Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleR

Melanoma m1: Diagnosis and Therapy

MARCO RASTRELLI, SAVERIA TROPEA, JACOPO PIGOZZO, ELISABETTA BEZZON, LUCA GIOVANNI CAMPANA, ROBERTO STRAMARE, MAURO ALAIBAC and CARLO RICCARDO ROSSI
In Vivo May 2014, 28 (3) 273-285;
MARCO RASTRELLI
1Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: marco.rastrelli{at}ioveneto.it
SAVERIA TROPEA
1Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JACOPO PIGOZZO
2Melanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ELISABETTA BEZZON
3Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUCA GIOVANNI CAMPANA
1Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERTO STRAMARE
4Department of Medical Diagnostic Sciences and Special Therapies, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAURO ALAIBAC
5Dermatologic Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CARLO RICCARDO ROSSI
1Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padova, Padova, Italy
6Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This article reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognostic factors and treatment of metastatic melanoma, including the most recent developments in the specific field. It examines the sequential and non-linear models of development and progression of melanoma and the main molecular disorder involved in these processes. Clinical and diagnostic aspects have been divided according to clinical staging. Surgical resectability, the site and number of metastases, the number of involved organs, the duration of remission, serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and tumor doubling-time have the greatest prognostic value. Surgical treatment has been analyzed considering its rational function and examining all sites involved in metastasis. We also discuss the palliative role of radiotherapy in relation to various metastatic sites, chemotherapy and recently introduced targeted-therapy. The association of newer drugs and new biological therapies such as ipilimumab and verumafenib have improved the treatment landscape of stage IV melanoma.

  • Stage IV melanoma
  • surgery
  • radiotherapy
  • chemotherapy
  • tumor doubling-time
  • review

Over the last decades of the twentieth century, melanoma incidence increased in Caucasian populations; thus, this type of cancer has become a significant public health problem worldwide in fair-skinned populations (1). Incidence rates per 100,000 patients vary between 21.9 in USA to 55.9 in Australian males. Differently, in Asia, the incidence of cutaneous melanoma (CM) is significantly lower (incidence rates of 2 to 5 per 1,000,000 patients/year (2). CM is the most common cause of mortality from skin cancer in Caucasian populations. The incidence rate of melanoma changes in relation to race shows that white populations have an approximately 10-fold greater risk that than black, Asian or Hispanic populations. However, both White and African Americans develop plantar melanoma with a similar risk, while mucosal melanoma is more common in non-White populations (3).

The median age at the time of diagnosis is 57 years and the incidence increases between the ages of 25 and 50 years (1).

Distant metastatic melanoma (DMM) has an overall survival rate of only 5-10% of cases at 5-years; median survival is 6 to 10 months depending on the site of metastasis (4). CM can metastasize to any organ or tissue. In 42% to 59% of patients, the initial sites of distant metastases are skin, subcutaneous tissue and distant lymph nodes; the most common sites of visceral metastases, in order of frequency, are the lung, liver, brain, bone and intestine. Metastasis to heart, pancreas, adrenal kidney and thyroid (in clinical series before 1985) were rare but frequent at autoptic examination. This discrepancy not only shows the aggressive behavior of metastatic melanoma but also suggests an underestimation of metastatic disease. Now, with the use of computed tomography (CT) and 2-(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron-emission tomography (PET) and PET-CT, more cases are being diagnosed (5-8).

Many prognostic factors have been identified predicting survival of patients with DMM: these include surgical resectability, response to chemotherapy, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, site of first metastasis, number of metastases and duration of remission (9-11).

Regarding the sites of distant metastasis, analysis of the melanoma database of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) showed three groups of patients with different prognoses: patients with skin, subcutaneous tissue and distant lymph node metastases, with a median survival of 18 months; patients with lung metastases, with a median survival of 12 months; and patients with visceral metastases other than of the lung, with a median survival of seven months (12).

In a study of 200 patients with stage IV melanoma at the University of Alabama, 1-year survival rate was 36% for patients with one metastatic site, 13% for patients with two sites and 1% for patients with three or more sites (13). In contrast to this study, a multivariate analysis conducted at the John Wayne Cancer Institute showed that the number of metastatic sites is not a significant independent prognostic factor and suggests that some sites of metastases have a dominant-negative effect on survival (14).

The most effective therapeutic approach for metastatic melanoma is surgery, whenever possible, because it limits the progression of disease, and interrupts metastatic progression without precluding new systemic therapies (15).

A certain degree of consensus has been established about diagnostic procedures, treatment and prognostic factors of DMM but several diagnostic and therapeutic aspects are still unclear. This article could be a valid tool for daily clinical practice for patients with melanoma because it combines a review of the most recent literature with the experience of a multidisciplinary group dealing with diagnosis and therapy of melanoma.

Pathogenesis

The main molecular disorders involved in development and progression of melanoma can be simplified as follows: Oncogenic mutation of BRAF gene and, in particular, gene re-arrangement of chromosome 9p21 with the resulting production of a protein called AKT3 are involved in melanocityc proliferation; mutation or epigenetic silencing of CDKN2A (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) with the consequent functional deficit of p16, amplification of CCND1, and inactivation of TP53 through a de-regulation of the p14 CDKN2A–MDM2-p53 pathway are implicated in the alteration of apoptosis and cellular survival (intermediate neoplastic phase); activating mutation of NRAS gene and c-KIT aberration contribute to neoplastic transformation; gene silencing of p16 CDKN2A, functional loss of (PTEN), activation of PI3K-AKT pathway and MIFT gene amplification have a role in the acquisition of malignant phenotype with melanoma progression.

A combination of these processes represents a linear model of melanoma genesis (16, 17). However, a non-linear model of neoplastic progression for melanoma development has been proposed, hypothesizing that the alteration of stem cells might produce melanoma cells in the superficial or vertical growth phase, or directly produce metastatic cells (Figure 1) (17-20).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging and classification of metastatic melanoma (2009) (12).

Diagnosis and Staging

Laboratory test and biomarkers. There is no universal agreement to the usefulness of laboratory tests such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) for DMM screening. High levels of LDH identify patients with a poor prognosis and the sixth edition of the AJCC staging system for melanoma considers serum LDH levels a good tool for characterizing the subpopulation of patients with M1c disease (21, 22).

The most useful biomarkers for early detection of melanoma metastases are melanocyte lineage/differentiation antigens such as S-100 β protein and melanoma inhibitory activity (23). The sensitivity for detecting new metastases was 29% for S-100 β protein, 24% for the multi-marker reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 22% for melanoma inhibitory activity, 17% for ALP and 2% for LDH. The diagnostic accuracy was 86% for melanoma inhibitory activity, 84% for S-100 β protein, 79 % for ALP, 77% for LDH and 72% for RT-PCR (24, 25). At present, although four different assays for measurement of S-100 β protein have been designed and many studies support that S-100 β assay has sensitivity, it is not used as a routine clinical tool to diagnose metastases in high-risk patients (21, 22, 23, 26).

During the past decade, many other markers of malignant melanoma have been investigated: a circulation immune complex composed of TA90 (a tumor-associated 90 kDa glycoprotein antigen and its immunoglobulin G antibody) or IL8, IL10, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), and lipid-associated sialic acid in plasma (LASA-P), but these have uncertain significance and are not routinely used in clinical practice (27-30) .

Recent studies have been conducted on serum proteomic fingerprinting analysis and this approach might become a useful tool to identify high-risk patients with melanoma who are candidates for adjuvant therapy (31, 32).

Imaging. Imaging studies should be undertaken on the basis of specific symptoms. Overall, the best approach to identify the presence of DMM is the use of total-body PET/CT scan. This examination combines the anatomic imaging of CT with the functional imaging of PET and reduces PET scan limits (33-37).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Models of melanoma development and progression. A: Sequential model, B: non-linear model. AKT: Protein Kinase B. CDKN2A: Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 2A. c-KIT: Tyrosine-Protein Kinase Kit. CCND1: Cyclin D1. PTEN: Phosphatase and tensin homolog. PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase. MIFT: Microphthalmia transcription factor.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium is considered the most sensitive examination to detect cerebral metastases and to distinguish metastases from melanoma from other types of metastases (38-40).

Ultrasound (US) of the lymph nodes in patients with CM is still controversial, because it is considered excessively operator-dependent (41, 42). Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) associated with US or CT is very accurate at obtaining cytological diagnosis of metastatic melanoma (41, 43, 44).

Clinical staging. Clinical staging of patients with melanoma is based on history, physical examination and evaluation of diagnostic examination. At the end of clinical staging, patients with metastases can be categorized into three groups. Table I shows a brief description of the latest version of AJCC melanoma staging system. Table II shows the clinical and diagnostic aspects of each clinical stage.

Surgical Treatment

Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with stage I and stage II melanoma and it is also the most effective therapy for those with stage III disease. In patients with stage IV melanoma, the role of surgery is less clear. In patients with distant metastases, surgery can have a palliative or a curative purpose. In the first option, resectable distant metastases that are symptomatic or might become symptomatic should be treated with surgery to obtain a better quality of life. In the second case, cytoreductive surgery is proposed to make the patients disease-free and, in selected cases, as a preparatory therapy prior to systemic treatment or radiotherapy. A 5-year survival rate of 20% to 30% after complete surgical resection has been recorded. This outcome is not currently achievable with any other systemic treatment (45-52).

It has been observed that, initially, most patients have only one to three synchronous metastases at a single organ site. In these patients, surgical treatment may prevent metastatic cascade to other sites and, if recurrence occurs, a secondary metastasectomy may be advantageous in an apparently disease-free patient. However, if surgical treatment fails, the patient becomes a candidate for systemic therapy (46, 47, 49-51, 53, 54). The rational function of surgical resection of DMM is multifactorial and summarized in Figure 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Clinical and diagnostic aspects of distant metastases according to AJCC substage for melanoma.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Rationale for surgical resection of metastatic melanoma.

Selection of patients. Many prognostic factors can be considered in the evaluation of a patient's eligibility for curative surgery: i) Site: median and 5-year progressive survival decrease according to the involved site (13, 14, 47). ii) Number of metastases: median survival falls from 23 to 8 months in patients with more than three metastases in a single organ compared to patients with single metastasis (13, 47). iii) Number of involved organs: the involvement of more than three organs reduces the median survival from 7 to 2 months (13, 14, 47, 50). iv) Disease-free interval: 5-year survival amounts to 15% if the disease-free interval is less than 36 months and goes up to 30% when it is greater than 36 months (47, 51). v) LDH: in patients with liver metastases, an increase of LDH reduces median survival from 11 to 3 months (13, 14, 21, 22, 23, 47). vi) Tumor doubling-time (TDT): the median and 5-year survival is zero if the TDT is less than 60 days; it goes up to 20.7%, if the TDT is 60 days or more (55, 56). vii) Performance status: patients undergoing surgery should have a good performance status to reduce intraoperative risks (13, 14).

Surgery for stage IV M1a melanoma

Skin: Metastases should be removed before they become bulky and symptomatic. The elective treatment is surgical removal with a rim of normal tissue (at least 1 cm or >1 cm for larger lesions). If metastases are multiple and sequential, in one or more areas, it may be necessary to resort to electrochemotherapy, locoregional or systemic chemotherapy. When patients undergo surgery, they have a median survival rate of 2 years (range 3 to 180 months) from the onset of metastases (57, 58).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Specific protein inhibitors of the most important pathways of signal transduction under investigation in clinical trials.

Lymph nodes: Surgical treatment for M1a lymph node metastases is complete dissection (cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymph nodes) (48, 59, 60-62).

Surgery for stage IV M1b melanoma

Patients with pulmonary metastases have a longer survival rate than patients with metastases at other visceral sites. The median survival in patients who undergo complete surgical excision is equal to 28 months. Generally, pulmonary metastases are multiple and bilateral and can be associated with hilar or mediastinal node metastases.

Surgery can give a survival benefit to a small number of selected patients who have a limited number of metastases with an acceptable residual lung capacity.

The 5-year survival rate amounts to 20-39%. Criteria for surgical excision should include an absence of metastases in other organs, prolonged TDT, the possibility of complete resection or palliation of symptoms (63, 64).

Especially for lung metastases, TDT can be a useful method for identifying suitable patients for metastasectomy. TDT is calculated by measuring the changing diameters of each nodule. Median survival after pulmonary metastasectomy correlates with TDT: patients with slow-growing tumor have better survival (56, 65). Minimally- invasive thoracoscopic-assisted resection is often used for these procedures. Lobectomy is rarely performed to obtain clear margins, and pneumonectomy is almost never recommended (63, 64, 66).

Endobronchial metastases or the more infrequent metastases to the trachea or larynx might be treated, after endoscopy with biopsy, by endoscopic fulguration, laser excision, external-beam radiation or implants. Segmental resection or pneumonectomy may sometimes be useful to treat endobronchial metastases (67-70).

Surgery for stage IV M1c melanoma

Brain: Involvement of cerebral parenchyma is common in patients with stage IV melanoma and life expectancy ranges from two to seven months in relation to the extent of disease and the response to treatment. Surgical excision is the elective treatment for metastases larger than 3.5 cm and symptomatic metastases.

Surgery alleviates symptoms and prevents neurological damage but should be considered as treatment-of-choice only for patients with a limited number of metastases in easily accessible sites, and in the absence of other systemic localizations. In fact, bleeding during surgical excision, because of the hemorrhagic nature of metastases, may be the major cause of symptoms. After surgery, patients survive on average approximately six months (71-75). Whole-brain radiotherapy after surgery reduces the incidence of relapses but it does not seem to improve survival (76, 77).

Spinal cord: Spinal cord metastases are rare and need immediate surgical decompression, radiotherapy and high doses of corticosteroids. An important randomized study concludes that patients with spinal cord compression, treated with decompressive surgery, corticosteroids and post operative radiotherapy, regain the capacity to walk more often and maintain it longer than patients treated with radiation and corticosteroids alone (78-82).

Gastrointestinal tract: About 50% of patients with stage IV melanoma have gastrointestinal metastases. In nearly all cases, intestinal involvement is symptomatic, and surgery, both curative and palliative, is the elective treatment. When surgical resection is curative, mean survival amounts to 15-49 months after surgery, compared with 5-8 months in patients who do not undergo surgery (83-85).

Extensive procedures such as esophagogastrectomy or subtotal gastrectomy should be performed only when long-term survival is considered possible. Segmental resection or partial gastrectomy should be used in the presence of bleeding. Sometimes, if the main symptom is obstruction, it may be necessary to perform a by-pass (thereby preventing a short bowel syndrome) (86-88).

Liver, biliary tract and spleen: Patients with liver metastases have an average survival rate of 2-4 months (89). A prospective study of 1,750 patients with hepatic metastases conducted at the John Wayne Cancer Institute and at the Sydney Melanoma Unit demonstrated that the median overall survival rate was 28 months for patients who underwent surgical resection and four months for patients who underwent exploration only (90).

Surgery is only recommended for isolated liver metastases; for patients who have multiple metastases, new techniques such as cryosurgery or radiofrequency ablation can be considered (91-96). Patients with symptomatic localized gallbladder metastases can benefit from cholecystectomy (97, 98).

Splenic metastases are rare but patients who undergo splenectomy have a mean survival of 20 months, in comparison with seven months for those not nominated for surgery (89-100).

Bone: Bone metastatic melanoma permits survival of only four to six months, and the survival of these patients is even shorter when other sites are involved. Treatment is related to the severity of symptoms, the site of metastases and the performance status of patients, and has mainly a palliative purpose.

Surgery is limited to operative bone fixation, joint replacement, repair with methyl methacrylate, or use of external braces or casts (11, 17, 101-104). De-compressive laminectomy and postoperative irradiation may be necessary in patients with fractures of vertebrae causing compression of spinal cord (104, 105).

Other sites: The heart, pericardium, kidney and urinary tract, endocrine organs, breast, ovaries, uterus, vagina, testes, penis, oral cavity, pharynx, eye and orbit can be sites of metastasis. Surgical treatment, both palliative and curative, may be considered in relation to the uniqueness of the lesion and the general condition of the patient (7, 17, 106-115).

Radiotherapy

Melanoma is generally considered a relatively radioresistant tumor. Retrospective clinical studies have shown that the standard treatment is effective in only 40% of irradiated sites. In the remaining cases, the lack of response could be due to the presence of hypoxic cell fractions and cell clones with the ability to repair the damage from radiation (6, 7, 15, 116).

Radioresponsiveness, however, varies from case to case. The main problem concerns the optimal dose (single and total dose). High single doses should be used to obtain an optimal response. The most recent radiation treatment protocols require individual doses of between 5 and 9 Gy. The total dose seems less important than the single dosage. The total dose varies depending on the type of fractionation. Currently, amounts up to 6 Gy twice a week for a total dose of 36-42 Gy are mainly used.

Overgaard et al. has proposed 9 Gy in three sessions within 96 h, up to a dose of 27 Gy in eight days (117, 118). This scheme, of short duration, produces more than 90% complete and partial responses (116, 117).

Bentzen et al. (119) designed a clinical trial to monitor the outcome of radiotherapy: the tumor control probability (TCP) on 239 treated lesions was analyzed, observing that the treatment time does not affect TCP, while it is influenced by the single-fraction dose (6 Gy are considered the ideal dose) and the size of the tumor (119).

Patients can obtain clinical benefit from radiation of symptomatic metastases and radiotherapy is usually used in addition to systemic therapy (116, 120).

Skin and subcutaneous metastases: Single lesion or small clusters of lesions are treated with a single dose of 8 Gy that can be repeated once or twice. Larger or deeper lesions may require 20 Gy in five fractions in one week or 24 to 30 Gy in 4 to 5 fractions at two fractions per week. Multiple skin or subcutaneous metastases involving wide areas are not usually treatable with radiotherapy (57, 116).

Lymph node metastases: The majority of lymph node metastases can be treated with 20 Gy in five daily fractions. A bolus may be needed in case of fungation (116, 121).

Brain metastases: In view of the predominantly palliative purpose of radiotherapy for brain metastases, treatments are more concentrated in time than in other cases and should be performed using single doses of 4-6 Gy for 2-3 times a week, up to a total dose of 20-30 Gy. Another scheme involves 4 Gy for five sessions on consecutive days. Generally, radiation therapy is associated with corticosteroids and anti-convulsant therapy and it is excluded in patients with poor performance status (74, 76, 116, 122-125). During the London Conference on the treatment of brain metastases, the following indications were estabilished: i) surgery in single localizations, in symptomatic patients, with good performance status; ii) whole-brain radiotherapy for patients with more than four brain metastases; iii) stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with a lower number of lesions.

Good palliation can be obtained with doses of 30 Gy in 10 fractions in two weeks. Daily multiple fractions do not improve palliative response. The traditional treatment of multiple lesions barely changes survival; the only common observation is a variation of survival in the case of single localization without other metastases, especially when it is removed or irradiated with stereotactic radiotherapy (126). Stereotactic therapy is a recent and complex tecnique based on focused radiation beams targeting a well-defined tumor and using extremely detailed imaging scans. Radiation oncologists perform stereotactic treatments, often with the help of a neurosurgeon (127, 128).

There are two types of stereotactic radiation: stereotactic radiosurgery is when a single radiation treatment is performed (122, 128, 129) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy refers to several stereotactic radiation treatments (130-132).

Stereotactic radiosurgery, in terms of survival, leads to the same results compared to surgery but with a considerable difference in costs (122, 128, 129).

Malignant spinal cord compression: For patients who are not candidates for surgery and those who refuse surgical treatment, radiotherapy can be appropriate. The treatment scheme involves 30 Gy at the depth of compression in 10 fractions at five fractions per week, in association with steroid therapy. A 67% response rate, in terms of improvement of compression symptoms and pain, was reported. If neurological deterioration continues, during radiation therapy, emergency surgical decompression must be performed (80, 133).

Bone metastases: In cases of bone metastases, single doses of 4 Gy seem to be sufficient and a total dose of 30 Gy must be achieved. If pathological fractures of long bones are found, prophylactic internal fixation followed by postoperative radiotherapy should be considered (116).

Systemic Treatment

The medical treatment of patients with stage IV melanoma can take advantage of using chemotherapy, ipilimumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors drugs or including patients inclinical trials.

Chemotherapy: Dacarbazine and its equivalent temozolomide, nitrosoureas (especially fotemustine), cisplatin, carboplatin, vinblastine, vindesine and paclitaxel have shown some activity in melanoma therapy. Dacarbazine, temozolomide and fotemustine, and more rarely paclitaxel, are mostly used in monochemotherapy, all others are used in combination (134, 135).

Chemotherapy has never been shown to increase the overall survival in metastatic melanoma. Dacarbazine at a dose of 1,000 mg/mq every 28 days or 850 mg/mq every 21 days and temozolomide at a dose of 200 mg/mq/day for five days every 28 days, remain the gold standard in almost all phase III studies.

Fotemustine. Fotemustine at a dose of 100 mg/mq (day 1, 8, 15), followed after five weeks by maintenance with 100 mg/mq every 21-28 days is also used outside experimental protocols.

Based on the results of comparative studies, temozolomide and fotemustine are considered equivalent to dacarbazine, with the only difference being that fotemustine is not registered in all countries. Dacarbazine achieves a response rate that ranges from 10 to 25% with a 1-year survival of 27% and median survival of 5.6 to 11 months (136). Temozolomide has a similar efficacy but it is able to pass the blood-brain barrier and has the advantage of oral intake (137). Fotemustine has a response rate of approximately 15% with a time-to-progression and median duration of responses similar to dacarbazine (138). Polychemotherapy generally leads to a higher response rate and improves progression-free survival compared to monochemotherapy but with greater toxicity and no increase in overall survival (134, 135).

Ipilimumab: Ipilimumab was the first drug to show an advantage in overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma (139). It is a monoclonal antibody that binds to (CTLA4) and blocks the inhibitory signal to T-lymphocytes, thus promoting the T-cell antitumor response. It is administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 21 days four times and in combination with dacarbazine. Toxicity is immune-mediated and, in particular, can involve the gastrointestinal tract, skin, liver and endocrine system (140).

Vemurafenib: Vemurafenib is able to target melanoma with a mutation in codon 600 of BRAF, which is found in 50-66% of cases and has been shown to be superior to dacarbazine in prolonging overall survival (84% vs. 64% at one year), with quick responses recorded in 80% of patients (1.45 months) (141). Unfortunately, some resistance mechanisms can arise very rapidly, so that the progression-free survival ranges from 5 to 7 months. The drug is taken orally continuously, at a dose of 960 mg twice a day and, frequently, toxicity appears at skin (where the onset of squamocellular carcinoma is also possible) and articular levels (142, 143).

Dabrafenib: Like vemurafenib, dabrafenib is a BRAF inhibitor used in cases that have a mutation at codon V600. It has been recently approved by the Food and Drug administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic melanoma, following the results of a phase III study in which an increased progression-free survival compared to dacarbazine (5.1 months vs. 2.7 months) was demonstrated, with a response rate of 52% and median response duration of five months. It is taken orally, at a dose of 150 mg twice daily. The most commonly encountered side-effects are hyperkeratosis, fever, headache, arthralgia, alopecia and palmoplantar eritrodisestesia. However, cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma have also been found (144).

Trametinib: Trametinib is an inhibitor of (MEK) that was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic melanoma with mutation of BRAF (V600E or V600K) that have not been previously treated with a BRAF inhibitor. Compared to chemotherapy (paclitaxel or dacarbazine), trametinib led to an increase in progression-free survival (4.8 vs. 1.5 months) and a higher response rate (22% vs. 8%) (145). In patients previously treated with a BRAF inhibitor, trametinib did not demonstrate any sort of activity. It is taken orally at dose of 2 mg daily. The most frequently observed toxicities include rash, diarrhea, and lymphedema (146).

Ongoing clinical trials: Several clinical trials are underway to evaluate the activity of new drugs or drug combinations already used in monotherapy of metastatic melanoma. In particular, the combination of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib with the MEK inhibitor trametinib seems to be promising. In a phase III study, this drug association has been shown to be superior to dabrafenib only in terms of progression-free survival (9.4 months vs. 5.8 months) and response rate (76% vs. 54%) (147). Another group of new drugs in development for the treatment of metastatic melanoma is represented by PD1 antibodies. These drugs lead to increased antitumor immune activity by blocking this receptor, which mediates the inhibitory signal to activate T-lymphocytes. In the phase I study, patients who took nivolumab (a PD1 inhibitor) at a dose of 3 mg/kg had a median survival of 20.3 months with a survival rate at two and three years of 44% and 40%, respectively (148). Recently, data from a combination study of nivolumab and ipilimumab have shown that this therapy is active in metastatic melanoma, causing a rapid and important response in the majority of patients (149). Another antibody against PD1, which currently stands at an advanced stage of study, is lambrolizumab. In a phase I study, this drug led to a response rate of 52% at a dose of 10 mg/kg every two weeks, with a median duration of 11 months at the time of the analysis (150). Table III shows the specific protein inhibitors of the most important pathways of signal transduction that are under investigation in clinical trials for metastatic melanoma.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received November 10, 2013.
  • Revision received December 2, 2013.
  • Accepted December 4, 2013.
  • Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Rastrelli M,
    2. Alaibac M,
    3. Stramare R,
    4. Chiarion Sileni V,
    5. Montesco MC,
    6. Vecchiato A,
    7. Campana LG,
    8. Rossi CR
    : Melanoma m (zero): Diagnosis and Therapy. ISRN Dermatol 616170, 2013.
  2. ↵
    1. Gandini S,
    2. Autier P,
    3. Boniol M
    : Reviews on sun exposure and artificial light and melanoma. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 107: 362-366, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Geller AG,
    2. Clapp RW,
    3. Sober AJ,
    4. Gonsalves L,
    5. Mueller L,
    6. Christiansen CL,
    7. Shaikh W,
    8. Miller DR
    : Melanoma epidemic: A n analysis of six decades of Data From the Connecticut Tumor Registry. J Clin Oncol 31: 4172-4178, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Panasiti V,
    2. Curzio M,
    3. Roberti V,
    4. Lieto P,
    5. Devirgiliis V,
    6. Gobbi S,
    7. Naspi A,
    8. Coppola R,
    9. Lopez T,
    10. Di Meo N,
    11. Gatti A,
    12. Trevisan G,
    13. Londei P,
    14. Calvieri S
    : Metastatic volume: A n old oncologic concept and a new prognostic factor for stage iv melanoma patients, Dermatology, 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
  5. ↵
    1. Gordon R
    : Skin cancer: A n overview of epidemiology and risk factors. Semin Oncol Nurs 29: 160-169, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jaimes N,
    2. Marghoob AA
    : An update on risk factors, prognosis and management of melanoma patients. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 147: 1-19, 2012 (in Italian).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Trinh VA
    : Current management of metastatic melanoma. Am J Health Syst Pharm 65: (suppl 9), 3-8 2008.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Korn EL,
    2. Liu PY,
    3. Lee SJ,
    4. Chapman JA,
    5. Niedzwiecki D,
    6. Suman VJ,
    7. Moon J,
    8. Sondak,
    9. Atkins MB,
    10. Eisenhauer EA,
    11. Parulekar W,
    12. Markovic SN,
    13. Saxman S,
    14. Kirkwood JM
    : Meta-analysis of phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future phase II trials. J Clin Oncol 26: 527-534, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Weide B,
    2. Elsässer M,
    3. Büttner P,
    4. Pflugfelder A,
    5. Leiter U,
    6. Eigentler TK,
    7. Bauer J,
    8. Witte M,
    9. Meier F,
    10. Garbe C
    : Serum markers lactate dehydrogenase and S100B predict independently disease outcome in melanoma patients with distant metastasis. Br J Cancer 107: 422-428, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Tarhini AA,
    2. Stuckert J,
    3. Lee S,
    4. Sander,
    5. Kirkwood JM
    : Prognostic significance of serum S100B protein in high-risk surgically resected melanoma patients participating in Intergroup Trial ECOG 1694. J Clin Oncol 27: 38-44, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Fernandez-Flores A
    : Prognostic factors for melanoma progression and metastasis: from hematoxylin-eosin to genetics. Rom J Morphol Embryol 533: 449-459, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Balch CM,
    2. Gershenwald JE,
    3. Soong SJ,
    4. Thompson,
    5. Atkins MB,
    6. Byrd DR,
    7. Buzaid AC,
    8. Cochran AJ,
    9. Coit DG,
    10. Ding S,
    11. Eggermont AM,
    12. Flaherty KT,
    13. Gimotty PA,
    14. Kirkwood JM,
    15. McMasters KM,
    16. Mihm MC Jr.,
    17. Morton DL,
    18. Ross MI,
    19. Sober AJ,
    20. Sondak VK
    : Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol 27: 527-534, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Balch CM,
    2. Soong SJ,
    3. Murad TM,
    4. Smith JW,
    5. Maddox WA,
    6. Durant JR
    : A multifactorial analysis of melanoma. IV. Prognostic factors in 200 melanoma patients with distant metastases (stage III). J Clin Oncol 1: 126-134, 1983
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    1. Barth A,
    2. Wanek LA,
    3. Morton DL
    : Prognostic factors in 1,521 melanoma patients with distant metastases. J Am Coll Surg 181: 193-201, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Batus M,
    2. Waheed S,
    3. Ruby C,
    4. Petersen L,
    5. Bines SD,
    6. Kaufman HL
    : Optimal management of metastatic melanoma: current strategies and future directions. Am J Clin Dermatol 14: 179-194, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Hill VK,
    2. Gartner JJ,
    3. Samuels Y,
    4. Goldstein AM
    : The genetics of melanoma: recent advances. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 14: 257-279, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Damsky WE,
    2. Theodosakis N,
    3. Bosenberg M
    : Melanoma metastasis: new concepts and evolving paradigms. Oncogene, 2013 [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Leong SP,
    2. Gershenwald JE,
    3. Soong SJ,
    4. Schadendorf D,
    5. Tarhini AA,
    6. Agarwala S,
    7. Hauschild A,
    8. Soon CW,
    9. Daud A,
    10. Kashani-Sabet M
    : Cutaneous melanoma:Amodel to study cancer metastasis. J Surg Oncol 103: 538-549, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mohamed A,
    2. Gonzalez RS,
    3. Lawson D,
    4. Wang J,
    5. Cohen C
    : Tumor Stem Cells (CD271, c-kit, SOX10) in Melanomas: Prognostic and Outcome Implications. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol, 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
  17. ↵
    1. Zimmerer RM,
    2. Korn P,
    3. Demougin P,
    4. Kampmann A,
    5. Kokemüller H,
    6. Eckardt AM,
    7. Gellrich NC,
    8. Tavassol F
    : Functional features of cancer stem cells in melanoma cell lines, Cancer Cell Int 13(1): 78, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Weide B,
    2. Elsässer M,
    3. Büttner P,
    4. Pflugfelder A,
    5. Leiter U,
    6. Eigentler TK,
    7. Bauer J,
    8. Witte M,
    9. Meier F,
    10. Garbe C
    : Serum markers lactate dehydrogenase and S100B predict independently disease outcome in melanoma patients with distant metastasis. Br J Cancer 107: 422-428, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Perrotta R,
    2. Bevelacqua Y,
    3. Malaguarnera G,
    4. Paladina I,
    5. Giordano M,
    6. Malaguarnera M
    : Serum markers of cutaneous melanoma. Fronti Biosci 2: 1115-1122, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Egberts F,
    2. Pollex A,
    3. Egberts JH,
    4. Kaehler KC,
    5. Weichenthal M,
    6. Hauschild A
    : Long-term survival analysis in metastatic melanoma: serum S100B is an independent prognostic marker and superior to LDH. Onkologie 31: 380-384, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Koyanagi K,
    2. Kuo C,
    3. Nakagawa T,
    4. Mori T,
    5. Ueno H,
    6. Lorico AR Jr..,
    7. Wang HJ,
    8. Hseuh E,
    9. O'Day SJ,
    10. Hoon DS
    : Multimarker quantitative real-time PCR detection of circulating melanoma cells in peripheral blood: relation to disease stage in melanoma patients. Clin Chem 51: 981-988, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Mohammed MQ,
    2. Abraha HD,
    3. Sherwood RA,
    4. MacRae K,
    5. Retsas S
    : Serum S100β protein as a marker of disease activity in patients with malignant melanoma. Med Oncol 18: 109-120, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Alber B,
    2. Hein R,
    3. Garbe C,
    4. Caroli U,
    5. Luppa PB
    : Multicenter evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of the Elecsys S100 immunoassay in patients with malignant melanoma. Clin Chem Lab Med 43: 557-563, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kelley MC,
    2. Jones RC,
    3. Gupta RK,
    4. Yee R,
    5. Stern S,
    6. Wanek L,
    7. Morton DL
    : Tumor-associated antigen TA-90 immune complex assay predicts subclinical metastasis and survival for patients with early stage melanoma. Cancer 83: 1355-1361, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Itakura E,
    2. Huang RR,
    3. Wen DR,
    4. Paul E,
    5. Wünsch PH,
    6. Cochran AJ
    : IL-10 expression by primary tumor cells correlates with melanoma progression from radial to vertical growth phase and development of metastatic competence. Mod Pathol 24: 801-809, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Facies MB,
    2. Gupta RK,
    3. Ye X,
    4. Lee C,
    5. Yee R,
    6. Leopoldo Z,
    7. Essner R,
    8. Foshag LJ,
    9. Elashoff D,
    10. Morton DL
    : A Comparison ofthree tumor markers (MIA, TA90IC, S100B) in stage III melanoma patients, Cancer Invest 25: 285-293, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Miliotes G,
    2. Lyman GH,
    3. Cruse CW,
    4. Puleo C,
    5. Albertini PA,
    6. Rapaport D,
    7. Glass F,
    8. Fenske N,
    9. Soriano T,
    10. Cuny C,
    11. Van Voorhis N,
    12. Reintgen D
    : Evaluation of new putative tumor markers for melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 3: 558-563,1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Mian S,
    2. Ugurel S,
    3. Parkinson E,
    4. Schlenzka I,
    5. Dryden I,
    6. Lancashire L,
    7. Ball G,
    8. Creaser C,
    9. Rees R,
    10. Schadendorf D
    : Serum proteomic fingerprinting discriminates between clinical stages and predicts disease progression in melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 23: 5088-5093, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Caron J,
    2. Mangé A,
    3. Guillot B,
    4. Solassol J
    : Highly sensitive detection of melanoma based on serum proteomic profiling. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135: 1257-1264, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Schröer-Günther MA,
    2. Wolff RF,
    3. Westwood ME,
    4. Scheibler FJ,
    5. Schürmann C,
    6. Baumert BG,
    7. Sauerland S,
    8. Kleijnen J
    : F-18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography imaging in primary staging of patients with malignant melanoma: A systematic review. Syst Rev 1: 62, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Tan JC,
    2. Chatterton BE
    : Is there an added clinical value of ‘true’ whole-body(18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with malignant melanoma? Hell J Nucl Med 15: 202-205, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bronstein Y,
    2. Ng CS,
    3. Rohren E,
    4. Ross MI,
    5. Lee JE,
    6. Cormier J,
    7. Johnson VE,
    8. Hwu WJ
    : PET/CT in the management of patients with stage IIIC and IV metastatic melanoma considered candidates for surgery: Evaluation of the additive value after conventional imaging. Am J Roentgenol 198: 902-908, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wagner T,
    2. Chevreau C,
    3. Meyer N,
    4. Mourey L,
    5. Courbon F,
    6. Zerdoud S
    : Routine FDG PET-CT in patients with a high-risk localized melanoma has a high predictive positive value for nodal disease and high negative predictive value for the presence of distant metastases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 26: 1431-1435, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Peric B,
    2. Zagar I,
    3. Novakovic S,
    4. Zgajnar J,
    5. Hocevar M
    : Role of serum S100B and PET-CT in follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma. BMC Cancer 11: 328, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Mosavi F,
    2. Ullenhag G,
    3. Ahlström H
    : Whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging compared to CT for staging of malignant melanoma. Ups J Med Sci 118: 91-97, 2013
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Zukauskaite R,
    2. Schmidt H,
    3. Asmussen JT,
    4. Hansen O,
    5. Bastholt L
    : Asymptomatic brain metastases in patients with cutaneous metastatic malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res 23: 21-26, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Tabouret E,
    2. Bauchet L,
    3. Carpentier AF
    : Brain metastases epidemiology and biology. Bull Cancer 100: 57-62, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Rubaltelli L,
    2. Beltrame V,
    3. Scagliori E,
    4. Bezzon E,
    5. Frigo AC,
    6. Rastrelli M,
    7. Stramare R
    : Potential use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the detection of metastatic superficial lymph nodes in melanoma patients. Ultraschall Med, 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
  33. ↵
    1. Schäfer-Hesterberg G,
    2. Schoengen A,
    3. Sterry W,
    4. Voit C
    : Use of ultrasound to early identify, diagnose and localize metastases in melanoma patients. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 7: 1707-1716, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Voit CA,
    2. Van Akkooi AC,
    3. Eggermont AM,
    4. Schäfer-Hesterberg G,
    5. Kron M,
    6. Ulrich J,
    7. Sterry W,
    8. Schoengen A,
    9. Rademaker J
    : Fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable and nonpalpable lymph nodes to detect metastatic melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 103: 1771-1777, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Schaefer-Hesterberg G,
    2. Akkooi AJ,
    3. Letsch A,
    4. Roewert J,
    5. Blume-Peytavi U,
    6. Keilholz U,
    7. Voit C
    : Clinically misinterpreted melanoma metastases can correctly be diagnosed by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Eur J Dermatol 21: 238-241, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Leung AM,
    2. Hari DM,
    3. Morton DL
    : Surgery for distant melanoma metastasis. Cancer J 18: 176-184, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Ollila DW,
    2. Gleisner AL,
    3. Hsueh EC
    : Rationale for complete metastasectomy in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma. J Surg Oncol 104: 420-424, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Caudle AS,
    2. Ross MI
    : Metastasectomy for stage IV melanoma: For whom and how much? Surg Oncol Clin N Am 20: 133-144, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Howard JH,
    2. Thompson JF,
    3. Mozzillo N,
    4. Nieweg OE,
    5. Hoekstra HJ,
    6. Roses DF,
    7. Sondak VK,
    8. Reintgen DS,
    9. Kashani-Sabet M,
    10. Karakousis CP,
    11. Coventry BJ,
    12. Kraybill WG,
    13. Smithers BM,
    14. Elashoff R,
    15. Stern SL,
    16. Cochran AJ,
    17. Faries MB,
    18. Morton DL
    : Metastasectomy for distant metastatic melanoma: analysis of data from the first Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I). Ann Surg Oncol 19: 2547-2555, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Ollila DW
    : Complete metastasectomy in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma, Lancet Oncol 7: 919-924, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Martinez SR,
    2. Youn SE
    : A rational surgical approach to the treatment of distant melanoma metastases. Cancer Treat Rev 34: 614-620, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Mosca PJ,
    2. Teicher E,
    3. Nair SP,
    4. Pockaj BA
    : Can surgeons improve survival in stage IV melanoma? J Surg Oncol 97: 462-468, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Wasif N,
    2. Bagaria SP,
    3. Ray P,
    4. Morton DL
    : Does metastasectomy improve survival in patients with Stage IV melanoma? A cancer registry analysis of outcomes. J Surg Oncol 104: 111-115, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Tauceri F,
    2. Mura G,
    3. Roseano M,
    4. Framarini M,
    5. Ridolfi L,
    6. Verdecchia GM
    : Surgery and adjuvant therapies in the treatment of stage IV melanoma: our experience in 84 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394: 1079-1084, 2009
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Young SE,
    2. Martinez SR,
    3. Essner R
    : The role of surgery in treatment of stage IV melanoma. J Surg Oncol 94: 344-351, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Carlson JA
    : Tumor doubling time of cutaneous melanoma and its metastasis, American Journal of Dermatopathology, vol. 25 no. 4 pp. 291-299, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Ollila DW,
    2. Stern SL,
    3. Morton DL
    : Tumor doubling time: a selection factor for pulmonary resection of metastatic melanoma. J Surg Oncol 69: 206-211, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Kähler KC,
    2. Egberts F,
    3. Gutzmer R
    : Palliative treatment of skin metastases in dermato-oncology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, 2013 [Epub ahead of print]
  49. ↵
    1. Galeon M,
    2. Bassi A,
    3. Scarfì F,
    4. Arunachalam M,
    5. Difonzo EM
    : Multiple skin metastases of malignant melanoma. QJM, 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
  50. ↵
    1. Spillane AJ,
    2. Pasquali S,
    3. Haydu LE,
    4. Thompson JF
    , Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Lymphadenectomy in Melanoma Patients: Clarifying the Effects of Timing of Surgery and Lymph Node Tumor Burden. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
  51. ↵
    1. Zdzienicki M,
    2. Rutkowski P,
    3. Nowecki ZI,
    4. van Akkooi AC,
    5. Michej W,
    6. Dziewirski W,
    7. Świtaj T,
    8. Pieńkowski A,
    9. Sałamacha M,
    10. Bylina E,
    11. Eggermont AM
    : The analysis of the outcomes and factors related to iliac-obturator involvement in cutaneous melanoma patients after lymph node dissection due to positive sentinel lymph node biopsy or clinically detected inguinal metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 39: 304-310, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Shada AL,
    2. Walters DM,
    3. Tierney SN,
    4. Slingluff CL Jr..
    : Surgical resection for bulky or recurrent axillary metastatic melanoma. J Surg Oncol 105: 21-25, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Badgwell B,
    2. Xing Y,
    3. Gershenwald JE,
    4. Lee JE,
    5. Mansfield PF,
    6. Ross MI,
    7. Cormier JN
    : Pelvic lymph node dissection is beneficial in subsets of patients with node-positive melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 14: 2867-2875, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Velu PP,
    2. Cao C,
    3. Yan TD
    : Current surgical management of melanoma metastases to the lung. J Thor Dis 5(suppl 3): 274-276, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Younes R,
    2. Abrao FC,
    3. Gross J
    : Pulmonary metastasectomy for malignant melanoma: prognostic factors for long-term survival, Melanoma Res 23: 307-311, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Lee JH,
    2. Gulec SA,
    3. Kyshtoobayeva A,
    4. Sim MS,
    5. Morton DL
    : Biological factors, tumor growth kinetics, and survival after metastasectomy for pulmonary melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16: 2834-2839, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Kidner TB,
    2. Yoon J,
    3. Faries MB,
    4. Morton DL
    : Preoperative imaging of pulmonary metastases in patients with melanoma: Implications for minimally invasive techniques, Arch Surg 147: 871-874, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Heyman BM,
    2. Chung MM,
    3. Lark AL,
    4. Shofer S
    : Endobronchial metastasis from primary anorectal melanoma. Am J Case Rep 14: 253-257, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bouchentouf R,
    2. Benjelloun A,
    3. Ibtissam Z,
    4. Ali Aitbenasser M
    : Endobronchial metastases of a malignant melanoma of rectal origin: Clinical case and review of the literature. Pan Afr Med J 14: 67, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Jennings BR,
    2. Millward MJ,
    3. Amanuel B,
    4. Mulrennan S,
    5. Joosten SA,
    6. Phillips MJ
    : Role of endobronchial ultrasound in diagnosis and molecular assessment of metastatic melanoma, Respirology 17: 991-996, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Teo YK,
    2. Kor AC
    : ‘Black bronchoscopy’ a case of endobronchial metastases from melanoma. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 14: 146-148, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Gorantla V,
    2. Kirkwood JM,
    3. Tawbi HA
    : Melanoma brain metastases: An unmet challenge in the era of active therapy, Curr Oncol Rep 15: 483-491, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bottoni U,
    2. Clerico R,
    3. Paolino G,
    4. Ambrifi M,
    5. Corsetti P,
    6. Calmieri S
    : Predictors and survival in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Med Oncol 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Zukauskaite R,
    2. Schmidt H,
    3. Asmussen JT,
    4. Hansen O,
    5. Bastholt L
    : Asymptomatic brain metastases in patients with cutaneous metastatic malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res 23: 21-26, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Ramakrishna N,
    2. Margolin KA
    : Multidisciplinary approach to brain metastasis from melanoma; local therapies for central nervous system metastases. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 399-403, 2013.
  61. ↵
    1. Long GV,
    2. Margolin KA
    : Multidisciplinary approach to brain metastasis from melanoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 393-398, 2013.
  62. ↵
    1. Bafaloukos D,
    2. Gogas H
    : The treatment of brain metastases in melanoma patients. Cancer Treat Rev 30: 515-520, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Nicholas S,
    2. Mathios D,
    3. Jackson C,
    4. Lim M
    : Metastatic melanoma to the brain: surgery and radiation is still the standard of care. Curr Treat Options Oncol 14: 264-279, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Vaidyanathan S,
    2. Mansour P,
    3. Hughes PL,
    4. Selmi F,
    5. Singh G,
    6. Pulya K,
    7. Soni BM
    : Challenges in diagnosis and treatment of a cervical spinal cord injury patient with melanoma, adenocarcinoma, and hepatic and osteolytic metastases: need to implement strategies for prevention and early detection of cancer in spinal cord injury patients. Case Rep Oncol Med, 2012: 531214, 2012.
    1. Wilson DA,
    2. Fusco DJ,
    3. Uschold TD,
    4. Spetzler RF,
    5. Chang SW
    : Chang, Survival and functional outcome after surgical resection of intramedullary spinal cord metastases. World Neurosurg 77: 370-374, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Hashii H,
    2. Mizumoto M,
    3. Kanemoto A,
    4. Harada H,
    5. Asakura H,
    6. Hashimoto T,
    7. Furutani K,
    8. Katagiri H,
    9. Nakasu Y,
    10. Nishimura T
    : Radiotherapy for patients with symptomatic intramedullary spinal cord metastasis, J Radiat Res 52: 641-645, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ishii T,
    2. Terao T,
    3. Komine K,
    4. Abe T
    : Intramedullary spinal cord metastases of malignant melanoma: an autopsy case report and review of the literature. Clin Neuropathol 29: 334-340, 2010
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Nishihara M,
    2. Sasayama T,
    3. Kondoh T,
    4. Tanaka K,
    5. Kohmura E,
    6. Kudo H
    : Long-term Survival after surgical resection of primary spinal malignant melanoma. Neurol Med Chir 49: 546-548, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. ↵
    1. Liang KV,
    2. Sanderson SO,
    3. Nowakowski GS,
    4. Arora AS
    : Metastatic malignant melanoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Mayo Clin Proc 81: 511-516, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Retsas S,
    2. Christofyllakis C
    : Melanoma involving the gastrointestinal tract. Anticancer Res 21(2B): 1503-1507, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Vettoretto N,
    2. De Cesare V,
    3. Cervi E,
    4. Villanacci V,
    5. Ruzzenenti N,
    6. Cervi G
    : Gastric metastasis from melanoma. Report of 2 surgically treated cases, Minerva Chir 55: 787-791, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Dequanter D,
    2. Sales F,
    3. Legendre H,
    4. Lothaire P
    : Surgical resection for gastrointestinal metastatic melanoma. Ann Chir, 129: 278-281, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kasza J,
    2. Espinel F,
    3. Khambaty F,
    4. Bashir S,
    5. Brody F
    : Laparoscopy for stage IV melanoma in two organs. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20: 295-297, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Góbor L,
    2. Czeyda-Pommersheim F,
    3. Köves I
    : Surgical treatment options of metastatic tumours in the gastrointestinal tract (stomach, small and large bowel). Magy Seb 60: 284-288, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Trout AT,
    2. Rabinowitz RS,
    3. Platt JF,
    4. Elsayes KM
    : Melanoma metastases in the abdomen and pelvis: Frequency and patterns of spread. World J Radiol 5: 25-32, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Rose DM,
    2. Essner R,
    3. Hughes TM,
    4. Tang PC,
    5. Bilchik A,
    6. Wanek LA,
    7. Thompson JF,
    8. Morton DL
    : Surgical resection for metastatic melanoma to the liver: the John Wayne Cancer Institute and Sydney Melanoma Unit experience. Arch Surg 136: 950-955, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Ryu SW,
    2. Saw R,
    3. Scolyer RA,
    4. Crawford M,
    5. Thompson JF,
    6. Sandroussi C
    : Liver resection for metastatic melanoma: equivalent survival for cutaneous and ocular primaries, J Surg Oncol 108: 129-135, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Aubin JM,
    2. Rekman J,
    3. Vandenbroucke-Menu F,
    4. Lapointe R,
    5. Fairfull-Smith RJ,
    6. Mimeault R,
    7. Balaa FK,
    8. Martel G
    : Systematic review and meta-analysis of liver resection for metastatic melanoma. Br J Surg 100: 1138-1147, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Du SD,
    2. Mao YL,
    3. Li SH,
    4. Sang XT,
    5. Lu X,
    6. Xu YY,
    7. Xu HF,
    8. Zhao L,
    9. Bai CM,
    10. Zhong SX,
    11. Huang JF
    : Surgical resection plus biotherapy/chemotherapy improves survival of hepatic metastatic melanoma. World J Hepatol 4: 305-310, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bala MM,
    2. Riemsma RP,
    3. Wolff R,
    4. Kleijnen J
    : Cryotherapy for liver metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6:CD009058, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Woon WW,
    2. Haghighi KS,
    3. Zuckerman RS,
    4. Morris DL
    : Liver resection and cryotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Int Surg 93: 274-277, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Kuvshinoff B,
    2. Fong Y
    : Surgical therapy of liver metastases. Semin Oncol 34: 177-185, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Ozülker T,
    2. Ozülker F,
    3. Cicin I,
    4. Ozpačac T
    : A case of malignant melanoma with cardiac and gallbladder metastases detected by FDG PET-CT. Clin Nucl Med 34: 948-949, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. MVernadakis S,
    2. Rallis G,
    3. Danias N,
    4. Serafimidis C,
    5. Christodoulou E,
    6. Troullinakis M,
    7. Legakis N,
    8. Peros G
    : Metastatic melanoma of the gallbladder: An unusual clinical presentation of acute cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol 15: 3434-3436, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Sen CA,
    2. Kargi A,
    3. Kaya V,
    4. Tanriverdi O
    : Isolated and solitary splenic metastasis detected by positron emission tomography in a patient with malignant melanoma: Case report and review of the literature. Contemp Oncol 17: 214-217, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  77. ↵
    1. Finocchi L,
    2. Covarelli P,
    3. Gentile D,
    4. Cattorini L,
    5. Cirocchi R,
    6. Noya G,
    7. Sciannameo FL
    : Melanoma metastases to the spleen: laparoscopic approach. Minerva Chir 67: 95-96, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Wedin R,
    2. Falkenius J,
    3. Weiss RJ,
    4. Hansson J
    : Surgical treatment of skeletal metastases in 31 melanoma patients. Acta Orthop Belg 78: 246-253, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Huang KY,
    2. Wang CR,
    3. Yang RS
    : Rare clinical experiences for surgical treatment of melanoma with osseous metastases in Taiwan. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8: 70, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lau YS,
    2. Sabokbar A,
    3. Giele H,
    4. Cerundolo V,
    5. Hofstetter W,
    6. Athanasou NA
    : Malignant melanoma and bone resorption. Br J Cancer 94: 1496-1503, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Gokaslan ZL,
    2. Aladag MA,
    3. Ellerhorst JA
    : Melanoma metastatic to the spine: A review of 133 cases. Melanoma Res 10: 78-80, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Stahl S,
    2. Santos Stahl A,
    3. Lotter O,
    4. Pfau M,
    5. Perner S,
    6. Schaller HE
    : Palliative surgery for skeletal metastases from melanoma in the scaphoid–a critical case report appraisal. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65: 1111-1115, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Judge JM,
    2. Tillou JD,
    3. Slingluff CL Jr..,
    4. Kern JA,
    5. Kron IL,
    6. Weiss GR
    : Surgical management of the patient with metastatic melanoma to the heart. J Cardiol Surg 28: 124-128, 2013.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pinto F,
    2. Cappa E,
    3. Brescia A,
    4. Sacco E,
    5. Volpe A,
    6. Totaro A,
    7. Gardi M,
    8. Pierconti F,
    9. Bassi PF
    : Metastasis to the renal hilum from malignant melanoma of the anterior trunk: An unusual finding. Arch Ital Urol Androl 82: 119-121, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Gakis G,
    2. Merseburger AS,
    3. Sotlar K,
    4. Kuczyk MA,
    5. Sievert KD,
    6. Stenzl A
    : Metastasis of malignant melanoma in the ureter: Possible algorithms for a therapeutic approach. Int J Urol 16: 407-409, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ejaz S,
    2. Shawa H,
    3. Henderson SA,
    4. Habra MA
    : Melanoma of unknown primary origin presenting as a rapidly enlarging adrenal mass. BMJ Case Rep, 2013.
    1. Gupta D,
    2. Neto AG,
    3. Deavers MT,
    4. Silva EG,
    5. Malpica A
    : Metastatic melanoma to the vagina: Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of three cases and literature review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 22: 136-140, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fenzl V,
    2. Prkacin I,
    3. Skrtic A
    : Malignant melanoma ovarian metastasis mimicking acute tubo-ovarian abscess. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 32: 582-584, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Simeone S,
    2. Laterza MM,
    3. Scaravilli G,
    4. Capuano S,
    5. Serao M,
    6. Orabona P,
    7. Rossi R,
    8. Balbi C
    : Malignant melanoma metastasizing to the uterus in a patient with atypical postmeno-pause metrorrhagia. A case report. Minerva Ginecol 61: 77-80, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kurul S,
    2. Aykan F,
    3. Tas F
    : Penile metastasis of cutaneous malignant melanoma: a true hematogenous spread? Case report and review of the literature. Melanoma Res 16: 259-261, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Friedrich RE,
    2. Abadi M
    : Distant metastases and malignant cellular neoplasms encountered in the oral and maxillofacial region: Analysis of 92 patients treated at a single institution. Anticancer Res 30: 1843-1848, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Rosenberg C,
    2. Finger PT
    : Cutaneous malignant melanoma metastatic to the eye, lids, and orbit. Surv ophthalmol 53: 187-202, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Forschner A,
    2. Heinrich V,
    3. Pflugfelder A,
    4. Meier F,
    5. Garbe C
    : The role of radiotherapy in the overall treatment of melanoma. Clin Dermatol 31: 282-289, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Overgaard J,
    2. Gonzalez Gonzalez D,
    3. Hulshof MC,
    4. Arcangeli G,
    5. Dahl O,
    6. Mella O,
    7. Bentzen SM
    : Randomised trial of hyperthermia as adjuvant to radiotherapy for recurrent or metastatic malignant melanoma. European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology. Lancet 345: 540-543, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Bentzen SM,
    2. Overgaard J,
    3. Thames HD,
    4. Overgaard M,
    5. Vejby Hansen P,
    6. von der Maase H,
    7. Meder J
    : Clinical radiobiology of malignant melanoma. Radiother Oncol 16: 169-182, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Bentzen SM,
    2. Thames HD
    : Tumor volume and local control probability: Clinical data and radiobiological interpretations. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 36: 247-251, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Rompoti N,
    2. Schilling B,
    3. Livingstone E,
    4. Griewank K,
    5. Hillen U,
    6. Sauerwein W,
    7. Pöttgen C,
    8. Stuschke M,
    9. Schadendorf D,
    10. Zimmer L
    : Combination of BRAF Inhibitors and brain radiotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma shows minimal acute toxicity. J Clin Oncol 31: 3844-3845, 2013
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. Gojkovič-Horvat A,
    2. Jančar B,
    3. Blas M,
    4. Zumer B,
    5. Karner K,
    6. Hočevar M,
    7. Strojan P
    : Adjuvant radiotherapy for palpable melanoma metastases to the groin: When to irradiate? Int J Rad Oncol 83: 310-316, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  89. ↵
    1. Majer M,
    2. Samlowski WE
    : Management of metastatic melanoma patients with brain metastases, Curr Oncol Rep 9: 411-416, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Fox MC,
    2. Lao CD,
    3. Schwartz JL,
    4. Frohm ML,
    5. Bichakjian CK,
    6. Johnson TM
    : Management options for metastatic melanoma in the era of novel therapies: A primer for the practicing dermatologist: Part II: Management of stage IV disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 68: 13.e1-13, 2013.
    OpenUrl
    1. Carlino MS,
    2. Fogarty GB,
    3. Long GV
    : Treatment of melanoma brain metastases: Anew paradigm. Cancer J 18: 208-212, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Meyners T,
    2. Heisterkamp C,
    3. Kueter JD,
    4. Veninga T,
    5. Stalpers LJ,
    6. Schild SE,
    7. Rades D
    : Prognostic factors for outcomes after whole-brain irradiation of brain metastases from relatively radioresistant tumors: a retrospective analysis. BMC Cancer 10: 582, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Marcou Y,
    2. Lindquist C,
    3. Adams C,
    4. Retsas S,
    5. Plowman PN
    : What is the optimal therapy of brain metastases? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 13: 105-111, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Thillays F,
    2. Doré M,
    3. Martin SA
    : Postoperative brain radiotherapy: Role of stereotactic radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 17: 407-412, 2013
    OpenUrlPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Lippitz B,
    2. Lindquist C,
    3. Paddick I,
    4. Peterson D,
    5. O'Neill K,
    6. Beaney R
    : Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases: The current evidence. Cancer Treat Rev, 2013 [Epub ahead of print]
  94. ↵
    1. Rava P,
    2. Leonard K,
    3. Sioshansi S,
    4. Curran B,
    5. Wazer DE,
    6. Cosgrove GR,
    7. Norén G,
    8. Hepel JT
    : Survival among patients with 10 or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 119: 457-462, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Rodrigues G,
    2. Gonzalez-Maldonado S,
    3. Bauman G,
    4. Senan S,
    5. Lagerwaard F
    : A statistical comparison of prognostic index systems for brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 25: 227-235, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Fokas E,
    2. Henzel M,
    3. Surber G,
    4. Kleinert G,
    5. Hamm K,
    6. Engenhart-Cabillic R
    : Stereotactic Radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: comparison of efficacy and toxicity in 260 patients with brain metastases. J Neurooncol 109: 91-98, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Kim YJ,
    2. Cho KH,
    3. Kim JY,
    4. Lim YK,
    5. Min HS,
    6. Lee SH,
    7. Kim HJ,
    8. Gwak HS,
    9. Yoo H,
    10. Lee SH
    : Single-dose versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol 81: 483-489, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Ishii T,
    2. Terao T,
    3. Komine K,
    4. Abe T
    : Intramedullary spinal cord metastases of malignant melanoma: An autopsy case report and review of the literature, Clin Neuropathol 29: 334-340, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Bedane C,
    2. Leccia MT,
    3. Sassolas B,
    4. Bregman B,
    5. Lebbé C,
    6. French investigators of the MELODY study
    : Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma in France. Curr Med Res Opin 29: 1297-1305, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Tzika E,
    2. Moura B,
    3. Romano E,
    4. Michielin O
    : New therapeutic weapons in stage IV melanoma. Rev Méd Suisse 9: 1095-1098, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Middleton MR,
    2. Grob JJ,
    3. Aaronson N,
    4. Fierlbeck G,
    5. Tilgen W,
    6. Seiter S,
    7. Gore M,
    8. Aamdal S,
    9. Cebon J,
    10. Coates A,
    11. Dreno B,
    12. Henz M,
    13. Schadendorf D,
    14. Kapp A,
    15. Weiss J,
    16. Fraass U,
    17. Statkevich P,
    18. Muller M,
    19. Thatcher N
    : Randomised phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 18: 158-166, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. ↵
    1. Quirt I,
    2. Verma S,
    3. Petrella T,
    4. Bak K,
    5. Charette M
    : Temozolomide for the treatment of metastatic melanoma: A systematic review. Oncologist 12: 1114-1123, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. ↵
    1. Avril MF,
    2. Aamdal S,
    3. Grob JJ,
    4. Hauschild A,
    5. Mohr P,
    6. Bonerandi JJ,
    7. Weichenthal M,
    8. Neuber K,
    9. Bieber T,
    10. Gilde K,
    11. Guillem Porta V,
    12. Fra J,
    13. Bonneterre J,
    14. Saïag P,
    15. Kamanabrou D,
    16. Pehamberger H,
    17. Sufliarsky J,
    18. Gonzalez Larriba JL,
    19. Scherrer A,
    20. Menu Y
    : Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma: A phase III study. J Clin Oncol 22: 1118-1125, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. ↵
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. O'Day SJ,
    3. McDermott DF,
    4. Weber RW,
    5. Sosman JA,
    6. Haanen JB,
    7. Gonzalez R,
    8. Robert C,
    9. Schadendorf D,
    10. Hassel JC,
    11. Akerley W,
    12. van den Eertwegh AJ,
    13. Lutzky J,
    14. Lorigan P,
    15. Vaubel JM,
    16. Linette GP,
    17. Hogg D,
    18. Ottensmeier CH,
    19. Lebbé C,
    20. Peschel C,
    21. Quirt I,
    22. Clark JI,
    23. Wolchok JD,
    24. Weber JS,
    25. Tian J,
    26. Yellin MJ,
    27. Nichol GM,
    28. Hoos A,
    29. Urba WJ
    : Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastases with melanoma. N Engl J Med 363: 711-723, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Robert C,
    2. Thomas L,
    3. Bondarenko I,
    4. O'Day S,
    5. M D JW,
    6. Garbe C,
    7. Lebbe C,
    8. Baurain JF,
    9. Testori A,
    10. Grob JJ,
    11. Davidson N,
    12. Richards J,
    13. Maio M,
    14. Hauschild A,
    15. Miller WH Jr..,
    16. Gascon P,
    17. Lotem M,
    18. Harmankaya K,
    19. Ibrahim R,
    20. Francis S,
    21. Chen TT,
    22. Humphrey R,
    23. Hoos A,
    24. Wolchok JD
    : Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 364: 2517-2526, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Davies H,
    2. Bignell GR,
    3. Cox C,
    4. Stephens P,
    5. Edkins S,
    6. Clegg S,
    7. Teague J,
    8. Woffendin H,
    9. Garnett MJ,
    10. Bottomley W,
    11. Davis N,
    12. Dicks E,
    13. Ewing R,
    14. Floyd Y,
    15. Gray K,
    16. Hall S,
    17. Hawes R,
    18. Hughes J,
    19. Kosmidou V,
    20. Menzies A,
    21. Mould C,
    22. Parker A,
    23. Stevens C,
    24. Watt S,
    25. Hooper S,
    26. Wilson R,
    27. Jayatilake H,
    28. Gusterson BA,
    29. Cooper C,
    30. Shipley J,
    31. Hargrave D,
    32. Pritchard-Jones K,
    33. Maitland N,
    34. Chenevix-Trench G,
    35. Riggins GJ,
    36. Bigner DD,
    37. Palmieri G,
    38. Cossu A,
    39. Flanagan A,
    40. Nicholson A,
    41. Ho JW,
    42. Leung SY,
    43. Yuen ST,
    44. Weber BL,
    45. Seigler HF,
    46. Darrow TL,
    47. Paterson H,
    48. Marais R,
    49. Marshall CJ,
    50. Wooster R,
    51. Stratton MR,
    52. Futreal PA
    : Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417: 949-954, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Chapman PB,
    2. Hauschild A,
    3. Robert C,
    4. Haanen JB,
    5. Ascierto P,
    6. Larkin J,
    7. Dummer R,
    8. Garbe C,
    9. Testori A,
    10. Maio M,
    11. Hogg D,
    12. Lorigan P,
    13. Lebbe C,
    14. Jouary T,
    15. Schadendorf D,
    16. Ribas A,
    17. O'Day SJ,
    18. Sosman JA,
    19. Kirkwood JM,
    20. Eggermont AM,
    21. Dreno B,
    22. Nolop K,
    23. Li J,
    24. Nelson B,
    25. Hou J,
    26. Lee RJ,
    27. Flaherty KT,
    28. McArthur GA,
    29. BRIM-3 Study Group
    : Improved survival with vemurafenib in BRAF V600E mutation with melanoma. N Engl J Med 364: 2507-2516, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Sosman JA,
    2. Kim KB,
    3. Schuchter L,
    4. Gonzalez R,
    5. Pavlick AC,
    6. Weber JS,
    7. McArthur GA,
    8. Hutson TE,
    9. Moschos SJ,
    10. Flaherty KT,
    11. Hersey P,
    12. Kefford R,
    13. Lawrence D,
    14. Puzanov I,
    15. Lewis KD,
    16. Amaravadi RK,
    17. Chmielowski B,
    18. Lawrence HJ,
    19. Shyr Y,
    20. Ye F,
    21. Li J,
    22. Nolop KB,
    23. Lee RJ,
    24. Joe AK,
    25. Ribas A
    : Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med 366: 107-114, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  108. ↵
    1. Hauschild A,
    2. Grob JJ,
    3. Demidov LV,
    4. Jouary T,
    5. Gutzmer R,
    6. Millward M,
    7. Rutkowski P,
    8. Blank CU,
    9. Miller WH Jr.,
    10. Kaempgen E,
    11. Martín-Algarra S,
    12. Karaszewska B,
    13. Mauch C,
    14. Chiarion-Sileni V,
    15. Martin AM,
    16. Swann S,
    17. Haney P,
    18. Mirakhur B,
    19. Guckert ME,
    20. Goodman V,
    21. Chapman PB
    : Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial, Lancet 380: 358-365, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. ↵
    1. Flaherty KT,
    2. Robert C,
    3. Hersey P,
    4. Nathan P,
    5. Garbe C,
    6. Milhem M,
    7. Demidov LV,
    8. Hassel JC,
    9. Rutkowski P,
    10. Mohr P,
    11. Dummer R,
    12. Trefzer U,
    13. Larkin JM,
    14. Utikal J,
    15. Dreno B,
    16. Nyakas M,
    17. Middleton MR,
    18. Becker JC,
    19. Casey M,
    20. Sherman LJ,
    21. Wu FS,
    22. Ouellet D,
    23. Martin AM,
    24. Patel K,
    25. Schadendorf D,
    26. METRIC Study Group
    : Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med 367: 107-114, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    1. Kim KB,
    2. Kefford R,
    3. Pavlick AC,
    4. Infante JR,
    5. Ribas A,
    6. Sosman JA,
    7. Fecher LA,
    8. Millward M,
    9. McArthur GA,
    10. Hwu P,
    11. Gonzalez R,
    12. Ott PA,
    13. Long GV,
    14. Gardner OS,
    15. Ouellet D,
    16. Xu Y,
    17. DeMarini DJ,
    18. Le NT,
    19. Patel K,
    20. Lewis
    : Phase II study of the MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor trametinib in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic cutaneous melanoma previously treated with or without a BRAF inhibitor. J Clin Oncol 31: 482-489, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  111. ↵
    1. Flaherty KT,
    2. Infante JR,
    3. Daud A,
    4. Gonzalez R,
    5. Kefford RF,
    6. Sosman J,
    7. Hamid O,
    8. Schuchter L,
    9. Cebon J,
    10. Ibrahim N,
    11. Kudchadkar R,
    12. Burris HA 3rd.,
    13. Falchook G,
    14. Algazi A,
    15. Lewis K,
    16. Long GV,
    17. Puzanov I,
    18. Lebowitz P,
    19. Singh A,
    20. Little S,
    21. Sun P,
    22. Allred A,
    23. Ouellet D,
    24. Kim KB,
    25. Patel K,
    26. Weber J
    : Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med 367: 1694-1703, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Sznol M,
    2. Kluger HM,
    3. Hodi FS,
    4. McDermott DF,
    5. Carvajal RD,
    6. Lawrence DP,
    7. Topalian SL,
    8. Atkins MB,
    9. Powderly JD,
    10. Sharfman WH,
    11. Puzanov I,
    12. Smith DC,
    13. Wigginton JM,
    14. Kollia G,
    15. Gupta AK,
    16. Sosman JA
    : Survival and long-term follow-up of safety and response in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase I trial of nivolumab. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr CRA9006^)
  113. ↵
    1. Wolchok JD,
    2. Kluger H,
    3. Callahan MK,
    4. Postow MA,
    5. Rizvi NA,
    6. Lesokhin AM,
    7. Segal NH,
    8. Ariyan CE,
    9. Gordon RA,
    10. Reed K,
    11. Burke MM,
    12. Caldwell A,
    13. Kronenberg SA,
    14. Agunwamba BU,
    15. Zhang X,
    16. Lowy I,
    17. Inzunza HD,
    18. Feely W,
    19. Horak CE,
    20. Hong Q,
    21. Korman AJ,
    22. Wigginton JM,
    23. Gupta A,
    24. Sznol M
    : Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 369: 122-133, 2013 .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. Hamid O,
    2. Robert C,
    3. Daud A,
    4. Hodi FS,
    5. Hwu WJ,
    6. Kefford R,
    7. Wolchok JD,
    8. Hersey P,
    9. Joseph RW,
    10. Weber JS,
    11. Dronca R,
    12. Gangadhar TC,
    13. Patnaik A,
    14. Zarour H,
    15. Joshua AM,
    16. Gergich K,
    17. Elassaiss-Schaap J,
    18. Algazi A,
    19. Mateus C,
    20. Boasberg P,
    21. Tumeh PC,
    22. Chmielowski B,
    23. Ebbinghaus SW,
    24. Li XN,
    25. Kang SP,
    26. Ribas A
    : Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. N Engl J Med 369: 134-144, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 28, Issue 3
May-June 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Melanoma m1: Diagnosis and Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Melanoma m1: Diagnosis and Therapy
MARCO RASTRELLI, SAVERIA TROPEA, JACOPO PIGOZZO, ELISABETTA BEZZON, LUCA GIOVANNI CAMPANA, ROBERTO STRAMARE, MAURO ALAIBAC, CARLO RICCARDO ROSSI
In Vivo May 2014, 28 (3) 273-285;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Melanoma m1: Diagnosis and Therapy
MARCO RASTRELLI, SAVERIA TROPEA, JACOPO PIGOZZO, ELISABETTA BEZZON, LUCA GIOVANNI CAMPANA, ROBERTO STRAMARE, MAURO ALAIBAC, CARLO RICCARDO ROSSI
In Vivo May 2014, 28 (3) 273-285;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Pathogenesis
    • Diagnosis and Staging
    • Surgical Treatment
    • Surgery for stage IV M1a melanoma
    • Surgery for stage IV M1b melanoma
    • Surgery for stage IV M1c melanoma
    • Radiotherapy
    • Systemic Treatment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • 3PO as a Selective Inhibitor of 6-Phosphofructo-2-Kinase/Fructose-2,6-Biphosphatase 3 in A375 Human Melanoma Cells
  • Residual Tumor on Wide Excisional Margins After Treatment of Invasive Melanoma
  • All-trans Retinoic Acid Overcomes Acquired Resistance to PLX4032 via Inhibition of PIN1 in Melanoma Cells
  • Abdominal Emergencies in Patients with Stage IV Melanoma: The Role of Surgery: A Single-centre Experience
  • Sensitivity of Human Malignant Melanoma Cell Lines to Newcastle Disease Virus
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • Stage IV melanoma
  • surgery
  • radiotherapy
  • Chemotherapy
  • tumor doubling-time
  • review
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire