Abstract
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an aerobic Gram-negative bacillus that usually causes infection in immunocompromised patients. We present the case of an immunocompetent patient with a distal necrosis of the second and third fingers of the right hand caused by S. maltophilia infection. The patient underwent antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole on the basis of the susceptibility tests and underwent surgical debridement of the necrotic tissues, including of the distal phalanx bone, and further reconstruction with Atasoy flap. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is emerging as an important cause of skin infection in immunoresponsive patients. Several community-acquired infections have been reported, however, as far as we are aware of, our case represents the first report of a digital wound of intact skin caused by community-acquired S. maltophilia infection in an immunocompetent patient.
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an aerobic Gram-negative bacillus that usually causes infection in immunocompromised patients, especially those with neutropenia (1). It is considered as a nosocomial opportunistic pathogen. It is a frequent colonizer of fluids used in the hospital setting, but it can also be isolated from soil and agricultural plants (2).
We present the case of a man with a distal necrosis of the second and third fingers of the right hand caused by S. maltophilia infection.
As far as we are aware of, this is the first reported case of digital intact skin infection caused by S. maltophilia in an immunocompetent patient. Clinical, microbiological, and surgical findings are discussed along with therapy and outcomes.
Case Report
A 58-year-old Caucasian man presented to the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the University of Sassari (Italy) with a distal necrosis of the second and third fingers of the right hand. Clinical examination reveled an erosive lesion, starting from the nail bed of the second and third fingers, with an adherent black crust and purulent exudate on the distal extremity, associated with extreme pain (Figure 1A). Past medical history was not significant, apart from cigarette smoking (20 cigarettes/day). There was no history of trauma, hospital admission orimmunosuppressive drug intake. The laboratory tests showed a normal blood count: white blood cells (WBC) 7,000×103/ml, neutrophils 56%, lymphocytes 31%. Liver and renal function tests and immunological screening (autoantibodies, cryoglobulins, antiphospholipid and anticardiolipid antibodies) were within normal ranges.
The first diagnostic hypothesis was Raynaud's syndrome. The patient underwent capillaroscopy and eco-color Doppler of the right arm vessels; both gave negative findings.
Chest X-ray was normal. Radiography of the hand ruled out osteomyelitis of the distal phalanx of the second finger of the right hand.
The patient underwent surgical debridement of the necrotic tissues, including of the distal phalanx bone, and reconstruction with Atasoy flap. In order to prevent tissue ischemia, the flap was sutured with pre-tied stitches, (Figures 1B and C) (3).
A swab of exudate and a deep biopsy were sent to the Microbiology Unit. A culture in blood, chocolate and MacConkey agar, reveled a monoculture colony, identified by Vitek and API20NE as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The isolates were sensitive to co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole).
As indicated by the infectious diseases consultant, the patient underwent antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole at 160/800 mg orally twice daily for four weeks, which allowed the infection to heal and relieved the pain.
The surgical wound was medicated every two days using polyurethane dressing with ibuprofen (4). After 10 days, the sutures were removed and the wound was completely healed (Figures 1B and C).
After two years, the patient remains in good health and shows no signs of recurrence.
Discussion
S. maltophilia is an ubiquitous bacterium which has been isolated from water, soil, plants and medical devices. It is an opportunistic nosocomial pathogen acquired from an independent source, possibly even before hospitalization, and selected from the commensal flora during anti-microbial exposure. The most important risk factors for developing S. maltophilia infection are associated with a severely-compromised health status and various medical treatments, i.e. intravascular catheter positioning, mechanical ventilation and exposure to broad-spectrum anti-microbials. Hematological malignancy is the most common risk factor for developing S. maltophilia infection, as reported in the literature (5, 6). Moreover, some series suggest the existence of an altered microenvironment in neoplastic tissue favorable for the multiplication of S. maltophilia. Therefore, in the presence of such infection, malignancy should be ruled out and the presence of latent disorders resulting in neutropenia should be excluded (7).
Despite the fact that S. maltophilia has been considered to be a nosocomial-acquired pathogen, community-acquired infection with this bacterium may occur more frequently than previously recognized (8-11). However, unlike recent reports, in our case the onset is not ascribable to a trauma nor to concomitant disease. The patient is a bricklayer who occasionally looks after cattle, so perhaps the cause of the infection is related to his job.
Cutaneous infections are very rare, and infection of intact skin is even more rare (12).
The most frequently described skin and soft tissue manifestations due to S. maltophilia infection are subcutaneous nodules and primary or metastatic cellulitis, which may manifest as ecthyma gangrenosum (6, 12, 13).
S. maltophilia is a bacillus with low virulence that usually causes infection in immunocompromised patients, while in our case, the patient was immunocompetent and S. maltophilia proved to have a particular clinical severity. The superficial swabs were not useful for the diagnosis. Only the deep tissue biopsy allowed isolation of the bacterium and selection of the targeted therapy.
Treatment of S. maltophilia infections is challenging because this organism is intrinsically resistant to most antibiotics and disinfectants, grows slowly, and has a high rate of mutation, which can confer antibiotic resistance. Resistance to β-lactams, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and chinolones is well-known (14). Recommendations for therapy rely on in vitro susceptibility testing.
A: Infected digital ulcer of the second and third fingers of the right hand. B: Postoperative image showing the outcomes of the amputation of the distal phalanges and their reconstruction with Atasoy flap. C: Detailed postoperative image.
In summary, S. maltophilia is emerging as an important cause of skin infection in immunoresponsive patients. Several community-acquired infections have been recently reported, however, our case appears to represent the first report of a digital wound of intact skin, i.e. without history of trauma, caused by community-acquired S. maltophilia infection in an immunocompetent patient.
- Received December 13, 2013.
- Revision received January 23, 2014.
- Accepted January 24, 2014.
- Copyright © 2014 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.






