Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research Article

siRNA is not more Effective than a First Generation Antisense Oligonucleotide when Directed against EGFR in the Treatment of PC-3 Prostate Cancer

PAULUS TSUI, MARVIN RUBENSTEIN and PATRICK GUINAN
In Vivo July 2005, 19 (4) 653-656;
PAULUS TSUI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARVIN RUBENSTEIN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: DrMarv@Prodigy.net
PATRICK GUINAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

siRNA specifically directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was compared to the previously described and effective MR2 oligo (also specific for EGFR) in a total of six comparative studies utilizing the chemotherapeutic agents Taxol, cisplatin and Cytoxan and the PC-3 prostate tumor line. When Taxol was administered in combination with either MR2 or siRNA, the MR2 was significantly more effective (p=0.000277) against PC-3 cells incubated for 24 h in their presence. In a sequential study in which a 24-h Taxol treatment was followed with either MR2 or siRNA for an additional 24 h, or in the reverse order where MR2 or siRNA was followed by Taxol, no significant differences were found. When cisplatin was similarly administered in combination with either MR2 or the siRNA, no significant differences in inhibition were found. In a subsequent study, in which a 24-h treatment with either MR2 or siRNA was followed by cisplatin for an additional 24 h, again no significant differences were found. Lastly, in a series of sequential administrations including Cytoxan the following was found. PC-3 cells treated for 24 h with Cytoxan followed by either MR2 or siRNA produced similar inhibition. When the cycle was reversed, with MR2 or siRNA treatment followed by Cytoxan, both treatments were again inhibitory, however the initial treatment with MR2 was significantly more effective (p=0.026095). We conclude that, although siRNA against EGFR has efficacy against the PC-3 line when administered either alone vs untreated controls, with Taxol vs Taxol alone, or with cisplatin vs cisplatin alone, it is not more effective than the better characterized MR2 oligo.

  • Antisense
  • siRNA
  • prostate cancer
  • therapy

Footnotes

    • Received May 11, 2005.
    • Accepted May 27, 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 19, Issue 4
July-August 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
siRNA is not more Effective than a First Generation Antisense Oligonucleotide when Directed against EGFR in the Treatment of PC-3 Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
siRNA is not more Effective than a First Generation Antisense Oligonucleotide when Directed against EGFR in the Treatment of PC-3 Prostate Cancer
PAULUS TSUI, MARVIN RUBENSTEIN, PATRICK GUINAN
In Vivo Jul 2005, 19 (4) 653-656;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
siRNA is not more Effective than a First Generation Antisense Oligonucleotide when Directed against EGFR in the Treatment of PC-3 Prostate Cancer
PAULUS TSUI, MARVIN RUBENSTEIN, PATRICK GUINAN
In Vivo Jul 2005, 19 (4) 653-656;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

In Vivo

© 2023 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire