Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

CYP17 (T-34C) and CYP19 (Trp39Arg) Polymorphisms and their Cooperative Effects on Breast Cancer Susceptibility

BORA M. TÜZÜNER, TÜLIN ÖZTÜRK, HALIL I. KISAKESEN, ŞENNUR İLVAN, CALAY ZERRIN, OĞUZ ÖZTÜRK and TURGAY İSBIR
In Vivo January 2010, 24 (1) 71-74;
BORA M. TÜZÜNER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TÜLIN ÖZTÜRK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HALIL I. KISAKESEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ŞENNUR İLVAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CALAY ZERRIN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
OĞUZ ÖZTÜRK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TURGAY İSBIR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tisbir{at}superonline.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the commonest cancer among women in industrialized countries. Most sporadic breast carcinomas are likely to be caused by low-penetrance genes. Genes encoding enzymes involved in estrogen and carcinogen metabolism are among these low-penetrance genes. In this study, for the first time the T/C (A1/A2) polymorphism at the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of CYP17 and the Arg/Trp (T/C) polymorphism at codon 39 of CYP19 among genes regulating endogenous estrogen levels was studied. Patients and Methods: Fifty-five female breast cancer patients and ninety-one controls took part in the study. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues for the patients and from blood cells for the controls. The distribution of genotypes was determined using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) techniques. Results: The frequency of the TC genotype of CYP19 was significantly higher in the patient group (p<0.001, κ2: 12.31, OR: 7.30, 95% CI: 2.29-25.64). CYP17 frequencies were similar to those in Caucasian populations. In combined analysis, when the high risk alleles were evaluated together, the results reached significance (p=0.006, κ2=7.01, OR: 2.53, %95 CI: 1.26-5.07) for the A2 allele of CYP17 and the C allele of CYP19, being more frequent in the patient group compared to the control. The risk possesed by the TC varient of CYP19 was reduced when evaluated with A1, the protective allele of CYP17 (p=0.082). The cumulative protective effects of both A1 allele and the TT genotype were ascertained to occur significantly less frequently in the patient group (p=0.001, κ2: 10.53, OR: 8.47, %95 CI: 1.9-37.04). Conclusion: The results were consistent with the individual studies of CYP17 and CYP19 in the literature, however, in combined analysis of the alleles of the two genes, the frequency of high risk alleles was higher and the frequencies of low risk alleles were lower in the patient group. The CYP17 A1 + CYP19 TT haplotype may be protective for breast cancer.

  • Estrogen metabolism
  • breast cancer
  • genetic polymorphism
  • CYP17
  • CYP19
  • cytochrome P450

Breast cancer is the most abundant cancer among women in industrialized countries (1). Only 10% of the cases are heritable and caused by high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1 (breast cancer 1) and BRCA2 (breast cancer 2). However, most sporadic breast carcinomas that have relatively late age onset, are likely to be caused by low-penetrance genes acting together with endogenous/lifestyle risk factors. The genes encoding enzymes involved in estrogen and carcinogen metabolism are among these low-penetrance genes (2). Most cases are due to increased or prolonged exposure to estrogen, so polymorphisms of the genes which regulate endogenous estrogen levels are candidates as breast cancer risk factors. In this study, polymorphisms of CYP19 and CYP17 among the genes regulating endogenous estrogen levels, were investigated.

CYP17 encodes cytochrome P450-17 (CYP17), which catalyzes the 17α-hydroxylation of pregnenolone and progesterone as well as conversion of C21 steroids to C17. CYP19 encodes aromatase, a key cytochrome P450 enzyme that converts C19 adrenal androgens to C18 estrogens in the ovarian tissues of premenopausal women and in the adipose tissue of postmenopausal women (3). Polymorphic variation in these genes may effect estrogen synthesis by causing slight changes in aromatase and CYP17 activities (4). Such changes may account for differences in pre- and postmenopausal estrogen levels, which can effect an individual's susceptibility to cancer.

In this study, a mutation causing a T/C nucleotide substitution at position 34 in the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) promoter of CYP17 was studied. These T and C alleles are also named A1 and A2 alleles respectively, hence the mutation creates a recognition site for MspAI restriction enzyme. It was hypothesized that T/C substitution would result in an additional binding site for Sp1 promoter causing an increased rate of transcription of enzyme in the A2A2 genotype due to enhanced promoter activity (5). Fiegelson et al. and Haiman et al. have also found that both premenopausal and postmenopausal women with the A2 allele of CYP17 have higher levels of estrogens (6-7). The A2 allele has been found to be significantly associated with advanced breast cancer (5), male breast cancer (8), and both postmenopausal (9) and early-onset breast cancer (10).

The other polmorphism we studied is a novel mutation first identified by Miyoshi et al. in the CYP19 gene (11). The T/C polymorphism causes a Trp/Arg amino acid substitution at codon 39 and in their study, Miyoshi et al. found a significant association with breast cancer risk among Japanese women (11). Hirose et al. have shown that homozygous and heterozygous carriers of the variant C allele have significantly increased risk of breast cancer among premenopausal Japanese women with a late age at first full-term pregnancy or a high body mass index (12).

In all these studies, the CYP19 T/C and CYP17 A1/A2 polymorphisms have been considered separately. Here we hypothesize that functionally relevant polymorphisms in such genes would exhibit small, but additive, effects on individual susceptibility to breast cancer. Moreover specific combinations could result in a high-risk profile by influencing lifetime levels of estrogen and also influence breast cancer risk. A case-control study was therefore conducted to analyze the association of CYP19 T/C and CYP17 A1/A2 polymorphisms together as breast cancer risk factors. It was also the first study of these polymorphisms among Turkish women.

Materials and Methods

Patient selection. A total of 146 unrelated individuals were included in this study: 55 breast cancer patients, (median age: 56.12±12.35, range 31-79 years) and 91 controls, (median age: 37.77±12.19, range 20-91 years). The patients were selected from the Department of Pathology, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medicine School, Istanbul from 2002-2007. Among the patients, 47 had invasive ductal, 3 had invasive lobular, 3 had invasive ducto-lobular carcinomas, one had muscinous breast carcinoma and one had medullar breast carcinoma. There was no statistical relation between the pathological features and the polymorphisms (data not shown). The control group was selected from healthy female blood donors.

DNA extraction. The patients' DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue with the use of a method taken from Wright and Manos (13). Blood specimens of the control group were collected in tubes containing EDTA, and DNA was prepared from leukocyte pellets by SDS lysis, ammonium acetate extraction and ethanol precipitation (14).

Genotyping method for CYP17 and CYP19. For genotyping, the DNA extracted from the blood of the controls and from the paraffin-embedded samples from non-tumoral neighboring breast tissue was used. CYP17 genotypes were determined following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) according to the method of Ambrosone et al. (15). Genotyping for the CYP19 polymorphism was conducted by a new method, PCR with confronting two-pair primers, according to the method of Hirose et al. (12).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Allelic variant frequencies of CYP17 and CYP19 polymorphisms among breast cancer patients and controls.

Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 7.5 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA) including the Chi-square (κ2) test, Fisher's exact test and the Pearson correlation test, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

Results

The allelic varient frequencies of CYP17 and CYP19 polymorphisms are shown on Table I. For CYP17, the frequencies showed no significant association between the patient and control group, the A1A1 genotype was slighlty higher in the control group and the frequency of the A2A2 genotype was double in the patient group. Carrying the A2 allele increased the breast cancer risk 1.4-fold (p>0.05, OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.73-2.96). The frequency of the heterozygote genotype was almost the same in both the patient and control groups. When the groups were statistically compared for the CYP19 polymorphism, TC variance in the patient group for CYP19 the gene was found to be very highly significant (p<0.001; κ2=12.31; OR=7.30; 95% CI=2.29-25.64). The TC genotype was 20% higher in the patient group. None of the participants had the CC genotype. Also the frequency of the TT genotype was six-fold increased in the controls. Therefore the T allele of CYP19 might be the protective allele.

Combined analysis was conducted to assess the cumulative effects of possible risk and protective attributes of the alleles. First, the higher risk genotypes, carriers of the C alleles of both genes, were evaluated together, and statistical significance was observed (p=0.006, κ2=7.01, OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.26-5.07) (Figure 1). This finding demonstrated that possession of the A2 allele of CYP17 supported the risk increased by possession of the TC variant of CYP19. The risk of the TC variant of CYP19 was also reduced when evaluated together with the A1 allele carriers of CYP17 (p=0.082). The cumulative effect of the protective allele (A1) of CYP17 and TT allele of CYP19 was evaluated and was ascertained to be significantly less in the patient group (p=0.001, κ2: 10.53, OR: 8.47, 95% CI: 1.9-37.04) (Figure 2).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Comparison of individuals carrying the A2 allele of CYP17 the TC genotype of CYP19 with the other haplotypes (p=0.006, κ2: 7.01; OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.26-5.07).

Discussion

CYP17 can play an important role, especially in breast cancer, polycystic ovary syndrome, endometrial cancer and prostate cancer. Genetic variation of CYP17 causes differences in circulating hormone levels (16, 17). Moreover, CYP17 may also affect androgen levels, either directly or by means of its effects on estrogen levels (16). Recent studies showed a possible protective association with the A1 allele and a risk association with the A2 allele of CYP17. For the first time, Fiegelson et al. showed higher serum estrogen and progesterone levels in A2 allele-carrying premenoposal women (6). Haiman et al. measured serum hormone fractions in 462 postmenopausal women and the A2A2 subjects had slightly higher levels of estrone (17). Morever, Fiegelson et al. showed that women with the A2A2 genotype required less hormone replacement therapy than women with the A1A1 genotype (18). The age at menarche is also partly hormonally mediated (5). Although having a later age menarche is considered as a risk-reducing factor for breast cancer, this effect disappears in women with the A2A2 genotype. The A2 allele of CYP17 has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer due to increased lifetime estrogen exposure in sub-groups such as premenopausal, nulliparous women (5). Here no significant relationship between the A2 allele of CYP17 and breast cancer was found. The A2A2 genotype frequency of the control group (9.9%) was similar to that in the Caucasian population (8-17%) (16), while in the patient group, the A2A2 allele frequency was 18.2 %. Significance might have been reached with a larger population. The A2 allele frequency differs in Asian and Caucasian populations and is higher than that of the A1 allele in Asian populations. Thus the CYP17 polymorphism cannot be directly associated with breast cancer (16). Few studies have investigated the relationship of CYP17 polymorphisms with other breast cancer and estrogen metabolism related genes. However, when compared cumulatively with CYP19 polymorphisms in the present study, significance was reached, suggesting cooperation between CYP17 and CYP19 in breast cancer development. It is plausible that both risky and protective traits of CYP17 and CYP19 occur in breast cancer.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Comparison of individuals carrying the A1 allele of CYP17 and the TT genotype of CYP19 with the other haplotypes (p=0.082; OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.73-2.96).

The CYP19 T/C is a rare polymorphism, only a few Hawaiians (2.1%) and Japanese (2.9) have the homozygote mutant genotype (19). Thus, with a Caucasian population, the CC genotype of CYP19 was not observed in the present study. Miyoshi et al. (11) and Hirose et al. (12) found an association between C allele-bearing and breast cancer risk for premenopausal Japanese women and the present results also corroborate that data. In Figure 1, the TT haplotype appeared to be the protective haplotype. Bearing the C allele increased the breast cancer risk markedly.

This study for the first time examined the association between the CYP17 MspA1 polymorphism and the CYP19 T/C polymorphism and breast cancer risk. In combined analysis, the protective and risky attributes of the alleles were obvious. When the TC genotype of CYP19 together with the CYP17 A2 allele was evaluated, it was significantly more frequent in the patient group (p=0.006, κ2: 7.01, OR: 2.53, % CI: 1.26-5.07). This means that carrying the A2 allele of CYP17 supported the increased risk in the C allele carriers of CYP19. Another interesting finding was that the risk constituted by carrying the C allele of CYP19 was reduced in the carriers of the A1 allele of CYP17 (p=0.082). The frequency of both the A1 variant of CYP17 and the TT genotype of CYP19 combination was statistically lower in the patient group (p=0.001, κ2: 10.53, OR: 8.47, 95% CI: 1.9-37.04), thus these haplotypes might be protective against breast cancer.

In conclusion, the results were consistent with the individual studies of CYP17 and CYP19 in the literature, however, in combined analysis, the frequency of the higher risk alleles was higher and the frequencies of the low risk alleles lower in the patient groups. The enhanced risk and enhanced protectivity of the variants suggest that these low penetrance genes may act together. Therefore, more studies including other low penetrance genes in the same individuals should be studied with larger groups. Studies in the literature have been conducted in hospital groups, therefore it is not reliable to regard these data as population frequencies. Population studies of both polymorphisms should be conducted.

Footnotes

    • Received August 13, 2009.
    • Revision received November 18, 2009.
    • Accepted November 25, 2009.
  • Copyright © 2010 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. McPherson K,
    2. Steel CM,
    3. Dixon JM
    : ABC of breast diseases, breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ 321: 624-628, 2000.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Singh V,
    2. Parmar D,
    3. Singh MP
    : Do single nucleotide polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing genes determine breast cancer susceptibility and treatment outcomes? Cancer Investigation 26-8: 769-783, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Mahendroo MS,
    2. Means GD,
    3. Mendelson CR,
    4. et al.
    : Tissue specific expression of human P450 AROM. J Biol Chem 266: 11276-11281, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Somner J,
    2. McLellan S,
    3. Cheung J,
    4. et al.
    : Polymorphisms in the P450 c17 (17-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase) and P450 c19 (aromatase) genes: association with serum sex steroid concentrations and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 89: 344-351, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Feigelson HS,
    2. Coetzee GA,
    3. Kolonel LN,
    4. Ross RK,
    5. Henderson BE
    : A polymorphism in the CYP17 gene increases the risk of breast cancer. Cancer Res 57: 1063-1065, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Feigelson HS,
    2. Shames LS,
    3. Pike MC,
    4. Coetzee GA,
    5. Stancyz FZ,
    6. Henderson BE
    : Cytochrome P450c17alpha gene (CYP17) polymorphism is associated with serum estrogen and progesterone concentrations. Cancer Res 58: 585-587, 1997.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Haiman CA,
    2. Hankinson SE,
    3. Spiegelman D,
    4. Colditz GA,
    5. Willett WC,
    6. Speizer FE,
    7. Kelsey KT,
    8. Hunter DJ
    : Relationship between a polymorphism in CYP17 with plasma hormone levels and breast cancer. Cancer Res 59: 1015-1020, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Young IE,
    2. Kurian KM,
    3. Annink C,
    4. Kunkler IH,
    5. Anderson VA,
    6. Cohen BB,
    7. Hooper ML,
    8. Wyllie AH,
    9. Steel CM
    : A polymorphism in the CYP17 gene is associated with male breast cancer. Br J Cancer 81: 141-143, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Miyoshi Y,
    2. Iwao K,
    3. Ikeda N,
    4. Egawa C,
    5. Noguchi S
    : Genetic polymorphism in CYP17 and breast cancer risk in Japanese women. Eur J Cancer 36: 2375-2379, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Spurdle AB,
    2. Hopper JL,
    3. Dite GS,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Cui J,
    6. McCredie MR,
    7. Giles GG,
    8. Southey MC,
    9. Venter DJ,
    10. Easton DF,
    11. Chenevix-Trench G
    : CYPl7 promoter polymorphism and breast cancer in Australian women under age 40 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 1674-1681, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Miyoshi Y,
    2. Iwao K,
    3. Ikeda N,
    4. Egawa C,
    5. Noguchi S
    : Breast cancer risk associated with polymorphism in CYP19 in Japanese women. Int J Cancer 89: 325-328, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hirose K,
    2. Matsuo K,
    3. Toyama T,
    4. et al.
    : The CYP19 gene codon 39 Trp/Arg polymorphism increases breast cancer risk in subsets of premenopausal Japanese. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13: 1407-1411, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Inis MA,
    2. Gelfand DH,
    3. Sninsky JJ,
    4. White TJ
    1. Wright DK,
    2. Manos MM
    : Sample preparation from paraffin-embedded tissues. In: PCR Protocols, A Guide to Methods and Applications. Inis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds.). U.K: Academic Press, pp. 153-158 1990.
  14. ↵
    1. Miller SA,
    2. Dykes DD,
    3. Polesky HS
    : Simple salting-out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acid Res 16: 1215, 1988.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Ambrosone CB,
    2. Moysich KB,
    3. Furberg H,
    4. Freudenheim JL,
    5. Bowman ED,
    6. Ahmed S,
    7. et al.
    : CYP17 genetic polymorphism, breast cancer, and breast cancer risk factors. Breast Cancer Res 5: 45-51, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sharp L,
    2. Cardy AH,
    3. Cotton SC,
    4. Little J
    : CYP17 gene polymorphisms: prevalence and associations with hormone levels and related factors. A HUGE review. Am J Epidemiol 160: 729-740, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Haiman CA,
    2. Hankinson SE,
    3. Colditz GA,
    4. et al.
    : A polymorphism in CYP17 and endometrial cancer risk. Cancer Res 61: 3955-3960, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Fiegelson HS,
    2. McKean-Cowdin R,
    3. Pike MC,
    4. Coetzee GA,
    5. Kolonel LN,
    6. Monura AM,
    7. et al.
    : Cytochrome P450cl7alpha gene (CYP17) polymorphism predicts use of hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Res 59: 3908-3910, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Samson M,
    2. Rama R,
    3. Swaminathan R,
    4. Sridevi V,
    5. Nancy KN,
    6. Rajkumar T
    : CYP17 (T-34C), CYP19 (Trp39Arg), and FGFR2 (C-906T) polymorphisms and the risk of breast cancer in South Indian women. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 10: 111-116, 2009.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 24, Issue 1
January-February 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CYP17 (T-34C) and CYP19 (Trp39Arg) Polymorphisms and their Cooperative Effects on Breast Cancer Susceptibility
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
CYP17 (T-34C) and CYP19 (Trp39Arg) Polymorphisms and their Cooperative Effects on Breast Cancer Susceptibility
BORA M. TÜZÜNER, TÜLIN ÖZTÜRK, HALIL I. KISAKESEN, ŞENNUR İLVAN, CALAY ZERRIN, OĞUZ ÖZTÜRK, TURGAY İSBIR
In Vivo Jan 2010, 24 (1) 71-74;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
CYP17 (T-34C) and CYP19 (Trp39Arg) Polymorphisms and their Cooperative Effects on Breast Cancer Susceptibility
BORA M. TÜZÜNER, TÜLIN ÖZTÜRK, HALIL I. KISAKESEN, ŞENNUR İLVAN, CALAY ZERRIN, OĞUZ ÖZTÜRK, TURGAY İSBIR
In Vivo Jan 2010, 24 (1) 71-74;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Transforming Growth Factor-β1 and α-Smooth Muscle Actin in Experimental Selective Obstructive Cholestasis
  • Time-course Investigation of Bone and Disc Degeneration in a Rat Model of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis
  • Plasma Exosomal miR-106b-5p Is Associated With Osteoporosis by Targeting SMAD5, BMP2, and MAPK1 Genes
Show more Experimental Studies
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire