research Institute, Theodor Theohari Cozzika Foundation, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SOPHIA HAVAKI
2Neurobiology Research Institute, Theodor Theohari Cozzika Foundation, Athens, Greece
3Laboratory of Histology and Embryology, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOHN LIAPPAS
1Research Unit of Histochemistry and Electron Microscopy, First Department of Psychiatry, University of Athens, Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIETTA ISSIDORIDES RADOVITCH
1Research Unit of Histochemistry and Electron Microscopy, First Department of Psychiatry, University of Athens, Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
2Neurobiology Research Institute, Theodor Theohari Cozzika Foundation, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the state of chromatin condensation in peripheral blood leukocytes of alcoholics, during the early detoxification period, in order to highlight structural modifications, indicating epigenetic mechanisms regulated by alcohol. Materials and Methods: Blood samples were obtained from alcoholic patients, who were admitted for detoxification on an inpatient basis, and from healthy controls. The level of condensed heterochromatin and de-condensed euchromatin were detected through the ratio of lysine to arginine residues, by the application of the ammoniacal silver reaction (ASR) staining on leukocyte pellets, and through immunohistochemical localization of histone H1 on peripheral blood smears. Results: Lymphocytes and neutrophils with relaxed de-condensed chromatin were found, indicating a more reactive genome in alcoholics, even at the stage of detoxification. Conclusion: The results underline the importance of chromatin structure of leukocytes as a sensitive, peripheral, biological marker for epigenetic studies in living chronic alcoholics.

  • Alcoholism
  • chromatin
  • histones
  • lymphocytes
  • ammoniacal silver reaction
  • arginine
  • lysine
  • electron microscopy
  • immunohistochemistry

Alcohol is one of the most widely used addictive substances, and continued use and abuse can lead to the development of tolerance and dependence (1-3). Alcohol dependence is a common, chronic, relapsing disorder (4), and chronic alcohol abuse exerts a major social and medical toll worldwide (5). Numerous studies have shown that both genetic and environmental risk factors play a role in the development of alcoholism (3, 6-8). Alcohol intake alters gene expression patterns, thereby producing long-lasting cellular and molecular adaptations that might explain the development and maintenance of alcohol dependence. The heterogeneous nature of alcohol dependence indicates a complex etiology involving mechanisms related to motivational behavior, reward and learning, and adaptation in signaling pathways owing to interactions between alcohol and target molecules (4). Although whole-genome expression profiling has highlighted the importance of several genes that may contribute to alcohol abuse disorders (9, 10), more recent findings have added yet another layer of complexity to the overall molecular mechanisms involved in a predisposition to alcoholism and addiction by demonstrating that processes related to genetic factors that do not manifest as DNA sequence changes i.e. epigenetic processes also play a role (11, 12). Epigenetic alterations include the direct addition of methyl groups to DNA and chemical modifications (acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation) of the histone proteins around which the DNA is wrapped to form the chromosomes. Both of these mechanisms work in concert to remodel the structure of the protein–DNA complex (i.e. the chromatin) and regulate gene expression (3, 13-15).

The chromatin fiber is a dynamic, malleable structure that is targeted by numerous regulatory factors that modify histones and DNA, and remodel the structure of the nucleosomes. The dynamics of the chromatin fiber reflect the combined action of numerous chromatin modifiers, including architectural proteins such as histone H1 (16). The interaction of histone H1 with nucleosomes stabilizes the higher-order compact chromatin structure (17), thereby restricting the ability of regulatory factors, nucleosome remodeling complexes, and histone modifiers to access their chromatin binding sites (18-20). The biology of the H1 and related linker histones is complex, as they are evolutionarily variable. It exists in multiple isoforms and undergoes a large variety of post-translational modifications in its long, unstructured NH2- and COOH-terminal tails (21). Contrary to core histones, H1 comprises three domains, one structured (‘globular’) domain and two unstructured, which specifically are lysine-rich N- and C-termini domains. In particular, the C-terminal domain accounts for more than half the histone H1 sequence, with ~40% composed of lysine residues (22).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinical characteristics of the alcoholic patients, participants in the leukocyte study.

There is an increasing body of evidence pointing to a close integration between the central nervous system and immunological functions, with lymphocytes playing a central role (23). Many investigations have shown that there is a close association between the state of the immune system, regarding leukocytes in particular, and major psychiatric disorders such as mania (24), depression (25), stress and anxiety (26) and schizophrenia (27). As early as 1975, Issidorides and co-workers (28) noted a difference in the nucleo-histone staining patterns of peripheral blood neutrophils in patients with schizophrenia compared to healthy controls, going so far as to suggest an increased dissociation of the lysine-rich H1 linker histone in schizophrenia resulting in a de-condensed pattern of heterochromatin. More recently, similar findings were confirmed by the measurement of the extent of chromatin de-condensation, in blood lymphocytes of first episode, drug-free, patients with schizophrenia, as measured by the level of exposed arginine residues in the core histones (29). This investigation reported a higher ratio of arginine/lysine residues, indicating a more ‘reactive’ genome in patients with new onset of schizophrenia.

Experimental and clinical data support the conclusion that alcohol is a potent immunomodulatory agent. Although impaired immunity in patients with chronic alcohol use has long been described in the medical literature (30), data of the immune status of chronic alcoholic patients show discrepancies. Chronic alcoholics are more prone to infections with a variety of pathogens, have less ability to fight against infections and have an increased risk of developing cancer (31). While malnutrition, vitamin deficiency, and advanced liver cirrhosis can contribute to some of the immune abnormalities in chronic alcoholics, alcohol itself is a potent modulator of the immune system and it can affect it at the level of innate and acquired immune responses (32).

Considering all the above, the present study was designed to investigate the state of chromatin condensation in the peripheral blood leukocytes of alcoholic patients, applying histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques.

Materials and Methods

Participants. The study cohort included nine alcoholics (Table I), selected out of a group of 25 randomly registered individuals over a 1-year period, who had successively contacted the Drug and Alcohol Addiction Clinic of the Athens University Psychiatric Clinic at the Eginition Hospital. All patients voluntarily sought treatment and fulfilled the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for alcohol abuse/dependence, ‘primary alcoholism’ (33), and were admitted at this specialized clinic for alcohol detoxification on an inpatient basis. Detailed information on the objectives of the study was provided to all participants, who all provided their informed consent. Ethical permission for the study was obtained from the Special Scientific Committee of the hospital (Approval Number 181/31.5.2007) and the procedures followed were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), as amended in the 59th World Medical Association General Assembly in Seoul (2008) (34).

The nine participants registered in the present investigation were selected from the above in-patient group, according to the following criteria: (i) age 30-56 years; (ii) good nutritional state and absence of serious physical illness (as assessed through physical examination and routine laboratory screening); (iii) absence of another pre- or co-existing major psychiatric disorder on the DSM-IV axis I, and (iv) absence of other drug/substance abuse. The mere presence of affective symptoms of anxiety was not considered to be an exclusion criterion. Alcohol abusers who fulfilled a DSM-IV diagnosis of depressive disorder were excluded from the study if a major depressive episode had been recorded before the onset of alcoholism.

The experimental group had abstained from alcohol for a mean±SD of 59.11±49.39 days prior to blood collection. They used to consume a mean of 250.00±91.75 g alcohol per day and they had a mean of 21.44±11.46 years of alcohol dependence (Table I). Upon admission, alcohol detoxification was initiated and completed over one week (7-10 days). Detoxification comprised of vitamin replacement (vitamin C, vitamin E, vitamins of B complex) and oral administration of diazepam (10-40 mg in divided doses), with gradual taper off over one week. Thereafter, all patients were given mirtazapine (30-60 mg in 1-2 divided doses per day) in addition to the standard treatment with a short-term psychotherapy of cognitive-behavioral orientation.

Nine healthy volunteers, aged 29 to 55 years (Table II), were also included in the study as a control group, and they also gave their written informed consent.

Preparation of blood cells. Peripheral blood, obtained by venipuncture from both controls and alcoholics, was collected in EDTA-K3-salt-containing tubes and processed for the application of the Ammoniacal Silver Reaction (ASR). Blood smears were also prepared for histone H1 immunohistochemistry.

ASR of Black and Ansley (35), modified for en bloc staining. The ammoniacal silver reaction (ASR) method was applied to blood leukocyte pellets. Briefly, 3 ml of peripheral venous blood from alcoholic patients or controls collected in tubes containing 3 mg EDTA-K3-salt were left undisturbed for two hours at 4°C and for a further hour at room temperature (RT). After sedimentation of the erythrocytes, the leukocyte layer with the supernatant plasma was removed, transferred to a centrifuge glass tube and centrifuged at 330× g for 10 min at RT in a swing-out rotor. The supernatant was discarded and the leukocyte pellet was then fixed with 10% formalin, and neutralized with 2% sodium acetate for 24 h at RT. After dissecting the fixed pellet into small pieces and washing them in distilled water, they were stained with ammoniacal silver reagent carefully prepared as described by Black and Ansley (35), for 8 min, at RT. Then, they were placed for 2 min in 3% formalin solution, and washed. Subsequently, they were dehydrated, embedded in epoxy resins, and polymerized at 60°C for 24 h. Semi-thin sections (1 μm) from 10 randomly selected epoxy resin capsules per participant were cut with an ultramicrotome Leica Ultracut R (Leica Mikrosysteme GmbH, Vienna, Austria), mounted on microscope glass slides and examined under a Leitz Aristoplan light microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), equipped with a CCD color camera. Image analysis was then performed using the Image-Pro Plus software by Media Cybernetics (Silver Spring, MD, USA). Further thin sections (160-180 nm) from the capsules were cut, mounted on copper grids, viewed without further staining in a Philips EM 201C electron microscope (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and photographed with Agfa Copex HDP13 microfilm (Belgium).

Histone H1 immunocytochemistry. Blood smears were prepared on pre-cleaned SuperFrost Plus microscope slides. The preparations were fixed in a buffered formalin-acetone solution (10% formaldehyde, 45% acetone, pH 6.6) for 30 s at 4°C, which is one of the best fixatives for preservation of nuclear morphology and for immunocytochemical applications (36, 37). After air-drying, they were rehydrated in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and pre-treated in avidin-biotin blocking kit (HK102-5K; Biogenex, San Ramon, CA, USA), for the elimination of non-specific background staining. The preparations were incubated with primary monoclonal antibody to H1 (clone 1415-1; MS-628-P; LabVision/Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA) at a concentration 3 μg/ml in TBS, for 30 min, at RT, and then washed in TBS. In order to visualize the end-product of the immunocytochemical reaction, blood smears were incubated consecutively with a multilink biotinylated secondary antibody, an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin solution, and naphthol phosphate/fast red chromogen (Super Sensitive Detection Kit QA200-OX; Biogenex, San Ramon, CA, USA). The preparations were finally counterstained with Gill's hematoxylin, mounted in an aqueous mounting medium and examined under a ×100 oil immersion objective in a Leitz Aristoplan microscope. Photomicrographs were taken with a Leitz Orthomat E automatic camera (Leica Microsystems CMS, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), using Kodak Ektachrome 64T color reversal film (Kodak Limited, England).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Control participants in the leukocyte study.

Image Analysis – Morphometry of ASR-stained Epon semi-thin sections. Image analysis was carried out using the Image-Pro Plus, version 3.0, software for Windows NT (Media Cybernetics, Inc. Rockville, MD, USA). The purpose was to measure the yellow nuclear areas representing lysine and the brown-black nuclear areas representing arginine in about 300 nuclei of leukocytes per individual, automatically using a number of commands from the software, as previously described (29). Briefly, the yellow areas were defined and measured in μm2 in every nucleus, while the brown-black areas were calculated automatically by the subtraction of the yellow area from the whole defined nuclear area. The relative availability of lysine and arginine was expressed in percentages and all the measurements were automatically recorded and statistically assessed.

Statistical analysis. All the statistical tests were performed with the STATISTICA 6.1 (StatSoft, Inc. Tulsa, OK, USA) software package. In order to compare the lysine and arginine areas between the polymorphonuclear and mononuclear cells of the two groups, a standard factorial MANOVA approach was employed (38). The two groups and the two types of cells, with the two dependent variables, lysine and arginine, constitute a 2×2 design.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Photomicrographs of representative fields of the Epon semi-thin sections of the leukocyte nuclei from controls as stained with ASR (A, B). Prevalence of yellow nuclear ASR staining, which represents lysine-rich histones, in the majority of mononuclear (thick arrows) and polymorphonuclear cells (thin arrows) is evident. In contrast, leukocyte nuclei from the alcoholic patients (C, D) show the prevalence of an increased amount of nuclear brown-black ASR staining, which represents arginine-rich histones, in the majority of mononuclear (thick arrows) and polymorphonuclear cells (thin arrows). Original magnification, ×2,500.

Results

ASR staining. Light microscopy: Under light microscopy, a survey of all the ammoniacal-stained Epon semi-thin sections of the leukocyte pellets from the controls revealed an almost common staining pattern of all nuclei: the characteristic colors of the ASR, ranging from yellowish brown to blackish, with a notable prevalence of yellowish brown staining, which represents lysine-rich histones, in the majority of both mononuclear and polymorphonuclear nuclei. Representative fields of these sections, from two different controls, are shown in Figure 1A and B. In contrast, the ASR staining of both mononuclear and polymorphonuclear cells from the alcoholic patients revealed the prevalence of brown-black nuclear staining, which represents arginine-rich histones. Representative fields of these sections, from two different alcoholic patients, are shown in Figure 1C and D.

After image analysis of the semi-thin sections, the comparison of the percentages of lysine and arginine areas showed a statistically significant predominance (p≤0.05) of lysine versus arginine in the nuclei of both mononuclear (lysine/arginine: 0.80/0.20±0.20) and polymorphonuclear (lysine/arginine: 0.66/0.34±0.24) cells of controls. On the contrary, the same comparisons in the alcoholic patients showed a predominance of arginine over lysine in the nuclei of both mononuclear (arginine/lysine: 0.57/0.43±0.25) and polymorphonuclear (arginine/lysine: 0.68/0.32±0.21) cells, which was statistically significant only in the latter (p≤0.05). These results are further illustrated in Figure 2 using box and whisker plots.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Box and whisker plots showing the distribution of the percentages of lysine and arginine areas in the nuclei of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear lymphocytes of the controls (A) and alcoholic patients (B). They illustrate the predominance of lysine in controls and of arginine in alcoholics. The box represents the interquartile range, and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum of the range, according to image analysis measurements reported in the text. The Y axis values are reduced to the unit.

In order to investigate putative correlations between certain parameters in the study (age, years of alcohol dependence, alcohol consumption, abstinence from alcohol) and lysine and arginine concentrations, Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis was used as being insensitive to the distribution of the variables involved. However, the analysis revealed no statistically significant correlations between the concentrations of lysine and arginine and these parameters in the mononuclear or polymorphonuclear cells (p>0.05).

Electron microscopy: Viewed under electron microscopy, discrete electron-opaque particles were distributed in the area of heterochromatin of leukocyte nuclei from the controls (Figure 3A and B) and the alcoholic patients (Figure 3C and D). In the nuclei of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear lymphocytes from the alcoholic patients, there was an increase in deposits observed as heavy grains associated with heterochromatin, as opposed to the lymphocyte nuclei of the controls, where the deposits observed as light grains were associated with heterochromatin. By comparing the ASR results from light and electron microscopy, it was found that the coarse deposits corresponded to the prevalence of the blackish stain seen under light microscopy in the majority of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear lymphocytes of alcoholics. In contrast, the yellow nuclear stain, seen under light microscopy in the majority of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear lymphocytes of controls, corresponded only to the light grains of ASR in the area of heterochromatin, as it was seen under electron microscopy.

Immunocytochemistry. The results from the study of the nine controls showed that H1 immunoreactivity was distributed over the whole nucleus in the majority of mononuclear leukocytes and over the entire area of the nuclear lobes of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (Figure 4A and B). The reaction appeared more intense along the periphery of the lobes and staining accumulated adjacent to the nuclear envelope, where heterochromatin is located. Diffuse immunoreaction was also observed throughout the nuclear lobes, while the cytoplasm was completely unstained. Contrary to the above, in the alcoholic patients, H1 immunoreactivity was found to be highly reduced, (Figure 4C and D). Specifically, the immunoreaction of polymorphonuclear and mononuclear lymphocytes was shown to be irregular by distributed, incomplete, vacuolated, patchy or completely absent. These patterns were distinctive for each alcoholic patient.

Discussion

The present study was designed to investigate the state of chromatin condensation in the peripheral blood leukocytes of alcoholic patients, during the early detoxification period, as compared to age- and sex-matched healthy individuals. For this reason, we used the histochemical ASR staining, as well as the immunohistochemical method for the detection of histone H1.

The staining pattern under light microscopy in the majority of lymphocyte nuclei of the alcoholic patients, when compared to controls, was characterized by a change in the color of the ASR staining from yellowish to brown-black, which is associated with an increase in the ratio of arginine-to-lysine residues, and was especially apparent in the polymorphonuclear leukocytes (p≤0.05). These observations were confirmed under electron microscopy, where fine particles by ASR were seen covering the heterochromatin areas of nuclei of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear leukocytes of controls, as opposed to coarse particles covering the corresponding area on the leukocytes of alcoholics. These findings are consistent with earlier experiments in developing erythroid cells of chick bone marrow (39) where the ASR coarse, discrete electron-opaque particles (190-200 Å in diameter), which observed in EM, appeared to correspond to the brown–black stain seen with the LM. The authors argued that this was due to some specific interaction of silver with reactive centers in arginine and was detectable in either newly-synthesized proteins with a high content of arginine, or in some structural rearrangement or reorientation of the histones, which made previously masked reactive sites available to the ASR.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Electron micrographs of leukocytes stained with ASR, from controls and alcoholic patients. The discrete, electron-opaque ASR deposits, associated with heterochromatin, are shown in mononuclear (A) and polymorphonuclear (B) lymphocytes of controls. On the contrary, in the corresponding cells of alcoholics, the ASR deposits heavily cover the nuclear areas of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear lymphocytes (C, D). Original magnification, ×9,600.

From these results, it becomes clear that staining by ASR reflects conformation changes in histone molecules and thus, in chromatin structure. As early as 1968, Tokuyasu and co-workers demonstrated that the first visible sign of lymphocyte activation under electron microscopy was the de-condensation of the compact chromatin structure of resting nuclei (40). Later, another study argued that the decondense state of the chromatin is due to dissociation of the lysine-rich histone H1 from the nucleosomes, exposing the arginine residues of the core histones H3 and H4 (41). Thus, the notable prevalence of the yellow stain of lysine-rich histones in the majority of both mononuclear and polymorphonuclear lymphocytes of controls in our study indicates a state of chromatin condensation and compact condition of the genome. These results compare favorably with those obtained from the immunohistochemistry, where H1 immunoreactivity was distributed over the entire area of nuclei of the majority of leukocytes, revealing the equivalence of the condensed state of the chromatin. All these findings were expected, since the controls selected for the study were physically and psychologically healthy, infection-free, with normal complete blood count, and thus, their mononuclear and polymorphonuclear lymphocytes were in a ‘resting’ phase (42, 43). On the contrary, in alcoholic patients, the decrease in the yellow-staining fraction, representative of the increased arginine-to-lysine ratio, indicates an aberrant de-condensed, relaxed state of the chromatin, allowing expression of the genome. Chromatin de-condensation was also confirmed by the reduction of the H1 immunoreactivity, particularly in the lobes of nuclei of polymorphonuclear cells.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Photomicrographs of representative fields of blood smears, demonstrating patterns of distribution of histone H1immunoreactivity (red color), in the nuclei of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Intense immunoreaction covers the majority of the nuclear area of polymorphonuclear taken from the controls (A, B), while reduced and irregular immunoreaction (incomplete vacuolated, patchy or completely absent) is shown in the nuclear lobes of polymorphonuclear leukocytes from the alcoholic patients (C, D). Immunostaining with antibody to histone H1, Fast Red chromogen system method. Original magnification, ×1,300.

All of the above are in agreement with previous studies showing that transcriptionally active chromatin contains less histone H1 than transcriptionally inactive regions (44). As pointed out earlier, histone H1 is an essential player in modulating and maintaining chromatin architecture (45). The globular domain of histone H1 interacts with both the nucleosome dyad and two short (10 bp) sequences at the very beginning of each of the two linker DNAs. The C-terminus of H1 binds to the remaining linker DNA, bringing together the two linkers and forming the stem-like structure, and thus leads to chromatin compaction (46). Harshman and co-workers indicated that the length, charge and number of posttranslational modification sites of the C-terminal tails vary between histone H1 isoforms (47), suggesting that individual H1 variants may play distinct roles in the regulation of higher-order chromatin structure. The compaction of chromatin by the linker histone H1 in general has a global and repressive impact on transcription. Binding of H1 to DNA at the termini of nucleosomes inhibits spontaneous wrapping and unwrapping of DNA and hence would prevent the binding of transcription factors. Another possibility in which H1 could affect transcription is by occupying the binding sequences of those transcription factors whose binding sites are located in the linker region. This suggests that transcription factors will have to compete with H1 to bind to their cognate sites. Several studies have provided evidence that in certain cases linker histone can be directly displaced by transcription factors (48, 49).

In reviewing the literature, an interesting example of the involvement of histone H1 in alcohol use is the family of transcription factors NF-κB/REL (50), which are sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins that initiate transcription from a variety of genes that are involved in immune response and inflammatory processes (51). Chronic alcohol use sensitizes peripheral blood leukocytes of the innate immune system (macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, neutrophils and other leukocytes) to lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated proinflammatory cytokines through, amongst others, activation of NF-κB (52). LPS, a Gram-negative bacterial endotoxin, is normally localized to the gut. Ethanol jeopardizes the tight junctions of the intestinal mucosa, allowing LPS to enter the systemic circulation. Once in the bloodstream, LPS is thought to activate peripheral toll-like receptor signaling cascades that initiate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and other immune mediators, via activation of the NF-κB (53). These cytokines then initiate immune responses in liver, blood and other tissues, including the brain (54, 55). Once activated, NF-κB dimers translocate to the nucleus and bind to their cognate sites in target genes, initiating their transcription. Apart from cytoplasmic regulation, NF-κB-dependent genes are also regulated inside the nucleus by the local chromatin structure (56). In agreement with other studies, Lone and co-workers found that the NF-κB binding completely displaces histone H1 from the nucleosomes and they propose that histone H1 eviction is needed for NF-κB to bind specifically to its recognition sequence embedded in the nucleosomes (53).

A quite interesting finding in our study is the demonstration of the activated polymorphonuclear lymphocytes of alcoholic patients, through the statistically significant predominance of the presence of arginine compared to lysine in the nuclei of polymorphonuclear cells (p≤0.05). According to the literature, a widespread but incorrect view of the neutrophil portrays it as a short-lived, terminally-differentiated cell with a highly condensed nucleus and, hence, unable to express genes (57). However, several studies have expanded the scope of neutrophil gene expression by showing a wide range of mRNAs present in unstimulated neutrophils (58, 59). The study of Zhang and co-workers indicates that a combinatorial transcriptional regulation, including alterations of chromatin structure, may play a role in the rapid changes in gene expression that occur in these cells, which constitute one of the main cell groups of the innate immune system (60).

The influence of innate immunity on the etiology and progression of alcohol abuse is a rapidly expanding area of interest in alcohol research. There is strong evidence for the neuroimmune role of addiction, with the innate immune system being linked to brain changes associated with acute and chronic alcohol exposure (55). Changes in expression of neuroimmune genes and microglial transcripts were first identified in postmortem brains from alcoholics (61). In addition, alcoholics showed altered levels of microRNAs that are known to regulate immune function (62). Furthermore, chronic alcohol treatment in mice induced pro-inflammatory gene expression that persisted for at least one week of abstinence (63), while LPS-induced neuroimmune activation persisted for months (64). These recent data make sense in an earlier interesting study, where the effect was analyzed of ethanol withdrawal on the immune system of chronic alcoholic patients without liver disease and without malnutrition through investigation of the distribution of peripheral blood lymphoid subsets (65). The authors showed that ethanol effects persisted or even became more evident after suppression of ethanol intake for a 9-month period, and suggested that in patients suffering from chronic alcoholism, once ethanol intake has been discontinued, a persistent immunological stimulus may contribute to the persistent of immunological changes. Given the fact that the alcoholics included in the present study were free from liver disease or other serious physical illness and had been abstinent from alcohol for an average of 58.5 days, our results show that immunological imbalances persist in spite of the absence of alcohol intake, through morphological chromatin alterations of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear lymphocytes. This imbalance is also supported by a recent clinical study according to which serum levels of interleukin-6, a multi-functional cytokine mainly produced by lymphocytes and which characterizes alcoholics without hepatic disease, decreased significantly in alcohol-dependent individuals during the detoxification process (66); however, its alteration during and after detoxification therapy is not yet clearly understood.

Reviewing several microarray studies in human and animal models concerning the identification of individual genes as candidates for addiction phenotypes (67), it becomes clear that an integrated view of molecular and cellular changes underlying alcohol addiction is lacking. However, more recent studies focus on and identify critical epigenetic components in gene co-expression and propose a central role for epigenetic regulation in alcohol-induced changes in global gene expression (68). This important study applied a novel systems approach to transcriptome profiling in postmortem human brains and generated a systemic view of brain alterations associated with alcohol abuse. The study identified previously unrecognized epigenetic determinants of gene co-expression relationships and discovered novel markers of chromatin modifications in brains of alcoholic patients, such as histone and DNA methylation. Another example constitutes findings which illustrate that changing the level of chromatin condensation by affecting DNA methylation or histone acetylation controls the level of excessive alcohol drinking and seeking behaviors in pre-clinical rodent models (69). This study demonstrates that modifications in chromatin remodeling by alcohol may be a focal point in neuroadaptations resulting in continuous excessive alcohol seeking and intake. If so, modifiers of chromatin structure can be used for the treatment of alcohol use disorders. In this respect, lack of a specific receptor target for alcohol in the brain makes a potential treatment strategy that targets chromatin structure particularly promising.

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the importance of chromatin structure and provide additional arguments for using blood chromatin of nucleated blood cells as a sensitive tool for epigenetic studies in living chronic alcoholic patients (70). Even though many questions still remain, it is clear that the post-translational modification of histone lysine and arginine residues is a critical signal-transduction pathway reminiscent of other well-established cascades (71). While the small number of cases studied, as well as lack of sequential blood sampling of our alcoholic patients during the detoxification period, do not allow us to make statistical comparisons with respect to the time of abstinence, our results revealed conformational changes in chromatin structure through the ASR method and histone H1 immunolocalization. These histochemical and immunohistochemical approaches applied to samples of peripheral blood leukocytes of alcoholics, coupled with modern molecular procedures, could be used to monitor epigenetic modifications that correlate to the harmful effects of alcohol. Indeed, these approaches could lead to methods of screening problem drinkers who engage in harmful excessive alcohol use, as well as alcohol-dependent individuals during the detoxification therapy.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grant no. 96SYN182 from the General Secretariat of Research & Technology, Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs of Greece and by the Theodor Theohari Cozzika Foundation. The Authors thank Ms. Olga Manthou, laboratory technician, for her technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Declaration of Interest

    The Authors report no conflicts of interest and they alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

  • Received January 30, 2014.
  • Revision received March 12, 2014.
  • Accepted March 13, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Koob GF
    : Alcoholism: Allostasis and beyond. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27: 232-243, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Tabakoff B,
    2. Cornell N,
    3. Hoffman PL
    : Alcohol tolerance. Ann Emerg Med 15: 1005-1012, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Starkman BG,
    2. Sakharkar AJ,
    3. Pandey SC
    : Epigenetics-beyond the genome in alcoholism. Alcohol Res 34: 293-305, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kalsi G,
    2. Prescott CA,
    3. Kendler KS,
    4. Riley BP
    : Unraveling the molecular mechanisms of alcohol dependence. Trends Genet 25: 49-55, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. World Health Organization (WHO)
    Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. Available at: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/en/.
  5. ↵
    1. Ducci F,
    2. Goldman D
    : Genetic approaches to addiction: Genes and alcohol. Addiction 103: 1414-1428, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Edenberg HJ,
    2. Foroud T
    : The genetics of alcoholism: Identifying specific genes through family studies. Addict Biol 11: 386-396, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Farris SP,
    2. Wolen AR,
    3. Miles MF
    : Using expression genetics to study the neurobiology of ethanol and alcoholism. Int Rev Neurobiol 91: 95-128, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Spanagel R,
    2. Bartsch D,
    3. Brors B,
    4. Dahmen N,
    5. Deussing J,
    6. Eils R,
    7. Ende G,
    8. Gallinat J,
    9. Gebicke-Haerter P,
    10. Heinz A,
    11. Kiefer F,
    12. Jager W,
    13. Mann K,
    14. Matthaus F,
    15. Nothen M,
    16. Rietschel M,
    17. Sartorius A,
    18. Schutz G,
    19. Sommer WH,
    20. Sprengel R,
    21. Walter H,
    22. Wichmann E,
    23. Wienker T,
    24. Wurst W,
    25. Zimmer A
    : An integrated genome research network for studying the genetics of alcohol addiction. Addict Biol 15: 369-379, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tabakoff B,
    2. Saba L,
    3. Printz M,
    4. Flodman P,
    5. Hodgkinson C,
    6. Goldman D,
    7. Koob G,
    8. Richardson HN,
    9. Kechris K,
    10. Bell RL,
    11. Hubner N,
    12. Heinig M,
    13. Pravenec M,
    14. Mangion J,
    15. Legault L,
    16. Dongier M,
    17. Conigrave KM,
    18. Whitfield JB,
    19. Saunders J,
    20. Grant B,
    21. Hoffman PL,
    22. WHO/ISBRA Study on State and Trait Markers of Alcoholism
    : Genetical genomic determinants of alcohol consumption in rats and humans. BMC Biology 7: 70, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Moonat S,
    2. Starkman BG,
    3. Sakharkar A,
    4. Pandey SC
    : Neuroscience of alcoholism: Molecular and cellular mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 73-88, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Tsankova N,
    2. Renthal W,
    3. Kumar A,
    4. Nestler EJ
    : Epigenetic regulation in psychiatric disorders. Nature Rev Neurosci 8: 355-367, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kornberg RD
    : Chromatin structure: A repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 184: 868-871, 1974.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Olins AL,
    2. Olins DE
    : Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science 183: 330-332, 1974.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Hsieh J,
    2. Gage FH
    : Chromatin remodeling in neural development and plasticity. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17: 664-671, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Catez F,
    2. Brown DT,
    3. Misteli T,
    4. Bustin M
    : Competition between histone H1 and HMGN proteins for chromatin binding sites. EMBO Rep 3: 760-766, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Wolffe AP
    : Histone H1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 29: 1463-1466, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Herrera JE,
    2. West KL,
    3. Schiltz RL,
    4. Nakatani Y,
    5. Bustin M
    : Histone H1 is a specific repressor of core histone acetylation in chromatin. Mol Cell Biol 20: 523-529, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hill DA,
    2. Imbalzano AN
    : Human SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling activity is partially inhibited by linker histone H1. Biochemistry 39: 11649-11656, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Koop R,
    2. Di Croce L,
    3. Beato M
    : Histone H1 enhances synergistic activation of the MMTV promoter in chromatin. EMBO J 22: 588-599, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Harshman SW,
    2. Young NL,
    3. Parthun MR,
    4. Freitas MA
    : H1 histones: current perspectives and challenges. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 9593-9609, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Hansen JC,
    2. Lu X,
    3. Ross ED,
    4. Woody RW
    : Intrinsic protein disorder, amino acid composition, and histone terminal domains. J Biol Chem 281: 1853-1856, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Gladkevich A,
    2. Kauffman HF,
    3. Korf J
    : Lymphocytes as a neural probe: potential for studying psychiatric disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psych 28: 559-576, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kronfol Z,
    2. House JD
    : Immune function in mania. Biol Psychiat 24: 341-343, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Maes M,
    2. Stevens W,
    3. DeClerck L,
    4. Bridts C,
    5. Peeters D,
    6. Schotte C,
    7. Cosyns P
    : Immune disorders in depression: higher T-helper/T-suppressor-cytotoxic cell ratio. Acta Psychiat Scand 86: 423-431, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Maes M,
    2. Song C,
    3. Lin A,
    4. Scharpe S,
    5. Smith RS
    : The effects of psychological stress on humans: increased production of proinflammatory cytokines and Th1-like response in stress-induced anxiety. Cytokine 4: 313-318, 1998.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Schwarz MJ,
    2. Chiang S,
    3. Müller N,
    4. Ackenheil M
    : T-helper-1 and T-helper-2 responses in psychiatric disorders. Brain Behav Immun 15: 340-370, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Issidorides MR,
    2. Stefanis CN,
    3. Varsou E,
    4. Katsorchis T
    : Altered chromatin ultrastructure in neutrophils of schizophrenics. Nature 258: 612-614, 1975.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Kloukina-Pantazidou I,
    2. Havaki S,
    3. Chrysanthou-Piterou M,
    4. Kontaxakis VP,
    5. Papadimitriou GN,
    6. Issidorides MR
    : Chromatin alterations in leukocytes of first-episode schizophrenic patients. Ultrastruct Pathol 34: 106-116, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Cook RT
    : Alcohol abuse, alcoholism, and damage to the immune system – a review. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22: 1927-1942, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Zahs A,
    2. Cook RT,
    3. Waldschimdt TJ,
    4. Choudhry MA,
    5. Kovacs EJ,
    6. Bird MD
    : Alcohol and inflammation and infection: clinical and experimental systems – summary of the 2010 Alcohol and Immunology Research Interest Group Meeting. Alcohol 46: 147-153, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Szabo G
    : Consequences of alcohol consumption on host defense. Alcohol Alcohol 34: 830-841, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. American Psychiatric Association
    . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  30. ↵
    1. World Medical Association
    Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, Seoul (2008). Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
  31. ↵
    1. Black MM,
    2. Ansley HR
    : Histone specificity revealed by ammoniacal silver staining. J Histochem Cytochem 14: 177-181, 1966.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Aratake Y,
    2. Tamura K,
    3. Kotani T,
    4. Ohtaki S
    : Application of the avidin-biotin-complex method for the light microscopic analysis of lymphocyte subsets with monoclonal antibodies on air-dried smears. Acta Cytol 32: 117-122, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Ramos-Vara JA
    : Technical aspects of immunohistochemistry. Vet Pathol 42: 405-426, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Arnold Edward
    1. Everitt BS,
    2. Dunn G
    : Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Arnold Edward (ed.). London. pp. 219-220, 1991.
  35. ↵
    1. MacRae EK,
    2. Meetz GD
    : Electron microscopy of the ammoniacal silver reaction for histones in the erythropoietic cells of the chick. J Cell Biol 45: 235-245, 1970.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Tokuyasu K,
    2. Madden SC,
    3. Zeldis LJ
    : Fine structural alterations of interphase nuclei of lymphocytes stimulated to growth activity in vitro. J Cell Biol 39: 630-660, 1968.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Van Holde K,
    2. Zlatanova J
    : What determines the folding of the chromatin fiber? P Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 10548-10555, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Zhao K,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Rando OJ,
    4. Xue Y,
    5. Swiderek K,
    6. Kuo A,
    7. Crabtree GR
    : Rapid and phosphoinositol-dependent binding of the SWI/SNF-like BAF complex to chromatin after T-lymphocyte receptor signaling. Cell 95: 625-636, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Olins DE,
    2. Olins AL
    . Granulocyte heterochromatin: Defining the epigenome. BMC Cell Biol 6: 39, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Fan Y,
    2. Nikitina T,
    3. Zhao J,
    4. Fleury TJ,
    5. Bhattacharyya R,
    6. Bouhassira EE,
    7. Stein A,
    8. Woodcock CL,
    9. Skoultchi AI
    : Histone H1 depletion in mammals alters global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation. Cell 123: 1199-1212, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Zlatanova J,
    2. Caiafa P,
    3. Van Holde K
    : Linker histone binding and displacement: versatile mechanism for transcriptional regulation. FASEB J 14: 1697-1704, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Syed SH,
    2. Goutte-Gattat D,
    3. Becker N,
    4. Meyer S,
    5. Shukla MS,
    6. Hayes JJ,
    7. Everaers R,
    8. Angelov D,
    9. Bednar J,
    10. Dimitrov S
    : Single-base resolution mapping of H1-nucleosome interactions and 3D organization of the nucleosome. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 9620-9625, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Harshman SW,
    2. Young NL,
    3. Parthun MR,
    4. Freitas MA
    : H1 histones: current perspectives and challenges. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 9593-9609, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Eisfeld K,
    2. Candau R,
    3. Truss M,
    4. Beato M
    : Binding of NF1 to the MMTV promoter in nucleosomes: influence of rotational phasing, translational positioning and histone H1. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3733-3742, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Lee HL,
    2. Archer TK
    : Prolonged glucocorticoid exposure dephosphorylates histone H1 and inactivates the MMTV promoter. EMBO J 17: 1454-1466, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Natoli G
    : Tuning up inflammation: how DNA sequence and chromatin organization control the induction of inflammatory genes by NF-κB. FEBS Lett 580: 2843-2849, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. DiDonato JA,
    2. Mercurio F,
    3. Karin M
    : NF-kappaB and the link between inflammation and cancer. Immunol Rev 246: 379-400, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Mandrekar P,
    2. Bala S,
    3. Catalano D,
    4. Kodys K,
    5. Szabo G
    : The opposite effects of acute and chronic alcohol on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation are linked to IRAK-M in human monocytes. J Immunol 183: 1320-1327, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Lone IN,
    2. Shukla MS,
    3. Charles Richard JL,
    4. Peshev ZY,
    5. Dimitrov S,
    6. Angelov D
    : Binding of NF-κB to nucleosomes: effect of translational positioning, nucleosome remodeling and linker histone H1. PLoS Genet 9: e1003830, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Mandrekar P,
    2. Szabo G
    : Signalling pathways in alcohol-induced liver inflammation. J Hepatol 50: 1258-1266, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Mayfield J,
    2. Ferguson L,
    3. Harris RA
    : Neuroimmune signaling: a key component of alcohol abuse. Curr Opin Neurobiol 23: 513-520, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Saccani S,
    2. Pantano S,
    3. Natoli G
    : Two waves of nuclear factor kappaB recruitment to target promoters. J Exp Med 193: 1351-1359, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Bainton DF,
    2. Ullyot JL,
    3. Farquhar MG
    : The development of neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leucocytes in human bone marrow. J Exp Med 134: 907–934, 1971.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  54. ↵
    1. Subrahmanyam YV,
    2. Yamaga S,
    3. Prashar Y,
    4. Lee HH,
    5. Hoe NP,
    6. Kluger Y,
    7. Gerstein M,
    8. Goguen JD,
    9. Newburger PE,
    10. Weissman SM
    : RNA expression patterns change dramatically in human neutrophils exposed to bacteria. Blood 97: 2457-2468, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Yang JJ,
    2. Preston GA,
    3. Alcorta DA,
    4. Waga I,
    5. Munger WE,
    6. Hogan SL,
    7. Sekura SB,
    8. Phillips BD,
    9. Thomas RP,
    10. Jennette JC,
    11. Falk RJ
    : Expression profile of leukocyte genes activated by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA). Kidney Int 62: 1638-1649, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Kluger Y,
    3. Nakayama Y,
    4. Poddar R,
    5. Whitney C,
    6. DeTora A,
    7. Weissman SM,
    8. Newburger PE
    : Gene expression in mature neutrophils: early responses to inflammatory stimuli. J Leukocyte Biol 75: 358-372, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Crews FT,
    2. Qin L,
    3. Sheedy D,
    4. Vetreno RP,
    5. Zou J
    : High mobility group box 1/Toll-like receptor danger signaling increases brain neuroimmune activation in alcohol dependence. Biol Psychiatry 73: 602-612, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Lewohl JM,
    2. Nunez YO,
    3. Dodd PR,
    4. Tiwari GR,
    5. Harris RA,
    6. Mayfield RD
    : Up-regulation of microRNAs in brain of human alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 35: 1928-1937, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Qin L,
    2. He J,
    3. Hanes RN,
    4. Pluzarev O,
    5. Hong JS,
    6. Crews FT
    : Increased systemic and brain cytokine production and neuroinflammation by endotoxin following ethanol treatment. J Neuroinflammation 5: 10, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Qin L,
    2. Wu X,
    3. Block ML,
    4. Liu Y,
    5. Breese GR,
    6. Hong JS,
    7. Knapp DJ,
    8. Crews FT
    : Systemic LPS causes chronic neuroinflammation and progressive neurodegeneration. Glia 55: 453-462, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Laso FJ,
    2. Madruga JI,
    3. San Miguel JF,
    4. Ciudad J,
    5. López A,
    6. Alvarez Mon M,
    7. Orfao A
    : Long lasting immunological effects of ethanol after withdrawal. Cytometry 26: 275-280, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Chatzipanagiotou S,
    2. Kalykaki M,
    3. Tzavellas E,
    4. Karaiskos D,
    5. Paparrigopoulos T,
    6. Liappas A,
    7. Nicolaou C,
    8. Michalopoulou M,
    9. Zoga M,
    10. Boufidou F,
    11. Liappas I
    : Alteration of biological markers in alcohol-dependent individuals without liver disease during the detoxification therapy. In Vivo 24: 325-328, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Mayfield RD,
    2. Harris RA,
    3. Schuckit MA
    : Genetic factors influencing alcohol dependence. Br J Pharmacol 154: 275-287, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Ponomarev I,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. Harris RA,
    5. Mayfield RD
    : Gene coexpression networks in human brain identify epigenetic modifications in alcohol dependence. J Neurosci 32: 1884-1897, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Warnault V,
    2. Darcq E,
    3. Levine A,
    4. Barak S,
    5. Ron D
    : Chromatin remodeling – a novel strategy to control excessive alcohol drinking. Transl Psychiatry 3: e231, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Sharma RP
    : Blood chromatin as a biosensor of the epigenetic milieu: a tool for studies in living psychiatric patients. Epigenomics 4: 551-559, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Schreiber SL,
    2. Bernstein BE
    : Signaling network model of chromatin. Cell 111: 771-778, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 28, Issue 4
July-August 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Structural Chromatin Alterations in Peripheral Blood Leukocytes of Alcohol-dependent Individuals During Detoxification Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Structural Chromatin Alterations in Peripheral Blood Leukocytes of Alcohol-dependent Individuals During Detoxification Therapy
MARGARITA CHRYSANTHOU PITEROU, ISMINI KLOUKINA PANTAZIDOU, SOPHIA HAVAKI, JOHN LIAPPAS, MARIETTA ISSIDORIDES RADOVITCH
In Vivo Jul 2014, 28 (4) 529-539;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Structural Chromatin Alterations in Peripheral Blood Leukocytes of Alcohol-dependent Individuals During Detoxification Therapy
MARGARITA CHRYSANTHOU PITEROU, ISMINI KLOUKINA PANTAZIDOU, SOPHIA HAVAKI, JOHN LIAPPAS, MARIETTA ISSIDORIDES RADOVITCH
In Vivo Jul 2014, 28 (4) 529-539;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Retinoic Acid-inducible Gene-I Increases Interferon-stimulated Gene 15 Expression in Human Renal Proximal Tubule Epithelial Cells
  • The Asn680Ser Variant Negatively Impacted the Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Thai Female Infertility
  • Microarray Analysis of Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm With Emphasis on Cardiovascular Genes Revealed Differentially Expressed Genes
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Alcoholism
  • chromatin
  • histones
  • Lymphocytes
  • ammoniacal silver reaction
  • arginine
  • lysine
  • electron microscopy
  • immunohistochemistry
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire