Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Association of Vitamin D Receptor Taq I Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

KIVANÇ BEKTAŞ-KAYHAN, MERAL ÜNÜR, İLHAN YAYLIM-ERALTAN, H.ARZU ERGEN, BAHAR TOPTAŞ, GÜNTER HAFIZ, AHMET KARADENIZ and TURGAY İSBIR
In Vivo September 2010, 24 (5) 755-759;
KIVANÇ BEKTAŞ-KAYHAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bektaskk{at}istanbul.edu.tr
MERAL ÜNÜR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
İLHAN YAYLIM-ERALTAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.ARZU ERGEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BAHAR TOPTAŞ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GÜNTER HAFIZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AHMET KARADENIZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TURGAY İSBIR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: It has been hypothesised that vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms may influence both the risk of cancer occurrence and prognosis. Materials and Methods: The distribution of VDR Taq I polymorphism in 64 patients with OSCC was determined by polymerase chain reaction based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and compared with that of 87 healthy controls. Results: There was a significant difference in the distribution of VDR Taq I genotypes between OSCC patients and healthy controls. Patients with the VDR Tt genotype were found to be at significantly higher risk for OSCC than those with other genotypes (p=0.036). In particular, female OSCC patients were at higher risk (p<0.001) for oral cancer. Conclusion: These results suggest that the VDR Taq I polymorphism may be associated with susceptibility to OSCC. Female predilection of the OSCC risk in association with VDR gene polymorphism should also be investigated.

  • Vitamin D receptor
  • polymorphism
  • oral squamous cell carcinoma

Oral carcinoma is not a major cancer type and accounts for about 3% of all cancer cases (1), although it is one of the ten common causes of mortality in the Western world (2). Moreover, there has been no remarkable success documented in 5-year survival of oral carcinoma in the last 50 years (2). These findings divert researchers attention to aetiological factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Aetiological factors of oral carcinoma, such as smoking (3), alcohol drinking (4), viral infection (5) and some genetic factors (6), have been well known for many years; however, not all, but only a small number of smokers and alcohol drinkers develop oral carcinoma. This dilemma supports the idea that genetic variations play an important role in oral cancer aetiology. Identification of the factors that would make an individual prone to OSCC is important in order to determine the at-risk subgroups and to start prevention programs.

Vitamin D has been associated with anti-tumour properties and a lower risk of several types of cancer, including head neck squamous cell carcinoma (7). Vitamin D is produced in the skin after exposure to UV radiation and may be obtained from dietary resources in low concentrations, or from supplements (8). Its action is mediated through the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which is expressed both in normal and neoplastic cells (9). The most biologically active form of vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25 [OH]2D3) is also the natural ligand for the vitamin D receptor (10, 11). The receptor has a crucial role in skeletal metabolism, calcium/phosphate balance and many other interactions with pathways of fibronectin, retinoid signalling and regulating the expression of p21 and p27 arresting cells (7, 10). The latter controls the proliferation of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and therefore VDR polymorphism could be an important biomarker to assess the risk of OSCC.

The VDR gene, located on chromosome 12, contains several polymorphisms (10, 12). A series of common polymorphisms in the VDR gene were recently reported to be associated with both circulating levels of active vitamin D and in vitro measures of gene expression (13). Four major polymorphic sites have been described within the VDR gene. A polymorphic FokI site in exon 2 results in an alternative transcription initiation site, leading to a protein variant with three additional amino acids at the amino terminus (14). Polymorphic Apa1 site is present in intron 8, and a silent T to C substitution creates a Taq I restriction site in exon 9 (15).

Since vitamin D mediates its effect through VDR, known to be genetically polymorphic, this study investigated the association of the Taq I restriction site polymorphism of VDR gene in patients with OSCC.

Materials and Methods

This study included 64 OSCC patients who were treated at İstanbul University (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Oncology and Department of Oral Surgery and Medicine Clinics) between 2006 and 2008. The mean ages (±standard deviation) of OSCC patients were 55.28±13.58 years. Blood samples were collected from the patients before any treatment had been started (surgery and/or radiotherapy). The control group was selected from patients, who were treated for non-neoplastic diseases, attending the otolaryngology, oral medicine and surgery clinics of the same hospital. The mean age of the control group was 57.24±12.83 years. Written informed consent was taken from all groups. The distribution of VDR Taq I polymorphism in 64 patients with OSCC was determined by polymerase chain reaction-based RFLP and compared with that of 87 healthy controls.

DNA isolation. Blood specimens were collected in tubes containing EDTA, and DNA samples were extracted from whole blood by a salting-out procedure (16).

Genotyping. Polymorphic restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) were genotyped using Taq I polymorphism in the 30 region of VDR. For Taq I polymorphism, the following primers (MBI Fermentas, Lithuania) were used to amplify the VDR gene: 50′–CAG AGC ATG GAC AGG GAG CAA G-30; 50–GCA ACT CCT CAT GGG CTG AGG TCT CA-30′. For detection of the TaqI RFLP, 50-100 ng genomic DNA was amplified with 1× polymerase chain reaction (PCR) buffer, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 mM of each primer and Taq polymerase (MBI Fermentas) in a 25 ml reaction volume. The PCR conditions were as follows: Initial denaturation step of 94°C for 4 min followed by 5 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 64°C for 60 s and 72°C for 2 min; and a further 25 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 64°C for 30 s and 72°C for 45 s. PCR products were digested with Taq I restriction enzyme (MBI Fermentas) at 65°C and electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. Genotypes were determined as TT (490, 245 bp), Tt (490, 290, 245, 205 bp), or tt (290, 245, 205 bp) for Taq I polymorphism.

Statistical analyses. Statistical analyses, using SPSS version 11 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), included the chi-square test for genotype and allelic frequency comparison. Whenever an expected cell value was less than five, Fisher's exact test was used. The odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated as an estimate of the relative risk. A p-value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

The analysis included 64 OSCC cases and 87 cancer-free controls. Frequency distributions of select characteristics are summarised in Table I. The genotype distribution of VDR Taq I polymorphism was in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among controls (p=0.320) but not among patients (p=0.030). There was a significant difference in the distribution of VDR Taq I genotypes in female OSCC patients and female controls but no significant differences were detected in males, nor in the total population (Table I). The allelic frequencies T and t in OSCC patients were 0.60:0.40 and those in normal individuals were 0.57: 0.43, respectively. Subjects with the VDR Tt genotype were found to be at significantly higher risk for OSCC than those with another genotype (p=0.036, OR=1.39, 95% CI=1.02–1.90). In contrast, the VDR tt genotype, which was associated with the prevention of cancer in previous studies, was found to be slightly higher in the control group compared to the OSCC patient group; however this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.060; OR=1.14, 95% CI=1.00-1.31). When the genotype distribution of the subjects was investigated according to gender, VDR Tt genotype was found in association with OSCC in females (p<0.001; OR=2.43, 95% CI=1.51-3.91). Moreover, a preventive role of VDR tt genotype was statistically significant for females (p=0.045, Fisher exact test; OR=1.33, 95% CI=1.07-1.65). These observations did not hold for the male subjects, neither for Tt (p=0.839; OR=0.96, 95% CI=0.64-1.43), nor for tt (p=0.809; OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.87-1.19) genotype distributions. Prognosis of the cancer may also be affected by genetic differences. Therefore, VDR genotype distribution according to TNM classification and histopathologic differentiation were analysed and summarised in Table II. Another remarkable finding was the T allele carriage of all tumours bigger than 4 cm diameter (p=0.074, Fisher exact test). There were no significant findings in the distribution of VDR Taq I polymorphism in OSCC patients according to nodal metastasis, differentiation and grade of the tumour.

OSCC patients were divided into two subgroups according to age. The first group consisted of patients aged 45 years or younger, while the second group consisted of patients older than 45 years of age. OSCC patient age as well as smoking status and family history of cancer did not affect the distribution of VDR Taq I polymorphism; alcohol consumption was associated with TT genotype. Patients with TT genotype who consumed alcohol were found to have 2.44 times higher risk for OSCC than those who did not consume alcohol (p=0.016; OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.17-5.07).

Discussion

This case–control study demonstrated a statistically significant association between VDR Taq I heterozygous Tt genotype and increased risk of OSCC. Moreover, those Tt genotype carrying subjects had >2-fold increase of risk if they were females. VDR tt genotype, which was associated with prevention from cancer in previous studies (7), was found to be slightly higher in the control group than in patients. An investigation of VDR Taq I genotypes through genders revealed that the VDR tt genotype was strongly associated with the protection from OSCC in females.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Distribution of VDR gene Taq1 polymorphism in OSCC patients and controls.

In many studies on various types of cancer, Taq I polymorphism was not found to be associated with the occurence or the prognosis of the disease (7-9, 17). In a study on lung cancer, TT genotype was found to be related with cancer susceptibility (18); however the majority of the cancer studies on VDR Taq I polymorphism have demonstrated its protective role, which is attributed to tt genotype (7-9).

Many studies in the literature have reported that the presence of variant t allele had a protective effect on some cancer types such as prostate (19) and breast (8) cancer. John et al. (17) reported that the Taq tt genotype was associated with reduced risk for prostate cancer. Similarly, Ma et al. (20) indicated that reduced risk was associated with VDR Taq I tt genotype but, conversely, only among men with low serum 25-OHD levels. Liu et al. (7) reported that Taq tt homozygous variants were associated with decreased head and neck cancer risk but the study did not indicate the gender specific distribution of the genotypes.

There were also contraversial reports about the preventive effect of the Taq t allele for cancer. Ogunkolade et al. (21) observed in their expression study that t allele was responsible for lower levels of both mRNA and protein, thus higher cancer risk. Doğan et al. (18) performed a case–control study on VDR polymorphism in lung cancer patients. They reported no protective effect of the t allele or tt genotype. Other studies have failed to find an association between the Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer in Caucasian and/or Japanese populations (22-25). Ntais et al. (26) conducted a meta-analysis on the association between VDR Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer and concluded that this gene polymorphism is unlikely to be a major determinant of the risk of prostate cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Distribution of VDR genotypes of the patient group according to TNM classification.

Although in the present study no significant result could be found for homozygous TT or tt genotypes, the results indicate that individuals carrying the Tt genotype have an increased risk for the development of OSCC.

A recent large scale case–control study of colorectal cancer reported a protective effect of the VDR tt variant genotype (27). Lurie et al. (28) showed that Taq t allele carriers among Caucasian and Japanese women were at higher ovarian cancer risk, but this association was not statistically significant. It has been suggested VDR may also inhibit androgen receptor expression found in the majority of ovarian tumours and dihydrotestosterone has been shown to increase VDR expression in the ovary (29).

The present study also provided evidence that all tumours bigger than 4 cm in diameter carried the T allele. In contrast, Barrasso et al. (8) found no association with any of the alleles or genotypes of VDR Taq I polymorphism in tumour size of breast cancer patients. Liu et al. (7) did not state any information about the tumour size in their head and neck cancer study.

OSCC patient's age as well as smoking status and family history of cancer did not affect the distribution of VDR Taq I polymorphism; however, alcohol consumption was associated with the TT genotype. Patients with the TT genotype who consumed alcohol were found to have significantly higher risk for OSCC than those who did not consume alcohol. No association of any genotypes of Taq I polymorphism with smoking and alcohol consumption were found in head and neck (7) or breast (8) cancer studies. In a lung cancer study, the alcohol consumption of the patients was not examined; however, smoking was found to be associated with TT genotype (p=0.012) (20).

No associations were also noted between the distribution of VDR Taq I polymorphisms and nodal metastasis, differentiation and grade of the tumour in OSCC patients. These findings are in agreement with the results of a breast cancer study (8).

Although the basis of the antitumour properties of vitamin D receptors have been described in the literature (30), the mechanisms which bind the VDR polymorphisms and alter the risk of cancer need to be explored. No published studies of VDR and OSCC exist in the literature and only a study by Liu et al. (7) from the U.S.A. with a large group of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients included OSCC patients. The limited knowledge on OSCC and VDR gene polymorphism leads to the suggestion that the role of VDR gene polymorphism is mainly attributed to females. In the latter study by Liu et al. (7), a significant protective role of the VDR tt genotype against the risk of HNSCC was observed, but the genotype distribution among genders was not stated.

The biochemical evidence for a putative relationship of this polymorphism with VDR function remains unclear, because this polymorphism does not alter the amino acid sequence of the VDR protein, but may alter the level of VDR mRNA (18).

Published studies on the association of VDR polymorphism with susceptibility to cancer suggest that the impact of this genetic variation differs in various cancer types and also in different ethnicities. These differences also depend on the methodology with which VDR polymorphism was investigated (combined genotypes, haplotypes), sample size and serum levels of vitamin D. Therefore, it is clear why there are so many conflicting results for even the same type of cancer. This is the first study focusing exclusively on OSCC and provides some evidence that the VDR gene may influence susceptibility to OSCC.

Conclusion

In summary, in this first case–control study on VDR Taq I polymorphism in OSCC patients, it is concluded that the VDR Tt genotype is found to be associated with an increased risk of OSCC compared to other homozygous genotypes. Furthermore, this association was observed to be stronger in female OSCC patients. These findings suggest that the VDR Tt genotype may be a risk factor for OSCC and also that the tt genotype has a protective role for OSCC, especially in females. However, additional work based on various populations is needed to confirm these findings and the relationship between vitamin D levels and OSCC risk should also be investigated. However, this hospital-based study may have introduced uncontrolled selection biases, and larger, population-based studies, particularly focusing on female populations, are needed to confirm these findings.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from İstanbul University Research Foundation.

  • Received May 4, 2010.
  • Revision received June 4, 2010.
  • Accepted June 11, 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Greenlee RT,
    2. Hill-Harmon MB,
    3. Murray T,
    4. Thun M
    : Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 51: 15-38, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Greennberg MS,
    2. Glick M
    1. Epstein JB
    : Oral cancer. In: Burket's Oral Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment 10th ed. Greennberg MS, Glick M (eds.). BC Decker Inc, Ontario pp. 194-234, 2003.
  3. ↵
    1. Jaber MA,
    2. Porter SR,
    3. Gilthorpe MS,
    4. Bedi R,
    5. Scully C
    : Risk factors for oral epitelial dysplasia – the role of smoking and alcohol. Oral Oncol 35: 151-156, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ogden GR,
    2. Wight AJ
    : Aetiology of oral cancer: Alcohol. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36: 247-251, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Syrjänen S
    : Human papillomavirus (HPV) in head neck cancer. J Clin Virol 32(Suppl): 59-66, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Prime SS,
    2. Thakker NS,
    3. Pring M,
    4. Guest PG,
    5. Paterson IC
    : A review of inherited cancer sydromes and their relevance to oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 37: 1-16, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Calderon JI,
    3. Zhang Z,
    4. Sturgis EM,
    5. Spitz MR,
    6. Wie Q
    : Polymorphisms of vitamin D reseptor gene protect against the risk of head and neck cancer. Pharmacogen Genomics 15: 159-165, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Barrosso E,
    2. Fernandez LP,
    3. Milne RL,
    4. et al.
    : Genetic analysis of the vitamin D reseptor gene in two epithelial cancers: melanoma and breast cancer case–control studies. BMC Cancer 8: 385, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. McCullough ML,
    2. Stevens VL,
    3. Diver WR,
    4. et al.
    : Vitamin D pathway gene polymorphisms, diet, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: a nested case–control study. Breast Cancer Research 9: R9, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Chen WY,
    2. Bertone-Johnson ER,
    3. Hunter DJ,
    4. Wilett WC,
    5. Hankinson SE
    : Associations between polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 2335-2339, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Gezen-Ak D,
    2. Dursun E,
    3. Ertan T,
    4. et al.
    : Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and Alzheimer's disease. Tohuku J Exp Med 212: 275-282, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Yaylım-Eraltan İ,
    2. Ergen HA,
    3. Arıkan S,
    4. et al.
    : Investigation of the VDR gene polymorphisms association with susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Cell Biochem Funct 25: 731-737, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Morrison NA,
    2. Yeoman R,
    3. Kelly PJ,
    4. Eisman JA
    : Contribution of trans-acting factor alleles to normal physiological variability: vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and circulating osteocalcin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 6665-6669, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Gross C,
    2. Eccleshall TR,
    3. Malloy PJ,
    4. Villa ML,
    5. Marcus R,
    6. Feldman D
    : The presence of a polymorphism at the translation initiation site of the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with low bone mineral density in postmenopausal Mexican-American women. J Bone Miner Res 11: 1850-1855, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Farrow S
    : Allelic variation and the vitamin D receptor. Lancet 343: 1242, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Miller SA,
    2. Dykes DD,
    3. Polesky HS
    : Simple salting-out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acid Res 16: 1215-1219, 1988.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. John EM,
    2. Schwarz GG,
    3. Koo J,
    4. Van Der Berg D,
    5. Ingles SA
    : Sun exposure, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, and risk of advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res 65: 5470-5479, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Doğan İ,
    2. Önen Hİ,
    3. Yurdakul AS,
    4. et al.
    : Polymorphism in the vitamin D receptor gene and risk of lung cancer. Med Sci Monit 15: BR232-242, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Medeiros R,
    2. Morais A,
    3. Vasconcelos A,
    4. et al.
    : The role of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in the susceptibility to prostate cancer of a southern European population. J Hum Genet 47: 413-418, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Ma J,
    2. Stampfer MJ,
    3. Gann PH,
    4. et al.
    : Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, circulating vitamin D metabolites, and risk of prostate cancer in United States physicians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 7: 385-390, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Ogunkolade BW,
    2. Boucher BJ,
    3. Prahl JM,
    4. et al.
    : Vitamin D receptor (VDR) mRNA and VDR protein levels in relation to vitamin D status, insulin secretory capacity, and VDR genotype in Bangladeshi Asians. Diabetes 51: 634-639, 2002.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Gsur A,
    2. Madersbacher S,
    3. Haidinger G,
    4. et al.
    : Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and prostate cancer risk. Prostate 51: 30-34, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Blazer DG 3rd.,
    2. Umbach DM,
    3. Bostick RM,
    4. Taylor JA
    : Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and prostate cancer. Mol Carcinog 27: 18-23, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hamasaki T,
    2. Inatomi H,
    3. Katoh T,
    4. Ikuyama T,
    5. Matsumoto T
    : Significance of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism for risk and disease severity of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia in Japanese. Urol Int 68: 226-231, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Suzuki K,
    2. Matsui H,
    3. Ohtake N,
    4. et al.
    : Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in familial prostate cancer in a Japanese population. Int J Urol 10: 261-266, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ntais C,
    2. Polycarpou A,
    3. Ioannidis JP
    : Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12: 1395-1402, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Slattery ML,
    2. Yakumo K,
    3. Hoffman M,
    4. Neuhausen SL
    : Variants of the VDR gene and risk of colon cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12: 359-364, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Lurie G,
    2. Wilkens LR,
    3. Thompson PJ,
    4. et al.
    : Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and epithelial ovarian cancer risk.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16: 2566-2571, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Ahonen MH,
    2. Zhuang YH,
    3. Aine R,
    4. Ylikomi T,
    5. Tuohimaa P
    : Androgen receptor and vitamin D receptor in human ovarian cancer: growth stimulation and inhibition by ligands. Int J Cancer 86: 40-46, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Köstner K,
    2. Denzer N,
    3. Müller CS,
    4. Klein R,
    5. Tilgen W,
    6. Reichrath J
    : The relevance of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms for cancer: a review of the literature. Anticancer Res 29: 3511-3536, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 24, Issue 5
September-October 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association of Vitamin D Receptor Taq I Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Association of Vitamin D Receptor Taq I Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
KIVANÇ BEKTAŞ-KAYHAN, MERAL ÜNÜR, İLHAN YAYLIM-ERALTAN, H.ARZU ERGEN, BAHAR TOPTAŞ, GÜNTER HAFIZ, AHMET KARADENIZ, TURGAY İSBIR
In Vivo Sep 2010, 24 (5) 755-759;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Association of Vitamin D Receptor Taq I Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
KIVANÇ BEKTAŞ-KAYHAN, MERAL ÜNÜR, İLHAN YAYLIM-ERALTAN, H.ARZU ERGEN, BAHAR TOPTAŞ, GÜNTER HAFIZ, AHMET KARADENIZ, TURGAY İSBIR
In Vivo Sep 2010, 24 (5) 755-759;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Plasma Exosomal miR-106b-5p Is Associated With Osteoporosis by Targeting SMAD5, BMP2, and MAPK1 Genes
  • Exercise Stimulates PINK-1, PARKIN, MFN-1, and ATG-3 Genes Expression Despite High-fat Diet: Tissue-specific Responses
  • The Role of ACE I/D Polymorphism in Glioblastoma Pathogenesis: A Study on the Turkish Population
Show more Experimental Studies
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire