Abstract
Background/Aim: A number of in vitro and in vivo studies have investigated the potential preventive activity of grape extracts against different diseases, and have mostly focused on their antioxidant properties. The present study examined the effects of 21 extracts from stem, skin and berry from Greek grape varieties on the activity of enzymes involved in regulation of oxidative stress, namely xanthine oxidase (XO), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Materials and Methods: The effects of the extracts on the enzymatic activity of XO, CAT and SOD were studied spectrophotometrically. Results: The tested extracts inhibited CAT and XO activity, while higher extract concentrations are required to induce SOD. However, stem and skin extracts exhibited a different inhibitory pattern against CAT and XO compared to berry extracts. The observed differences are possibly attributed to the extract polyphenolic composition. Conclusion: Although the induction of SOD activity suggests an antioxidant capacity, the inhibition of CAT and XO indicates a pro-oxidant action. In general, the extracts showed pro-oxidant activity, possibly dependent on both their polyphenolic composition and concentration.
Fruit, vegetables and wine constitute basic components of the Mediterranean diet. Grape extracts and wine have gained much interest because of their beneficial effects on human health. Previous studies have reported that grapes and wine may prevent cardiovascular diseases (1) and carcinogenesis (2), and exhibit antimicrobial (3) and antiulcer activities (4). The beneficial biological properties of grapes and wine are mainly attributed to the antioxidant properties of the various polyphenolic compounds which they contain, such as phenolic acids, flavanols, flavonols, anthocyanins and stilbenes (1, 5, 6).
It is well established that free radicals are produced during physiological metabolic processes and are involved in several biochemical processes, such as signal transduction (7), gene expression (8) and useful adaptations during exercise (9). When the pro-oxidant/antioxidant balance is disturbed, oxidative stress occurs, resulting in the excess production of free radicals (10). In order to counterbalance the free radical-induced damage of biological molecules, antioxidant mechanisms and enzymes are activated. Two of the main enzymes involved in protection against oxidative stress are superoxide dismutase (SOD) (EC 1.15.1.1) and catalase (CAT) (EC 1.11.1.6). SOD catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radical (O2•−) into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), while CAT catalyzes the decomposition of the harmful H2O2 to water and oxygen (10).
Another biochemical mechanism associated with free radical production, especially during exercise, is xanthine oxidase (XO) (EC 1.2.3.2) activation, an enzyme with a dual role (11). XO participates in degradation of purines and other compounds and is the main producer of free radicals during exercise. It uses molecular oxygen as the electron acceptor, thereby resulting in production of O2•− and H2O2 (12, 13). However, XO also results in uric acid production, which constitutes the most abundant antioxidant molecule in plasma. Thus, the role of XO in redox status is equivocal, since its activity leads to the production of both free radicals and uric acid. Furthermore, we have recently demonstrated that inhibition of XO by allopurinol leads to oxidative stress in exercised rats and reduces performance (14).
Dietary antioxidants are known to contribute to the prevention of free radical-induced oxidative damage of macromolecules (11). Therefore, antioxidants, and especially polyphenolic compounds have been widely used as part of human daily diet or as supplements. There is also experimental evidence demonstrating pro-oxidant actions of polyphenolic compounds, especially in systems containing redox-active metals (15, 16). We have previously examined several extracts derived from varieties of grape, Vitis vinifera, cultivated in Greece, for their antioxidant and chemopreventive properties. More specifically, grape extracts and polyphenolics present in them exhibited potent antiradical and chemopreventive properties and protected DNA against free radical-induced damage (17). Additionally, grape extracts and polyphenolics also demonstrated antioxidant and antimutagenic activity against bleomycin-induced mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium TA102 (18) and mitomycin C-induced sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes (19).
The present study examines the effects of 21 extracts derived from different Greek grape varieties on XO, CAT and SOD activities. Because the activity of these enzymes is crucial in oxidative stress-inducing conditions, such as exercise, the effects of the tested extracts may reveal some properties of the phytochemical antioxidants they contain.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and reagents. XO from bovine milk and pyrogallol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis MO, USA). H2O2 was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All the other chemicals and solvents were of the highest quality commercially available.
Plant material. The two Greek Vitis vinifera varieties Mandilaria (red grapes) and Asyrtiko (white grapes) are cultivated in the Greek island of Santorini. The methanolic and aqueous extracts were obtained as follows: the juice was removed from the grapes and the solid residue was air-dried. Part of the residue was then extracted three times with methanol for 48 h and another part was extracted with water at 45°C for 48 h. The solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure and the residues were diluted in water.
The other extracts derived from grape (berry), stem (fruits talk) and skin (pomace) were obtained as vinification by-products from common red (Mandilaria, Mavrotragano, Voidomato, and Batiki) and white (Vilana, Asyrtiko and Athiri) varieties cultivated in Greek regions. The date accompanying some extracts refers to the year of vinification. The respective samples were air-dried, mill-powdered and stored at room temperature. Part of the dried samples was mixed with MeOH/H2O/HCl 1.0 N (90:9.5:0.5 v/v) and sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min. The solvent was filtered and the remaining solid was re-extracted for an additional three times, using the same solvent system and procedure. The combined extracts were evaporated under vacuum and the resulting slurry was dissolved in MeOH/H2O (1:1) and centrifuged for 10 min (3,000×g). The supernatant was extracted with petroleum ether (3×30 ml) to remove the lipids and concentrated under vacuum. The remaining residue was poured into brine and extracted repetitively with ethyl acetate (EtOAc, 4×30 ml). Thus, all sugars present remained in the aqueous layer. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated under vacuum. The resulting dried residues were diluted in water. To avoid polyphenol degradation, all the aforementioned processes were performed in the absence of direct sunlight and at temperatures below 35°C.
The polyphenolic composition of the tested grape extracts is presented in Tables I and II. The identification and quantification of the polyphenolic compounds has been previously described using HPLC analysis (20).
Assessment of total polyphenol content of the extracts. The phenolic content of the different extracts was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (21). Each sample (0.1 ml at an appropriate dilution) was added to 5 ml of deionized water and 0.5 ml of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. After mixing, the samples were left for 3 min at room temperature and 1.4 ml of a 25% w/v solution of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and 3 ml of deionized water were added. The mixture was left for 1 h at room temperature in the dark and the absorbance at 765 nm was measured. Each sample was tested in triplicate. Blank samples contained only 5.1 ml of deionized water and 0.5 ml of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. The optical density of the samples (0.1 ml) alone in 1.4 ml of a 25% w/v solution of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and 8 ml of deionized water at 765 nm was also measured. The total phenolic content was determined by a standard curve of absorbance values using standard concentration solutions of 0, 50, 150, 250 and 500 μg/ml of gallic acid (GA). The total polyphenol content (TPC) is presented as mg of GA per g of extract (mg GA/g extract).
Red blood cell lysate preparation. Human blood was drawn from a forearm vein of healthy, resting, male volunteer of 28 years of age. Blood was collected in EDTA tubes, centrifuged immediately at 1,370×g for 10 min at 4°C and the plasma was discarded. The packed erythrocytes were lysed with 1:1 (v/v) distilled water, inverted vigorously and centrifuged at 4,020×g for 15 min at 4°C. Red blood cell lysate (RBCL) was collected as supernatant and was used as the source of CAT and total SOD. Typically, 4-5 ml of RBCL were obtained from 10 ml of whole blood. The lysate samples were freshly used.
Enzyme activity experiments. The effect of the extracts on the inhibition or induction of enzymatic activity was assessed at the substrate concentration where maximum velocity was obtained. The Michaelis-Menten model was applied to all enzymatic experiments. Many polyphenols exhibit maximal absorption at the tested wavelengths, therefore it is possible that extracts increase the optical density of the samples. However, the majority of the tested extracts did not affect the optical density. Control samples were prepared identically to the test samples without the extract. It should be noted that the addition of the extracts to the reaction mixture did not affect the pH of the reaction. All initial reaction rates were in the linear range and were measured over the first 2 to 4 min of the reaction, depending on the enzyme. Each assay was performed in triplicate in three independent experiments and the optical density was measured using a Hitachi U-1500 Spectrophotometer (San Jose, USA).
Assessment of XO activity. XO activity was determined by measuring the formation of uric acid from xanthine within a set time. Changes in the levels of uric acid produced through the presence of the test samples allow the potency of inhibitors/activators to be assessed. The reaction mixture (500 μl) contained sodium phosphate buffer (33 mM, pH 7.5 with EDTA 0.1 mM), xanthine (4.8 μM) and the extract at different concentrations (1-300 μg/ml). The reaction was initiated through the addition of 43 mU XO diluted in water. The production of uric acid was determined at room temperature at 295 nm for 4 min. IC50 values were determined as the concentration of the extract required to inhibit XO activity by 50% as monitored through the decrease in uric acid production. Allopurinol was used as positive control since it is a known inhibitor of XO (15).
Assessment of CAT activity. CAT activity was determined using the method of Aebi (22). Changes in the levels of H2O2 decomposed through the presence of CAT in the test samples allow the potency of inhibitors/activators to be assessed. Briefly, 4 μl RBCL (diluted 1:40) in 67 mM sodium potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) and the extract at different concentrations (1-300 μg/ml) were incubated at 37°C for 10 min. Afterwards, H2O2 at a final concentration of 30 mM was added to each reaction mixture and the change in absorbance was immediately measured at 240 nm for 2 min. IC50 values were determined as the concentration of sample required to inhibit CAT activity by 50% as monitored through H2O2 decomposition. Sodium azide was used as positive control since it is a known inhibitor of CAT (23).
Assessment of total SOD activity. SOD activity was determined using the method of Dieterich et al. (24). Pyrogallol autoxidation by O2•− present in the air can be inhibited by the SOD scavenging of O2•−. Therefore, changes in pyrogallol autoxidation rate through the presence of SOD in the test samples allow the potency of inhibitors/activators to be assessed. Briefly, 1 ml of reaction contained 770 μl Tris-HCl diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid (DTPA) buffer pH 8.2 (0.05 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM DTPA), 100 μl test extract at different concentrations (50-800 μg/ml) and 30 μl RBCL diluted 1:10. The samples were mixed and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. The reaction was initiated by the addition of pyrogallol (final concentration 80 μM) and the absorbance was immediately measured at 420 nm for 3 min. Control samples were prepared identically to the test samples without the extracts.
Many polyphenols are potential scavengers of O2•− (25). Therefore, we tested the possible inhibitory effects of extracts on pyrogallol autoxidation without the presence of SOD. The reaction mixture (1 ml) contained 800 μl Tris-HCl DTPA buffer pH 8.2 (0.05 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM DTPA) and 100 μl test extract at the IC50 concentration. The reaction was initiated by the addition of pyrogallol (final concentration 80 μM) and the absorbance was immediately read at 420 nm for 3 min. Control samples were prepared identically to the test samples without the extracts.
The concentration of extract increasing SOD activity by 50% (PC50) was determined through decrease in pyrogallol autoxidation rate. The percentage of possible inhibition of pyrogallol autoxidation by the extracts at concentrations equal to PC50 values was also determined.
Statistical analysis. Statistical computations were carried out using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For statistical analysis of the results, one-way ANOVA was applied followed by Dunnett's test for multiple pair-wise comparisons. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.
Results
Effects on XO activity. All extracts inhibited XO activity (Table III). IC50 data, indicating potent inhibitory activity of the berry extracts, ranged from 36 to 250 μg/ml. IC50 data ranged from 2.5 to 60 μg/ml for the stem extracts and from 15 to 75 μg/ml for the skin (pomace) extracts. Berry extracts exhibited lower inhibitory activity than the stem and skin (pomace) extracts. Allopurinol, a known inhibitor of XO activity, exerted inhibitory activity with an IC50 value at 2.1 μM (Table III).
Effects on CAT activity. All the tested extracts inhibited CAT activity (Table III). Stem extracts exerted the most potent inhibitory activity, with IC50 data ranging from 1.5 to 27 μg/ml. IC50 values ranged from 4 to 34 μg/ml for skin extracts and from 40 to 214 μg/ml for berry extracts. Extracts of berries from two varieties inhibited CAT activity, however the IC50 values could not be evaluated with the method used in this study because these extracts exhibited maximal absorbance at the examined wavelength of 240 nm. Sodium azide, a known inhibitor of CAT activity, exerted inhibitory activity with an IC50 value at 0.35 μM (Table III).
Effects on SOD activity. Most of the tested extracts induced SOD activity, with PC50 values ranging from 180 to 650 μg/ml. Superoxide radical-scavenging activity of the extracts was also observed which partly affected pyrogallol autoxidation (Table III).
Discussion
Many grape varieties are cultivated in Greece and constitute a crucial part of the Mediterranean diet. Grape extracts (e.g. grape seed extract) are widely used as food supplements due to their beneficial effects, mainly the antioxidant ones, on human health. We have previously demonstrated that grape extracts exhibit antioxidant and chemopreventive properties (17-19). The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of grape extracts on the activity of XO, CAT and SOD, enzymes that are involved in oxidative stress regulation.
Most studies on the biological properties of grapes use extracts from seeds (26). In the present study, extracts from skin, stems and berries were used since these extracts are also enriched in potent bioactive compounds such as polyphenols (20). The majority of the tested extracts affected the activity of all three enzymes. They inhibited CAT and XO activities, while they induced SOD activity. The inhibitory activity on CAT and XO differed among the different plant parts (stems, skins, berries). Stem and skin extracts affected CAT activity at lower concentrations than those affecting XO activity. The inhibitory pattern of berry extracts was different compared to that of the other extracts, since they inhibited CAT and XO at similar concentrations. According to their polyphenolic content, berry extracts are not as rich in catechins ((+)-catechin, (−)-epicatechin, epicatechin gallate) as stem and skin extracts (Tables I and II). For example, stem and skin extracts contain higher amounts of catechins (~100 mg/g extract) compared with berry extracts (~10 mg/g extract). Additionally, polyphenols such as quercetin, kaempherol and phenolic acids are not present in berry extracts in considerable amounts. Furthermore, skin and stem extracts exhibit greater diversity of polyphenols (e.g. they include the bioactive stilbene trans-resveratrol) compared to berry extracts (Tables I and II). Consequently, the difference in the potency of the inhibitory activity observed between the extracts may be attributed to their different chemical composition. Possible interactions occurring between the polyphenols in the extracts may also be responsible for their different effect on XO and CAT activities. It should be noted that there is a difference in the number of varieties of stem extracts which exceeds the varieties of skin and berry extracts. Therefore, a safer conclusion could be made if the same number of extract varieties for each plant part was tested.
The inhibition of CAT activity by the extracts suggests a pro-oxidant action, since CAT is important for the elimination of H2O2 (10). In contrast, the same extracts induced SOD activity, thereby implying a possible antioxidant action. It should be noted that the extract concentrations which induce SOD are 100-fold higher than those which inhibit CAT activity. Such a concentration range is too high to be physiologically achieved in human tissues. This implies that the extract concentration is a critical factor for its antioxidant or pro-oxidant action. This is in agreement with the so-called antioxidant paradox (27).
This study identified a few extracts as potent inhibitors of XO activity. This might be attributed to the extract polyphenolic content, since a number of studies have shown that polyphenols, such as flavones and flavonols, exhibit potent inhibitory activity on XO (15, 25). XO is considered as one of the most crucial enzymes in free radical production, especially during exercise. However, XO also results in generation of uric acid, a potent free radical scavenger molecule (9), thus improving tissue antioxidant defence. For example, we recently demonstrated that administration of an XO inhibitor, allopurinol, reduced performance after swimming until exhaustion in rats and resulted in oxidative stress, probably due to uric acid reduction (14).
The findings of this study demonstrate that grape extracts from skin, stem and berries affect the activity of enzymes playing a significant role in oxidative stress regulation. An important parameter that should be addressed regarding the use of such extracts is if the real concentrations achieved in blood can relate to the concentrations used in the study. It is well known that polyphenolic compounds such as those found in grapes have low oral bioavailability and are widely metabolized. For example, it has been shown that after consumption of 10-100 mg of polyphenolic compounds, their plasma concentration does not exceed 1-2 μM (28). However, tissue distribution studies have demonstrated that polyphenol concentration in some tissues can be significantly higher than in plasma after consumption of polyphenol-rich food (29). Thus, supplementation of plant antioxidants before stimuli inducing oxidative stress, such as exercise, merits further investigation.
- Received February 9, 2011.
- Revision received March 29, 2011.
- Accepted March 30, 2011.
- Copyright © 2011 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved