Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Single-step Therapy — Feasibility and Safety of Simultaneous Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatic Malignancies

COSMO GADALETA, ANNAMARIA CATINO, GIROLAMO RANIERI, VITO FAZIO, GENNARO GADALETA-CALDAROLA, ANTONIO CRAMAROSSA, FRANCESCO ARMENISE, EUGENIO CANNIELLO, GIANLUCA VINCIARELLI, GIUSEPPE LARICCHIA and VITTORIO MATTIOLI
In Vivo September 2009, 23 (5) 813-820;
COSMO GADALETA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: c.gadaleta{at}infinito.it
ANNAMARIA CATINO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIROLAMO RANIERI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VITO FAZIO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GENNARO GADALETA-CALDAROLA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIO CRAMAROSSA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FRANCESCO ARMENISE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EUGENIO CANNIELLO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIANLUCA VINCIARELLI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIUSEPPE LARICCHIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VITTORIO MATTIOLI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) has been demonstrated to be useful for the treatment of liver neoplasms. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and RFA, performed simultaneously to treat primary and secondary liver neoplasms. Patients and Methods: From July 2006 to October 2007, 34 patients (21 with HCC and 13 with liver metastases) underwent 37 sessions of treatment. The schedule consisted of: induction TACE (with epirubicin, mitomycin C and lipiodol, or with doxorubicin/irinotecan loaded on microspheres), percutaneous RFA and second TACE. Monopolar RFA was used on 52 nodules, whereas the bipolar multiprobe technique was used in 6 cases. Results: The treatment was well tolerated, with moderate hepatic and hematological toxicity. In total 51 nodules were evaluable for response, with technical success in 45/51 cases (88%). Conclusion: Combined TACE plus RFA is feasible and safe; the preliminary data make it a promising procedure with regard to efficacy and support further investigation.

  • Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
  • radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA)
  • liver neoplasms

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies, and its incidence is increasing worldwide (1-2). Despite improvements in surveillance and diagnosis, treatments are still a challenge, due to co-existing cyrrhosis with variable liver function that could limit the eligibility of these patients for therapeutical options. Furthermore, the liver is the most common metastatic site from various primary neoplasms and, even if now improved with modern drugs, the outcome of these patients is still unsatisfactory.

Recent reports have highlighted the usefulness of integrated therapies in order to improve the locoregional treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies. Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) has been demonstrated to be effective for treating focal malignancies in the liver (3-8) as well as in other organs (9-13), with a minimally invasive approach; nevertheless, its usefulness is limited by the size of lesions, resulting in a high rate of local recurrences, particularly for larger tumors (14-16).

RFA procedures need to achieve complete and homogeneous necrosis of the neoplasm as well as a safety margin; hence, due to the possible presence of residual disease and/or satellites, the locoregional treatment should be extended to the perinodular parenchyma. Indeed, also regardless of the tumor type and lesion size, long-term data have shown an appreciable incidence of local relapse after RFA (17). In addition, the risk of incomplete treatment is high in cases of tumoral nodules located close to large vessels or in the proximity of the liver surface close to the stomach and/or bowel. Thus, many studies have investigated the possibility of optimizing the volume of tumor necrosis induced by RFA, both with modern devices and technologies able to increase the energy deposition (18, 19), and also by using chemotherapeutic agents combined with RFA in different schedules (20-22).

Hepatic transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been demonstrated to be an interesting locoregional approach in the treatment of liver malignancies, expecially in HCC (23-26).

This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of TACE plus RFA, administered concurrently (“single-step therapy”), in patients with primary and secondary liver neoplasms, unresectable or refusing surgery; the secondary end-point was to assess the efficacy of treatment in terms of complete response and the local control of disease.

Patients and Methods

Study population. From July 2006 to October 2007, 34 patients with 58 primary and secondary liver neoplasms were enrolled into the study. The main inclusion/exclusion criteria are shown in Table I. Pre-treatment evaluation included hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and total body CT scan.

Technique. Firstly, an hepatic arteriography, to determine the parenchymal and neoplastic vascularization, was performed with a percutaneous femoral approach and by using a 4-5 Fr. wire-catheter (Terumo Co., Japan) followed by a 3 Fr. coaxial catheter (Terumo Co., Japan). In one subgroup of patients, chemoembolization was performed using Lipiodol (LUF) mixed with mitomycin C plus epirubicin; a first dose was administered via the hepatic artery (by a selective-superselective infusion), immediately followed, during the same session, by the RFA of the nodules to be treated. During the last stage of this three-stage process, the remaining dose of the antiblastic drug was administered followed by hepatic arterial embolization with a gelatine sponge.

In the other subgroup of patients, doxorubicin or irinotecan, according to the type of neoplasm, loaded on microspheres (Dc-Bead; Biocompatibles, Farnham (GB); Hepasphere; BioSphere Medical, Roissy, Cedex, France), without Lipiodol, were perfused; in these cases, the two-stage procedure was completed by performing RFA immediately after TACE.

The percutaneous US-guided RFA was performed with a 17-gauge monopolar cooled-tip electrode-needle with a 1 to 3 cm-long non-insulated tip (Radionics, Burlington, MA, USA) while, for the lesions larger than 3 cm, bipolar multiprobe 15-gauge electrode-needles (Olympus, Celon AG, Teltow, Germany) with a 4 cm-long exposed section were used.

Response assessment. Local therapeutic efficacy was assessed by contrast-enhanced CT scan, and technical success was defined as non-enhancing tissue including the neoplasm and a safety zone of 5 mm or more from the tumor edges (complete ablation).

The contrast-enhanced CT scan was obtained 48 hours after the treatment in order to detect early complications and to evaluate technical success.

Post-treatment follow-up included upper abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan one month after the procedure and every three months thereafter, in order to assess the treatment outcome. Local recurrence was defined as the appearance of an enhanced area adjacent to the zone of ablation. Distant recurrence was defined as the detection of new lesions in untreated hepatic areas.

Statystical analysis. The statistical analysis, performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS inc, Chicago, IL, USA) software (version 9.0), evaluated the differences in time to progression between the subgroups according to the size and histological type of the neoplasms, as well as to the schedule of treatment. The estimated local tumor progression and overall survival rates were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Treatment response. The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table II. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range 2-17), 31 patients were evaluable for local response and 34 for toxicity. With regard to the three cases not evaluable for response, one patient showed multifocal bilobular disease at the first angiographic step of the procedure, while two patients died early, one due to severe liver insufficiency and the other due to reasons unrelated to the treatment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Main inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study.

A total of 37 sessions of TACE plus RFA (single-step therapy) for 58 neoplasms was performed. In 23 sessions of TACE, epirubicin (35 mg) plus mitomycin C (15 mg) was used, doxorubicin (100 mg) loaded on Dc-Beads was used in 9 cases and one patient was treated with doxorubicin (100 mg) loaded on Hepasphere. Finally, irinotecan (100 mg) loaded on Dc-Beads was used in 4 patients affected by liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. A monopolar electrode-needle was used in 52 nodules, whereas 6 neoplasms (larger than 3 cm) underwent the bipolar multiprobe technique, with a maximum of four electrode-needles employed simultaneously.

Technical success was evaluable for 51 nodules in 31 patients. Complete necrosis was observed in 45/51 nodules (88%); therefore in six cases (local progressive disease) the treatment was considered incomplete. Intrahepatic recurrences (distant recurrences) distant from the treated areas occurred in 8/34 patients (23.5%).

Three patients received a second session of single-step therapy, two of them due to relapsed disease, while one patient was treated twice due to bilobular disease.

In all patients treated with TACE including LUF, the early CT scan evaluations showed a typical appearance, with a homogeneous deposition of Lipiodol inside the treated nodules, and a wide segmental distribution in the area surrounding the nodules. In the patients treated with microspheres without LUF, the necrotic area was very wide and with sharp outlines compared to the surrounding healthy parenchyma; this radiological aspect was characteristic, not detectable in the cases treated with LUF and considered as a skip area (Figures 1 and 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Patient characteristics.

The statistical analysis did not find any significant correlation between local tumor progression and the histopathology, size of the nodules, or the schedule of treatment. The estimated local tumor progression and overall survival rates are showed in Figures 3 and 4, respectively.

Side-effects and complications. The treatment was well tolerated by the majority of patients. Hematological toxicity was moderate; grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 4/37 sessions in the cirrhotic patients (10.8%), while grade 3-4 anemia and leukopenia were observed in two cases (5%), requiring blood cell transfusion in one patient.

Elevated serum bilirubin levels occurred in 8 sessions (grade 1-2 for 7 patients, 19%, and grade 3-4 in one patient, 2.7%). Raised aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) levels were commonly observed, but recovered by the first week with standard post-TACE care.

Six patients (18%) experienced slight, long-lasting fatigue. In addition, grade 1 nausea/vomiting was common and easily manageable. In 4 sessions (10.8%), the patients had moderate abdominal pain and recovered within 12 hours with the administration of analgesics; moderate-grade and short-lasting ascites was observed in two cirrhotic patients with HCC.

One patient, affected by cirrhosis, developed severe impairment of liver function and died due to liver insufficiency.

Discussion

In the current study, the three stages of the treatment had different aims. Firstly, TACE was performed to treat hyper-hypovascular large nodules, ghost nodules and satellites; the subsequent RFA may have been potentiated by the ischemic effect of embolization and by using LUF, thus reducing the heat dissipation due to the blood flow in the adjacent vessels (“heat-sink” effect) (8), and consequently obtaining a larger and more homogeneous volume of necrosis.

In the third stage, TACE could have contributed to prolonging the contact of the peritumoral area with the antiblastic drugs because of the marked hyperemia surrounding the tumoral area including satellites.

Furthermore, we hypothesized that the use of nondegradable microspheres (Dc-Beads and Hepasphere) could optimize and extend the ischemic area, and this was the rationale for using these devices in one subgroup of the patient population. The possibility of increasing the volume of necrosis by the ischemic effect of embolization in combination with RFA has been described in several studies (27-34); in addition, some experimental reports have shown synergism between some antineoplastic drugs, such as doxorubicin, and RF-induced thermal ablation (20-22).

Experimental data have indicated an increased delivery of doxorubicin to the peripheral area treated with RFA, probably due to hyperemia, in comparison with the direct intratumoral injection of doxorubicin (21, 35). However, the increased volume of cellular necrosis induced by the combination of chemotherapy plus RFA could involve multiple mechanisms.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Large nodular HCC measuring 5.5 cm in a 75-year-old woman. (a) Axial venous-phase enhanced CT image showing the neoplasm before “single-step” therapy. (b) After the procedure, CT image demonstrating the necrotic area including the primary nodule, visible as a slightly hyperdense area. The safety zone appears as non-enhancing tissue around the tumor and is very large and clear-cut with respect to the surrounding parenchyma (skip area).

In fact, doxorubicin activity is strengthened by the hypoxia and also by the moderate hyperthermia that is generally detectable at the periphery of a thermally-ablated area (20); in addition, hyperthermia interferes with cellular and vascular structures (21, 36, 37), by increasing the permeability of cellular membranes and by damaging the pump that usually extrudes intracellular doxorubicin (36). Furthermore, RFA slackens the blood flow at 45-50°C (such as in the peritumoral area). Under hypoxic conditions, the cellular uptake of doxorubicin is increased. Therefore, the efficacy of doxorubicin could be optimized at very low doses; hence, the synergism between doxorubicin and RF heating is potentiated, thus increasing the extent of coagulation necrosis.

In the peritumoral area, multiple sublethal injuries occur that generally singly cause reversible cellular damage, potentially representing a possible starting point for relapses; the synergism between the sublethal damage caused by the hyperthermia and the drug-induced cytotoxicity might lead to lethal effects over a larger peritumoral area and, finally, achieve a safety zone never smaller than 5 mm.

In this study, following the reported efficacy of drug-eluting beads as locoregional intra-arterial hepatic therapy (38-42), this device was used with doxorubicin or irinotecan in cases of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. This drug/device combination was chosen in order to increase the therapeutic efficacy by long-term local drug release within the tumoral tissue, as well as to minimize the toxicity related to systemic levels of the drug.

With regard to the RFA procedure, a very interesting observation was made. In our previous experience (personal, unpublished data) in the treatment of liver neoplasms, a peak of maximal power during RFA ranging from 120 to 160 W was achieved, with values of impedance usually between 85 and 65 Ohms; nevertheless, in these cases, the energy was delivered with very frequent peaks interrupted by pauses (“on-off slots”). However, during the combined treatment it was possible to detect lower values of impedance while delivering very high power. Furthermore, because of the constantly low impedance (usually ranging between 60-80 Ohms), it was possible to deliver progressive amounts of power, at a rate of 10 W/minute, with a steady course without automatic stops of the RFA generator (Figure 5). We think that this could actually correlate with the complete and persistent ischemia caused by the embolization of medium/small vessels and be capable of decreasing the heat-sink effect and consequently optimizing the RFA by a more homogeneous and continuous energy deposition.

The single-step therapy was demonstrated to be feasible and safe. With a median follow-up of 14 months, a satisfactory local response was evident, irrespective of the type of treatment, histopathology and size of the nodules. In all cases, a larger necrotic volume was obtained, despite our expectations based on the effects of RFA alone. Hence, assuming that RFA alone is able to achieve a satisfactory local control in neoplasms smaller than 3 cm, we believe that this combined technique could be applied to obtain a higher rate of complete response in the treatment of lesions with maximum diameter larger than 3-4 cm. The local tumor control is a significant prognostic factor in ablative treatments (33), thus the combined technique could improve the therapeutical results in these cases These preliminary data, even if limited by the heterogeneity and the small patient population, strongly supported further investigation and a longer follow-up to draw definitive conclusions also with respect to long-term efficacy and survival.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma in a 59-year-old woman, pretreated with RFA of a single nodule and relapsed in three adjacent sites. (a) The axial venous-phase enhanced CT scan showing the three new tumors before single-step therapy. (b) The catheter used for TACE during the procedure, with three electrode-needles simultaneously delivering RFA. (c) After the procedure, CT image showing the very large necrotic area, with maximum diameter of 8.5 cm, including the three nodules plus a safety zone, clear-cut with respect to the surrounding parenchyma (skip area). At the perifery of this area, there is a pseudocapsule representing fibrosis and reparative phenomena.

In addition, the good tolerability of these procedures make it an attractive option to be integrated into a multidisciplinary approach. Hence, patients with HCC, with acceptable hepatic reserve, could receive a more efficacious locoregional treatment, which is minimally invasive and repeatable or subdividable in cases of bilobular disease.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Local progression-free survival after RFA plus TACE (single-step therapy).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Overall survival after RFA plus TACE (single-step therapy).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Energy delivery by RFA in the combined treatment. The power values detected during the RFA (10 W/60 seconds) showed an incremental trend followed by a plateau-phase in which the impedance generally did not exceed 80 Ohm.

Furthermore, liver metastases could be treated with a combination of locoregional and systemic treatment; this approach could be especially useful in patients with colorectal or breast cancer, or other chemosensitive neoplasms with a high risk of extrahepatic metastasis.

On the basis of our results in the group of patients treated with drug-loaded microspheres, we believe that more advanced and efficacious applications will be derived from the use of such devices. In conclusion, the improvement of minimally invasive locoregional procedures, both with specific drugs (such as irinotecan for liver metastases from colorectal cancer) and by up-to-date technologies, such as bipolar multiprobe devices to treat larger nodules, could allow better results in the management of liver malignancies.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs Teresa Lionetti and Mr Vincenzo Colaluce for their valued technical collaboration.

  • Received February 27, 2009.
  • Revision received July 2, 2009.
  • Accepted July 13, 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bruix J,
    2. Sherman M,
    3. Practice Guidelines Committee,
    4. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
    : Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42(5): 1208-1236, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Okuda K
    : Hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepat 32(suppl 1): 225-237, 2000.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Rossi S,
    2. Di Stasi M,
    3. Buscarini E,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous RF interstitial thermal ablation in the treatment of hepatic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167: 759-768, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Curley SA,
    2. Izzo F,
    3. Ellis LM,
    4. Vauthey JN,
    5. Vallone P
    : Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular cancer in 110 patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 232: 381-391, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Buscarini L,
    2. Buscarini E,
    3. Di Stasi M,
    4. Vallisa D,
    5. Quaretti P,
    6. Rocca A
    : Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results. Eur Radiol 11(6): 914-921, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tateishi R,
    2. Shiina S,
    3. Teratani T,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. An analysis of 1000 cases. Cancer 103(6): 1201-1209, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. DeBaere T,
    2. Elias D,
    3. Dromain C,
    4. et al.
    : Radiofrequency ablation of 100 hepatic metastases with a mean follow-up of more than 1 year. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175: 1619-1625, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Goldberg SN,
    2. Gazelle GS,
    3. Mueller PR
    : Thermal ablation therapy for focal malignancy: a unified approach to underlying principles, techniques and diagnostic imaging guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174: 323-331, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Gervais DA,
    2. Arellano RS,
    3. Mueller P
    : Percutaneous ablation of kidney tumors in nonsurgical candidates. Oncology (Williston Park) 19(11): 6-11, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Wood BJ,
    2. Ramkaransingh JR,
    3. Fojo T,
    4. Walther MM,
    5. Libutti SK
    : Percutaneous tumor ablation with radiofrequency. Cancer 2: 443-451, 2002.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zlotta AR,
    2. Djavan B,
    3. Matos C,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous transperineal radiofrequency ablation of prostate tumor: safety, feasibility and pathological effect on human prostate cancer. Br J Urol 81: 265-275, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Dupuy DE,
    2. Zagoria RJ,
    3. Akerley W,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174: 57-59, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Gadaleta C,
    2. Catino A,
    3. Mattioli V
    : Radiofrequency thermal ablation in the treatment of lung malignancies. In Vivo 20(6A): 765-767, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Rossi S,
    2. Buscarini E,
    3. Garbagnati F,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous treatment of small hepatic tumors by an expandable RF needle electrode. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170: 1015-1022, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Solbiati L,
    2. Goldberg SN,
    3. Ierace T,
    4. Livraghi T,
    5. Sironi S,
    6. Gazelle GS
    : Hepatic metastases: percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with cooled-tip electrodes. Radiology 205: 367-374, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Livraghi T,
    2. Goldberg SN,
    3. Meloni F,
    4. Solbiati L,
    5. Gazelle GS
    : Radiofrequency of large hepatocellular carcinomas. Radiology 214: 761-768, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Solbiati L,
    2. Livraghi T,
    3. Goldberg SN,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: long-term results in 117 patients. Radiology 221: 159-166, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Goldberg SN,
    2. Solbiati L,
    3. Hahn PF,
    4. et al.
    : Large-volume tissue ablation with radiofrequency by using a clustered, internally cooled electrode technique: laboratory and clinical experience in liver metastases. Radiology 209: 371-379, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Goldberg SN,
    2. Stein MC,
    3. Gazelle GS,
    4. Sheiman RG,
    5. Kruskal JB,
    6. Clouse ME
    : Percutaneous radiofrequency tissue ablation: optimization of pulsed-radiofrequency technique to increase coagulation necrosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10: 907-916, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Goldberg SN,
    2. Saldinger PF,
    3. Gazelle GS,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous tumor ablation: increased necrosis with combined radiofrequency ablation and intratumoral doxorubicin injection in a rat breast tumor model. Radiology 220: 420-427, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Goldberg SN,
    2. Girnan GD,
    3. Lukyanov AN,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous tumor ablation: increased necrosis with combined radiofrequency ablation and intravenous liposomal doxorubicin in a rat breast tumor model. Radiology 222: 797-804, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Goldberg SN,
    2. Kamel IR,
    3. Kruskal JB,
    4. et al.
    : Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: increased tumor destruction with adjuvant liposomal doxorubicin therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179: 93-101, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Marelli L,
    2. Stigliano R,
    3. Triantos C,
    4. et al.
    : Treatment outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma using chemoembolization in combination with other therapies. Cancer Treat Rev 32: 594-606, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fiorentini G,
    2. Poddie DB,
    3. De Giorgi UD,
    4. et al.
    : Global approach to hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: indications and outcome of intra-arterial chemotherapy and other hepatic-directed therapies. Med Oncol 17: 163-173, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Vogl TJ,
    2. Mack MG,
    3. Balzer JO,
    4. et al.
    : Liver metastases: neoadjuvant downsizing with transarterial chemoembolization before laser-induced thermotherapy. Radiology 229(2): 457-464, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Rilling WS,
    2. Drooz A
    : Multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13: S259-S263, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Buscarini L,
    2. Buscarini E,
    3. Di Stasi M,
    4. Quaretti P,
    5. Zangrandi A
    : Percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation combined with transcatheter arterial embolization in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultraschall Med 20: 47-53, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Yamakado K,
    2. Nakatsuka A,
    3. Ohmori S,
    4. et al.
    : Radiofrequency ablation combined with chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment response based on tumor size and morphology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(12): 1225-1232, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Veltri A,
    2. Moretto P,
    3. Doriguzzi A,
    4. Pagano E,
    5. Carrara G,
    6. Gandini G
    : Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a combined therapy for unresectable non-early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Eur Radiol 16(3): 661-669, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kitamoto M,
    2. Imagawa M,
    3. Yamada H,
    4. et al.
    : Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas: comparison of the radiofrequency effect with and without chemoembolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181: 997-1003, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Gasparini D,
    2. Sponza M,
    3. Marzio A,
    4. Zanardi R,
    5. Bazzocchi M,
    6. Cemal Y
    : Combined treatment, TACE and RF ablation, in HCC: preliminary results. Radiol Med 104(5-6): 412-420, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rossi S,
    2. Garbagnati F,
    3. Lencioni R,
    4. et al.
    : Percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after occlusion of tumor blood supply. Radiology 217: 119-126, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Takaki H,
    2. Yamakado K,
    3. Nakatsuka A,
    4. et al.
    : Radiofrequency ablation combined with chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas 5 cm or smaller: risk factors for local tumor progression. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(7): 856-861, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Yamakado K,
    2. Nakatsuka A,
    3. Akeboshi M,
    4. Shiraki K,
    5. Nakano T,
    6. Takeda K
    : Combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term recurrences and survival. Oncol Rep 11(1): 105-109, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kruskal JB,
    2. Oliver BS,
    3. Huertas JC,
    4. Goldberg SN
    : Dynamic intrahepatic flow and cellular alterations during radiofrequency ablation of liver tissue. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12: 1193-1202, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Toffoli G,
    2. Bevilacqua C,
    3. Franceschin A,
    4. Boiocchi M
    : Effect of hyperthermia on intracellular drug accumulation and chemosensitivity in drug-sensitive and drug-resistant P388 leukaemia cell lines. Int J Hyperthermia 5: 163-172, 1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Dudar TE,
    2. Jain RK
    : Differential response of normal and tumor microcirculation to hyperthermia. Cancer Res 44: 605-612, 1984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Varela M,
    2. Real MI,
    3. Burrel M,
    4. et al.
    : Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug-eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol 46(3): 474-481, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Aliberti C,
    2. Tilli M,
    3. Benea G,
    4. Fiorentini G
    : Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) of liver metastases from colorectal cancer using irinotecan-eluting beads: preliminary results. Anticancer Res 26(5B): 3793-3795, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Taylor RR,
    2. Tang Y,
    3. Gonzalez MV,
    4. Stratford PW,
    5. Lewis AL
    : Irinotecan drug-eluting beads for use in chemoembolization: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of drug release properties. Eur J Pharm Sci 30(1): 7-14, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lewis LA,
    2. Gonzalez V,
    3. Lloyd AW,
    4. et al.
    : DC-Bead: in vitro characterization of a drug-delivery device for transarterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17: 335-342, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Fiorentini G,
    2. Aliberti C,
    3. Turrisi G,
    4. Del Conte A,
    5. et al.
    : Intraarterial hepatic chemoembolization of liver metastases from colorectal cancer adopting irinotecan-eluting beads: results of a phase II clinical study. In Vivo 21: 1085-1092, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 23, Issue 5
September-October 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Single-step Therapy — Feasibility and Safety of Simultaneous Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatic Malignancies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Single-step Therapy — Feasibility and Safety of Simultaneous Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatic Malignancies
COSMO GADALETA, ANNAMARIA CATINO, GIROLAMO RANIERI, VITO FAZIO, GENNARO GADALETA-CALDAROLA, ANTONIO CRAMAROSSA, FRANCESCO ARMENISE, EUGENIO CANNIELLO, GIANLUCA VINCIARELLI, GIUSEPPE LARICCHIA, VITTORIO MATTIOLI
In Vivo Sep 2009, 23 (5) 813-820;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Single-step Therapy — Feasibility and Safety of Simultaneous Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatic Malignancies
COSMO GADALETA, ANNAMARIA CATINO, GIROLAMO RANIERI, VITO FAZIO, GENNARO GADALETA-CALDAROLA, ANTONIO CRAMAROSSA, FRANCESCO ARMENISE, EUGENIO CANNIELLO, GIANLUCA VINCIARELLI, GIUSEPPE LARICCHIA, VITTORIO MATTIOLI
In Vivo Sep 2009, 23 (5) 813-820;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial embolisation in rabbit liver: investigation of the ablation zone according to the time interval between the two therapies
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical and Biochemical Predictors of 30-Day Mortality After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Development of a Protocol for Dynamic Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy
  • Elevated Serum Interleukin 6 Is Associated With High Risk of First Non-bleeding Decompensation in Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis
Show more Clinical Studies
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire