Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Incidence of Arm Lymphoedema Following Sentinel Node Biopsy, Axillary Sampling and Axillary Dissection in Patients with Breast Cancer

FRANCO LUMACHI, STEFANO M.M. BASSO, MANUELA BONAMINI, FILIPPO MARINO, BERNARDO MARZANO, ELISA MILAN, BEATA U. WACLAW and GIORDANO B. CHIARA
In Vivo November 2009, 23 (6) 1017-1020;
FRANCO LUMACHI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: flumachi@unipd.it
STEFANO M.M. BASSO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MANUELA BONAMINI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FILIPPO MARINO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BERNARDO MARZANO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ELISA MILAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BEATA U. WACLAW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIORDANO B. CHIARA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of lymphoedema after different treatments of the axilla in patients with breast cancer (BC). Medical records of 205 women (median age 61 years, range 26-72 years) who underwent curative surgery for primary BC were reviewed. According to the treatment of the axilla, the study population was divided into four age- and stage-matched groups of patients: Group A (N=54 patients), sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) alone; Group B (N=48 patients), SLNB followed by axillary node (AN) sampling using ultrasound scissors (harmonic scalpel); Group C (N=53 patients), AN dissection using ultrasound scissors; Group D (N=50 patients), traditional AN dissection. The median follow-up was 22 months (range 18-28 months). The intraoperative frozen section of SLNB (Groups A and B) showed 32 out of 102 (31.4%) patients with metastasis to AN, while final pathology showed AN metastases in 20, 17, 16 and 17 patients of groups A, B, C and D, respectively (p=NS). The sensitivity of SLNB alone was 80% and that of SLNB followed by AN sampling was 95% (p=NS). At follow-up patients with lymphoedema were 2 (3.7%), 2 (4.2%), 3 (5.6%) and 8 (16%) in groups A, B, C and D, respectively (p=NS). In conclusion, AN sampling is a sensitive and low-morbidity procedure which, in conjunction with the use of harmonic scalpel, may reduce the onset of arm lymphoedema.

  • Breast cancer
  • sentinel node
  • axillary sampling
  • axillary lymphadenectomy
  • lymphoedema
  • harmonic scalpel

Axillary lymph node (AN) status is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) (1, 2). Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was for decades the standard surgical approach for staging the axilla, but unfortunately this procedure is associated with high morbidity and increases risk of lymphoedema (3). Recently, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was introduced as a less invasive technique for evaluation of axillary involvement (4). Intraoperative examination of the SLNB may correctly detect AN metastases in more than 90% of patients with BC. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of lymphoedema after different treatments of the axilla in patients with BC.

Patients and Methods

Medical records of 205 women (median age 61 years, range 26-72 years) who underwent curative surgery for primary BC were reviewed. Patients with bilateral, multicentric or multifocal BC were previously excluded from the study, as well as those who had undergone preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The diagnosis of BC was obtained by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (N=156, 76.1%), core-biopsy (N=28, 13.7%) or open biopsy (N=21, 10.2%). Patients requiring breast-conserving surgery with SLNB or axillary cleaning (N=118, 57.6%) or a modified radical mastectomy (N=87, 42.4%) were eligible to enter the study, whilst those who underwent immediate reconstruction following mastectomy were excluded. The median follow-up was 22 months (range 18-28 months). Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants and the study had full ethical approval by the Institutional Review Boards. A combined method using radioisotope and blue dye was used for SLNB. The removed ANs were bisected and two frozen sections (FS) were obtained (hematoxylin-eosin stain, 40 μm between levels). In patients with positive SLNB or axillary sampling, a standard level I and II ALND was performed. In all patients, electrocautery was used only for skin flap dissection and two closed suction drains were placed in the axilla and on the chest, respectively, as previously reported (5). A standard non-compressive dressing was used at the end of operation. Each drain was removed when their output was less than 10-20 mL per day. The diagnosis of lymphoedema was made when a difference of 2 cm or more was observed in the arm circumference between affected and non-affected arms. Tumour staging was obtained according to the TNM staging system at final pathological examination (pTNM). The ANs were examined by serial sections (150-200 μm) and immunostained with an anti-cytokeratin antibody (AE1/AE2) to detect micrometastases. The main characteristics of the tumour are reported in Table I. No pT1a BC was observed. According to the treatment of the axilla, the study population was divided into four age- and stage-matched groups of patients: Group A (N=54 patients): SLNB alone; Group B (N=48 patients): SLNB followed by AN sampling using ultrasound scissors (harmonic scalpel); Group C (N=53 patients): ALND using ultrasound scissors; Group D (N=50 patients): traditional ALND. The reported data are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD). Comparisons between groups were performed using Student's t-test and the chi-squared (χ2) test, when required. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

No significant differences (p=NS) between groups were found (Table II). The intraoperative frozen section of SLNB (groups A and B) showed 32 out of 102 (31.4%) patients with metastasis to AN, while final pathology showed AN metastases in 20, 17, 16 and 17 patients of groups A, B, C and D, respectively (p=NS). There were 70 (34.1%) N1 patients and 135 (65.9%) N0 patients. In groups C and D the average number of removed AN was 17.0±4.6, while the number of involved nodes was 9±4. The sensitivity of SLNB alone was 80% and that of SLNB followed by AN sampling was 95% (p=NS). At follow-up patients with lymphoedema were 2 (3.7%), 2 (4.2%), 3 (5.6%)and 8 (16%) in groups A, B, C and D, respectively (p=NS).

Discussion

AN involvement is a strong predictor of recurrence and a major prognostic factor in patients with early BC (6). Unfortunately, neither preoperative techniques nor SLNB may at present exclude the presence of AN metastases and the long-term survival of women with negative AN still remains less than 80-85% (7). Increased public awareness of BC has lead to an earlier diagnosis of small BC, which can benefit of more conservative surgical approach (8). The management of the axilla should guarantee high accuracy and low morbidity, but is highly dependent on the real number of involved AN at final pathology, because in frozen sections the findings of micro-metastases could be missed (9). ALND still represent the most accurate means of determining AN status and it has been routinely performed for decades in all patients with BC (10). The incidence of axillary recurrence after ALND is low (2-5%), but the procedure is associated with high morbidity, including neuropathy, pain and lymphoedema (11). Such a complication, which appears in 6% to 50% of patients, is known to be related to several risk factors: enclosed extensive surgery, number of the removed ANs, post-surgical radiotherapy of the axilla, and it seems to be likely multifactorial (3, 12, 13). In a previous report, it was found that in patients with BC who underwent ALND, the volume of drainage significantly correlates with body mass index (BMI), AN status, number of both total and positive ANs and size of the tumour (5). It has been suggested that less invasive procedures (i.e. SLNB) might reduce the incidence of lymphoedema at short- and medium-term follow-up (14). SLNB has been introduced as an invasive procedure in patients with clinically node-negative BC and it was considered an appropriate alternative to routine staging ALND by The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Expert Panel in their guidelines (15). Assuming that the sentinel node receives a direct drainage from the primary cancer, a negative SLNB makes further AN dissection unnecessary and this technique has already become a standard of care for BC patients (1, 16). Both patients who underwent SLNB and those who underwent ALND show comparable axillary recurrence rates (17, 18). However, most patients with a positive sentinel node who undergo ALND do not have further AN metastases (19). Many authors have suggested strategies to predict AN negativity in patients with positive SLNB. The Edinburgh group developed a four-node sampling procedure (20) and more recently, in a group of patients with stage 1-2 BC who underwent AN sampling followed by ALND, the accuracy of AN sampling was 98% (21). In a recent meta-analysis it is reported that the characteristics related with the highest likelihood of non-SN metastasis are tumour size (>2 cm), lymphovascular invasion in the primary tumour, number of positive SN (>1), size of SN metastasis (>2 mm) and extranodal extension in the sentinel node (22). However, data are conflicting and other studies found that there are only a few independent predictors of non-sentinel node metastases (23, 24). Several clinical trials evaluated long-term survival and morbidity after SLNB alone and in conjunction with ALND (1). The Milan Study, found that the accuracy of SLNB was 89%, with less pain and arm swelling in the group treated with SLNB alone, but no differences in the overall survival (25). However, the relationship between AN positivity and development of lymphoedema is unclear (26). The reported incidence of lymphoedema in patients who underwent SLNB and ALND may reach 7% and 70%, respectively and the AN negative patients operated with SLNB have less arm morbidity (26, 27). In a previous study, it was found that the use of a harmonic scalpel reduces the total drained volume in patients requiring axillary dissection (28). In conclusion, AN sampling is a sensitive and low-morbidity procedure useful in reducing the false-negative results of SLNB alone. The use of harmonic scalpel may reduce the onset of arm lymphoedema, especially when ALND is required, although its real usefulness is still under discussion (28-30).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Main characteristics of the tumours (mean±SD).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Differences between groups (mean±SD).

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are expressed to Miss Francesca Bissolotti for help in preparing the manuscript and for reviewing the English.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Presented at the 6th European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC-6), Berlin (Germany) 15-19 April, 2008. Eur J Cancer Suppl 6: 151-152, 2008. Elsevier, Oxford (UK).

  • Received December 15, 2008.
  • Revision received February 17, 2009.
  • Accepted March 16, 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Samphao S,
    2. Eremin JM,
    3. El-Sheemy M,
    4. Eremin O
    : Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer: current clinical practice and a new selective targeted approach. Ann Surg Oncol 15: 282-296, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Lenning PE
    : Breast cancer prognostication and prediction: are we making progress? Ann Oncol 18: viii3-7, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Herd-Smith A,
    2. Russo A,
    3. Muraca MG,
    4. Del Turco MR,
    5. Cardona G
    : Prognostic factors for lymphedema after primary treatment of breast carcinoma. Cancer 92: 1783-1787, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Veronesi U,
    2. Paganelli G,
    3. Galimberti V,
    4. Viale G,
    5. Zurrida S,
    6. Bedoni M,
    7. Costa A,
    8. de Cicco C,
    9. Geraghty JG,
    10. Luini A,
    11. Sacchini V,
    12. Veronesi P
    : Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes. Lancet 349: 1864-1867, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Lumachi F,
    2. Brandes AA,
    3. Burelli P,
    4. Basso SMM,
    5. Ermani M
    : Seroma prevention following axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer by using ultrasound scissors: a prospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol 30: 526-530, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Canavese G,
    2. Catturich A,
    3. Vecchio C,
    4. Tomei D,
    5. Gipponi M,
    6. Bruzzi P,
    7. Badellino F
    : Prognostic role of lymph-node level involvement in patients undergoing axillary dissection for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 24: 104-109, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fisher B,
    2. Redmond C,
    3. Dimitrov NV,
    4. Bowman D,
    5. Legault-Poisson S,
    6. Wickerham DL,
    7. Wolmark N,
    8. Fisher ER,
    9. Margolese R,
    10. Sutherland C
    : A randomized clinical trial evaluating sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with node-negative breast cancer who have estrogen receptor-negative tumors. N Engl J Med 320: 473-478, 1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tabàr L,
    2. Duffy SW,
    3. Vitak B,
    4. Chen HH,
    5. Prevost TC
    : The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening? Cancer 86: 449-462, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Graverson HP,
    2. Toft MB,
    3. Andersen JA,
    4. Zedeler K
    : Breast cancer: risk of axillary recurrence in node-negative patients following partial dissection of the axilla. Eur J Surg Oncol 14: 407-412, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Duff M,
    2. Hill ADK,
    3. McGreal G,
    4. Walsh S,
    5. McDermott EW,
    6. O'Higgins NJ
    : Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of axillary clearance for breast cancer. Br J Surg 88: 114-117, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Den Bakker MA,
    2. Van Weeszenberg A,
    3. De Kanter AY,
    4. Beverdam FH,
    5. Pritchard C,
    6. van der Kwast TH,
    7. Menke-Pluymers M
    : Non-sentinel lymph node involvement in patients with breast cancer and sentinel node micrometastasis; too early to abandon axillary clearance. J Clin Pathol 55: 932-935, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Petrek JA,
    2. Senie RT,
    3. Peters M,
    4. Rosen PP
    : Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis. Cancer 92: 1368-1377, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kissin MW,
    2. Querci della Rovere G,
    3. Easton D,
    4. Wtsbury G
    : Risk of lymphedema following the treatment of breast cancer. Br J Surg 73: 580-584, 1986.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Peintinger F,
    2. Reitsamer R,
    3. Stranzl H,
    4. Ralph G
    : Comparison of quality of life and arm complaints after axillary lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 89: 648-652, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Maggard MA,
    2. Lane KE,
    3. O'Connell JB,
    4. Nanyakkara DD,
    5. Ko YY
    : Beyond the clinical trials: how often is sentinel lymph node dissection performed for breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 12: 41-47, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sato K
    . Current Technical overviews of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 14: 354-361, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Schulze T,
    2. Mucke J,
    3. Markwardt J,
    4. Schlag PM,
    5. Bembenek A
    : Long-term morbidity of patients with early breast cancer after sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to axillary lymph node dissection. J Surg Oncol 93: 109-119, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Palesty JA,
    2. Foster JM,
    3. Hurd TC,
    4. Watroba N,
    5. Rezaishiraz H,
    6. Edge SB
    : Axillary recurrence in women with a negative sentinel lymph node and no axillary dissection in breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 93: 129-132, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Motomura K,
    2. Egawa C,
    3. Komoike Y,
    4. Nagumo S,
    5. Koyama H,
    6. Inaji H
    : Three-axillary lymph node sampling for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 13: 985-989, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Forrest APM,
    2. Everington D,
    3. McDonald CC,
    4. Steele RJ,
    5. Chetty U,
    6. Stewart HJ
    : The Edinburgh randomized trial of axillary sample or clearance after mastectomy. Br J Surg 82: 1504-1508, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Tanaka K,
    2. Yamamoto D,
    3. Kanematsu S,
    4. Okugawa H,
    5. Kamiyama Y
    : A four-node axillary sampling trial on breast cancer patients. Breast 15: 203-209, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Degnim AC,
    2. Griffith KA,
    3. Sabel MS,
    4. Hayes DF,
    5. Cimmino VM,
    6. Diehl KM,
    7. Lucas PC,
    8. Snyder ML,
    9. Chang AE,
    10. Newman LA
    : Clinicopathologic features of metastasis in nonsentinel lymph nodes of breast carcinoma patients. Cancer 98: 2307-2315, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Cserni G,
    2. Gregori D,
    3. Merletti F,
    4. Sapino A,
    5. Mano MP,
    6. Ponti A,
    7. Sandrucci S,
    8. Baltás B,
    9. Bussolati G
    : Meta-analysis of non-sentinel node metastases associated with micro-metastatic sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Br J Surg 91: 1245-1252, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Viale G,
    2. Maiorano E,
    3. Mazzarol G,
    4. Zurrida S,
    5. Galimberti V,
    6. Luini A,
    7. Renne G,
    8. Pruneri G,
    9. Maisonneuve P,
    10. Veronesi U
    : Histologic detection and clinical implications of micrometastases in axillary sentinel lymph nodes for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 92: 1378-1384, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Veronesi U,
    2. Paganelli G,
    3. Viale G,
    4. Luini A,
    5. Zurrida S,
    6. Galimberti V,
    7. Intra M,
    8. Veronesi P,
    9. Maisonneuve P,
    10. Gatti G,
    11. Mazzarol G,
    12. De Cicco C,
    13. Manfredi G,
    14. Fernández JR
    : Sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomized controlled study. Lancet Oncol 7: 983-990, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Purushotham AD,
    2. Bennett Britton TM,
    3. Klevesath MB,
    4. Chou P,
    5. Agbaje OF,
    6. Duffy SW
    : Lymph node status and breast cancer-related lymphedema. Ann Surg 246: 42-45, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Madsen AH,
    2. Haugaard K,
    3. Soerensen J,
    4. Bokmand S,
    5. Friis E,
    6. Holtveg H,
    7. Garne JP,
    8. Horby J,
    9. Christiansen P
    : Arm morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection: a study from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Breast 17: 138-147, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Lumachi F,
    2. Burelli P,
    3. Basso SMM,
    4. Ermani M
    : Usefulness of ultrasound scissors in reducing serous drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer: a prospective randomized clinical study. Am Surg 70: 80-84, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Deo SV,
    2. Shukla NK,
    3. Asthana S,
    4. Nirajan B,
    5. Srinivas G
    : A comparative study of modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel and electocautery. Singapore Med J 43: 226-228, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kontos M,
    2. Kothari A,
    3. Hamed H
    : Effect of harmonic scalpel on seroma formation following surgery for breast cancer: a prospective randomised study. J Buon 13: 223-230, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 23, Issue 6
November-December 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incidence of Arm Lymphoedema Following Sentinel Node Biopsy, Axillary Sampling and Axillary Dissection in Patients with Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Incidence of Arm Lymphoedema Following Sentinel Node Biopsy, Axillary Sampling and Axillary Dissection in Patients with Breast Cancer
FRANCO LUMACHI, STEFANO M.M. BASSO, MANUELA BONAMINI, FILIPPO MARINO, BERNARDO MARZANO, ELISA MILAN, BEATA U. WACLAW, GIORDANO B. CHIARA
In Vivo Nov 2009, 23 (6) 1017-1020;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Incidence of Arm Lymphoedema Following Sentinel Node Biopsy, Axillary Sampling and Axillary Dissection in Patients with Breast Cancer
FRANCO LUMACHI, STEFANO M.M. BASSO, MANUELA BONAMINI, FILIPPO MARINO, BERNARDO MARZANO, ELISA MILAN, BEATA U. WACLAW, GIORDANO B. CHIARA
In Vivo Nov 2009, 23 (6) 1017-1020;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Lymphedema Precautions: Time to Abandon Old Practices?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Response to Letter to the Editor from Finsterer: “Encephalitis Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Child With Chiari Malformation Type I”
  • Solitary Fibrous Tumor in the Retroperitoneal Space Arising from the Diaphragm
  • The Relationship Between Oxidative Stress, Selenium, and Cumulative Risk in Metabolic Syndrome
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

In Vivo

© 2023 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire