Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review Article

Tumor Markers in Cancer Patients. An Update of their Prognostic Significance. Part II

N.J. AGNANTIS, A.C. GOUSSIA, A. BATISTATOU and D. STEFANOU
In Vivo July 2004, 18 (4) 481-488;
N.J. AGNANTIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nagnanti@cc.uoi.gr
A.C. GOUSSIA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. BATISTATOU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. STEFANOU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The primary determinant of outcome in patients with cancer is the development of distant metastasis. Metastasis is a multistep process involving disruption of cell-matrix adhesion, dissolution of the extracellular matrix, angiogenesis, invasion in the blood vessel wall, extravasation and establishment of a secondary growth. Nowadays, a large number of biochemical and cell biological studies have indicated the important role of extacellular matrix adhesion molecules, proteinases and angiogenic factors in the dissemination of cancer. Cell adhesion molecules, such as integrins, E-cadherin, catenins and CD44 appear to have some prognostic significance, especially in gastric, colorectal and lung cancer patients. Since matrix degrading proteinases are involved in cancer spread, they should be good candidates as prognostic factors. The proteinase which has been investigated in greatest detail is uPA in breast cancer. As a marker of cancer, its main value is to aid in selecting the subgroups of node-negative breast cancer patients that are unlikely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Cathepsin D and metalloproteinases (MMPs) look promising prognostic markers but further work is needed to establish their utility. Intratumoral angiogenesis is a putative prognostic indicator for some types of cancer. High expression of the angiogenic factor VEGF is associated with angiogenesis and an unfavourable survival.

  • Tumor markers
  • breast cancer
  • prognosis

Footnotes

  • Received December 5, 2003.
  • Revision received February 6, 2004.
  • Accepted March 3, 2004.
  • Copyright © 2004 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 18 (4)
In Vivo
Vol. 18, Issue 4
July-August 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumor Markers in Cancer Patients. An Update of their Prognostic Significance. Part II
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Tumor Markers in Cancer Patients. An Update of their Prognostic Significance. Part II
N.J. AGNANTIS, A.C. GOUSSIA, A. BATISTATOU, D. STEFANOU
In Vivo Jul 2004, 18 (4) 481-488;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Tumor Markers in Cancer Patients. An Update of their Prognostic Significance. Part II
N.J. AGNANTIS, A.C. GOUSSIA, A. BATISTATOU, D. STEFANOU
In Vivo Jul 2004, 18 (4) 481-488;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Predictive Role of CYFRA21-1 and CEA for Subsequent Docetaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
  • Cell-surface and mitotic-spindle RHAMM: moonlighting or dual oncogenic functions?
  • The Hyaluronan Receptors CD44 and Rhamm (CD168) Form Complexes with ERK1,2 That Sustain High Basal Motility in Breast Cancer Cells
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

In Vivo

© 2023 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire