Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleClinical StudiesR

Canine Mammary Tumours as a Model to Study Human Breast Cancer: Most Recent Findings

FELISBINA LUISA QUEIROGA, TERESA RAPOSO, MARIA ISABEL CARVALHO, JUSTINA PRADA and ISABEL PIRES
In Vivo May 2011, 25 (3) 455-465;
FELISBINA LUISA QUEIROGA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fqueirog{at}utad.pt
TERESA RAPOSO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA ISABEL CARVALHO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUSTINA PRADA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ISABEL PIRES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Clinical and molecular similarities between canine mammary tumours and human breast cancer have been described in recent decades. Clinically, the similarities are very strong: spontaneous tumours, hormonal aetiology, age of onset and an identical course of the disease. The clinical characteristics that have an impact on the clinical outcome are also identical: tumour size, lymph node invasiveness and clinical stage. Nowadays, as far as human medicine is concerned, the goal is to identify prognostic factors, mainly at the molecular level, such as those involved in metastasis, which could be used as therapeutic targets to support a better outcome. Moreover, in this area, canine mammary tumours seem to mimic human breast cancer, as a range of similarities are found at the molecular level concerning the overexpression of steroid receptors, proliferation markers, epidermal growth factor, p53 supressor gene mutations, metalloproteinases, cyclooxygenases, among many others. Clinical and molecular data that support canine mammary tumours as a model to study human breast cancer are analysed in this review. Additionally, it is shown that some recent molecular targets in canine mammary tumours may be seen as indicators for similar research to be performed in the corresponding human disease.

  • Canine mammary tumours
  • dog
  • mammary
  • canine model
  • human breast cancer
  • molecular markers
  • prognosis
  • review

Canine mammary tumours (CMT) have been suggested as a model to study human breast cancer (HBC), for a number of years due to the great number of similarities between them, from epidemiological data to the histological patterns of the neoplastic lesions (1, 2).

Despite having different lifespans, the average age at onset of mammary tumors is approximately the same for humans (after 40 years) (3) and dogs (after 6 years) (Table I), in addition the reported peak incidence of the disease is also comparable between the two species [humans (50-58 years) and dogs (8-11) (1)].

Among the factors involved in the aetiology of mammary gland tumours, the importance of hormonal influence, both in humans (5) and dogs (6), has long been recognized. The analysis of shared hormonal aetiology in CMT and HBC is only possible if we consider the premenopausal period in women, when the mammary gland is under a cyclic hormonal influence, as in the dog; however, in the female dog there is no menopause.

In this review, we collected information from previous studies that strengthen the value of CMT as models to HBC, as there are many similarities in epidemiological data, prognostic factors and therapeutic targets that may lead to novel advances and improve the efficacy of breast cancer treatments.

Incidence and Risk Factors

Epidemiological studies in the United States (7) and Spain (8) have shown that the incidence of HBC has increased in recent decades, probably due to the greater use and efficacy of screening mammography in the diagnosis of the disease. In dogs, Dobson et al. in the United Kingdom, reported a standardized-incidence rate for CMT of 205/100000 dogs/year within a defined population (9), higher than the peak observed for breast cancer in women in the years 2000-2001 by Glass et al. (7). This high incidence probably reflects an improvement in the diagnostic efficacy associated with an increased concerning for pet wellbeing by owners. This interest has been rising exponentially. The high number of mammary tumours observed in dogs could be used to a considerable advantage in the performing of clinical trials, applicable in comparative medicine.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

The age of medium-sized dogs corresponding to human years [adapted from Metzger, 2005 (4)].

The hormonal aetiology is well defined for CMT. Non-spayed female dogs have a 4-fold higher risk of developing mammary tumours compared to those spayed ones before 2 years of age. Male dogs are rarely affected (10). The hormonal aetiology in canines was strengthened by immunohistochemical studies that identified oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors in benign and malignant lesions (11, 12). ERs are more intensively expressed in benign neoplasms or normal mammary tissues than in malignant counterparts (12). In women, the ER status of breast cancer was established as a useful predictor of tumour hormonal dependency and, consequently, the likelihood of obtaining a positive response to an endocrine therapy (13). As in the CMT, in HBC an increase in cellular differentiation with increasing levels of ER and PR was also observed (14). Hormonal dependency is therefore another common feature of the two species.

In canines, some studies suggested an associated risk between obesity and mammary tumours, especially for juvenile obesity. A thin body conformation at 9-12 months of age reduced the risk of breast cancer among spayed dogs by 99%, and among non-spayed dogs by 40% (15). The influence of the diet was also studied, comparing commercial diets to homemade ones (with superior proportions of red meat). The homemade diet was associated with an increased risk of mammary tumours and dysplasia (16). In women, body size is an important predictor of breast cancer survival. The relatively poor survival of heavier women seems only partially explicable by their tendency to have more advanced disease at the time of diagnosis (17). Among women who carry a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, those that lost weight between the age of 18 to 30 years had a 34% reduction in the risk of developing breast cancer (18). There is apparently a greater risk among premenopausal women that gain weight after the age of 30 years up to menopause. The biological effect of weight gain may in part depend on the influence of other hormone-related variables, such as puberty, pregnancy, lactation, and menopause (19).

Histological Features

Breast cancer histological type reflects its morphological features and also its biological characteristics. The most common histological type of mammary tumour in women is the invasive carcinoma, more precisely, the invasive ductal carcinoma (20, 21). In the dog, mammary gland tumours can be either malignant or benign and arise from different types of tissues in the mammary gland (epithelial or glandular tissues, and mesenchymal or connective tissues), however the majority of malignant tumours classified as epithelial tumours are carcinomas (22). CMT can be also evaluated on the basis of the degree of nuclear differentiation. As in women, the degree of nuclear differentiation is usually inversely related to the clinical aggressiveness of the tumour (23).

In HBC, histological grading of invasive lobular carcinoma has shown an association with other markers of prognosis and has an independent prognostic value (24). In CMT, histological grading by the method of Elston and Ellis was also related to prognosis, especially in cases of simple carcinoma (25).

Clinical Course

The clinical course of mammary tumours is comparable in dogs and humans. In the dog, the proportion of malignant mammary tumours is reported to be about 50% (26) and approximately 50% of mammary carcinomas metastasize to regional lymph nodes and lungs. Bone metastases are infrequent (27, 26). In the human counterpart, the number of affected axillary lymph nodes is the most important factor for prognosis followed by the TNM status, ER concentration and extent of tumour necrosis (28). Nearly 20% of women with a history of early breast cancer will eventually develop metastases (29). It is noteworthy that in both species, a larger tumour size, presence of lymph node metastases and advanced clinical stage are linked to a worse prognosis (2, 27-32).

CMT could be clinically as aggressive and lethal as the corresponding disease in women. For this reason, in both species, the search for prognostic factors to divide patients into groups with higher risk of recurrence or death due to the tumour and consequently to identify newer therapeutic approaches is required.

Molecular Markers

In recent decades, there has been intense research of new molecular prognostic markers and a remarkable similarity was found between both species. Here we discuss some of these molecular markers, especially those with a particular interest as targets of new anticancer therapies and with potential impact on comparative medicine.

Hormones

Oestrogen receptors. In mammals, steroid hormones play an important role in mammogenesis during puberty. Throughout gestation, full lobulo-alveolar development takes place under the continued stimulation of oestrogen and progesterone (33). The role of steroid hormones and its receptors was firstly studied in HBC during the 1970s. The prognostic implications of ERs were analysed, and a relationship between recurrence after primary mastectomy and a negative ER status was found, without considering the primary size or location of the tumour, number of involved axillary lymph nodes, age or adjuvant therapy (34). In CMT, the presence of ER was correlated with pathological features of the disease, and the presence of ER seems to correlate with the degree of tumoral differentiation (11), similarly to what has been confirmed in humans (13).

There are two known isoforms of the ER, ERα and ERβ. The role of ERα is well established, but further knowledge about the therapeutic implications and prognostic significance of ERβ is still needed. In HBC, it has been confirmed by immunochemistry and Real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) that ERα is the major ER (35). In CMT, a lower ERα expression was related to a worse prognosis, concurrently in tumours with a larger size and skin ulceration (36).

With respect to ERβ, its expression was described in HBC and was demonstrated to be related to an increased survival time in those patients treated with tamoxifen and with ERα negative tumours (37). In CMT, ERβ-positive tumours are more frequently benign than malignant. The higher expression of ERβ in malignant CMT with a lower grade of malignancy is suggestive of its value as a factor of good prognosis (36). These differences in ERs have a considerable influence on endocrine therapy and so selective ER modulators (SERMs), which work as complete antagonists for ERα and agonists for ERβ, may be useful in the treatment of CMT as was suggested for HBC, especially in chemoprevention strategies (38).

Progesterone receptors. PRs play a role in breast development, promoting the terminal ductal lobular units expansion during puberty and pregnancy (39).

In HBC, PRs were found to be valuable indicators of recurrence, as a negative PR status is related to a worse prognosis (40, 41). The combined ER and PR status has revealed differences in overall survival, with both ER− and PR- status having the worst survival time, followed by ER−/PR+, ER+/PR− and ER+/PR+ (42).

In CMT, normal unaltered and benign tissues commonly contain both ER and PR (12). Differences between benign and malignant tumours were found regarding the simultaneous immunohistochemical expression of PR and ERα. Among benign tumours, the most common receptor status of positivity was ERα+/PR+, while among malignant tumours, the ERα−/PR+ status was twice as common as the double positive (34). As the disease progresses towards metastasis, malignant tumours have a tendency to lose their hormonal dependency, therefore malignant tumours and their metastases tend to be negative for PR and ER (12). As in women, the ER−/PR− profile seems to indicate a worse prognosis.

Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I). The role of the GH/IGF-I axis in human breast tumourigenesis has been investigated (43-45). GH-induced IGF-I is required to permit estrogen and progesterone action in the mammary gland. Prevention of preneoplastic breast disease and breast cancer by GH/IGF-I inhibition is a recent concept (44). In canines, it was observed that local production of GH by mammary gland tissue was induced by progestin stimulation. It was postulated that this autocrine GH might be the mediator of the epithelial hyperplasia classically observed after progestin administration (46). Soon after mammary gland biosynthesis of GH measured by in situ hybridization and immunoelectron microscopy was described (47). However, the role of progestins in triggering GH production in normal and neoplastic mammary gland remains to be clarified.

The molecular characterization of the canine full-length GH receptor (GHR) in canine mammary tissue revealed extensive homology with the GHR sequence of several species, including that of humans (48), which might support a more important role of this hormone in comparative pathology.

Recent data has shown a strong correlation between tissue levels of progesterone and GH in CMT homogenates, suggesting that the progesterone/GH axis plays a distinct role in CMT (49). The GH/IGF-I axis seems also to be implicated in the prognosis of CMT as pre-surgical serum concentrations and tissue GH and IGF-I content of the malignant tumours are related to reduced post-surgical survival times (50). The same study reported that serum IGF-I concentrations in female dogs with malignant tumours were significantly higher than those in healthy controls (51). For the first time, in both human and veterinary medicine, the prognostic value of GH and IGF-I in mammary tumours was demonstrated. This evidence could open a window to new therapeutic modalities, namely involving the use of GH competitive antagonists such as pegvisomant (52, 53).

Prolactin. Prolactin, well known for its lactogenic activity, may also play a role as growth factor in mammary cancer. In HBC, the hormonal dependence on prolactin was suggested by the improved clinical condition of patients after hypophysectomy and the increased survival of mammary tissue cultures with prolactin supplementation (54). HBC cells and tumours co-express prolactin and sex steroid receptors and their expression levels were found to be cross-regulated. This fact might explain the synergy between prolactin and the sex steroid hormones during mammary development and in neoplastic growth, especially that between progesterone and prolactin (55).

In CMT, it was firstly proposed in 2005 (50) that steroid hormones and prolactin act as local growth factors in malignant tumours, stimulating their proliferation. Furthermore, it has been observed that levels of prolactin in tissue homogenates were correlated with the clinical tumoral characteristics studied, presenting a strong correlation with steroid hormone levels. Further studies on the influence of prolactin on prognosis are still lacking in veterinary medicine.

Molecular markers for cancer. With regard to molecular oncology and the fundamental gene alterations in order to the development of tumours, numerous antigens and oncogenes have been identified in the last decades. From the wide range of genes involved in breast cancer, some of them were also found to play a role in the carcinogenesis in CMT. In order to unravel the complex molecular pathogenesis of breast cancer, research on CMT contribution is enlightening new paths towards possible answers.

Proliferation markers. The antigen Ki-67 is a nuclear protein actively expressed in cycling cells, but not after mitosis (56). Ki-67 labelling has been found in a wide variety of tumours, both in humans (57-59) and dogs (60-62).

In humans, immunohistochemical studies with the antibody Ki-67, as measure of tumour cell proliferation, suggest that it is a useful prognostic indicator for the relapse-free period in patients with breast carcinoma (63). Other proliferation markers have been studied along with the Ki-67 antigen, such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Several authors also described a reliable prognostic value for PCNA (64-70), although a poor value for this prognostic marker in these tumours was also reported (71).

In the canine counterpart, the immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67 and PCNA was studied and a relation with a poor prognosis was established for Ki-67 (61). Malignant CMT also had significantly higher PCNA index than normal mammary gland, hyperplasia and benign tumours (72). Ki-67 expression in benign and malignant tumours, similar to that of HBC, was reported, as was a significant association with the appearance of distant metastases, and a relationship between the PCNA index and histological criteria of malignancy (73).

p53 tumor suppressor gene. The p53 tumor suppressor gene plays a major role in controlling cellular growth after DNA damage. When mutations happen in this gene, deregulated cell proliferation occurs, which underlies tumour formation and progression (74). In HBC, immunoexpression of accumulated p53 nuclear protein, the result of p53 gene mutation, seems to have prognostic value, being strongly correlated with poor patient survival (75, 76). In CMT, mutant p53 expression is also recognized for its prognostic value (77-79). The frequency of p53 mutation in CMT (20%) is similar to that observed in HBC (75, 77, 80). Likewise, mutations in the conserved domains of p53 appear to play a significant role in mammary carcinogenesis in both humans and canines (81). Veldhoen et al. (82) identified p53 mutations in CMT located within exons two, four and five, and a point mutation on Ala125Val, corresponding to the Ala125Val mutation of the human p53 gene. This finding in an aggressive carcinoma is suggestive of an association between the aggressive type and p53 mutations, as reported previously in HBC studies. The organization of canine p53 coding exons and gene products are very similar to those reported in the human gene, suggestive of a shared therapy target (80).

p63. The p63 gene belongs to the p53 gene family; even though it is not a tumoral suppressor, it is involved in epithelial stem cell regeneration. The analysis of p63 in varied types of human cancers has shown overexpression, particularly in basal epithelial cells (83). There is still the possibility that p63 gene acts as a tumour promoter under certain pathological conditions (84).

In humans, p63 is overexpressed in the basal phenotype of breast carcinomas; this fact supports its role in differentiation and growth control in stratified epithelia (85). In HBC, p63 appears to be a sensitive and specific marker for myoepithelial cells and, due to the intense staining observed for papillary carcinomas, myoepithelial differentiation is suggested within this type of neoplasm (86). In canine mammary tissues, p63 has proven to be a potential myoepithelial cell marker, useful in diagnosis to distinguish basal or myoepithelial cells from stromal myofibroblasts (87). It has also been verified that p63 overexpression suggests the possibility of a closer relationship involving myoepithelial and stem cells, thus clarifying the histogenesis of CMT (87).

HER-2/neu. HER-2/neu is an intensively studied proto-oncogene in human medicine, and has become a widely used prognostic factor, with excellent treatment results being obtained using specific therapy for HER2/neu+ tumours (88). In veterinary medicine, studies on the same oncogene have not been so abundant. One study performed by Rungsipipat et al. (89) analysed 79 CMT. HER2/neu expression was present in about 50% of the benign tumors, such as adenomas of the simple and complex types, and in 19.1% of the adenocarcinomas. The percentage of malignant CMT expressing HER2/neu in that study was of the same order as that of HBC (20% to 30%) (90). In the study of Kerns and collaborators (90), co-expression of p53 and HER2/neu was also detected, which could be interpreted as the loss of one mechanism that controls cell proliferation, activating malignant cell potential.

As in humans (91-93), four distinct phenotypic subtypes were identified in malignant CMT, based on the immunohistochemical expression for HER2 and ER: luminal A (ER+/HER2−, 44.8%), luminal B (ER+/HER2+, 13.5%), basal-like (ER−/HER2−, 29.2%) and HER2 overexpressing (ER−/HER2+, 8.3%), with individuals with the basal-like subtype having shorter survival (94). This serves as a proof of the molecular heterogeneity of CMT and its potential as a model of breast cancer oncogenesis.

Epidermal growth factor receptor. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), also known as HER-1, is related to the previously referred tyrosinase receptor HER2/neu. The EGFR is suggested as a molecular marker of prognosis in cases of triple negative HBC (ER−, PR− and HER2/neu−) in which there is a lack of specific therapeutic targets (95). In CMT, a tendency toward shorter disease-free survival and overall survival was found in dogs with positive EGFR expression. Furthermore, similarly to reports from previous HBC studies, myoepithelial cells in normal, hyperplastic and benign lesions consistently express EGFR (96). Concurrently high progesterone and EGF tissue concentrations suggest that a mechanism involving the progesterone sensitization of neoplastic cells to proliferative and angiogenic effects of EGF could be present in CMT (97).

BRCA genes. BRCA2 gene plays an important role in the maintenance of genomic stability and is the basis of genetic predisposition for breast cancer. BRCA2 gene products modulate the activity of RAD51, regulating the expression of recombinase, a protein essential for the maintenance of genome integrity through DNA repair and for growth by homologous recombination (98).

In HBC, low immunoexpression of the BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51 complex is correlated with high histological grade of the tumour, suggesting an association between loss of these proteins and an aggressive tumour phenotype (99). In lymph node metastasis of canine mammary adenocarcinomas Rad51 mRNA was mostly overexpressed, while BRCA2 was only expressed in 50% of the cases. Rad51 might be associated with malignancy of CMT, but to confirm this hypothesis further studies are still required with a large series of tumours (100).

Uva et al. (101) studied the expression pathways of oncogenes shared in human and canine breast cancer and found a great similarity between the networks of signalling circuitries that govern the biology of mammary cancer, as well as a strong correlation between most of the prognostic signatures in both species. The possibility of the development of transcriptional biomarkers in dogs to be applied subsequently to humans was also proposed (101).

Matrix metalloproteinases. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are a family of zinc-binding enzymes that cleave matrix components; they contribute to tumour cell invasion by the proteolysis of the extracellular matrix which might have a boundary effect for tumour cells (102).

In HBC, the evaluation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 by zymography reported a significant correlation of MMP-2 activation with lymph node metastasis and suggested that MMP-2 could be useful as a drug target in the treatment of breast cancer (103).

In CMT, the immunohistochemical expression of MMP-9 and MMP-2 revealed a higher intensity for MMP-9 expression in malignant tumours, which suggests that MMP-9 plays an important role in the aggressive behavior of these tumours and indicates its possible prognostic implication (104). Another study, performed among varied canine neoplasms, has shown that in zymography and immunohistochemistry, MMP production was higher at the edge of canine malignancies compared with the tumour centre, in accordance with the previously suggested role of MMPs in human cancer invasion (105).

Phosphatase and tensin homolog. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a gene often lost in late-stage tumours. Recently, the mechanisms implicated in its regulation have been increasingly studied, and its role in human diseases such as cancer and diabetes is now better understood (106). In HBC, the loss of PTEN protein expression is relatively common and is apparently linked to an aggressive ER−/PR− phenotype, lymph node metastasis, and poor survival time (107). In CMT, the percentage of cases of loss of PTEN protein expression is similar to that reported in humans (108). Additionally PTEN loss in invasive carcinomas is higher when compared with that of in situ lesions, suggesting that it is a phenomenon occurring in advanced phases of carcinogenesis as previously reported for human breast cancer (108). Another study in CMT shows an direct correlation between clinicopathological stage and loss of PTEN expression, thus suggestive that the altered expression of PTEN might underlie molecular mechanisms of differentiation (109).

Heat-shock proteins. Most heat-shock proteins (HSPs) have strong cytoprotective effects and behave as molecular chaperones, having properties in protein homeostasis; their function is to restore the balance after the activation of signalling pathways for acute or chronic stress both in humans and dogs (110). HSPs play a double role: while HSPs accumulate in cancer cells and contribute to tumour survival, on the other hand, they also have an extracellular immunological function that can be used to induce a specific anti-tumoural response (111). A study involving both CMT and HBC showed an enhanced expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and HSP-70 and -90 (related to the inhibition of apoptosis) with down-regulation of Bax and caspases, which are known to regulate apoptosis (112). The escape of neoplastic cells from apoptosis allows them to sustain mutations and survive for longer, being a characteristic aspect of carcinogenesis. Taken together, these findings reinforce the value of the canine model in understanding the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis.

Mucins. Mucins are a family of proteins that have a common glycosylated domain. Mucins have been identified as markers of adverse prognosis and as attractive therapeutic targets, as they promote tumour progression (113). In HBC, the presence of mucin 1 (MUC1) has been related to well-differentiated tumours and to an improved prognosis (114). MUC1 expression can be seen on the apical membrane of tumour cells in mucinous carcinomas, or more strongly in the cytoplasm of invasive ductal carcinomas (115). Correspondingly, different patterns of MUC1 expression are also present in malignant CMT and normal adjacent mammary gland tissues. There is an apical localization, resembling the normal mammary gland in humans, hence suggesting a comparable biological function (116); in this recent study, MUC1 overexpression was associated with distant metastasis and thus may have a role as a potential prognostic marker or immunotherapeutic target in these neoplasias.

Maspin. Maspin is a serine proteinase inhibitor that has suppressor activity and is expressed in human normal mammary epithelia, however, to date there are limited data on its clinical significance. At very low concentrations, maspin is capable of inhibiting the invasion of breast and prostate cancer cells by blocking their motility at the cell surface (117). In HBC, the immunohistochemical expression of maspin was proven to be significantly correlated with an aggressive phenotype in relation to higher histological grade, a larger tumour size and negative PR status (118). In the canine mammary gland, maspin seems to be a sensitive myoepithelium marker. Nevertheless, stromal myofibroblasts did not react with maspin antibody, which could represent an advantage in detecting in situ and microinvasive forms of malignant CMT with a myoepithelial cell origin (119). However, studies of the prognostic significance and biological aggressiveness of tumour as related to maspin expression are still lacking in CMT.

Sialyl Lewis x (sLx) antigen. Sialyl Lewis x (sLx) antigen is a ligand for E-selectin, responsible for adhesion of several types of human carcinoma cells to endothelium, and it was suggested that these interactions influence the formation of metastases in colon and pancreatic cancer (120). Renkonen et al. (121) observed that in breast carcinomas, the expression of these oligosaccharide epitopes was enhanced in metastases compared with primary lesions, probably being involved in interactions with endothelial selectins during metastasis formation. On the other hand, sLx expression in breast cancer does not seem to be related to distant metastasis and poor prognosis, although a higher expression of sLx was observed on the surface of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ cells, while expression was lower in the surrounding invasive tumor. This pattern resembles that of CD31 expression, which is used as a marker of neoplastic angiogenesis (122).

The majority of CMT express sLx, through immunohistochemical analysis, while in the normal mammary gland, sLx expression is absent. Nevertheless, no relationship with clinicopathological features or prognosis was observed (123). Pinho et al. (124) found a significant correlation between sLx expression and lymph node metastasis in malignant CMT, which emphasizes the role of sLx antigen on local lymphatic invasion and metastasis. However, since no association with distant metastasis was found, the authors conclude that sLx might not contribute to the haematogenous pathway of metastasis (124).

Cyclooxygenase-2. There is accumulating evidence suggesting the role of cyclooxygenase (Cox), particularly Cox-2, in tumour development and progression both in human and canine cancer (125).

Cox enzymes are the main targets of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The first studies about Cox-2 expression in HBC were published in 1998 (126); in 2003, the first evidence of Cox-2 expression in CMT arose (127). In HBC, the overexpression of COX-2 was thought to be involved in the production of prostaglandins, during tumourigenesis (126) and seems to be implicated in the first steps of mammary carcinogenesis (128). Larger and metastasizing tumours preferentially express COX-2; accordingly, COX-2 expression showed a strong prognostic impact for disease-free survival and overall survival. (129-133). Interestingly, similar findings were observed in CMT. Several studies showed that malignant tumours expressed more Cox-2 than did benign neoplasias (134-137) and there is a correlation between higher Cox-2 levels and reduced disease-free and overall survival times (138).

In HBC, an association was demonstrated between COX-2 overexpression and angiogenesis using factor VIII-related antigen (133) and the anti-CD31 antigen also known as platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM-1) (139). This supports the role of COX-2 in tumourigenesis and provides support for a potential therapeutic role for COX-2 inhibitors, due to their antiangiogenic properties. In the canine counterpart, the relationship between Cox-2 was also explored in mammary tumours, presenting a correlation with microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression (140).

It is noteworthy that in malignant CMT, the highest levels of Cox-2, assessed by enzyme immunoassay, were found in inflammatory mammary carcinoma (IMC) (134), a very aggressive CMT, with histological and clinical similarities with human inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) (141, 134). In both species, inflammatory cancer is rare, but some empirical evidence suggests that there has been an increase in this type of cancer in recent decades. Curiously, there are no reports of COX-2 expression in IBC and the possible use of COX-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as co-adjuvant in its treatment, although these have already been suggested as chemopreventive therapy to reduce the risk of breast cancer in general (125). As for other markers that revealed strong similarity between CMT and HBC, it is expected that IBCs also express elevated amounts of COX-2 like their canine counterpart. In the Authors' opinion, this topic deserves additional research for a better understanding of this aggressive disease.

Future Perspectives

Nowadays, one of the major goals in human and veterinary medicine is to identify prognostic factors that could identify therapeutic targets to support a better outcome and to improve survival. In HBC, a great number of prognostic markers have been identified, however, only a few are routinely used to group patients and choose the most adequate therapeutic approach. In CMT, the use of prognostic markers is still reserved for research purposes.

Usually, investigations performed in CMT follow similar research previously performed in HBC. However, there have been some exceptions, as sometimes the investigations performed in CMT might enlighten newer research themes in human disease. Such is the case for Cox-2 research in IMC, which was firstly studied in CMT (134), and in the investigation concerning the prognostic value of GH/IGF-I, previously mentioned (49).

Taken together, the accumulating similarities presented here reinforce the notion that it is of great interest to consider CMT as a resource to enhance the understanding of molecular pathogenesis of HBC. It remains for us to take advantage of this widely available resource for the research of new biomarkers needed for earlier detection and more complete biochemical characterization of breast cancer, and for the development of improved therapeutic strategies.

  • Received December 22, 2010.
  • Revision received March 10, 2011.
  • Accepted March 11, 2011.
  • Copyright © 2011 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Strandberg JD,
    2. Goodman DG
    : Animal model of human disease: canine mammary neoplasia. Am J Pathol 75: 225-228, 1974.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Misdorp W,
    2. Hart AA
    : Prognostic factors in canine mammary cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 56: 779-786, 1976.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lilienfeld AM
    : The epidemiology of breast cancer. Cancer Res 23: 1503-1513, 1963.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Metzger FL
    : Senior and geriatric care programs for veterinarians. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 35: 743-753, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bernstein L
    : Epidemiology of endocrine-related risk factors for breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 7: 3-15, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Donnay I,
    2. Rauis J,
    3. Devleeschouwer N,
    4. Wouters-Ballman P,
    5. Leclercq G,
    6. Verstegen J
    : Comparison of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in normal and tumor mammary tissues from dogs. Am J Vet Res 56: 1188-1194, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Glass AG,
    2. Lacey JV Jr..,
    3. Carreon JD,
    4. Hoover RN
    : Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst 99: 1152-1161, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Pollan M,
    2. Pastor-Barriuso R,
    3. Ardanaz E,
    4. Arguelles M,
    5. Martos C,
    6. Galceran J,
    7. Sanchez-Perez MJ,
    8. Chirlaque MD,
    9. Larranaga N,
    10. Martinez-Cobo R,
    11. Tobalina MC,
    12. Vidal E,
    13. Marcos-Gragera R,
    14. Mateos A,
    15. Garau I,
    16. Rojas-Martin MD,
    17. Jimenez R,
    18. Torrella-Ramos A,
    19. Perucha J,
    20. Perez-de-Rada ME,
    21. Gonzalez S,
    22. Rabanaque MJ,
    23. Borras J,
    24. Navarro C,
    25. Hernandez E,
    26. Izquierdo A,
    27. Lopez-Abente G,
    28. Martinez C
    : Recent changes in breast cancer incidence in Spain, 1980-2004. J Natl Cancer Inst 101: 1584-1591, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Dobson JM,
    2. Samuel S,
    3. Milstein H,
    4. Rogers K,
    5. Wood JL
    : Canine neoplasia in the UK: estimates of incidence rates from a population of insured dogs. J Small Anim Pract 43: 240-246, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Schneider R
    : Comparison of age, sex, and incidence rates in human and canine breast cancer. Cancer 26: 419-426, 1970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. MacEwen EG,
    2. Patnaik AK,
    3. Harvey HJ,
    4. Panko WB
    : Estrogen receptors in canine mammary tumors. Cancer Res 42: 2255-2259, 1982.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Rutteman GR,
    2. Misdorp W,
    3. Blankenstein MA,
    4. van den Brom WE
    : Oestrogen (ER) and progestin receptors (PR) in mammary tissue of the female dog: different receptor profile in non-malignant and malignant states. Br J Cancer 58: 594-599, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Block GE,
    2. Jensen EV,
    3. Polley TZ
    : The prediction of hormonal dependency of mammary cancer. Ann Surg 182: 342-352, 1975.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Fisher ER,
    2. Sass R,
    3. Fisher B
    : Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project. Correlations with concordant and discordant estrogen and progesterone receptors. Cancer 59: 1554-1559, 1987.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Sonnenschein EG,
    2. Glickman LT,
    3. Goldschmidt MH,
    4. McKee LJ
    : Body conformation, diet, and risk of breast cancer in pet dogs: a case–control study. Am J Epidemiol 133: 694-703, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Perez Alenza D,
    2. Rutteman GR,
    3. Pena L,
    4. Beynen AC,
    5. Cuesta P
    : Relation between habitual diet and canine mammary tumors in a case control study. J Vet Intern Med 12: 132-139, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Greenberg ER,
    2. Vessey MP,
    3. McPherson K,
    4. Doll R,
    5. Yeates D
    : Body size and survival in premenopausal breast cancer. Br J Cancer 51: 691-697, 1985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kotsopoulos J,
    2. Olopado OI,
    3. Ghadirian P,
    4. Lubinski J,
    5. Lynch HT,
    6. Isaacs C,
    7. Weber B,
    8. Kim-Sing C,
    9. Ainsworth P,
    10. Foulkes WD,
    11. Eisen A,
    12. Sun P,
    13. Narod SA
    : Changes in body weight and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 7: R833-843, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Harvie M,
    2. Howell A,
    3. Vierkant RA,
    4. Kumar N,
    5. Cerhan JR,
    6. Kelemen LE,
    7. Folsom AR,
    8. Sellers TA
    : Association of gain and loss of weight before and after menopause with risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 656-661, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Akiyama F,
    2. Horii R
    : Therapeutic strategies for breast cancer based on histological type. Breast Cancer 16: 168-172, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Weigelt B,
    2. Horlings HM,
    3. Kreike B,
    4. Hayes MM,
    5. Hauptmann M,
    6. Wessels LF,
    7. de Jong D,
    8. Van de Vijver MJ,
    9. Van't Veer LJ,
    10. Peterse JL
    : Refinement of breast cancer classification by molecular characterization of histological special types. J Pathol 216: 141-150, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Misdorp W
    : Histological classification of mammary tumors of the dog and the cat. Washington: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in cooperation with the American Registry of Pathology and the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Worldwide Reference on Comparative Oncology, p. 59, 1999.
  23. ↵
    1. Elston CW
    : Classification and grading of invasive breast carcinoma. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 89: 35-44, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Rakha EA,
    2. El-Sayed ME,
    3. Menon S,
    4. Green AR,
    5. Lee AH,
    6. Ellis IO
    : Histologic grading is an independent prognostic factor in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111: 121-127, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Karayannopoulou M,
    2. Kaldrymidou E,
    3. Constantinidis TC,
    4. Dessiris A
    : Histological grading and prognosis in dogs with mammary carcinomas: application of a human grading method. J Comp Pathol 133: 246-252, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Gilbertson SR,
    2. Kurzman ID,
    3. Zachrau RE,
    4. Hurvitz AI,
    5. Black MM
    : Canine mammary epithelial neoplasms: biologic implications of morphologic characteristics assessed in 232 dogs. Vet Pathol 20: 127-142, 1983.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Rosol TJ,
    2. Tannehill-Gregg SH,
    3. LeRoy BE,
    4. Mandl S,
    5. Contag CH
    : Animal models of bone metastasis. Cancer 97: 748-757, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Shek LL,
    2. Godolphin W
    : Model for breast cancer survival: relative prognostic roles of axillary nodal status, TNM stage, estrogen receptor concentration, and tumor necrosis. Cancer Res 48: 5565-5569, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Stevanovic A,
    2. Lee P,
    3. Wilcken N
    : Metastatic breast cancer. Aust Fam Physician 35: 309-312, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Abner AL,
    2. Collins L,
    3. Peiro G,
    4. Recht A,
    5. Come S,
    6. Shulman LN,
    7. Silver B,
    8. Nixon A,
    9. Harris JR,
    10. Schnitt SJ,
    11. Connolly JL
    : Correlation of tumor size and axillary lymph node involvement with prognosis in patients with T1 breast carcinoma. Cancer 83: 2502-2508, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hellmen E,
    2. Bergstrom R,
    3. Holmberg L,
    4. Spangberg IB,
    5. Hansson K,
    6. Lindgren A
    : Prognostic factors in canine mammary tumors: a multivariate study of 202 consecutive cases. Vet Pathol 30: 20-27, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Sarli G,
    2. Preziosi R,
    3. Benazzi C,
    4. Castellani G,
    5. Marcato PS
    : Prognostic value of histologic stage and proliferative activity in canine malignant mammary tumors. J Vet Diagn Invest 14: 25-34, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Lamote I,
    2. Meyer E,
    3. Massart-Leen AM,
    4. Burvenich C
    : Sex steroids and growth factors in the regulation of mammary gland proliferation, differentiation, and involution. Steroids 69: 145-159, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Knight WA,
    2. Livingston RB,
    3. Gregory EJ,
    4. McGuire WL
    : Estrogen receptor as an independent prognostic factor for early recurrence in breast cancer. Cancer Res 37: 4669-4671, 1977.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Balfe P,
    2. McCann A,
    3. McGoldrick A,
    4. McAllister K,
    5. Kennedy M,
    6. Dervan P,
    7. Kerin MJ
    : Estrogen receptor alpha and beta profiling in human breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30: 469-474, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Martin de las Mulas J,
    2. Ordas J,
    3. Millan MY,
    4. Chacon F,
    5. De Lara M,
    6. Espinosa de los Monteros A,
    7. Reymundo C,
    8. Jover A
    : Immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor beta in normal and tumoral canine mammary glands. Vet Pathol 41: 269-272, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Gruvberger-Saal SK,
    2. Bendahl PO,
    3. Saal LH,
    4. Laakso M,
    5. Hegardt C,
    6. Eden P,
    7. Peterson C,
    8. Malmstrom P,
    9. Isola J,
    10. Borg A,
    11. Ferno M
    : Estrogen receptor beta expression is associated with tamoxifen response in ERalpha-negative breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13: 1987-1994, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Saji S,
    2. Hirose M,
    3. Toi M
    : Clinical significance of estrogen receptor beta in breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 56 Suppl 1: 21-26, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Anderson E
    : The role of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in human mammary development and tumorigenesis. Breast Cancer Res 4: 197-201, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Gelbfish GA,
    2. Davidson AL,
    3. Kopel S,
    4. Schreibman B,
    5. Gelbfish JS,
    6. Degenshein GA,
    7. Herz BL,
    8. Cunningham JN
    : Relationship of estrogen and progesterone receptors to prognosis in breast cancer. Ann Surg 207: 75-79, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Chevallier B,
    2. Mosseri V,
    3. Dauce JP,
    4. Bastit P,
    5. Julien JP,
    6. Asselain B
    : A prognostic score in histological node-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 61: 436-440, 1990.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Pichon MF,
    2. Broet P,
    3. Magdelenat H,
    4. Delarue JC,
    5. Spyratos F,
    6. Basuyau JP,
    7. Saez S,
    8. Rallet A,
    9. Courriere P,
    10. Millon R,
    11. Asselain B
    : Prognostic value of steroid receptors after long-term follow-up of 2257 operable breast cancers. Br J Cancer 73: 1545-1551, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Krajcik RA,
    2. Borofsky ND,
    3. Massardo S,
    4. Orentreich N
    : Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding proteins, and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11: 1566-1573, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Kleinberg DL,
    2. Wood TL,
    3. Furth PA,
    4. Lee AV
    : Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I in the transition from normal mammary development to preneoplastic mammary lesions. Endocr Rev 30: 51-74, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Schernhammer ES,
    2. Holly JM,
    3. Hunter DJ,
    4. Pollak MN,
    5. Hankinson SE
    : Insulin-like growth factor-I, its binding proteins (IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3), and growth hormone and breast cancer risk in The Nurses Health Study II. Endocr Relat Cancer 13: 583-592, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Selman PJ,
    2. Mol JA,
    3. Rutteman GR,
    4. van Garderen E,
    5. Rijnberk A
    : Progestin-induced growth hormone excess in the dog originates in the mammary gland. Endocrinology 134: 287-292, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. van Garderen E,
    2. de Wit M,
    3. Voorhout WF,
    4. Rutteman GR,
    5. Mol JA,
    6. Nederbragt H,
    7. Misdorp W
    : Expression of growth hormone in canine mammary tissue and mammary tumors. Evidence for a potential autocrine/paracrine stimulatory loop. Am J Pathol 150: 1037-1047, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. van Garderen E,
    2. van der Poel HJ,
    3. Swennenhuis JF,
    4. Wissink EH,
    5. Rutteman GR,
    6. Hellmen E,
    7. Mol JA,
    8. Schalken JA
    : Expression and molecular characterization of the growth hormone receptor in canine mammary tissue and mammary tumors. Endocrinology 140: 5907-5914, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Queiroga FL,
    2. Perez-Alenza MD,
    3. Silvan G,
    4. Pena L,
    5. Lopes CS,
    6. Illera JC
    : Crosstalk between GH/IGF-I axis and steroid hormones (progesterone, 17beta-estradiol) in canine mammary tumours. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 110: 76-82, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Queiroga FL,
    2. Perez-Alenza MD,
    3. Silvan G,
    4. Pena L,
    5. Lopes C,
    6. Illera JC
    : Role of steroid hormones and prolactin in canine mammary cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 94: 181-187, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Queiroga FL,
    2. Perez-Alenza D,
    3. Silvan G,
    4. Pena L,
    5. Lopes CS,
    6. Illera JC
    : Serum and intratumoural GH and IGF-I concentrations: Prognostic factors in the outcome of canine mammary cancer. Res Vet Sci 89: 396-403, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Divisova J,
    2. Kuiatse I,
    3. Lazard Z,
    4. Weiss H,
    5. Vreeland F,
    6. Hadsell DL,
    7. Schiff R,
    8. Osborne CK,
    9. Lee AV
    : The growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant blocks both mammary gland development and MCF-7 breast cancer xenograft growth. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98: 315-327, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Yin D,
    2. Vreeland F,
    3. Schaaf LJ,
    4. Millham R,
    5. Duncan BA,
    6. Sharma A
    : Clinical pharmacodynamic effects of the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant: implications for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res 13: 1000-1009, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Hobbs JR,
    2. Salih H
    : Prolactin dependence in human breast cancer. Proc R Soc Med 66: 866, 1973.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Ormandy CJ,
    2. Hall RE,
    3. Manning DL,
    4. Robertson JF,
    5. Blamey RW,
    6. Kelly PA,
    7. Nicholson RI,
    8. Sutherland RL
    : Coexpression and cross-regulation of the prolactin receptor and sex steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 3692-3699, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Gerdes J,
    2. Lemke H,
    3. Baisch H,
    4. Wacker HH,
    5. Schwab U,
    6. Stein H
    : Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67 J Immunol 133: 1710-1715, 1984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Crispino S,
    2. Brenna A,
    3. Colombo D,
    4. Flores B,
    5. D'Amico S,
    6. Lissoni P,
    7. Barni S,
    8. Paolorossi F,
    9. Bratina G,
    10. Tancini G
    : Ki-67 labeling index in breast cancer. Tumori 75: 557-562, 1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Menezes HL,
    2. Juca MJ,
    3. Gomes EG,
    4. Nunes BL,
    5. Costa HO,
    6. Matos D
    : Analysis of the immunohistochemical expressions of p53, BCL-2 and Ki-67 in colorectal adenocarcinoma and their correlations with the prognostic factors. Arq Gastroenterol 47: 141-147, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Vacchi-Suzzi M,
    2. Bocciolini C,
    3. Bertarelli C,
    4. Dall'Olio D
    : Ki-67 proliferation rate as a prognostic marker in major salivary gland carcinomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119: 677-683, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Buishand FO,
    2. Kik M,
    3. Kirpensteijn J
    : Evaluation of clinicopathological criteria and the Ki-67 index as prognostic indicators in canine insulinoma. Vet J 185: 62-67, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Pena LL,
    2. Nieto AI,
    3. Perez-Alenza D,
    4. Cuesta P,
    5. Castano M
    : Immunohistochemical detection of Ki-67 and Pcna in canine mammary tumors: relationship to clinical and pathologic variables. J Vet Diagn Invest 10: 237-246, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. van Rijn SJ,
    2. Grinwis GC,
    3. Penning LC,
    4. Meij BP
    : Expression of Ki-67, Pcna, and p27kip1 in canine pituitary corticotroph adenomas. Domest Anim Endocrinol 38: 244-252, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Railo M,
    2. Nordling S,
    3. von Boguslawsky K,
    4. Leivonen M,
    5. Kyllonen L,
    6. von Smitten K
    : Prognostic value of Ki-67 immunolabelling in primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 68: 579-583, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Keshgegian AA,
    2. Cnaan A
    : Proliferation markers in breast carcinoma. Mitotic figure count, S-phase fraction, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Ki-67 and MIB-1. Am J Clin Pathol 104: 42-49, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Haerslev T,
    2. Jacobsen GK,
    3. Zedeler K
    : Correlation of growth fraction by Ki-67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemistry with histopathological parameters and prognosis in primary breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 37: 101-113, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Biesterfeld S,
    2. Kluppel D,
    3. Koch R,
    4. Schneider S,
    5. Steinhagen G,
    6. Mihalcea AM,
    7. Schroder W
    : Rapid and prognostically valid quantification of immunohistochemical reactions by immunohistometry of the most positive tumour focus. A prospective follow-up study on breast cancer using antibodies against MIB-1, PCNA, ER, and PR. J Pathol 185: 25-31, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bukholm IR,
    2. Bukholm G,
    3. Holm R,
    4. Nesland JM
    : Association between histology grade, expression of HsMCM2, and cyclin A in human invasive breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 56: 368-373, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sheen-Chen SM,
    2. Eng HL,
    3. Chou FF,
    4. Chen WJ
    : The prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer. Arch Surg 132: 264-267, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schonborn I,
    2. Zschiesche W,
    3. Minguillon C,
    4. Spitzer E,
    5. Mohner M,
    6. Ebeling K,
    7. Grosse R
    : Prognostic value of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and c-erbB-2 compared with conventional histopathological factors in breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 121: 115-122, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Kato T,
    2. Kimura T,
    3. Miyakawa R,
    4. Fujii A,
    5. Yamamoto K,
    6. Kameoka S,
    7. Nishikawa T,
    8. Kasajima T
    : Clinicopathologic study associated with long-term survival in Japanese patients with node-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 82: 404-411, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Thomas M,
    2. Noguchi M,
    3. Kitagawa H,
    4. Kinoshita K,
    5. Miyazaki I
    : Poor prognostic value of proliferating cell nuclear antigen labelling index in breast carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 46: 525-528, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Funakoshi Y,
    2. Nakayama H,
    3. Uetsuka K,
    4. Nishimura R,
    5. Sasaki N,
    6. Doi K
    : Cellular proliferative and telomerase activity in canine mammary gland tumors. Vet Pathol 37: 177-183, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Kumaraguruparan R,
    2. Prathiba D,
    3. Nagini S
    : Of humans and canines: Immunohistochemical analysis of PCNA, BCL-2, p53, cytokeratin and ER in mammary tumours. Res Vet Sci 81: 218-224, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Velculescu VE,
    2. El-Deiry WS
    : Biological and clinical importance of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Clin Chem 42: 858-868, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Kim K,
    2. Chie EK,
    3. Han W,
    4. Noh DY,
    5. Park IA,
    6. Oh DY,
    7. Im SA,
    8. Kim TY,
    9. Bang YJ,
    10. Ha SW
    : Prognostic value of p53 and bcl-2 expression in patients treated with breast conservative therapy. J Korean Med Sci 25: 235-239, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Beenken SW,
    2. Grizzle WE,
    3. Crowe DR,
    4. Conner MG,
    5. Weiss HL,
    6. Sellers MT,
    7. Krontiras H,
    8. Urist MM,
    9. Bland KI
    : Molecular biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis: coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53. Ann Surg 233: 630-638, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Lee CH,
    2. Kim WH,
    3. Lim JH,
    4. Kang MS,
    5. Kim DY,
    6. Kweon OK
    : Mutation and overexpression of p53 as a prognostic factor in canine mammary tumors. J Vet Sci 5: 63-69, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lee CH,
    2. Kweon OK
    : Mutations of p53 tumor suppressor gene in spontaneous canine mammary tumors. J Vet Sci 3: 321-325, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Wakui S,
    2. Muto T,
    3. Yokoo K,
    4. Yokoo R,
    5. Takahashi H,
    6. Masaoka T,
    7. Hano H,
    8. Furusato M
    : Prognostic status of p53 gene mutation in canine mammary carcinoma. Anticancer Res 21: 611-616, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Chu LL,
    2. Rutteman GR,
    3. Kong JM,
    4. Ghahremani M,
    5. Schmeing M,
    6. Misdorp W,
    7. van Garderen E,
    8. Pelletier J
    : Genomic organization of the canine p53 gene and its mutational status in canine mammary neoplasia. Breast Cancer Res Treat 50: 11-25, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Muto T,
    2. Wakui S,
    3. Takahashi H,
    4. Maekawa S,
    5. Masaoka T,
    6. Ushigome S,
    7. Furusato M
    : p53 gene mutations occurring in spontaneous benign and malignant mammary tumors of the dog. Vet Pathol 37: 248-253, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Veldhoen N,
    2. Watterson J,
    3. Brash M,
    4. Milner J
    : Identification of tumour-associated and germ-line p53 mutations in canine mammary cancer. Br J Cancer 81: 409-415, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Moll UM,
    2. Slade N
    : p63 and p73: roles in development and tumor formation. Mol Cancer Res 2: 371-386, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. McKeon FD
    : p63 and p73 in tumor suppression and promotion. Cancer Res Treat 36: 6-12, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Matos I,
    2. Dufloth R,
    3. Alvarenga M,
    4. Zeferino LC,
    5. Schmitt F
    : p63, cytokeratin 5, and P-cadherin: three molecular markers to distinguish basal phenotype in breast carcinomas. Virchows Arch 447: 688-694, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Stefanou D,
    2. Batistatou A,
    3. Nonni A,
    4. Arkoumani E,
    5. Agnantis NJ
    : p63 expression in benign and malignant breast lesions. Histol Histopathol 19: 465-471, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Gama A,
    2. Alves A,
    3. Gartner F,
    4. Schmitt F
    : p63: a novel myoepithelial cell marker in canine mammary tissues. Vet Pathol 40: 412-420, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    1. Ross JS,
    2. Fletcher JA,
    3. Linette GP,
    4. Stec J,
    5. Clark E,
    6. Ayers M,
    7. Symmans WF,
    8. Pusztai L,
    9. Bloom KJ
    : The Her-2/neu gene and protein in breast cancer 2003: biomarker and target of therapy. Oncologist 8: 307-325, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Rungsipipat A,
    2. Tateyama S,
    3. Yamaguchi R,
    4. Uchida K,
    5. Miyoshi N,
    6. Hayashi T
    : Immunohistochemical analysis of c-Yes and c-ErbB-2 oncogene products and p53 tumor suppressor protein in canine mammary tumors. J Vet Med Sci 61: 27-32, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Kerns BJ,
    2. Pence JC,
    3. Huper G,
    4. Kinney RB,
    5. Iglehart JD
    : c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer detected by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 38: 1823-1830, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Paredes J,
    2. Lopes N,
    3. Milanezi F,
    4. Schmitt FC
    : P-Cadherin and cytokeratin 5: useful adjunct markers to distinguish basal-like ductal carcinomas in situ. Virchows Arch 450: 73-80, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Abd El-Rehim DM,
    2. Pinder SE,
    3. Paish CE,
    4. Bell J,
    5. Blamey RW,
    6. Robertson JF,
    7. Nicholson RI,
    8. Ellis IO
    : Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma. J Pathol 203: 661-671, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Sorlie T,
    2. Tibshirani R,
    3. Parker J,
    4. Hastie T,
    5. Marron JS,
    6. Nobel A,
    7. Deng S,
    8. Johnsen H,
    9. Pesich R,
    10. Geisler S,
    11. Demeter J,
    12. Perou CM,
    13. Lonning PE,
    14. Brown PO,
    15. Borresen-Dale AL,
    16. Botstein D
    : Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8418-8423, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Gama A,
    2. Alves A,
    3. Schmitt F
    : Identification of molecular phenotypes in canine mammary carcinomas with clinical implications: application of the human classification. Virchows Arch 453: 123-132, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Rakha EA,
    2. El-Sayed ME,
    3. Green AR,
    4. Lee AH,
    5. Robertson JF,
    6. Ellis IO
    : Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 109: 25-32, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Gama A,
    2. Gartner F,
    3. Alves A,
    4. Schmitt F
    : Immunohistochemical expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr) in canine mammary tissues. Res Vet Sci 87: 432-437, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Queiroga FL,
    2. Perez-Alenza D,
    3. Silvan G,
    4. Pena L,
    5. Illera JC
    : Positive correlation of steroid hormones and Egf in canine mammary cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 115: 9-13, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Davies AA,
    2. Masson JY,
    3. McIlwraith MJ,
    4. Stasiak AZ,
    5. Stasiak A,
    6. Venkitaraman AR,
    7. West SC
    : Role of BRCA2 in control of the RAD51 recombination and DNA repair protein. Mol Cell 7: 273-282, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Soderlund K,
    2. Skoog L,
    3. Fornander T,
    4. Askmalm MS
    : The BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51 complex is a prognostic and predictive factor in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 84: 242-251, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Klopfleisch R,
    2. Gruber AD
    : Increased expression of Brca2 and Rad51 in lymph node metastases of canine mammary adenocarcinomas. Vet Pathol 46: 416-422, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    1. Uva P,
    2. Aurisicchio L,
    3. Watters J,
    4. Loboda A,
    5. Kulkarni A,
    6. Castle J,
    7. Palombo F,
    8. Viti V,
    9. Mesiti G,
    10. Zappulli V,
    11. Marconato L,
    12. Abramo F,
    13. Ciliberto G,
    14. Lahm A,
    15. La Monica N,
    16. de Rinaldis E
    : Comparative expression pathway analysis of human and canine mammary tumors. BMC Genomics 10: 135, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Woodhouse EC,
    2. Chuaqui RF,
    3. Liotta LA
    : General mechanisms of metastasis. Cancer 80: 1529-1537, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Shah FD,
    2. Shukla SN,
    3. Shah PM,
    4. Shukla HK,
    5. Patel PS
    : Clinical significance of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in breast cancer. Indian J Cancer 46: 194-202, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Hirayama K,
    2. Yokota H,
    3. Onai R,
    4. Kobayashi T,
    5. Kumata T,
    6. Kihara K,
    7. Okamoto M,
    8. Sako T,
    9. Nakade T,
    10. Izumisawa Y,
    11. Taniyama H
    : Detection of matrix metalloproteinases in canine mammary tumours: analysis by immunohistochemistry and zymography. J Comp Pathol 127: 249-256, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Loukopoulos P,
    2. Mungall BA,
    3. Straw RC,
    4. Thornton JR,
    5. Robinson WF
    : Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 involvement in canine tumors. Vet Pathol 40: 382-394, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. ↵
    1. Tamguney T,
    2. Stokoe D
    : New insights into PTEN. J Cell Sci 120: 4071-4079, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  97. ↵
    1. Depowski PL,
    2. Rosenthal SI,
    3. Ross JS
    : Loss of expression of the PTEN gene protein product is associated with poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 14: 672-676, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Ressel L,
    2. Millanta F,
    3. Caleri E,
    4. Innocenti VM,
    5. Poli A
    : Reduced Pten protein expression and its prognostic implications in canine and feline mammary tumors. Vet Pathol 46: 860-868, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  99. ↵
    1. Qiu CW,
    2. Lin DG,
    3. Wang JQ,
    4. Li CY,
    5. Deng GZ
    : Expression and significance of Pten and Vegf in canine mammary gland tumours. Vet Res Commun 32: 463-472, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Calabrese V,
    2. Cornelius C,
    3. Dinkova-Kostova AT,
    4. Calabrese EJ
    : Vitagenes, cellular stress response, and acetylcarnitine: relevance to hormesis. Biofactors 35: 146-160, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Schmitt E,
    2. Gehrmann M,
    3. Brunet M,
    4. Multhoff G,
    5. Garrido C
    : Intracellular and extracellular functions of heat shock proteins: repercussions in cancer therapy. J Leukoc Biol 81: 15-27, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. ↵
    1. Kumaraguruparan R,
    2. Karunagaran D,
    3. Balachandran C,
    4. Manohar BM,
    5. Nagini S
    : Of humans and canines: a comparative evaluation of heat-shock and apoptosis-associated proteins in mammary tumors. Clin Chim Acta 365: 168-176, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Kufe DW
    : Mucins in cancer: function, prognosis and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 9: 874-885, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Rakha EA,
    2. Boyce RW,
    3. Abd El-Rehim D,
    4. Kurien T,
    5. Green AR,
    6. Paish EC,
    7. Robertson JF,
    8. Ellis IO
    : Expression of mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC6) and their prognostic significance in human breast cancer. Mod Pathol 18: 1295-1304, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Chu JS,
    2. Chang KJ
    : Mucin expression in mucinous carcinoma and other invasive carcinomas of the breast. Cancer Lett 142: 121-127, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. de Oliveira JT,
    2. Pinho SS,
    3. de Matos AJ,
    4. Hespanhol V,
    5. Reis CA,
    6. Gartner F
    : Muc1 expression in canine malignant mammary tumours and relationship to clinicopathological features. Vet J 182: 491-493, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Sheng S,
    2. Carey J,
    3. Seftor EA,
    4. Dias L,
    5. Hendrix MJ,
    6. Sager R
    : Maspin acts at the cell membrane to inhibit invasion and motility of mammary and prostatic cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 11669-11674, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  108. ↵
    1. Lee MJ,
    2. Suh CH,
    3. Li ZH
    : Clinicopathological significance of maspin expression in breast cancer. J Korean Med Sci 21: 309-314, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  109. ↵
    1. Espinosa de los Monteros A,
    2. Millan MY,
    3. Ramirez GA,
    4. Ordas J,
    5. Reymundo C,
    6. Martin de las Mulas J
    : Expression of maspin in mammary gland tumors of the dog. Vet Pathol 42: 250-257, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  110. ↵
    1. Ugorski M,
    2. Laskowska A
    : Sialyl Lewis(a): a tumor-associated carbohydrate antigen involved in adhesion and metastatic potential of cancer cells. Acta Biochim Pol 49: 303-311, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  111. ↵
    1. Renkonen J,
    2. Paavonen T,
    3. Renkonen R
    : Endothelial and epithelial expression of sialyl Lewis(x) and sialyl Lewis(a) in lesions of breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 74: 296-300, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Sozzani P,
    2. Arisio R,
    3. Porpiglia M,
    4. Benedetto C
    : Is sialyl Lewis x antigen expression a prognostic factor in patients with breast cancer?. Int J Surg Pathol 16: 365-374, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. ↵
    1. Nakagawa T,
    2. Uyama R,
    3. Ohashi E,
    4. Takahashi T,
    5. Hong SH,
    6. Mochizuki M,
    7. Matsunaga S,
    8. Nishimura R,
    9. Sasaki N
    : The expression of sialyl Lewis X in canine and feline mammary gland tumors. J Vet Med Sci 64: 949-952, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. Pinho SS,
    2. Matos AJ,
    3. Lopes C,
    4. Marcos NT,
    5. Carvalheira J,
    6. Reis CA,
    7. Gartner F
    : Sialyl Lewis x expression in canine malignant mammary tumours: correlation with clinicopathological features and E-cadherin expression. BMC Cancer 7: 124, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Prescott SM,
    2. Fitzpatrick FA
    : Cyclooxygenase-2 and carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1470: M69-78, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  116. ↵
    1. Hwang D,
    2. Scollard D,
    3. Byrne J,
    4. Levine E
    : Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 in human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 455-460, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. ↵
    1. Dore M,
    2. Lanthier I,
    3. Sirois J
    : Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in canine mammary tumors. Vet Pathol 40: 207-212, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  118. ↵
    1. Soslow RA,
    2. Dannenberg AJ,
    3. Rush D,
    4. Woerner BM,
    5. Khan KN,
    6. Masferrer J,
    7. Koki AT
    : COX-2 is expressed in human pulmonary, colonic, and mammary tumors. Cancer 89: 2637-2645, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Denkert C,
    2. Winzer KJ,
    3. Muller BM,
    4. Weichert W,
    5. Pest S,
    6. Kobel M,
    7. Kristiansen G,
    8. Reles A,
    9. Siegert A,
    10. Guski H,
    11. Hauptmann S
    : Elevated expression of cyclooxygenase-2 is a negative prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 97: 2978-2987, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ristimaki A,
    2. Sivula A,
    3. Lundin J,
    4. Lundin M,
    5. Salminen T,
    6. Haglund C,
    7. Joensuu H,
    8. Isola J
    : Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in breast cancer. Cancer Res 62: 632-635, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Spizzo G,
    2. Gastl G,
    3. Wolf D,
    4. Gunsilius E,
    5. Steurer M,
    6. Fong D,
    7. Amberger A,
    8. Margreiter R,
    9. Obrist P
    : Correlation of COX-2 and Ep-CAM overexpression in human invasive breast cancer and its impact on survival. Br J Cancer 88: 574-578, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Boland GP,
    2. Butt IS,
    3. Prasad R,
    4. Knox WF,
    5. Bundred NJ
    : COX-2 expression is associated with an aggressive phenotype in ductal carcinoma in situ. Br J Cancer 90: 423-429, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  120. ↵
    1. Costa C,
    2. Soares R,
    3. Reis-Filho JS,
    4. Leitao D,
    5. Amendoeira I,
    6. Schmitt FC
    : Cyclooxygenase 2 expression is associated with angiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in human breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 55: 429-434, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  121. ↵
    1. Queiroga FL,
    2. Perez-Alenza MD,
    3. Silvan G,
    4. Pena L,
    5. Lopes C,
    6. Illera JC
    : Cox-2 levels in canine mammary tumors, including inflammatory mammary carcinoma: clinicopathological features and prognostic significance. Anticancer Res 25: 4269-4275, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dias Pereira P,
    2. Lopes CC,
    3. Matos AJ,
    4. Santos M,
    5. Gartner F,
    6. Medeiros R,
    7. Lopes C
    : Cox-2 expression in canine normal and neoplastic mammary gland. J Comp Pathol 140: 247-253, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Queiroga FL,
    2. Alves A,
    3. Pires I,
    4. Lopes C
    : Expression of Cox-1 and Cox-2 in canine mammary tumours. J Comp Pathol 136: 177-185, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    1. Heller DA,
    2. Clifford CA,
    3. Goldschmidt MH,
    4. Holt DE,
    5. Shofer FS,
    6. Smith A,
    7. Sorenmo KU
    : Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is associated with histologic tumor type in canine mammary carcinoma. Vet Pathol 42: 776-780, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  123. ↵
    1. Queiroga FL,
    2. Pires I,
    3. Lobo L,
    4. Lopes CS
    : The role of Cox-2 expression in the prognosis of dogs with malignant mammary tumours. Res Vet Sci 88: 441-445, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. ↵
    1. Davies G,
    2. Salter J,
    3. Hills M,
    4. Martin LA,
    5. Sacks N,
    6. Dowsett M
    : Correlation between cyclooxygenase-2 expression and angiogenesis in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9: 2651-2656, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  125. ↵
    1. Queiroga FL,
    2. Pires I,
    3. Parente M,
    4. Gregorio H,
    5. Lopes CS
    : Cox-2 overexpression correlates with Vegf and tumour angiogenesis in canine mammary cancer. Vet J, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.06.022. Jul 30, 2010.
  126. ↵
    1. Vermeulen PB,
    2. van Golen KL,
    3. Dirix LY
    : Angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, growth pattern, and tumor emboli in inflammatory breast cancer: a review of the current knowledge. Cancer 116: 2748-2754, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 25, Issue 3
May-June 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Canine Mammary Tumours as a Model to Study Human Breast Cancer: Most Recent Findings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Canine Mammary Tumours as a Model to Study Human Breast Cancer: Most Recent Findings
FELISBINA LUISA QUEIROGA, TERESA RAPOSO, MARIA ISABEL CARVALHO, JUSTINA PRADA, ISABEL PIRES
In Vivo May 2011, 25 (3) 455-465;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Canine Mammary Tumours as a Model to Study Human Breast Cancer: Most Recent Findings
FELISBINA LUISA QUEIROGA, TERESA RAPOSO, MARIA ISABEL CARVALHO, JUSTINA PRADA, ISABEL PIRES
In Vivo May 2011, 25 (3) 455-465;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Incidence and Risk Factors
    • Histological Features
    • Clinical Course
    • Molecular Markers
    • Hormones
    • Future Perspectives
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Establishment and characterization of a tumoroid biobank derived from dog patients mammary tumors for translational research
  • Identification of oncolytic vaccinia restriction factors in canine high-grade mammary tumor cells using single-cell transcriptomics
  • Expression of Podoplanin in Mammary Cancers in Female Dogs
  • Differential stromal reprogramming in benign and malignant naturally occurring canine mammary tumours identifies disease-promoting stromal components
  • Next-generation RNA sequencing of FFPE subsections reveals highly conserved stromal reprogramming between canine and human mammary carcinoma
  • In Vivo Monitoring of Natural Killer Cell-dependent Clearance of Lung Metastasis Using Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effects of Short-term High-dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Mineral Homeostasis in Healthy Young Adults
  • Impact of Heart Dose on Survival in Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases: Propensity Score-matched Analysis
  • Usability of a Reminder App that May Help to Reduce Radiotherapy-related Skin Toxicity in Patients With Breast Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire